USA Online local classifieds

Community - politics classifieds in denver

<![CDATA[I've noticed that you haven't answered a single question from any member of the press since you were introduced. In fact the press has been kept away from you, and the McCain campaign is refusing to discuss any of the controversies surrounding you. What's up, Madame Governor? This is highly unusual behavior from a person who is openly and aggressively competing for the second most powerful leadership position in the US government. You talk plenty tough and you are not at a loss for words in challenging Obama and Biden to come forth and give a proper account of themselves. Aren't you going to play by the same rules? You're not hiding from the press are you?]]>

<![CDATA[Hamas and other terrorist groups, as well as Islamic enemy nations who have vowed to destroy America are supporting Obama. See video to hear them praise the "muslim" Obama and find out why. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sj91NH5fvw&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sj91NH5fvw&feature=related</a> See video: Proof that Obama is not on the side of America.]]>

<![CDATA[What's the matter, sugar ... did you strain your typing finger? <a href="http://denver.craigslist.org/pol/830577315.html" rel="nofollow">http://denver.craigslist.org/pol/830577315.html</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Why would we be embarrassed, since we obviously won't click a link posted by an idiot who derides us as "leftie nutz"? You're right, you really are in GOP "never never land". Reply to: comm-831328510@craigslist.org [?] Date: 2008-09-07, 11:49AM MDT thank a teacher's union that leftie nutz like this are given the slightest amount of credence-100% guaranteed every one of these whackos will vote for the suit-to the some what sane, just left of center libs, doesn't this embarrass the shit out of you? ]]>

<![CDATA[Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin do not seem to have sound judgement to me. Their behavior shows me a Severe Lack of Moral Fortitude, and Really Poor Family Values. McCain, the original "maverick," cheated on his 1st wife, who he had children with, and left that marriage to have children with his next wife. Why didn't he show some moral fortitute and work out things for his children's sake in his 1st marriage. Because, he is a "maverick" who has a record of reckless, and hot-headed behavior. Did McCain take his marriage vows seriously. How will he treat the Oath of Office? McCain seems to want to shoot from his hip with no thought of the concequences that may come of his decisions. I would hate to see what he would do if he could shoot off a balistic missile. We do NOT need a leader who's temperment is shoot first, ask questions and sort out the concequences later. As for Gov. Palin, she has executive experience Obama does not. (over less than 8,000 people) She has served in that executive power for 2 years. (less time in office than Obama) Worst of all, she used her "power" to fire an employee who was involved in a romantic escapade in the office, unfairly. Everyone says Obama doesn't have the experience to lead this country. I think Palin has even less, and what "powers" will she abuse as Vice President? I come from a single parent family where my sister had a baby when she was 13 years old. My mother was raising 3 kids on her own and didn't give us the dicipline and supervision we needed not to get in this sort of trouble. Palin, who, IS married AND has a father in the home, has a minor daughter who came up pregnant. In both of these instances I feel that the parents were not involved with their children the way parents should be. I am a woman, and I feel that Palin was too busy with her "Community Organizer Positon - that had real responsibilities" that she neglected her duties as a mother at home. What duties will she neglect if given the chance to lead our country? What I have heard from these two makes me cringe with fear! Plans to: 1. Build 45 new nuclear power plants,in the next 4 years, when the technology is already there for widespread "Green" energy production. (look up solar energy, wind power, hyro-electric) 2. Blazing ahead with oil drilling, when we need to blaze ahead on building cars that can run 400 miles off a battery charged with 110 ac current. Yes, that's the same outlet you plug in your alarm clock. (In 1997, GM made a modle that OPEC convinced them to destroy all but 2, one's at the Smithsonian) 3. Continuing to extract oil from the earth when there is a company in California that can grow enough algea AND process it into barrels of deisel in less than 1 month. (seen last week on DirectTV channel Planet Green) What are we thinking????? WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!! What happens if McCain cannot serve his station? Instead of a Reckless Hot Headed War Monger, we are left with Bush's female equivalant, a Gun Totin' Crooked Political Puppet, who can't even keep her home straight. I am registered aa an Independat. I'm not a demorcat or a republican. I will only vote for a canadate I feel will put the USA and it's populus first. I see the McCain/Palin ticket interested in promoting big business instead of lifting up the little people, who are in fact the blood of this nation. I pray for this country. I hope that we come to our senses before it's too late. LAST OF ALL: If we pull out of Iraq (and they HAVE asked us to do so) there is 10 BILLION a MONTH that we can use to fund all the progressive ideas to better this country (including Universal Heathcare) WITHOUT RAISING TAXES!!! ]]>

<![CDATA[Perhaps you should have another drink of that kool aid. You are every bit as partisan as you claim the other poster to be. Pull your head outta your ass and think. Do you really believe this crap Obama is spewing. Dem's have run on the same platform for 30 years. It's all bullshit. I for one will take my chances with McCain, what I won't do is vote for a complete socialist.]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://s475.photobucket.com/albums/rr118/beemerjon/?action=view&current=McSamePalin.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://i475.photobucket.com/albums/rr118/beemerjon/McSamePalin.jpg" border="0"></a>]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSEaHyzbqTA&eurl=http://www.lindasog.com/archives/2008/09/todays_unintentional_comedy_go.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSEaHyzbqTA&eurl=http://www.lindasog.com/archives/2008/09/todays_unintentional_comedy_go.html</a> thank a teacher's union that leftie nutz like this are given the slightest amount of credence-100% guaranteed every one of these whackos will vote for the suit-to the some what sane, just left of center libs, doesn't this embarrass the shit out of you? to the deficit moron, our current deficit, as a percentage of GDP, is well within historical norms-try some sensible economic reasoning before you open your piehole-truly only an economic illiterate would look favorably at a federal revenue surplus]]>

<![CDATA[You're nothing but a partisan hack, posting your lies, with nothing to back them up. Obama never said what you claim. You are a typical Republican piece of shit for using pictures of 9/11 in your post! To politicize such a horrific event, that BUSH knew about BEFORE it happened?!? Not only did he do NOTHING while the attacks were underway, he took absolutely NO STEPS to prevent it in the first place! The Republicans were in control of our entire government AND our military when 9/11 happened! The greatest nation on the planet, the largest military and air force in the world, and you mean to tell me that the Republicans didn't drop the ball? At best Bush and the Republicans are completely incompetent, at worse they were collaborators! Now, you tell me where to see video evidence of your claim, let's see something that isn't edited to distort the true meaning of this supposed quote made by Obama. Oh, can't come up with that, can you? You hacks are all alike, keep us from getting to the real solutions with your blatant slander. Obama is not a Muslim, he is not a terrorist, he is an AMERICAN, born in Hawaii and raised abroad, exposed to different cultures. Someone who can bring an understanding of other cultures to the table would be more effective at dealing with those cultures. If ANYTHING, that alone should make him the logical choice for Persident, because WE CAN'T AFFORD ANY MORE IGNORANT LEADERS. Chew on this for a minute, Bush is a complete moron and McCain is his puppet... Voted with GW 95% of the time, and look where it has gotten us! Oooh, what GREAT leadership we got there. And yeah, wow, how irresponsible was it for McCain to select the partisan hack from Alaska as his running mate, eh? She's all slander and NO solutions! More of the same old tired rhetoric spewing from her. They are so worried that Obama has a better platform, they can't beat it on their own merits, so they focus their energy at tearing it down, just like they will tear this country down if they are elected. Oh, and one more thing, I know this has nothing to do with YOUR post, but it is YOUR political party that takes pictures of misplaced American flags, neatly rolled up and placed in plastic bags (for protection, mind you), and post them on the internet in an effort to make the Democratic party look unpatriotic, funny, if we were unpatriotic, then why were 84,000 people waving flags in celebration? Ok, so how patriotic is it to not only to then STEAL said flags, but to take them to a speech, haul them out onto the stage, and disrespect every American, our Country AND OUR FLAG, by DISPLAYING THEM THAT WAY! Yeah, REAL PATRIOTIC! Morons! --------------story below---------------- COLORADO SPRINGS - Some supporters of Sen. John McCain brought trash bags of American flags they say they found after Sen. Barack Obama spoke at INVESCO Field at Mile High to a rally for McCain and his running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin. McCain supporters said a vendor found the trash bags full of flags after the Aug. 28 event. In a statement, Damon Jones with the Democratic National Convention Committee said, "Stories circulating about flags from the Democratic National Convention are false. More than 125,000 American-made flags were distributed at the Convention - any flags removed from the Convention after the event were taken without authorization." Jones continued by saying, "It's disappointing that someone would take American flags without authorization and then falsely describe their intended purpose. We have the utmost respect for the American flag and it's sad to see them being used for a cheap political stunt." A spokesperson for the DNC, Karen Finney, e-mailed this statement to 9NEWS: "American flags were proudly waved by the 84,000 people who joined Barack Obama at the Democratic Convention. John McCain should applaud that, but instead his supporters wrongfully took leftover bundles of our flags from the stadium to play a cheap political stunt calling into question our patriotism. On the same day he agrees to join Barack Obama at Ground Zero on September 11, John McCain attacks the patriotism of Obama supporters who so proudly waved the American flag at our historic event in Denver just days ago." U.S. Code says the proper method for disposing of an American flag is actually burning, provided it is "no longer a fitting emblem for display." The United States Flag Store, which sells full-sized and miniature flags, says on its Web site that flags can also be put in the trash, when they are "worn, damaged or tattered beyond repair." (Copyright KUSA*TV, All Rights Reserved) ---------------end of news story ---------------- Hillary is right... NO WAY... NO HOW... NO McCAIN! ]]>

<![CDATA[ Twenty-Two Reasons To Vote Against Obama By: Herb Denenberg, The Bulletin 09/05/2008 Now here's 22 reasons to vote against Mr. Obama and for McCain/Palin. 1. Sen. Obama gives flowery speeches on change and hope. But he's part of one of the most corrupt political machines of all time. And instead of fighting and trying to reform the corrupt Chicago Cook County political machine, he used it to rise to power. When reformers tried to fight it, Mr. Obama refused to help them and actually was instrumental in defeating the reform movement. He preaches a new kind of politics but supports and uses one of the worst political machines in the U.S. 2. He led the battle in the Illinois legislature to assure that born-alive infants would not be treated as persons and would not be entitled to medical care. Instead, if Sen. Obama had his way, such babies born alive after a botched abortion would be left to die, thus legalizing what appears to be infanticide and murder. 3. When he first responded to Russia's invasion of Georgia, he said that aggression was wrong, but the U.S. would be in a better position if we set a good example. Thus he made it clear he was drawing a moral equivalence between Russia's aggression and the U.S.'s liberation of Iraq, which had violated 17 United Nations resolutions. This reaction alone, suggests not merely bad judgment but apparently no judgment at all. Then after giving it more thought, his second response was turning the matter over to the United Nations. That of course was a stupid idea as Russia has a veto in the Security Council. 4. He sat in the pews of the Trinity Church in Chicago, listening to a notorious racist, bigot and anti-American, Rev. Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright, without a peep of protest. He did not leave the church until Rev. Wright said Obama is just another politician who says what he has to say. And that move was dictated by political considerations, not any moral outrage. 5. He started his political career in a fund-raiser in the home of William Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist and anti-American. He still hasn't denounced him but says Mr. Ayers is now a member of the Chicago Democratic mainstream. He still maintains a friendly relationship with him, has served on a board with him, and has participated in speaking panels with him. 6. He refused to wear a flag on his lapel, claiming he viewed it as a symbol of false patriotism employed after 9/11. He started wearing the flag only when he was embarrassed into doing so under political pressure. At that time he suddenly started ending his speeches with the words "God Bless America." 7. He got an earmark appropriation from Congress for his wife's employer, the University of Chicago Medical Center. When questioned on the appearance of conflict of interest, he said there was nothing improper about that but he should have gone to his fellow Illinois Sen. Dick Durban, to put the appropriation through. In other words, if there is an appearance of conflict of interest, you should hide it somehow instead of avoiding what creates such appearance. This is a pattern: saying one thing and doing the opposite. When he started to run for the presidency, he stopped putting in earmarks. As is his usual pattern, he started doing the right thing for election purposes only. So judge him by his record, not moves that are merely campaign calculation. 8. He favors increasing the capital gains tax, even though he admitted it will not raise tax revenue, but cut it instead. He justifies such an irrational move, out of what he calls a sense of fairness. That would mean less tax revenue, higher deficits and less incentive for saving, investment, capital formation, economic growth, and creation. 9. He called for negotiations without preconditions with the Ahmadinejad of Iran, Chavez of Venzuela, and Castro of Cuba. Even Senator Obama recognized the folly of this idea, so he backed off of it after an explosion of criticism. He thinks sweet talk solves all problems, and when a problem calls for something beyond sweet talk, he 's stumped. He speaks loudly and often, but carries a toothpick-size stick which he is afraid to use. Another example of Mr. Obama's naiveté was his comment that Iran is a small country not to be feared. 10. He opposed the surge, said it would fail, and even after it was almost universally acclaimed to be a success, he refuses to admit the surge succeed ed. 11. He called for withdrawal from Iraq, in effect, calling for retreat and defeat, which would have turned over the Middle East and much of the world's oil supplies to terrorists and their supporters in Iran. 12. He associated with and made a land deal with convicted felon, Tony Rezko, even knowing he was under serious investigation. He admitted this was what he called a boneheaded mistake. Mr. Obama seems incapable of judging his associates, as his close and friendly encounters with the hate-America and terrorist crowd suggests. Even an otherwise friendly biographer, said he is at home with the hate-America types. 13. He claims he will bring all sides together but he has never shown any signs or symptoms of bipartisanship. His record is that of a far-left liberal, the most liberal of any member of the U.S. Senate. He goes down the party line, and never reaches across the aisle. 14. He claims he will bring change to Washington, but picks a long-term Washington insider, Sen. Joe Biden, who has been in the Senate for decades, and is rated the third most liberal in the U.S. Senate. He claims he'll be the agent of change, but in his acceptance speech he catalogs the tired left-wing Democratic agenda, that has been regurgitated every four years for decades. He talks change but dishes up only the old liberal dishes, which have been rejected by voters many times from McGovern to Carter, and which have failed when implementation was attempted. If Mr. Obama wins the White House, he is likely to have a veto proof Congress, which mean all of his left-loony proposals would probably become law. Electoral history suggests Americans don't go for such unrestrained power. Beware of an Obama/Pelosi/Reid triumvirate that would bring us radical liberalism in its worst form. 15. He says he wants to bring us energy independence but refuses to drill and extract our huge reserves, greater than those of Saudi Arabia. He wants us to check our tire pressure instead of drilling. Give me a break! He also advises everyone to tune-up their cars, even though most cars no longer need tune-ups. 16. He never sticks with a job. For example, when he became senator he started writing his book. Then within two years of becoming a senator, he started running for president. It is not surprising that he has no legislative accomplishments. This has been the pattern of his entire career. He never sticks with anything long enough to chalk up significant achievements. That's why when asked about his accomplishments, his supporters seem to be stumped. Dean Barnett, in an article in the Weekly Standard (Sept. 1, 2008), entitled "Would You Hire Barack Obama? The resume of a chronic underachiever," writes, "You'd have to conclude that Obama's failure to commit himself to any career sufficiently to excel at it suggests some unexplained restlessness." I'd say it suggests he's a dilitante, who flits from one project to another, but never stays long enough to deliver a satisfactory end product. 17. As talk show host Michael Medved has pointed out, the people vouching for him at the Democratic National Convention were mainly relatives, such as his wife and brother-in-law. There were not major figures vouching for him, because they could not vouch for a classic empty-suit. Even Hillary Clinton, in her convention endorsement speech, said Democrats must support him, but in no way vouched for his character or judgment. Contrast that with the people at the Republican National Convention who vouched for Sen. McCain - Sen. Joe Lieberman and former Sen. Fred Thompson. 18. To bolster his foreign policy credentials, he picked Sen. Joe Biden as vice president. Sen. Biden voted for the war in Iraq, which vote Sen. Obama views as the symbol of bad judgment. So even Sen. Obama admits Sen. Biden ha bad judgment. Sen. Biden also comes up with wacky ideas of his own such as splitting Iraq, a sovereign nation, into three parts for the Kurds, Shias, and Sunnis. He also voted against the first Gulf War, even after Iraq had invaded Kuwait and threatened Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Middle East. I'd think most would consider that the height of bad judgment. He opposed the surge. He opposed Reagan's build-up to fight international communism, so his bad record is long and unbroken. Biden has judgment bad enough to match that of Sen. Obama's. 19. He flip-flops on matters that suggest he has no principles except the old Chicago machine principle of do anything you have to do to get elected. He promised to take public financing, something that the great reformer and change artist claimed to be committed to. Then when he saw it was to his political advantage to stay with totally private contributions, as that would bring in more money, he went back on his promise and rejected public funding. He said that his wide array of contributors to his campaign made his approach into public financing, one of his more nonsensical pieces of logic. He think if he uses sufficient oratorical powers he can make two and two equal ten, or private financing equal public financing. 20. He constantly uses such expressions as, "I would be glad to debate my opponent on that issue anytime, anywhere." But that is just for oratorical effect. In practice, he refused Sen. McCain's offer of a town meeting every week to debate the issues. He is clearly afraid of unscripted sessions. If he is not smart enough to go off the teleprompter and script, he is not smart enough to be president. When he participated in the Saddleback debate with Pastor Rick Warren, he demonstrated again he doesn't make sense when confronted with tough questions without the answers on a script. When asked when does life begin, he said that was above his pay-grade. If that question is above his pay grade so is the presidency of the United States. 21.He would like voters to view him as a man of great political courage, but he has a documented record of political cowardice. For example, when in the Illinois legislature, he voted "present" over 100 times and was well known for taking that route, of neither a yes or no vote. Present is a classic sitting on the fence and waiting to find out which way the wind will blow. As William Kristol of the Weekly Standard (Sept. 1, 2008) has pointed out, " Has he shunned the easy path or broken with the conventional liberal pieties of those around him? Has he taken on his own party on a major issue? Nope." 22. Mr. Obama bases his campaign on his superior judgment, and that in turn is based on his speech against the war in Iraq. Of course, he never made a vote against the war, as at the time he was in the Illinois legislature, not the U.S. Senate. He gave the speech at an anti-war rally in the liberal Hyde Park section in Chicago. But votes are more important than speeches. And since he's been in the Senate, he's been wrong on every issue related to Iraq. These mistaken positions were summed up in an article by Emery in the Weekly Standard (Sept.1, 2008) entitled "Misfortunes of War: Success in Iraq Confounds the Democrats." It isn't easy to be wrong on every vote and pronouncement on Iraq, but don't underestimate Sen. Obama's ineptness in the foreign policy area. Mr. Emery writes: "He claimed that the Anbar Awakening took place as a result of Democrats' congressional victories, but it began in September 2006, two months before before the voting took place. He opposed not only the troop surge, but also the strategic changes that took place along with it, that did so much to enable the victory. He said the American military had noting to do with the Anbar Awakening or with the retreat of the Sadr militia, something denied by the Iraqi military and by the Iraqi Sunnis themselves. He was also wrong in his predictions that none of this would occur." Sen. Obama not only has judgment bad enough to make him wrong on every foreign policy question, but he also has the knack of picking advisors and close associates who have a strong record of being wrong. For example, his choice for vice president, Sen. Biden, and one of the senators that accompanied him on his trip to Iraq, Sen. Chuck Hagel, introduced a resolution in opposition to the buildup that was the surge that turned the tide in Iraq. Sen. Obama's inexperience in foreign policy is perhaps his most dangerous deficiency. But don't underestimate his ability to wreck our economy, destroy the incentives for entrepreneurs to take risks and build jobs, and to wreck our health care delivery system. ]]>

<![CDATA[The taxpayer-funded Illinois growth industry - $100,000+ public pensions - here are just the top 100 By Bill Zettler The top two pensions in 2007 were $379,000 and $368,000, giving Illinois the dubious distinction of having two retired public employees with pensions over $1,000/day. That means these two former state employees receive a DAILY pension greater than the average MONTHLY Social Security payment of $977. To give you an idea of what that pension is worth think about it this way: in order to receive $379,800 in interest each year you would have to buy a CD worth at least $7 million. In 2007 the State of Illinois continued to make 10,000’s of pension millionaires out of retired public employees with the taxpayer picking up the tab. Here are some more disturbing pension facts: In 2007 at least 2,535 former public employees had pensions of over $100,000, up more 35% from 2006’s 1,847. Next year we should easily cross the 3,000 mark. $100,000/yr public pensions is one of Illinois few growth industries. Based upon current growth rates we will be paying for over 10,000 by 2012. Last year 28 former public employees had pensions greater than President Clinton. Despite a nice increase for Clinton, this year’s total is 33. For the first time you need a pension of at least $160,000 to even make it into the Top 100. 93 of the 100 were University or K-12 employees meaning they probably spent the majority of their careers working 9 months a year with tenure. Only one was a former politician, Arthur Berman. Over 535 state pensions had MONTHLY payments greater than average Social Security ANNUAL payment of $11,000. Another way to look at it is the top pension is 34 times the amount the average Social Security recipient receives and 12 times the median wage of the average full time Illinois worker ($28,806). Why do average people, most of whom do not have enough money for their own retirement, have to pay taxes to buy the equivalent of a $7 million CD for one public employee? If these former Illinois Public employees had been on Social Security and a 401K program during their working years (like the rest of us) taxpayer liability for their pensions would be zero as opposed to $312 billion in taxpayers will have to pay in taxes over the next 39 years for public employee pensions. That’s $312 billion they will not have available for their own pensions. Illinois Top 100 Pension Payouts 2006-2007 Fiscal Year 33 Illinois Public Employees Have Pensions Greater Than the President of the United States! 2,535 Former Illinois Public Employees have Pensions of Over $100,000/yr Paid For by the Taxpayer ]]>

<![CDATA[Market Crash Means Illinois Taxpayers Owe More for State Pensions Posted: March 20, 2008 By Bill Zettler The current worldwide market slump has undoubtedly affected the investment returns of many people and organizations including the Illinois Teachers Retirement System (TRS). The reason this is a problem for Illinois taxpayers is because all of the pension fund market risk is passed to the taxpayer not the retiree. In other words if the value of the investments go down $2 billion the amount of taxpayer liability goes up by a like amount. This is because the taxpayer is the ultimate guarantor of the teachers pension. The teacher has no liability because the pension amount and increases are guaranteed by law. This is true for all of the state pension plans not just the teachers. The degree of this liability is highlighted by TRS 2007 investment returns. According to the TRS 2007 CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report), 2007 was an outstanding year for investment returns as the TRS was able to achieve a record return of 19% well above its estimated 8.5% per year return. But the bad news is even with a 19% return taxpayers accrued liability actually increased by $2.4 billion from 2006 to 2007. How could that happen, record returns and taxpayers owe more than the year before? It happened exactly the way we told you it would happen in our article on investment returns and increased taxpayer liability. What happened is during the 2007 5-year actuarial review actuaries determined that: Teacher salaries were going up faster than projected. Teachers were retiring in greater numbers than expected. Retired teachers were living longer than expected. When you change upwards key assumptions used in projecting taxpayer liability forward 35 years it adds up to a lot of money, more money indeed than even one year 19% investment returns can cover. Which brings us to the investment returns we should expect from TRS in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 a mere 3 months from now. According to the TRS 2007 CAFR 9 out of 10 of their largest stock holdings were down in price as of 3/18/08. Also $5 billion of the assets were in real estate, almost certainly down in value from last year. In addition they held $4.5 billion in mortgage-backed securities including almost a billion dollars in the infamous CMO's (Collateralized Mortgage Obligations). Things can certainly change in 3 months but as of now it looks like a substantial loss in asset value should be expected this year. Let's for the sake of argument assume the loss for 2008 is 5%, a reasonable estimate at this time. That would mean for the 8 year period 2001-2008 TRS has had a return of 6.4% very close to the 6.5% estimated by Warren Buffet for the next 2 decades. If this trend would continue, the INCREASE in required taxpayer payments to the TRS over the next 35 years would be in excess of $100 billion. Add in the other state pension funds and you are up to $150 billion. That's on top of the $300 plus billion we are required by law to pay now assuming an 8.5% return. That would also mean $150 billion fewer dollars available for taxpayers' own retirement. So as taxpayers own retirement incomes are threatened by a decrease in the value of their 401K and IRA's, their tax liability for funding other peoples retirement goes up, just at the time when they are least able to afford it. This is not only unfair but as the above numbers indicate, will be virtually impossible to pay for. Social Security and 401K's for all public employees is the only equitable and affordable solution. The question remains when will Illinois politicians face up to this problem and their responsibility to the taxpayers of Illinois. Public employees do not deserve better pensions than the people they work for, the taxpayers of Illinois. Bill Zettler is the owner of a computer-consulting firm in Illinois. Click here to read more by Mr. Zettler. ]]>

<![CDATA[He says he's been in 57 states with one more to go. (not including Alaska and Hawaii) I'd get a refund if I was him!]]>

<![CDATA[Your Rovian Smear and Fear campaign is so lame and so 90's... Let us see the positive contributions a McCain/Palin White House would make to the United States of America. Yesterday's posts were yet another mere collection of hysterical negative made up stories against Obama/Biden. Is it possible? Can you do it?]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Reporter - Do you really think you are qualified to become President of the United States? Obama - "Answering that question with any specificity is beyond my pay grade."]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.infowars.com/?p=4384" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com/?p=4384</a> Update on CIA drug plane owned by “Donna Blue Aircraft, Inc” Mark Frauenfelder Boingboing September 6, 2008 Here’s an update on the strange story of the Gulfstream II jet filled with 3.7 tons of cocaine that crashed in the Yucatan last year. The Mexico City newspaper El Universal reports that European Parliament was investigating the circumstances surrounding the plane, which had previously been used by the CIA for "extraordinary rendition" flights. The daily said it had obtained documents from the United States and the European Parliament which "show that that plane flew several times to Guantanamo, Cuba, presumably to transfer terrorism suspects." It said the European Parliament was investigating the private Grumman Gulfstream II, registered by the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation, for suspected use in CIA "rendition" flights in which prisoners are covertly transferred to a third country or US-run detention centers. Last October, the Austin American Statesman reported the plane had previously flown to Guantanamo Bay. Here’s a Chicago Public Radio story from October 31, 2007 about the crashed CIA drug plane. The crashed drug plane also has been linked to a Bush fundraiser. Mad Cow Morning news has been covering stories about the CIA and drug smuggling. The plane was owned by Donna Blue Aircraft, Inc. Mad Cow visited Donna Blue’s offices and took photos of what appears to be a sham company. Here’s a photo of some unmarked police cars parked in front Donna Blue Aircraft’s empty suite: Drug plane used for US rendition flights Is this a video of the plane? 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising Get the DVD and make copies or watch the high quality streaming and download version online at Prison Planet.tv. Click here to read more about the film and view sample trailers. Bookmark This 15 Responses to “Update on CIA drug plane owned by “Donna Blue Aircraft, Inc”” Pages: [2] 1 » Show All 15 Lookout Says: September 7th, 2008 at 8:57 am C.U.F.F. = CITIZENS UNITED FOR FREEDOM. To unite once a month in protest and boycott against the United Sttates Government. When: The 11th day of every month What: Protest 911 and the N.W.O. To also take money out of the hands of the government to stop the N.W.O. How: Stay home from work (if at all possible), This will take tax dollars out of their hands. Do not buy anything (especially gasoline unless it is used to drive to a local protest), This will take tax dollars out of their hands and out of the hands of the oil companies. Do not buy ANYTHING on that day. This will take tax dollars out of their hands. Do not use electricity to light your house on the night of the 11th…..BURN CANDLES in rememberance of those who lost their lives that day. This will save you money that can be put toward burning dvd’s and handing them out at the local protest. Do not deposit money, do not do business transactions, do not eat out,…NOTHING! Do form a local protest group. Do help spread the word about 911 and the N.W.O. Pass this on to everyone you know. We will make the 11th of EVERY month a day of protest against the 911 cover-up and the N.W.O. We will effectivly take money out of the hands of those who cover up 911 and are creating the N.W.O. WE WILL TIE THE HANDS OF THOSE WHO BIND US…C.U.F.F. THEM. We are the ones who ultimatly financially support what they are doing. If we do not buy, they make no money to create all the bad things we are now facing. Please stand with me on this on the 11th day of EVERY month. Together we can make a difference. 14 Nass Says: September 7th, 2008 at 8:41 am CIA controls most of the drug production on the planet. 13 Angry American Says: September 7th, 2008 at 7:07 am Looks like he was trying to fly under radar and maybe that second plane hit him with machine guns or a missile or something. At the end the CIA handler or whatever says there two miles form the border. The question is like how many miles from the border did they crash? 12 Deacon Says: September 7th, 2008 at 6:59 am The accuracy of this story comes into question if any of this story linked below is true. <a href="http://citizenspook.blogspot.c.....-mole.html" rel="nofollow">http://citizenspook.blogspot.c.....-mole.html</a> 11 Stop NWO Says: September 7th, 2008 at 6:14 am Interesting coincidence that since Bush has invaded Afghanistan opium production there has increased several times over. ]]>

<![CDATA[Mexico drug plane used for US 'rendition' flights: report 2 days ago MEXICO CITY (AFP) — A private jet that crash-landed almost one year ago in eastern Mexico carrying 3.3 tons of cocaine had previously been used for CIA "rendition" flights, a newspaper report said here Thursday, citing documents from the United States and the European Parliament. The plane was carrying Colombian drugs for the fugitive leader of Mexico's Sinaloa cartel, Joaquin "Chapo" Guzman, when it crash-landed in the Yucatan peninsula on September 24, El Universal reported. The daily said it had obtained documents from the United States and the European Parliament which "show that that plane flew several times to Guantanamo, Cuba, presumably to transfer terrorism suspects." It said the European Parliament was investigating the private Grumman Gulfstream II, registered by the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation, for suspected use in CIA "rendition" flights in which prisoners are covertly transferred to a third country or US-run detention centers. It also said the US Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) logbook registered that the plane had traveled between US territory and the US military base in Guantanamo. It said the FAA registered its last owner as Clyde O'Connor in Pompano Beach, Florida. Extraordinary rendition has been harshly criticized since it began in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States Confirmed: Mexico drug plane used for CIA ‘rendition’ flights AFP September 6, 2008 A private jet that crash-landed almost one year ago in eastern Mexico carrying 3.3 tons of cocaine had previously been used for CIA “rendition” flights, a newspaper report said here Thursday, citing documents from the United States and the European Parliament. The plane was carrying Colombian drugs for the fugitive leader of Mexico’s Sinaloa cartel, Joaquin “Chapo” Guzman, when it crash-landed in the Yucatan peninsula on September 24, El Universal reported. The daily said it had obtained documents from the United States and the European Parliament which “show that that plane flew several times to Guantanamo, Cuba, presumably to transfer terrorism suspects.” It said the European Parliament was investigating the private Grumman Gulfstream II, registered by the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation, for suspected use in CIA “rendition” flights in which prisoners are covertly transferred to a third country or US-run detention centers. Read article 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising Get the DVD and make copies or watch the high quality streaming and download version online at Prison Planet.tv. Click here to read more about the film and view sample trailers. Bookmark This 14 Responses to “Confirmed: Mexico drug plane used for CIA ‘rendition’ flights” Pages: [2] 1 » Show All 14 Phoenix Says: September 7th, 2008 at 8:59 am “I’m sick of dills”is an idiot who needs to do some research. He would see that there is indeed a Bush Crime Family that has been operating since the days when Daddy Bush can’t remember where he was when JFK was shot–when he was, in fact, in Dallas. From the 60s onward Daddy Bush was highly connected with the CIA until he, in fact, was running it. He cultivated the Clintons for “service” and during the time when Clinton was Governor of Arkansas, Mena airport was known to be the major incoming area for the CIA’s drug running. Given the fact that his grandfather was Hitler’s banker, I think asking whether or not this “crime family” may have suffered a bit of financial loss with the downing of these drug running planes is a legitimate question. Just because Bush is working for the Fourth Reich as a “puppet” doesn’t mean he isn’t a damned powerful puppet in the scheme of things. So, why don’t you wake up the 90% of the posters on this site, Mr. “sick of dills?” If all you can do is keeping shouting “it’s the NWO, stupid!” Well, what does that tell us? I could say it is the Wizard of Oz and it would mean about the same thing, asshole–(I’m not feeling particularly charitable today). We need to name some names and never forget WHO is responsible for this mess we are in. And I would say Daddy “poppy” Bush is right up there at the top. 13 Lookout Says: September 7th, 2008 at 8:56 am C.U.F.F. = CITIZENS UNITED FOR FREEDOM. To unite once a month in protest and boycott against the United Sttates Government. When: The 11th day of every month What: Protest 911 and the N.W.O. To also take money out of the hands of the government to stop the N.W.O. How: Stay home from work (if at all possible), This will take tax dollars out of their hands. Do not buy anything (especially gasoline unless it is used to drive to a local protest), This will take tax dollars out of their hands and out of the hands of the oil companies. Do not buy ANYTHING on that day. This will take tax dollars out of their hands. Do not use electricity to light your house on the night of the 11th…..BURN CANDLES in rememberance of those who lost their lives that day. This will save you money that can be put toward burning dvd’s and handing them out at the local protest. Do not deposit money, do not do business transactions, do not eat out,…NOTHING! Do form a local protest group. Do help spread the word about 911 and the N.W.O. Pass this on to everyone you know. We will make the 11th of EVERY month a day of protest against the 911 cover-up and the N.W.O. We will effectivly take money out of the hands of those who cover up 911 and are creating the N.W.O. WE WILL TIE THE HANDS OF THOSE WHO BIND US…C.U.F.F. THEM. We are the ones who ultimatly financially support what they are doing. If we do not buy, they make no money to create all the bad things we are now facing. Please stand with me on this on the 11th day of EVERY month. Together we can make a difference. 12 Porky pig Says: September 7th, 2008 at 7:01 am …Ah-bdi… This drug runnin’ scam from South America to the U.S. was started by no less than the beloved Klaus Barbie ” The butcher of Lyon “. Tennis anybody !!! 11 foofoo Says: September 7th, 2008 at 6:41 am #9 Sure, there is a shadow government behind the puppet government…however, it was George Herbert Bush, almost 4 decades ago, that made CIA into a drug-smuggling, criminally insane agency. So the Bush family is criminal whether they are controlled by the shadow government or not. ]]>

<![CDATA[ABC News: Six-Figure Public Employee Pensions Posted: May 17, 2007 The Family Taxpayers Foundation's website, which used to host the teacher salary database now is found on this site, was featured on the local ABC News on May 16, 2007. Website contributor Bill Zettler was interviewed. Here is an excerpt from the report: Even the pension of former U.S. president Bill Clinton is less than many of Illinois top state pensioners. So who are these 100 retired Illinois employees currently paid the highest state pensions? "Ninety-four are educators," said Bill Zettler, state pension critic. Zettler started compiling pension stats five years ago after he questioned how his suburban school district was spending money. What he found stunned him. "There are over 1,100 teachers who have pensions of over $111,000 a year and they can retire at age 55," said Zettler. Zettler's findings, drawn from public records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, are posted on this website. The former host of the database, the Family Taxpayers Foundation, fights public spending abuse and works for educational system reform. Zettler says many people have a misconception that school teachers are poorly paid. While the average pay for a teacher in Illinois is about $57,000 dollars a year, nearly 3,500 teachers make more than $100,000 year. Most work only nine months a year. Click here to watch the video and read the full text. Click here to read "Illinois Needs Pension Reform" and other articles by Bill Zettler.]]>

<![CDATA[ A PRESS RELEASE FROM THE NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION: For Further Information, Contact: Peter J. Sepp, Sam Batkins, (703) 683-5700 (Alexandria, VA) – Massive tax and spending hikes greet Illinois taxpayers each year as officials continue to pile massive new entitlements onto the state’s overburdened finances, according to a new study from the non-partisan National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF). After reviewing years of data, NTUF found that government growth in Illinois has continued unabated without regard to taxpayers’ interests. Study author Sam Batkins noted, “In a 10-year period from 1994 to 2003, annual state revenues increased on average by 3.9 percent. Expenditures, however, quickened at an average yearly pace of 7.4 percent, leading to the current structural deficit. Moreover, in a nine-year period from 1995 to 2003, revenues increased 3.1 percent on average, while expenditures rose twice as fast (6.2 percent).” The study found that if Illinois had restrained spending to population growth plus inflation (about 3.12 percent) over the last ten years, the state’s budget would be approximately $43.5 billion, rather than the $55.3 billion budget Governor Blagojevich submitted. Taxpayers could have saved up to $11.8 billion (approximately $900 per capita) if Springfield had enacted spending limits. To illustrate how Illinois’s spending machine hums along without regard to economic conditions, Batkins showed that from FY 2000 to 2002, yearly net revenues actually declined 15.3 percent. During the same interval, however, annual spending jumped 19.3 percent. “With that kind of record, Springfield should look to its profligate spending to address budget deficits, not taxpayers’ wallets,” he said. These record spending increases have been met with large tax hikes for residents of the Land of Lincoln. In the past three Fiscal Years, Illinois has raised taxes by more than $1.6 billion. Although state leaders have attempted to avoid large increases in sales or income taxes, citizens are still left without $1.6 billion of disposable income. Few states in the nation have increased taxes and fees as dramatically as Illinois in the past few years. The current FY 2007 budget also calls for a 67 percent tobacco tax increase. Batkins noted that the introduction of massive new health care and education entitlements will only further burden state finances, and increase the likelihood taxpayers will be tapped to fund this new spending. For example, the state’s five retirement systems are chronically under capitalized. Under Governor Blagojevich, the state’s bonded debt has doubled, and Illinois has borrowed more money during his administration than in the last 185 years. “For every bleak fiscal reality in Illinois, the Governor and Legislature seem to defy logic and implement discordant policies that exacerbate long-term debt and take from taxpayers what should be devoted to the private sector,” Batkins concluded. “It is not clear why Illinois chose to further burden state finances and enact $1.6 billion in tax hikes, but what is now crystal clear is the state’s poor financial outlook and anemic economic growth record.” NTUF is the research and educational arm of the 350,000-member National Taxpayers Union. Note: NTUF Issue Brief 153, Illinois’s Fiscal Picture: A Portrait of Profligate Spending is available online at www.ntu.org. -30- For more information, click here: National Taxpayers Union.]]>

<![CDATA[Steve Chapman is dumber than a bag of hammers and should be beaten with the same. Barry Goldwater, the xenophobic racist is your gold standard?! The modern-day conservative movement started when Goldwater got spanked in '64. Politics Made Simple: There are only 2 candidates that can win. OF COURSE, neither of them represents every 1 of we 300 million exactly. So, you gotta go with the candidate that A. represents you most or B. is the one you can influence with your views. Voting for other than Obama is just plain ignorance. ]]>

<![CDATA[Four links: One from a Christian group, one from an individual and two very informative posts <a href="http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/doc/pol/829657769.html" rel="nofollow">McCain gets his "Dear John" Letter</a> <a href="http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/doc/pol/830561011.html" rel="nofollow">Trinity Ministries serves McCain</a> <a href="http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/doc/pol/829796005.html" rel="nofollow">Doug Bandow on John McCain</a> <a href="http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/doc/pol/827494976.html" rel="nofollow">The speech told us a lot about Sarah Palin (did you listen? )</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[Maybe she can give us demo.......OMG Her Pastor Kroon said God is going to strike America.....OMG ]]>

<![CDATA[You know, the ones the Necons spit on....OMG]]>

<![CDATA[Anti-Religion Extremism <a href="http://www.stopthehatespeech.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stopthehatespeech.blogspot.com</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[Cheney Tells Ukraine to “Unite” Against Russia Damien McElroy Telegraph September 6, 2008 After separate meetings with Ukraine’s pro-Western president Victor Yushchenko and reformist Prime Minister Julia Timoshenko in Kiev, Mr Cheney made clear the depth of Washington’s concerns over Moscow’s spreading influence among its eastern neighbours. “We believe in the right of men and women to live without the threat of tyranny, economic blackmail or military invasion or intimidation,” Mr Cheney declared. “Ukraine’s best hope to overcome these threats is to be united - united domestically first and foremost, and united with other democracies.” Ukraine was the third stop on Mr Cheney’s tour of Russia’s “near abroad”. On stops in Georgia and Azerbaijan, the Vice-President focused on important energy corridors to the West and unveiling an American assistance package to bolster the weakened Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili. But in Ukraine his mission was explicitly political. The already fractious relationship between Mr Yushchenko and his prime minister descended into open warfare on the eve of Mr Cheney’s visit, as the president withdrew his supporters from the governing coalition. Read article 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising Get the DVD and make copies or watch the high quality streaming and download version online at Prison Planet.tv. Click here to read more about the film and view sample trailers. Bookmark This 34 Responses to “Cheney Tells Ukraine to “Unite” Against Russia” Pages: [4] 3 2 1 » Show All 34 BloodyDoGooder Says: September 6th, 2008 at 9:19 pm Thank You Marcus!! I thought I watched every video out there. This one was excellent. All you people on this board have got to see this one and email it to all on your list. This went into detail and explained in detail things I already knew but didn’t understand all details surrounding the event. This video is a real expose that I recommend to those seeking the truth. From it I learned that a Neo-Con is just another name for a criminal Jew. A “Zionist” is just a criminal Jew. Illuminati is just an organization of criminal Jews. I used to think there was a difference between Hebrews and Zionists. I learned from this video that All these so-called “Nicknames” are only created to draw your attention away from the fact that they are all criminal Jews. Another term used as propaganda to make people think twice about pointing fingers at Israel is the “Anti-Semite” card. Well, let me tell you. I am now an anti-semite. Mel Gibson was right. All the strife in this world leads back to those fucking Jews. Too bad he had to be drunk to exercise his first amendment rights. You know all of those toy helicopters you see for sale at the mall kiosks? Fox news uncovered these as Jewish spy ring fronts!!! Hundreds of these kiosks in malls all over the US closed down after the discovery. I had one of these kiosks at the mall in my town. I always wondered why the Dead Sea Skin Care and Helicopter kiosks were run by Jewish sales force that came straght over from Israel and rotated with other jews after a month or so of sharing the kiosk. What a front and right under our owns noses! Watch the video. It will open your eyes and piss you off royally! <a href="http://www.911missinglinks.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.911missinglinks.com</a> Best video since Alex’ videos. Now I see why Marcus posted it three times!! 33 strafemoore Says: September 6th, 2008 at 9:16 pm The Ukrainians would be better off if they all shot someone they hated, Cheney for instance, at a duck hunt than they would be to heed that shit out of her mouth. 32 Canadianperson Says: September 6th, 2008 at 8:09 pm “We believe in the right of men and women to live without the threat of tyranny, economic blackmail or military invasion or intimidation,” Mr Cheney declared. That one had to be hard with a straight face lol 31 Shenk Says: September 6th, 2008 at 7:46 pm @ the_enlightened_one I read about it one month ago, I know it’s a huge machine because I’ve seen it, however I doubt it’d be able to do what you said. Nothing is impossible and if it’s true what it can do and since it’s most likely on the hands of the secret societies then we know one thing for sure, they will bring their beloved abomination satan and their demon friends to earth. Pages: [4] 3 2 1 » Show All ]]>

<![CDATA[Eight protesters arrested during the RNC have been charged under Minnesota's 2002 version of the PATRIOT Act. They eight defendents were charged with "conspiracy to riot in furtherance of terrorism," according to a dispatch published this afternoon by Twin Cities IndyMedia: Affidavits released by law enforcement which were filed in support of the search warrants used in raids over the weekend, and used to support probable cause for the arrest warrants, are based on paid, confidential informants who infiltrated the RNCWC on behalf of law enforcement. They allege that members of the group sought to kidnap delegates to the RNC, assault police officers with firebombs and explosives, and sabotage airports in St. Paul. Evidence released to date does not corroborate these allegations with physical evidence or provide any other evidence for these allegations than the claims of the informants. Based on past abuses of such informants by law enforcement, the National Lawyers Guild is concerned that such police informants have incentives to lie and exaggerate threats of violence and to also act as provacateurs in raising and urging support for acts of violence. "These charges are an effort to equate publicly stated plans to blockade traffic and disrupt the RNC as being the same as acts of terrorism. This both trivializes real violence and attempts to place the stated political views of the Defendants on trial," said Bruce Nestor, President of the Minnesota Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild. "The charges represent an abuse of the criminal justice system and seek to intimidate any person organizing large scale public demonstrations potentially involving civil disobedience, he said." The criminal complaint doesn't allege than any of the defendants committed, or attempted to commit, any of the notional crimes mentioned by the paid informants. This is the first time that criminal charges have been brought under the 2002 law. Share This Spotlight 85 Responses to “Eight RNC Protesters Face State Terrorism Charges” steve13133 September 3rd, 2008 at 4:31 pm 1 Lindsey, may I place a quote or two in your mind (perhaps it will give you an idea to research for another article, …I certainly hope so as you are an excellent writer) 1) “the State is in essence the result of the successes achieved by a band of brigands who superimpose themselves on small, distinct societies.” Bertrand de Jouvenel 2) In this century, the human race faces, once again, the virulent reign of the State – of the State now armed with the fruits of man’s creative powers, confiscated and perverted to its own aims. The last few centuries were times when men tried to place constitutional and other limits on the State, only to find that such limits, as with all other attempts, have failed. Of all the numerous forms that governments have taken over the centuries, of all the concepts and institutions that have been tried, none has succeeded in keeping the State in check. The problem of the State is evidently as far from solution as ever. Perhaps new paths of inquiry must be explored, if the successful, final solution of the State question is ever to be attained. -Murry Rothbard Reply steve13133 September 3rd, 2008 at 4:40 pm 2 Really, does it matter who wins. Obama voted for telecom immunity, he states that everything is on the table concerning Iran (that actually has a valid case for development of Nuke power for peaceful purposes, especially to make their own nuke fuel for their power plants). Obama or McSame, there is almost mo difference. They will both reach into my wallet and take forcfully my hard earned labor, which amounts to taking food off of my children’s plates and clothes off their backs. I have no regret taking away the tax money to feed illegal immigrants or defense profiteers. That is my children’s money. Reply Lindsay Beyerstein September 3rd, 2008 at 4:40 pm 3 Thanks, Steve. Definitely food for thought. I’ve been trying to figure out what the place of direct action is in the modern high-security media-mediated world. When people take to the streets, who are they demonstrating for and why? Who should they be demonstrating for? How should tactics change to be more effective. Reply Lindsay Beyerstein September 3rd, 2008 at 4:47 pm 4 Yes, it matters who wins. People said in 2000 that Gore and Bush would be more or less the same…. Reply neurophius September 3rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm 5 Digg this post HERE Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:09 pm 6 According to the US State Department, the definition of TERRORISM is not confined to the physical act of killing. Terrorism occurs when a state utilizes fear tactics against its own people to accomplish political objectives. The mere act or announcing a falsely construed terror alert - or overplaying the significance of a plot known not to be viable - is itself terrorism. Karl Rove is a Terrorist under the definition ascribed by the US State Department. We often wonder why people like Ledeen seem to be so interested in creating conflict for the sake of conflict. One reason is that people who are aware of the timing of a conflict are in a position to make money off it. Another reason is that this constant conflict constitutes the sole reason why these people have any power. They create an escalating series of problems, and then have to remain in power to ‘solve’ them. Of course, the solutions continue to lead to more conflicts. Ledeen’s take on this idea is wedded to ideology. In summarizing his book “The War Against the Terror Masters” on the American Enterprise Institute Web site, he writes: “We wage total war because we fight in the name of an idea, and ideas either triumph or fail … totally.” In his reckoning, force is the only reliable strategy to enforce our ideology on our enemies. In the same summary he claims, drawing inspiration from Machiavelli: “We can lead by the force of high moral example … [but] fear is much more reliable, and lasts longer. Once we show that we are capable of dealing out terrible punishment to our enemies, our power will be far greater.” <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/15860/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/story/15860/</a> ”We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” Karl Rove Rove is Ledeen’s facilitator. Rove was behind the planning for Georgia’s genocide of innocent civilians in S. Osettia…but it was actually Ledeen’s plan that Rove facilitated - and ran the “perception of” in its aftermath. Scapegoating the aftermath of civilian autrocities by blaming your enemy is a Ledeen trademark…like blaming Saudi Arabia for 9/11, and blaming Russia for the Genocide in S. Osettia and Georgia. Assume that Ledeen, Rove, Chertoff, Cheney and Zakheim sat in frequent planning meetings prior to their 9/11 operation: <a href="http://www.takeoverworld.info/conquest.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.takeoverworld.info/conquest.html</a> The BBC, the Washington Post and Jim Lobe writing for the Asia Times report that Michael Ledeen is the only full-time international affairs analyst consulted by Karl Rove (President G.W. Bush’s “brain”). Ledeen has regular conversations with Rove. The Washington Post said, “More than once, Ledeen has seen his ideas faxed to Rove, become official policy or rhetoric.” ALL EVIL ORIGINATES WITH LEDEEN - AGENT OF DAVID ROCKEFELLER. Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:10 pm 7 <a href="http://proliberty.com/observer/20000906.htm" rel="nofollow">http://proliberty.com/observer/20000906.htm</a> From the September 2000 Idaho Observer: RAND analyst admits Defense Secretary fits profile of domestic terrorist? “Astute observation” begs question: “Who are the real terrorists?” The Department of Defense’s definition of terrorism is: “The calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or try to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious or ideological.” “All acts of terrorism are politically motivated,” “Why would Cohen, who has access to all chemical/biological weapons intelligence data, including that disseminated by RAND, scare the public with the imminence of a chemical/biological threat? Is he not mirroring the intent of ‘terrorists’ to leave a specific impression on a gullible public,” asked Don Harkins of The Idaho Observer. Chalk gave a thoughtful and lengthy answer to Harkins’ question. Chalk explained that Cohen’s public announcement was undoubtedly prompted by lobbyists who used the Clinton cabinet member as political leverage to fund their anti-terrorism programs and research. “Earlier today Dr. Hoffman stated that ‘all terrorist acts are politically motivated.’ What you just described to me is that Cohen’s threat of imminent chemical or biological attack was politically motivated. How, then, is Defense Secretary Cohen’s behavior different from what you guys have described as that of a domestic terrorist?” Harkins asked. With a smile that seemed to say, “touchet,” Chalk said, “Your observation is very astute.” Reply CTuttle September 3rd, 2008 at 5:13 pm 8 Lindsay, what’s the deal on the one ‘protester’ that conspired to detonate molotov cocktails at the RNC convention that MSNBC reported earlier on… It mentioned that he was monitored since he had attended an anarchist meeting in Wisconsin where he’d mentioned it to an FBI informant at that meeting… Something reeks to high heaven…! Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:15 pm 9 I copied and saved this for a day like this: Here’s the actual Bottom Line for All 6 Billion humans living on Earth. You’ve been sold out by the same money lenders Jesus had to throw out of the temple. The governments, the corporations, the militaries, the etc’s. Call it whatever you want. Fascism still remains one of the more close dictionary definitions. And now even in America, the methods have moved to Nazism. The secret polices, the secret agents, the secret orders, the secret meetings, the secret militaries, the secret governments, the secret documents, the sealed forever documents, the secret budgets, the secret domestic spying, the secret minutes, the secret presidential directives, the secret this and that and that and that and that…. It’s all one big Secret. From the actual People who are Legally Bound to finance it daily with their blood, sweat, tears, and taxes. That’s called Totalitarianism in the dictionary. They take your money and pollute your complete water, air, soil, food etc you and your family eats and drinks all that, and then people wonder where things like cancers come from (sorry, not from aliens). They kill you every day, both your bodies, your minds, your spirits, your souls, your hearts, and your wallets. They steal you blind, elect their pals and relatives to help them steal you blind. And weave an Illusion of Social and Political Freedom and throw crumbs from the “masters’” tables to make sure you don’t get too upset as they’re doing it, and you still can walk from point A to point B, but you are just so many rats to them that pay taxes. Economic and Societical Slaves “living in freedom”. That’s called Totalitarianism in the dictionary. The MEDIA now even takes Bribes from them and prints stories across America that are favorable to them. A MAJORITY of almost all of the rest of the MEDIA across America also now looks like it joined “The Big Boys” much longer ago than you can imagine. That’s called Totalitarianism, Nazism, Fascism, whatever you want to call it at this late date. You pay for it all. And they take that money and print the News telling you how it’s all going in America and the World. That’s called Hell in the dictionary. Then they purposely manipulate Wars in mainly Oil-Rich countries and send your kids to die for a Pipeline. And call it “We Are Spreading Democracy”. That’s called Criminal Activity, Genocide, and Treason in the dictionary. Do all the math, that above is barely even the first letter of the first word of the first sentence of it. You live like rats held captive in your own country by a SYSTEM that keeps Everthing SECRET from you while you PAY for it all and the Government and the Corporations poison your entire environment, you and your family, as they start wars over Oil, keep you economic slaves in America, and make out like bandits at all their banks in the process. Well, someone with better education, more information, better language skills, etc, could put it much better than I could in many less words. But even they cannot get such a tiny message of Truthful Information to a *Majority* of Americans because 90 Percent of All American Media is Controlled by about 5? Giant Corporate Conglomerates. And they ain’t talkin’ no Major Truth. It is inconvenient to even them. That’s called Nazi Germany 2 - The Sequel, Editors Edition. Lemme see now, you got the Corporate Leeches, the Military, and the Government eating America daily, your families, your health, your money, your everything. That’s called “THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL-COMPLEX” in all dictionaries. The “MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL-COMPLEX” was once referred to by the Republican decorated U.S. General Dwight D. Eisenhower who fought *THE NAZIS* *FOR AMERICA* as “THE WORST ENEMY AMERICA HAS IN THE WORLD, NOW, AND FOREVER”. Now I want you to sit there and call the Republican decorated U.S. General Dwight D. Eisenhower who fought *THE NAZIS* *FOR AMERICA* a LIAR here in front of all the world so we can see you do it. Or shut the fuck up, you’re only so more Judas Traitors to America and The American People. Either call Eisenhower a Liar about “The Military-Industrial-Complex” or sit there and continue with your knitting and remain embarrassed for partaking in the Betrayal Of The United States Of America. If you *do* decide to call Eisenhower a Liar about “The Military-Industrial-Complex” and make a total fool of yourself and identify yourself as nothing more than another slimy Propagandist, the only problem you are going to have with your *Full Explanation* for calling Eisenhower a Liar is that The American People only have to but look around at their surroundings to easily see how right Eisenhower was the entire time. And still is. That’s called The End Of All Freedom On Earth in every dictionary ever created on this planet. Do you know how many Billions of People on this planet live like Rats..? You are becoming just like them in America. Running through mazes for those who Lie, Cheat, Steal, and Kill you and your families every day of your lives. And you pay them to do it. And then they make up secret lists. And if you check out the wrong book at a public library in America, they sent secret police to your parent’s house to investigate it. Both me and every dictionary on Earth still calls those kind of people NAZIS. You can call them what you want. I see 10 billion light years ahead of you. These people are NAZIS. They’re just wearing nicer suits, not speaking German, while they control the Media to tell you who and what they want you to think they are. While cashing in on your blood, sweat, tears, and taxes at their banks. And stamping everything, including Budgets (your taxes again) as Classified, Top Secret, Military Secret, National Security Secret, Ultra-National Pork Barrel Secret, etc. So you, who pay ALL their Salaries with your blood, sweat, tears, and taxes, will never have to bother yourselves with knowing what they are actually ever doing. And they wave God, the Flag, Mom, and Apple Pie in your face, and call it “Democracy”. And themselves “Your Leaders Chosen By You And By God”. And say Bird Flu is on the way. And that The Military is “best qualified to quarantine various sections of the country”. And that Spying On Americans and Sending Secret Police To Childrens’ Houses Who Have Checked Out The Wrong Book At An American Public Library is okeydokey. And as 40 Million American Men Women and Children live in Poverty and Hunger, they’re going to build a 700 Mile Wall to Save All America America. And that if anyone who objects to such things they go on *Lists*. And get Fired. And Blackballed. And Smeared. And Imprisoned. And Set Up. And Silenced. And the rest get instructed to take their families into the hallways of their houses and seal themselves in with duct tape and plastic sheeting. Until Democracy blows over. Those are NAZIS, children. Wake up your parents and tell them. Posted by: Mary12 on December 18, 2005 at 06:03am From Huffington Post Reply CarolynU September 3rd, 2008 at 5:16 pm 10 Wow. I guess this is not a shock. This has been the plan all along: anyone who is against you is a terrorist. Anyone who notices your criminality is a terrorist. Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:16 pm 11 “Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which he lives is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one’s self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.” Michael Rivera Reply steve13133 September 3rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm 12 Perhaps the husband of Palin is correct is a secessionist movement. Albeit, the last time that was tried, Lincoln sent in the troops to squash the movement. The Civil War was not about slavery, it was about economic control of Northern Bankers and Industrialists over the South. Slavery would have ended in the US peacefully in the next decade as it had already ended almost everywhere else in the world by that time. A million deaths could have been averted. The power of the state is what is evil, whether it is kings, lords, democrats, republicans, or warlords. Reply Millineryman September 3rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm 13 Great job and thank you for covering all of this Lindsay. Reply CTuttle September 3rd, 2008 at 5:20 pm 14 In response to CTuttle @ 8 Here’s the link to the story…! Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:21 pm 15 STUDY THIS - ROVE DID! Reply perris September 3rd, 2008 at 5:21 pm 16 The criminal complaint doesn’t allege than any of the defendants committed, or attempted to commit, any of the notional crimes mentioned by the paid informants. This is the first time that criminal charges have been brought under the 2002 law. let’s be clear here; this administration claims the right to just make believe someone is a terrorist and then not only hold them indefinatley but torture them as well that is not an exageration, this administration claims by virtue of them SAYING this is an enemy combatant, that person is by rote that is the fascist state we live in today Reply neurophius September 3rd, 2008 at 5:22 pm 17 I actually used to have some respect for former Sen. Jack Danforth, believing him to be one of the few remaining “moderates” prominent in the Republican Party today. But just now on MSNBC, he lost all credibility with me by referring to McBush as “a Maverick”*, proving himself to be a tool who has drunk the Kool-Aid and who is only suited to mouth Republican talking points. *I wish I knew how to make the little “TM” trademark symbol on a PC Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:22 pm 18 Creeping Fascism The voices of the past, on Recognizing the Unrecognizable… Reply selise September 3rd, 2008 at 5:23 pm 19 In response to Lindsay Beyerstein @ 3 Who should they be demonstrating for? How should tactics change to be more effective. i think before you can sit in judgement of others, you must answer these questions for yourself. and remember the boston tea party. if you are going to condemn direct action, you must condemn even more this founding act of our country because of the value of the tea that was destroyed. may i suggest you read starhawk’s “webs of power,” gene sharp’s “waging nonviolent struggle” as a start if you haven’t already. also take some training from the afsc and starhawk. if you only see it from the outside you may get it very wrong. from starhawk’s webpage on webs of power: Webs of Power is a call to reconceive our political and economic systems at the very deepest levels. Writing from the front lines, Starhawk chronicles the global justice movement sparked by Seattle’s 1999 anti-World Trade Organization protest. An activist in many of the major peace and justice movements of our times, Starhawk continues to be deeply involved as a direct action participant and trainer in the anti-globalization movement. (For the latest, see her writings on the WTO Cancun mobilization.) The book is divided into “Actions” and “Visions.” In Part I, Starhawk begins with a direct-action perspective of what really happened in Seattle and provides an overview of the complex political and economic powers that the anti-globalization movement opposes. Recounting the blow-by-blow events of the critical confrontations faced by the anti-globalization protestors after Seattle, Prague, Brazil, Quebec, Genoa, Starhawk discusses police brutality, the Black Bloc versus the pacifists, and the magic of solidarity. Reply CTuttle September 3rd, 2008 at 5:23 pm 20 The FBI began investigating DePalma in July, after he attended a convention of anarchists in Wisconsin called the CrimethInc. Convergence. He told an FBI source there that he planned to go to “make some bombs and “blow [stuff] up” at the Republican convention. From then on, federal agents had him under surveillance with the cooperation of the source, who allowed DePalma to use his Minneapolis apartment, in which the FBI secretly made audio and video recordings of their discussions. It seems to reek of entrapment to me…! Reply NorskeFlamethrower September 3rd, 2008 at 5:24 pm 21 1,753 DAYZ AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND… Citizen Lindsay Beyerstein and the Firepup Freedom Fighters: Well it’s here isn’t it…now we know what the strategy was all along, to get state charges of “terrorism” placed against US citizens and have the court proceedings grind on through the election. Notice that the federal role is still in darkness here so we assume that after the spectacle of a state show trial these poor bastards will face federal “terrorism” charges…this ,of course, will be an early test of an Obama justice department assuming he wins. The shit that a new administration will hafta clean up jest gets deeper and deeper. Let’s close ranks here and make sure that we don’t start arguin’ among ourselves about who the “terrorists” are and who instigated this bullshit…keep the heat on the fascists and don’t let ‘em criminalize politics. KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, I TOLDJA THESE BASTARDS WOULDN’T GIVE UP!! Reply steve13133 September 3rd, 2008 at 5:24 pm 22 In response to plunger @ 9 Bravo! now we are seeing the light! Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:27 pm 23 <a href="http://www.greaterthings.com/N" rel="nofollow">http://www.greaterthings.com/N</a>…..index.html General Ralph Eberhart, who was in charge of air defense on 9-11, was the first commander of “Northern Command,” the domestic unified military command established in October 2002. If the domestic use of the U.S. military escalates into full-scale martial law, the Northern Command would essentially manage it. If 9/11 had been an “intelligence failure,” it is likely that General Eberhart would have been court-martialed instead of promoted. <a href="http://www.oilempire.us/redalert.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.oilempire.us/redalert.html</a> “Recent pronouncements from the Bush Administration and national security initiatives put in place in the Reagan era could see internment camps and martial law in the United States.” – The Sydney Morning Herald, July 27, 2002 <a href="http://www.buzzflash.com/farre" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzflash.com/farre</a>…..06003.html Reply eCAHNomics September 3rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm 24 When did the Rs abolish men? One would think from tonight’s speakers that all Rs are women. And one would be wrong. I am only surprised there are so few black women speakers. Reply plunger September 3rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm 25 GOP Worried? About losing an election? What election is that? Didn’t you get the memo? Haven’t you been listening? There is going to be Bird Flu (or at least the Wag The Dog Version thereof). Stay in your homes and listen to Dear Leader for further instructions. Then there is going to be a dirty bomb attack. Then they are going to impose Martial Law. Then they are going to activate the Camps which Haliburton is building throughout the United States right now. Elections? How quaint. Just as quaint as the Geneva Conventions. KBR Awarded Homeland Security contract worth up to $385M. (HAL) (By Katherine Hunt) SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — KBR, the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton Co, (HAL), said Tuesday it has been awarded a contingency contract from the Department of Homeland Security to supports its Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the event of an emergency. The maximum total value of the contract is $385 million and consists of a 1-year base period with four 1-year options. KBR held the previous ICE contract from 2000 through 2005. The contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to expand existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs, KBR said. The contract may also provide migrant detention support to other government organizations in the event of an immigration emergency, as well as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency, such as a natural disaster, the company said. <a href="http://news.pacificnews.org/ne.....3f4c9b3a77" rel="nofollow">http://news.pacificnews.org/ne.....3f4c9b3a77</a> <a href="http://www.infowars.com/articl.....rsives.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com/articl.....rsives.htm</a> Reply ApacheTrout September 3rd, 2008 at 5:28 pm 26 The phrase “paid informant” is extremely troublesome. Who paid them? If someone paid me to say loudly at a public meeting that my neighbor is stockpiling weapons, does that make my claim the basis of an arrest? If I was paid by another neighbor who covets the other neighbor’s property, wouldn’t I be subject to charges of falsifying police reports? Wouldn’t also the person who paid me? There’s so much to disbelieve about “paid informant.” Is the informant paid based upon the dished intelligence? What about the incentive to lie in order to get paid? Could the informant be paid to simply provide false intelligence? What happens to the paid informants? Are then defendants allowed to confront their accuser in a court of law, or is the accuser hidden behind a veil of secrecy? This situation is just ripe for abuse. Reply eCAHNomics September 3rd, 2008 at 5:29 pm ]]>

<![CDATA[Corporate Media Refuses to Report Pakistan’s Blocking Major Fuel Route to NATO Infowars September 6, 2008 For the corporate media, the fact Pakistan has blocked a major fuel supply route for occupation forces in Afghanistan is a story not worthy of mention. Pakistan blocked the route after the U.S. once again violated Pakistan’s national sovereignty and killed more innocents in Pakistani territory. Do a Google News search on “Pakistan fuel supply” and marvel at the result — a paltry return, mostly from new sources in Pakistan, India, Australia, and the Long War Journal in Medford, Massachusetts. In the United States, this is a non-story. “Sources said the federal government did not cite any reason for the move, but the decision was apparently taken in the wake of the US ground and missile attacks in North and South Waziristan tribal regions,” reports Dawn. “The US-led forces have intensified assaults in the tribal region over the past few days and five attacks, including the ground assault in Angoor Adda, have been launched, killing over 50 people, including foreign and local militants and civilians… The Torkham highway, linking Peshawar with Kabul and northern parts of Afghanistan and Central Asian states, is a major supply route for the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) in the war-ravaged country.” It looks like Pakistan is playing hardball with the neocons, at least in the short term. So will the neocons bomb Islamabad next? 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising Get the DVD and make copies or watch the high quality streaming and download version online at Prison Planet.tv. Click here to read more about the film and view sample trailers. Bookmark This 20 Responses to “Corporate Media Refuses to Report Pakistan’s Blocking Major Fuel Route to NATO” Pages: [2] 1 » Show All 20 Jeff Says: September 6th, 2008 at 9:05 pm They’re also probably planning on pinning the price increase from this on Russia. 19 ZZ Says: September 6th, 2008 at 9:04 pm I think Pakis are just reminding the US of their forgotten strategic significance. The US would never have won the Afghan-Soviet war without the help of Pakistan, and can’t suatain control over Afghanistan without the help of Pakistan. Of course, the Zio Cold Warriors have their ways of convincing. In the Afghan-Soviet war, they lied that Soviets were trying to gain access to the warm waters of the Arabian Sea, which meant that regardless of helping or not, Pakistan would be the next Soviet target. In the War against Taleban, the neocons threatened to bomb Pakistan into stone age themselves if Pakistan failed to cooperate. 18 LR Says: September 6th, 2008 at 8:28 pm The lines are starting to be drawn. The Zionist war mongering military industrialists are weakening from the resistance outside our borders. When the resistance inside arises they will be doomed! Prepare and contribute to the rebuilding of our once great nation. Down with dual nation citizenships! Let’s kick these Israeli neocon mother f**kers asses back to the middle east and let them fight and fund their own f**king wars! 17 Babylon AD Says: September 6th, 2008 at 7:35 pm This was a GOOD GOOD movie! I know a lot of people don’t understand this film but if you get it.Man this is an awesome film. They have a control grid in place the and for those that know about Revelations in the bible when watching this film think about the two wittness. Revelation 11 - 3,13 16 pray for america! Says: September 6th, 2008 at 7:06 pm this sucks but whats got me worried is the satanist blowing up one of our ships in the black sea and put the price tag on the russians, instant ww3 15 Stop NWO Says: September 6th, 2008 at 5:44 pm The MSM propaganda machine is too busy covering Russian “attack” on Georgia.Pakistan war can wait. 14 ohnobravenewworld Says: September 6th, 2008 at 4:52 pm Bomb Islamabad, you say? Done. And, of course, in the name of chasing the Taliban. 13 ohnobravenewworld Says: September 6th, 2008 at 4:51 pm Um…well…They did… Like clockwork… <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com.....er-region/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com.....er-region/</a> 12 LOL Says: September 6th, 2008 at 4:04 pm Check this out…. <a href="http://www.theonion.com/conten....._announces" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/conten....._announces</a> 11 NeoCon Narc Says: September 6th, 2008 at 3:46 pm I think it would be alot cheaper and save alot more time if they just nuke everyone if they are going to start a war with everyone. ]]>

<![CDATA[Fabled Enemies Debuts at Number 1 on Google Video… then disappears from the rankings Infowars.com September 5, 2008 Jason Bermas’ Fabled Enemies has already launched as both a success and a threat against the New World Order system. After topping Google Video as the most watched video in the world one day after being released, it is now nowhere to be found in the ratings list — a key to driving films like its predecessor Loose Change to have literally tens of millions of views online. The films comments and view counts have been seemingly frozen, as the screen shots below demonstrate. Fabled Enemies is a potent new film that exposes the deep intelligence roots of the so-called hijackers, Osama bin Laden and the international spy ring that helped carry out 9/11, so it is no surprise that its livelihood might be suppressed. The film also throws light on the continuity of government that was operational on 9/11 and is still in power today. It provides a challenging picture of who the real enemy is that is undoubtedly a threat to the establishment. Do not let this film be censored, suppressed and stifled. There’s a reason they don’t want this film to be seen. Get a high quality DVD at Infowars.com or get high quality DIVX, WMV, MOV and FLASH files from PrisonPlanet.tv and post them at every online distribution there is so the entire world has the opportunity to see this important film. Burn discs and show them to everyone in your family, neighborhood and city. Just get them out now! Watch the trailer below or see all three trailers and sneak peaks from the film in high quality here. From Jason Bermas: I am happy to report that Fabled Enemies, went from number 2 on September 1st to number 1 on September 2nd. Of course it was mysteriously gone from the top 100 all together by the 3rd, and comments and views seemed to freeze. Here is your chance to see it in high quality at www.prisonplanet.tv, or buy the DVD here and make copies to pass out. Fabled Enemies #2 Google Video on September 1, 2008 Fabled Enemies #1 on Google Video on September 2, 2008 Fabled Enemies off the charts; Loose Change Final Cut at #1 on September 5, 2008 FABLED ENEMIES TRAILER — SEE MORE FROM FABLED ENEMIES IN HIGH QUALITY HERE 9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising Get the DVD and make copies or watch the high quality streaming and download version online at Prison Planet.tv. Click here to read more about the film and view sample trailers. Bookmark This 85 Responses to “Fabled Enemies Debuts at Number 1 on Google Video… then disappears from the rankings” Pages: [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All 85 NeoCon Narc Says: September 6th, 2008 at 9:19 pm I agree with Ron #84. I to think all of this is a bit comical and is good movie material. So true the points you hit. 84 Ron Says: September 6th, 2008 at 7:23 pm We need to do a movie about an innocent guy who fell asleep for 30 years. He wakes up and finds out how everything has changed. Call it “Bernie Wakes Up”. We can sow him going thru a checkpoint getting his teeth knocked out for asking polite questions. He goes to the drug store and gets in trouble there. He gets thrown out of his doctors office. The neighbor’s kids rat on him because he was smoking grass. He gets pissed off over an $8 dollar per gallon propane delivery and shouts at the delivery man. He goes on the internet and gets arrested for downloading songs. He mentions the Constitution at a community event and gets dragged off to jail. I bet there are hundreds of little funny episodes tailored for this guy. Maybe he is watching “Fabled Enemies” and the camera shows the look of disbelief on his face. The illegal aliens torch his car. He gets a summons for collecting rain water. He goes into New York City and the police are running after him because he had a camera in his hand and a duffelbag load with “Terror Storm” cd’s. (showing his change of perception about his homeland). Bernie than evolves from a mindless 70’s hippie into an infowarrior. We can make this a mainstream movie and maybe the mindless public may get the message. Hey it may even be a hit. 83 renegade666 Says: September 6th, 2008 at 7:00 pm Folks who has the most to gain by losing this video. The Israel scum. Israel is quite worried. The NWO is in a pincer. We the Freedom Movement are on one side and we will not stop. The Russians are on the other side and I think they can take care of themselves. So lets keep pushing and crush this New World Order Scum. 82 Joe Rogers Says: September 6th, 2008 at 6:58 pm Don’t waste time trying to counter what the main stream media is telling people. YOU need to become the main stream media. Always replace the word “terrorist” with “Neo-con”. Replace “terrorism” with “Neo-conservatism”. The “911 Neo-Con attacks” instead of the “911 Terrorist” attacks, get it? We are safe from what? Are we safe from terrorists or Neo-cons? Do not let anyone use the word “terrorist” it must be replaced with the word “Neo-Con”. YOU the main stream media not MSNBC or any other MSM elementary school educator never refers to terrorists you always refer to Neo-cons in its place. Remember you are educated on the subject of 911 better than most because you have done the research while those that rely on MSM has been held to no higher than the 3rd grade. They have been held to believe that steel melts from fires. YOU have gone past third grade you understand that steel does not melt. YOU understand that the buildings were brought down with explosives. YOU know that because you are educated while others are not. Go out and educate everyone about the Neo-cons with whatever means you can. 81 Adrian Peirson Says: September 6th, 2008 at 3:14 pm It say here we can’t defeat the NWO. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related</a> I say we can, Bring it on Scumbags, lets get this thing underway. ]]>

<![CDATA[First off no one has said I will end this war ???? hummmmmm no. 2 how will the unemployment rate look then????? hmmmmmm no.3 wake up join the infowars.com network real people very real discussion. Get away from the Fear and be proud... you children need you now more than ever.................watch this short little movie and see if you notice any common points of discussion zeitgeistthemovie.com ]]>

<![CDATA[Well with the pending socialization of Fannie Mae and Freedie Mac is there much doubt left that America is rapidly becoming a socialist country? What has happened to the soul of America? Our heritage of Freedom and Liberty, previously cherished concepts that lift the shroud of misery and give promise to so many are slowly being relegated to anachronism. We so need a to reinvigorate the ideas that are the very foundation of our nation. Here is a great article that I thought the need to post here that speaks to how the republicrats have shat on our Heritage. <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0907chapmansep07,0,5991702.column" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0907chapmansep07,0,5991702.column</a> When did the idea of freedom become a political orphan? Steve Chapman September 7, 2008 This year's Republican National Convention had a different theme for each day. Monday was "Serving a Cause Greater than Self." Tuesday was "Service," Wednesday was "Reform" and Thursday was "Peace." "We must, and we shall, set the tide running again in the cause of freedom. And this party, with its every action, every word, every breath, and every heartbeat, has but a single resolve, and that is freedom. " —Barry Goldwater, accepting the 1964 Republican presidential nomination So what was missing? Only what used to be held up as the central ideal of the party. The heirs of Goldwater couldn't spare a day for freedom. Neither could the Democrats. Their daily topics this year were "One Nation," "Renewing America's Promise" and "Securing America's Future." The party proclaimed "an agenda that emphasizes the security of our nation, strong economic growth, affordable health care for all Americans, retirement security, honest government, and civil rights." Expanding and upholding individual liberty? Not so much. Forty-four years after Goldwater's declaration, it's clear that collectivism, not individualism, is the reigning creed of Republicans as well as Democrats. Individuals are not valuable and precious in their own right but as a means for those in power to achieve their grand ambitions. You will scour the presidential nominees' acceptance speeches in vain for any hint that your life is rightfully your own, to be lived in accordance with your beliefs and desires and no one else's. The Founding Fathers set out to protect "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," but Barack Obama has a different idea. The "essence of America's promise," he declared in Denver, is "individual responsibility and mutual responsibility"—rather than, say, individual freedom and mutual respect for rights. The "promise of America," he said, is "the fundamental belief that I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper." In reality, that fundamental belief is what you might call the promise of socialism. What has set this country apart since its inception is not the notion of obligations but the notion of rights. "All previous systems had regarded man as a sacrificial means to the ends of others, and society as an end in itself," wrote the novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand. "The United States regarded man as an end in himself, and society as a means to the peaceful, orderly, voluntary co-existence of individuals." That idea got lost somewhere between Thomas Jefferson and John McCain. What do Republicans believe in? McCain told us Thursday: "We believe in a strong defense, work, faith, service, a culture of life, personal responsibility, the rule of law . . . We believe in the values of families, neighborhoods and communities." Would it be too much to mention that what sustains the American vision of those things is freedom? That without it, personal responsibility becomes hollow and service is servitude? Apparently it would. Republicans are big on promoting freedom abroad, but in this country, the term encompasses a lot of things they don't like—the right to a "homosexual lifestyle," the right to protest the Iraq war, the right to privacy, the right not to recite the Pledge of Allegiance, and more. Conservatives who once thought Americans had too little freedom now sometimes think they have too much. Liberals, on the other hand, are wary of embracing freedom precisely because of its historic importance to the right. They fear it means curbing the power of a government whose reach they want to expand. While they value many personal liberties, they have no great attachment to forms of freedom that involve buying, selling, trading and accumulating. Those, after all, can involve selfishness, and Democrats, like Republicans, don't want to protect selfishness. But freedom isn't freedom without the right to pursue what you value—money or knowledge, pleasure or sacrifice, God or atheism, community or misanthropic solitude—rather than what others think you should value. It includes the right to go to hell, and the right to tell others to do the same. The latter is a valuable prerogative that we have not yet lost. After watching the conventions, if you have the urge to use it on either of the two major parties, feel free. If he were alive, Barry Goldwater might join you. <a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaignforliberty.com/</a> P/P ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgvn9YkKn78&feature=email" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bgvn9YkKn78&feature=email</a>]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDk" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDk</a>]]>

<![CDATA[David Frum, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, is the author of “Comeback: Conservatism That Can Win Again.” September 7, 2008 The Vanishing Republican Voter By DAVID FRUM I LIVE IN WASHINGTON, in a neighborhood that is home to lawyers, political consultants, television personalities and the chief executive of the TIAA-CREF pension fund. Not exactly an abode of the superrich, but the kind of neighborhood where almost nobody does her own yardwork or vacuums his own floor. Children’s birthday parties feature rented moon bounces or hired magicians. The local grocery stores offer elegant precooked dinners of salmon, duck and artichoke ravioli. Four miles to the southeast there stretches a different Washington. More than one-third of the people live in poverty. Close to half the young children are overweight. Fewer than half the adults work. The rate of violent crime is more than 10 times that of the leafy streets of my neighborhood. Measured by money income, Washington qualifies as one the most unequal cities in the United States. Yet these two very different halves of a single city do share at least one thing. They vote the same way: Democratic. And in this, we are not alone. As a general rule, the more unequal a place is, the more Democratic; the more equal, the more Republican. The gap between rich and poor in Washington is nearly twice as great as in strongly Republican Charlotte, N.C.; and more than twice as great as in Republican-leaning Phoenix, Fort Worth, Indianapolis and Anaheim. My fellow conservatives and Republicans have tended not to worry very much about the widening of income inequalities. As long as there exists equality of opportunity — as long as everybody’s income is rising — who cares if some people get rich faster than others? Societies that try too hard to enforce equality deny important freedoms and inhibit wealth-creating enterprise. Individuals who worry overmuch about inequality can succumb to life-distorting envy and resentment. All true! But something else is true, too: As America becomes more unequal, it also becomes less Republican. The trends we have dismissed are ending by devouring us. THE TREND TO INEQUALITY is not new, and it is not confined to the United States. It has manifested itself just about everywhere in the developed world since the late 1970s, and for the same two reasons. The first reason is the revolution in family life. Not so long ago, most households were home to two adults, one who worked and one who did not. Today fewer than half of America’s households are headed by married couples, and married women usually work. So America and other advanced countries have become increasingly divided between families earning two incomes and those getting by on one at most. The family revolution coincided with another: a great shift from a national to a planetary division of labor. Inequality within nations is rising in large part because inequality is declining among nations. A generation ago, even a poor American was still better off than most people in China. Today the lifestyles of middle-class Chinese increasingly approximate those of middle-class Americans, while the lifestyles of upper and lower America increasingly diverge. Less-skilled Americans now face hundreds of millions of new wage competitors, while highly skilled Americans can sell their services in a worldwide market. As long as all Americans were becoming better off, few cared that some Americans were becoming better off than others. But since 2000, something has changed. Incomes at the middle have ceased to rise. The mood of the country has soured. Conservatives who disregard the mood of unease may forfeit their power to defend the more open and productive American economy they did so much to build. STEP ACROSS THE COUNTY line between Washington and suburban Fairfax County, Va., and you see the forfeiting process at work. A third of a century ago, Fairfax had only recently evolved from farm country to bedroom community. Some rich families clustered in the village of McLean, where Robert Kennedy had his Hickory Hill estate. Otherwise, Fairfax housed middle-class families looking for inexpensive housing and excellent schools. These middle-class families voted Republi