Classified Listings

Find jobs, housing, for sale, personals, services, local community, and events.

USA Online local classifieds

Community - politics classifieds in new york

<![CDATA[As long as America has a mentally inferior Redneck majority population, a small minority of conniving Jews will be in control of this nation. Witness what is happening with the Crackers in the U.S. Government, The Jews own them!]]>

<![CDATA[I agree bro, the nigger is really funny. Almost as funny as white Bill Mahr.]]>

<![CDATA[________________S.T.O.P. AMNESTY in 4 DAYS! (Friday, March 19, 2010 at 1:30pm) S.T.O.P. AMNESTY in 4 DAYS! What you can do this Friday, March 19, 2010 at 1:30pm. Dear Grassroots Activists: On Sunday March 21, 2010 reports say that 100,000 pro-amnesty supporters will "March for America" in Washington D.C. to fight for citizenship of 11-20 million illegal aliens in this country. We need you to help us S.T.O.P. AMNESTY in 4 DAYS! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR): Join FAIR's ...To counter the amnesty march, FAIR is holding its own “virtual march” to let Capitol Hill and the White House know that mass amnesty is unacceptable! ... <a href="http://www.fairus.org/site/PageNavigator/washington_march_310" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairus.org/site/PageNavigator/washington_march_310</a> - Cached ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ]]>

<![CDATA[He talks about it all.... I had to post this to support him <a href="http://twitter.com/themostreal" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/themostreal</a>]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=659498" rel="nofollow">http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=659498</a>]]>

<![CDATA[PROOF!... Plans to Depopulate the Planet of Humans by 90%! Submitted by SadInAmerica on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 1:55pm. It is my intention to give you clips from documents, many from the United Nations that prove there is a plan to depopulate this planet. ~ Stephanie R. Pasco I will also provide quotes from various people and organizations that further show this agenda is afoot. I pray the guidance of the Lord God Almighty will be with me in this pursuit to warn others of this dark plot against humanity. Everything written in this paper is easily verifiable. It may take some time and effort, but I took great pains to make this paper as accurate as I possibly could. The depopulation agenda is based on nature worship, or Gaia worship. In Genesis, God clearly told Adam and Eve, and then Noah and his family to go forth and multiply to fill the earth. Nowhere in the Bible does God rescind that clearly spoken commandment. Therefore man is attempting to supercede the command of the Lord God in heaven: The Creator! I ask you, who knows more about the state of the earth, the created, or the Creator? The basis for the depopulation agenda is a standard all elitist’s hold dear. This standard is called: The Hegelian Dialectic: Problem – Reaction-Solution Create the Problem Cause a Reaction Offer a Solution You will see exactly how they have created the problem; caused a reaction so widespread it is really quite impressive how successful they have been; and offered a solution: A deadly solution. I ask that you please make an attempt to distribute this paper everywhere you possibly can. The time grows short and so many are going to be caught unawares. By getting the word out, you may be able to prevent someone from needless pain and suffering. William Benton, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State at UNESCO 1946: (UNESCO is the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization) “As long as a child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only precarious results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The schools therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favor jingoism (nationalism)…we shall presently recognize in nationalism the major obstacle to development of world mindedness. We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty. UNESCO must be the pioneer.” (Emphasis mine throughout) Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill (this is absolute proof that man made global warming is a fabrication)…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.” Aldous Huxley Aldous Huxley, Brave New World 1946: “There is, of course, no reason why the new totalitarians should resemble the old. Government by clubs and firing squads, by artificial famine, mass imprisonment and mass deportation, is not merely inhumane (nobody cares much about that nowadays); it is demonstrably inefficient and in an age of advanced technology, inefficiency is the sin against the Holy Ghost.” Aldous Huxley, Lecture named Population Explosion 1959: “…Let us ask ourselves what the practical alternatives are as we confront this problem of population growth. One alternative is to do nothing in particular about it and just let things go on as they are…The question is: Are we going to restore the balance in the natural way, which is a brutal and entirely anti-human way, or are we going to restore it in some intelligent, rational, and humane way…Try to increase production as much as possible and at the same time try to re-establish the balance between the birth rate by means less gruesome than those which are used by nature – by intelligent and human methods?…There are colossal difficulties in the way of implementing any large-scale policy of limitation of population; whereas death control is extremely easy under modern circumstances, birth control is extremely difficult. The reason is very simple: death control – the control, for example, of infectious diseases – can be accomplished by a handful of experts and quite a small labour force of unskilled persons and requires a very small capital expenditure.” Barry Commoner, Making Peace with the Planet: “There have been ‘triage’ proposals that would condemn whole nations to death through some species of global ‘benign neglect’. There have been schemes for coercing people to curtail their fertility, by physical and legal means that are ominously left unspecified. Now we are told that we must curtail rather than extend our efforts to feed the hungry peoples of the world. Where will it end?” Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997, Testimony before Congressional Committee: “There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.” Jacques Cousteau Jacques Cousteau UNESCO Courier 1991: “In order to save the planet it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day.” Jacques Cousteau, Population: Opposing Viewpoints: “If we want our precarious endeavor to succeed, we must convince all human beings to participate in our adventure, and we must urgently find solutions to curb the population explosion that has a direct influence on the impoverishment of the less-favoured communities. Otherwise, generalized resentment will beget hatred, and the ugliest genocide imaginable, involving billions of people, will become unavoidable.” “Uncontrolled population growth and poverty must not be fought from inside, from Europe, from North America, or any nation or group of nations; it must be attacked from the outside – by international agencies helped in the formidable job by competent and totally non-governmental organizations.” Bertrand Russell, The Impact Of Science On Society 1953: “I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing… War… has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s… There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…” Henry Kissinger, 1978: “U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation” David Rockefeller, 2000: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” David Rockefeller: Memoirs 2002 Founder of the CFR: “We wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” David Rockefeller, Co-founder of the Trilateral Commission: “We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine & other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American Case Officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA) (now the US State Dept. Office of Population Affairs, est. by Henry Kissinger in 1975): “There is a single theme behind all our work -we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population -or else we will have trouble. “So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.” (1981) Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997; Testimony before Congressional Committee: “And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its Purpose and its Philosophy: “Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” In the early 1950’s, former Communist Joseph Z. Kornfeder expressed the opinion that UNESCO was comparable to a Communist Party agitation and propaganda department. He stated that such a party apparatus ‘handles the strategy and method of getting at the public mind, young and old.’ Huxley would lard the agency with a motley collection of Communists and fellow travelers. President Richard Nixon believed abortion was necessary as a form of eugenics to prevent interracial breeding Theodore Roosevelt to Charles B. Davenport, January 3, 1913, Charles B. Davenport Papers, Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them…The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…” Theodore Roosevelt Theodore Roosevelt: “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…. Any group of farmers, who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum…. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population… The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity…” “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them… The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed…” ]]>

<![CDATA[Yeag right lets elect Ron Paul or Ralph Nader, I mean they have done so much already. My guess is that you all were the idiots who voted for Obama and now that you see the Democrats/Progressives/Socialists/Marxists are scumbags oh yes we must run around sayiong BOTH PARTYS ARE THE SAME instead of saying I am a gullable stupid asshole. Try it...it's not that hard.. ]]>

<![CDATA[funny shit <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEkaEQHM814" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEkaEQHM814</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Lets get real. He is from a district that includes Cleveland which he was also once the mayor of. Cleveland was the hometown of that great American and former convict for murder Don "only in America" King. One can say this district "reflects" Obama the mulatto wonder boy very much if you know what I mean. I mean free cheese, free welfare, free fiood stamps and free health care right whitey LOLOLOL. All we need is free newports, free Colt 45 and free lotto tickets. I mean yo man enuff wit tis boo shit, I want mines mutta fucka. Really any white person in favor of this health care plan should die from cancer.]]>

<![CDATA[re: "how about instead"........ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-17, 4:35PM EDT Reply to: comm-j2xwv-1648717112@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- So......... You don't think our present health care system leaves hard working American citizens out of the loop, not because of poor work ethic or excessive credit card spending on luxuries, or bad financial planning? The conservative model is that, we're all free to buy anything we want. OK, so next time you're on a subway, or being served dinner, or someone packs your groceries, or washes your car or sweeps the hall of your building and you interact, it won't matter that this class of decent working Americans may soon be completely without health care. How will that work? The kid in school? I guess, just buy private education is your answer. As to the rest of us, where the number don't add up, it's tough luck. While it's true that no one is turned away from emergency rooms, (now), it's also true that without insurance or money to pay for it, you are likely to not receive any or adequate care and medicines. This isn't about the classic poor. It's about what was once a dynamic middle class. Clearly you're either too young to be affected by it, or too rich to care. Either way, you're outside. Good for you. ]]>

<![CDATA[Keeping conservative loving insurance co. death care not happening (USA !) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-17, 11:19AM EDT Reply to: comm-qdgz8-1648168638@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conservatives love their corporations more then their mothers and fathers and children. Hate your government. Distrust anything for the common good. But love love love Exxon Mobil, Blue Cross, Dupont and Halliburton. Those companies care about us! Death care? lol. how true. Tis what we have now dear misinformed propagandist poster boy. These ignorant conservatives have been led to believe that if we have universal health care that they'll die in the hallways of government medical clinics, but like they do in Canada, Israel and France. No one lives there I guess, they're all dying from their inferior pharmaceuticals, and waiting for operations. I guess that means they must have a shorter life span and higher infant mortality rate? Do they. The answer dear neo con brainless sheep is NO. Do we have the best medical science here? Yep. Got cancer? Go to Sloan Kettering. No one's arguing that dumkupf. What we are saying is that why should a family lose their home, their health and possibly their lives on the basis of a non existent middle class working economic system. But no. It's you neo cons who support business as usual, the status quo of insurance company death panels, while telling your ignorant radio listening followers that it's libs and Obama who want to put granny to sleep. ]]>

<![CDATA[RE: Do the math Bozo... (TriBeCa) (Party of No...whine whine) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-17, 2:21PM EDT Reply to: see below -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Same old crying by the GOP. This was the cry of the GOP about Medicare in the early 1960s: "The legislation will lead to deteriorating service! ” Washington bureaucrats will invade the privacy of the examination room! We are on the road to rationed care and patients will lose the freedom to choose their own doctor! The costs will ruin our great country!" These same arguments were used even earlier, to attack President Franklin Roosevelt’s call for Social Security. It was denounced as a socialist program. GOP cried: "With Social Security, Americans would come to feel the lash of the dictator. It would end the progress of a great country! Never in the history of the world has any measure been brought here so insidiously designed as to prevent business recovery, to enslave workers.” Sounds a bit ridiculous, doesn’t it? Social Security passed, and the republic survived. Healthcare will pass. Problems with it will be addressed and corrected as it goes along. In time, Americans will just see another deduction on their paychecks, and have health coverage...as do all the other civilized western countries do. It will be done. Deal with it. ]]>

<![CDATA[They will need it after the beatings they will begin to recieve ha ha hahaha haha haha haha hah I love the earlier asshole who says about the bill passing "get used to it". I say hey suck my big cock you queer freak...you will get used to it ha ha ha ha. He also says they will just take it out of your paycheck. Oh how caring he is that they will just take it out of YOUR paycheck. Of cousse he does not care because I'm ssure he sits at home all day smoking watching MTV like all freeloading monkeys do. I womder if the genius ever wonders why the proud leftwing congress passes this crap at 3AM on a Saturday night. Don't worry good people because in the end this will fuck them big time. My guess is that this will be the cataylist that will eventually turn ugly and sad to say people will get hurt. That is always what happens when the people in power are just corrupt lying scumbags. We will see I guess. ]]>

<![CDATA[Irish Prime Minister Committed to United Nations Depopulation Agenda and Savors Ireland’s Dying Society * Wise Up Journal 05.09.2009 by Gabriel O’Hara The current Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen’s speech below comes from the United Nations website. The speech addresses the UN on Ireland’s commitment to funding depopulation around the world, especially in developing countries. Mr Cowen points out Ireland’s relevant situation of our dying population, thanks to government funded education/propaganda and organizations, when he boasts, “couples in Ireland are controlling their fertility” and “the Irish fertility rate has been below replacement level since 1991.” PERMANENT MISSION OF IRELAND TO THE UNITED NATIONS Source: <a href="http://www.un.org/popin/unpopcom/32ndsess/gass/state/ireland.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.un.org/popin/unpopcom/32ndsess/gass/state/ireland.pdf</a> ADDRESS BY MR BRIAN COWEN T.D. MINISTER FOR HEALTH AND CHILDREN IRELAND TO: The Special Session of the General Assembly for the Review and Appraisal of the Implementation of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development at United Nations Headquarters 30 June, 1999 “I would also like to pay tribute to Dr Sadik, who contributed so much to the Cairo Programme of Action and to the five-year review process. This Special Session is the conclusion of that process, a process that has focused attention on what we in the international community have achieved in population and development since Cairo. It also allows us, indeed forces us, to take stock of the challenges still remaining. At the outset I would like to share with you some of the pertinent changes which have taken place in Ireland in recent years. The major change relates to the sharp decline in the Irish birth rate which indicates that couples in Ireland are controlling their fertility to a much greater extent. The birth rate fell from 2 1.8 births per 1000 in 1980 to*1 3.5 in 1998. In 1995 the fertility rate was 1.84 which is below the population replacement level of 2.1. The Irish fertility rate has been below replacement level since 1991. Since Cairo in 1994, policy on family planning has been reviewed and new programmes developed and implemented. Persons in the lower socio- economic groups are entitled to family planning services free of charge from their family doctor. Non-Governmental organisations play an important role in the provision of reproductive health services and work closely with the statutory authorities in doing so. In relation to adolescent health a schools-based relationships and sexuality education programme has been developed. […] reducing the extent of abortion throughout the world. Improved health education, access to family planning services and contraception are essential in order to bring that about. Cairo was one of the great UN Conferences of the past decade. It set specific goals and targets for the entire international community[…] Ireland is strongly of the view that the role of the United Nations is indispensable in the achievement of the agreed international development goals and affirms its full commitment to the UN role in international development cooperation. Both bilateral donors and multilateral agencies - the UNFPA in particular - have ensured that improved health and family planning services are now available to many in the developing world. Formidable challenges remain however. While population growth rates have fallen, and fallen steeply in many countries there are very high fertility rates in many of the poorest countries. 15% of the Irish Aid budget within our priority countries in sub-Saharan Africa is spent on the health sector, including an important reproductive health component in many of our projects. The support of the entire international community is crucial to ensuring that the agreement reached at Cairo five years ago represents more than just good intentions. The commitments made at Cairo cannot be fulfilled without an adequate and assured level of funding for population activities. Ireland’s overseas development assistance has enjoyed several years of sustained growth and will continue to do so. The Irish Government is fully committed to the UN target to 0.7% of GNP for ODA. Our spending on health care, including reproductive health care, will continue to remain a high priority for the Irish Aid programme. Ireland’s strong support for the leading role of the UN Population Fund is underlined by our steadily increasing voluntary contributions to that organisation, as well as through our membership of the UNFPA’s Executive Board. In addition to our regular contribution to the work of the UNFPA last year, Ireland was pleased to make an additional voluntary contribution specifically earmarked for the Cairo review process. This is an acknowledgement of Ireland’s support for the international consensus on population issues. In conclusion I wish to confirm the Irish Government’s commitment to the ongoing implementation of the programme of action which will enable us to cope with the challenge which is confronting the global community in the approaching century.” To solve poverty, global warming and any other global problem the elite and the elite’s managers at the UN along with their lower followers have decided decades ago that humanity is the enemy and the solution to all our problems is less humans. ”A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” - United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment When these problems intensify, with a lot of help from the top, will the public also come to the same conclusion? Have the ordinary people already come to the conclusion that there are too many us? If they don’t there are numerous organisations that will “educate” them. “Mankind is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish and unethical animal on the earth.” - Michael Fox, vice-president of The Humane Society In the west family is not as important as it was before, sperm rates have dropped by 75% (never mentioned as a problem by the UN or what is causing it), cancer rates have exploded, and birth rates have dropped “below replacement levels”. In other parts of the world depopulation is taking place at an even faster rate due to legal systems that prohibit more than one child (potentially coming to the west thanks to Global Warming fear), AIDS and false food shortages, and the 21st century war death count of innocent people is in the millions with more wars looming. Good news to some. “This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” - Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/17/health-premiums-rise-obamas-plan/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/17/health-premiums-rise-obamas-plan/</a>]]>

<![CDATA[ Obama Depopulation Policy Exposed! Red Alert! << 1 2 3 4 >> Topic started on 27-6-2009 @ 11:32 AM by Blundo +20 more YouTube Link Ezkiel Emanuel is the brother of Rahm Israael Emanuel And Son of a Well Know Israeli Terrorist Panelists warn of the revival of eugenics under Obama’s modern healthcare through the denial of care to millions who would be judged ‘not fit to live’, just as in Nazi Germany. Historian Anton Chaitkin also alleges that Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Rahm Emanuel, in working with Obama, has also called for the Hippocratic oath to be ‘junked.’ <a href="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476906/pg1" rel="nofollow">http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476906/pg1</a> copyright & usage Click here for more New World Order topics Hot Topics | Top Topics | This Week | Subscribe | Home reply posted on 27-6-2009 @ 11:43 AM by awakentired Good find. Seems our US government is so tirelessly trying to follow in the footsteps of the Nazi regime that they must have a timeline overlay to get it just right. I prefer to die with a gun in my hands than be sheperded into oblivion by Evil humans. copyright & usage reply posted on 27-6-2009 @ 11:55 AM by ShadowLife Holy Crap this is crazy. We had to vote Adolf Obama. I wonder how strict the "fit to live" requirement will be. I dont have health care anyway. I dont sick so i usually dont have to worry about it. But old people? Thats not right, they paid for the health care with all the taxes. copyright & usage reply posted on 27-6-2009 @ 12:13 PM by unfndqlt Well its what people on here have been saying for a long time. The plan is finally starting to reveal itself. Its ironic that we can be called conspiracy nuts... anyone who follows news, understand what is going on in the world and does not find anything evil or sinister about how things are is just naive... Vive la revolution.... before its to late. ]]>

<![CDATA[Feds Create Fake Accounts on Social Network Sites to Collect Evidence, But Does Undercover Work Violate Terms of Service? <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/16/tech/main6303563.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/16/tech/main6303563.shtml</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[ What is with Obama’s administration? First a depopulation nutjob, now a confirmed Marxist! It was bad enough news when Barack Obama announced that his science czar was to be John Holdren, but now he has announced that Van Jones will be the clean energy czar! What else can he do to destroy the United States? We now have a fan of one-world government, depopulation, and legal rights for trees as science czar, and a self-admitted Marxist in charge of green energy! (Not to mention a Christian fundamentalist in charge of the National Institutes of Health! Although Francis Collins is a fine scientist, by most accounts, I question how a Christian fundamentalist can really support evolution, which is an essential aspect of any science-related job, and especially one that involves medicine and evolution at it’s core. Let’s hope he can keep his personal religious beliefs away from his duties at the NIH. But, I digress.) In 1977, John Holdren co-authored a book titled “Eccoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” along with Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. In this very long book, he strongly advocated for depopulation. The book could be summarized by the statement: “To provide a high quality of life for all, there must be fewer people.” To accomplish that, he advocated for forced sterilizations, limiting women to no more than one or two children, and forcing unmarried women to abort their children. The following is a direct quote from his book: Isn’t this just the man for the job of science czar??? And, he also famously predicted that the oceans would rise 13 feet by the end of the 21st century due to global warming, even though the highly dubious IPCC report only predicts a sea level rise of 13 inches by the end of the century. In the above mentioned book, Holdren also argued for zero GDP growth, along with zero population growth. It is by now abundantly clear that the GNP cannot grow forever. Why should it? Why should we not strive for zero economic growth (ZEG) as well as zero population growth?” What a brilliant idea, especially right after the Obama administration has foisted a $10 trillion budget deficit upon the children of America! When the youth of America fully realize the impact of that fact, and are told that we should not have economic growth that might at least help to pay for that staggering debt load, they might want to consider suicide, which will probably be handily supplied by your local government controlled doctor, if and when you can get an appointment. That will help to both lower population, and reduce GNP at the same time! I am beginning to see the logic. In 1973, Holdren stated, in relation to the population of the United States, “210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many”. The current population of the United States is a bit over 307 million. I guess he got that wrong. Holdren stated in another book that he co-authored with Paul and Anne Ehrlich in 1973, “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions”: A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States. De-devolopment means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation. Resources and energy must be diverted from frivolous and wasteful uses overdeveloped countries to filling the genuine needs of underdeveloped countries. This effort must be largely political, especially with regard to our overexploitation of world resources, but the campaign should be strongly supplemented by legal and boycott action against polluters and others whose activities damage the environment. The need for de-development presents our economists with a major challenge. They must design a stable, low-consumption economy in which there is a much more equitable distribution of wealth than the present one. Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential, if a decent life is to be provided for every human being. It can’t get much clearer than that. He favors depopulation and redistribution of wealth. He is another Marxist, just like Obama, and Obama’s new pick for green czar, Van Jones. Plus, what better way to depopulate the country than by socialized medicine, where the government gets to decide who gets what treatment, who is allowed to have children, and how many, etc. When you look at it, it all starts to fall into place. But, to make it even worse, Holdren also argued for giving up some national sovereignty, in favor of a world police force and government! As verified by the “Accuracy In Media” website ( <a href="http://www.aim.org/aim-report/obama-czar-favors-planetary-regime/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aim.org/aim-report/obama-czar-favors-planetary-regime/</a> ) pages 942-943 the book calls for a “Planetary Regime” that “should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born.”Page 942 does include a heading, “Toward a Planetary Regime,” and page 943 declares, “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea and other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions.” World Government? Holdren cannot wiggle out of responsibility for these statements because he does not specifically attribute them to anyone else in particular. Hence, the endorsement of a “planetary regime” can be correctly attributed to the authors of the book, including Holdren. What’s more, Holdren’s endorsement of the Law of the Sea Treaty is currently relevant because this is a treaty that Obama is now pushing for ratification by the U.S. Senate. The book declares on page 943: “Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP [United Nations Environmental Program] and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime-sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural re-sources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist.” This is not only dangerous but an accurate prediction of what is currently happening under Obama, who is pushing Senate ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty and hoping to produce another and much tougher global warming treaty at a United Nations conference in December in Copenhagen, Denmark. Global Enforcer Zombietime highlights that the Holdren book declares on page 917 that “If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force.” This statement is followed by the important caveat: “But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible.” In this case, the caveat is not convincing, in part because Holdren seems to have dedicated his career to exaggerating “the danger” and can be counted on to continue to do so in his White House position. It goes without saying that the major media should belatedly begin to probe Holdren’s views with a careful reading of the book Ecoscience. I’m sorry, but I consider this chilling, and not the kind of philosophy that I want in any government official, much less the “science czar.” But now, to add insult to injury, Obama appoints an admitted Marxist and Communist as his “green jobs czar”, officially “Special Advisor for Green Jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality”. As the East Bay Express reported about Van Jones: One week later, while Jones was observing the first large rally since the lifting of the city’s state of emergency, he got swept up in mass arrests. It was a turning point in his life. Jones had planned to move to Washington, DC, and had already landed a job and an apartment there. But in jail, he said, “I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of.’” Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. “I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.” In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.”]]>

<![CDATA[Depopulation by Government Edict February 12, 2010 — SadInAmerica In 1922, Margaret Sanger wrote The Pivot of Civilization with an introduction by eugenicist H. G. Wells. The Rockefeller Foundation “enthusiastically supported the concept of ‘eugenics,’ which encourages the reproductive efforts of those deemed to have ‘good’ genes, while discouraging or stopping procreation by undesirables. ~ Deanna Spingola But Rockefeller and others were anxious to go even further to mold America’s breeding patterns along evolutionary lines.” [1] John D. Rockefeller Jr., per the advice of Raymond B. Fosdick, provided financial backing for Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood movement. [2] Sanger, a feminist and birth control activist established the first family planning clinics in New York City. Several U.S. foundations financed eugenic research, including the Carnegie Institution, which funded Davenport’s eugenic studies at Cold Spring Harbor, and the Rockefeller Foundation, which gave grants in the 1930s for eugenic research at the Galton Laboratory at University College in London and to the Cornell Medical School in New York. [3]]]>

<![CDATA[Rising food prices may start with seeds Farmers say consolidation in the industry means they're forced to buy more costly seeds. But Monsanto, the world's largest seed firm, says competition 'is alive and flourishing.' March 11, 2010|By P.J. Huffstutter For 40 years, farmer Todd Leake and his family have battled bitter cold, hungry pests and a short growing season to coax soybeans out of their fields in eastern North Dakota. The one thing they never had to fight for, though, was their seeds. FOR THE RECORD: Seed prices: An article Friday in Section A about the federal government examining whether certain practices in agriculture were driving food prices higher said officials were seeking to determine whether there were antitrust practices that violated federal laws. The practices should have been described as anti-competitive or monopolistic. — A decade ago, salesmen from as many as 50 seed companies would compete for their dollars. Each would promise healthier plants, richer yields or a better discount. Today the Leakes have little choice: There are four seed companies in their area, and all sell seeds that include genetic traits patented and licensed by Monsanto Co., the world's largest seed firm. "There's basically nothing else available," said Leake, 48. "You have to use their seeds and pay their prices." The concerns of farmers such as Leake will take center stage in Ankeny, Iowa, on Friday as the Justice Department and U.S. Department of Agriculture kick off the first of a yearlong series of public meetings to examine whether antitrust practices in agriculture are driving food prices higher. The meetings are intended to allow producers, competitors and activists to air their concerns about the grain, poultry, dairy and livestock industries. The government is also trying to ferret out reasons for the sometimes vast gaps between what farmers are paid for producing food and the prices shoppers pay at the grocery store. Justice Department officials, who spoke on background because they said it was too early to comment about concerns raised at the meetings, said the workshops were a chance for the government to examine the changes the food sector had undergone in recent years. The push to hold such events, the officials said, was driven in part by President Obama's concerns over how consolidation has affected industry competition. Many experts believe that rising food prices start with seeds. In recent years, the companies that develop seeds for farmers to sow in their fields have consolidated. Complaints about unfair competitive practices by the few giant firms left have soared. As a result, critics say, the effects of more costly seeds have rippled out to the nation's dining tables.]]>

<![CDATA[The Gov is going to delay returning YOUR money. Why not cut spending by 500 million instead of keeping our money?]]>

<![CDATA[Join the PROTEST and change your profile pic to KILL THE BILL! We can DO THIS- Call, e-mail FAX the Democrats. Keep the PRESSURE ON! Invite ALL your friends! Post on all your group and fan pages! Capitol Switchboard: 877-762-8762 Write the Dems in under a minute: <a href="http://servethepeople.gop.com/" rel="nofollow">http://servethepeople.gop.com/</a> VERY handy link! Spread the word- join the voice of WE THE PEOPLE! ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://wcbstv.com/topstories/paterson.tax.refund.2.1569690.html" rel="nofollow">http://wcbstv.com/topstories/paterson.tax.refund.2.1569690.html</a> Stop spending!!!!!!!!!!]]>

<![CDATA[In an epic interview from the White House, a visibly shaken President Obama struggled for words, unable to keep up with an excellent series of questions Fox News anchor Bret Baier. Despite evasiveness and avoidance on the part of Mr. Obama, Bret Baier expertly dissected Obama, catching him in a tangled web of lies. ]]>

<![CDATA[A list of the actual primary stockholders of the Federal Reserve Bank: Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seaf of Italy Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York; Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany; Lehman Brothers of New York; Goldman, Sachs of New York; Rockefeller Brothers of New York. There are approximately three hundred more people, mostly relatives, that hold stock or shares. NOTE: This information was researched BEFORE present "Bailout" re-configuration.]]>

<![CDATA[ Obama wants THE final “50 + 1” vote this week on health care reform. And he wants citizens to "make their voice heard." Let Obama and Congress hear from EVERY American – whether they support healthcare reform or OPPOSE it!! What is stated in the bills presently in the Senate and House versions, is NOT what the vast majority of Americans want. The Senate and House bills were put together and ‘agreed upon’ by the Dems as a result of the many ‘kickbacks’ and ‘sweetheart deals’ which many of our elected officials might still receive by voting ‘Yea’. This health care reform bill is extremely flawed and yet Pelosi wants this bill passed in the House as it stands now, ‘but will make the revisions at a later date’! Does anyone in Congress know what they’re doing?? The American people are neither blind nor stupid. Also, take into consideration that the bill presently in the Senate will cut $800 BILLION from Medicare. With the government NOT increasing Social Security payments this year, how will YOU pay for your parents or elderly family member’s health needs under Medicare? Keep your health care choices, decisions and care in YOUR hands, not in the hands of a government-run ‘health committee’. This is URGENT!! Please call, fax or e-mail your Reps & Senators and tell them to vote “NO” on any government-run healthcare reform bill as now on the table: <a href="http://www.senate.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/</a> ; <a href="http://www.house.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.house.gov/</a> . This is the link which lists of all ‘swing-vote’ Dems who have not yet committed to voting ‘Yea’ on this bill: <a href="http://www.repealthebill.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.repealthebill.org/</a> Together we, as Americans, can and MUST make a difference!! Please forward this information to everyone you know. FYI - *Amendment 28 – Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States. *Again, it is illegal for our government to force ANY citizen to purchase any product, such as health insurance; or the government will impose fines/taxes if you choose not to carry any health insurance. *It is also against ANYONE'S moral, ethical or religious beliefs if you understand that abortion is MURDER, to be taxed so that abortions in America can be funded with YOUR tax dollars!! ]]>

<![CDATA[She has to be getting so much money from insurance companies for all the new people she is sending their way. ]]>

<![CDATA[In" BANKSTARDS!" I am hearing all these rumors and I think it is about time, that Al should just come out and tell the public about it! Is it such a big secret? Someone said, they had heard, someone else say, (now don't quote me on this) that someone, if they wanted to, (no pressure mind you), could find the 100% true inspirational facts and history for coming up with this drabble at... banksterstruth,blogspot.com , Also... theglowingamigo . All I know is it has something to do with the Illuminati ( Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan and the like) secretly and slowly, (like a stalking jaguar in the night) taking over Americans and Democracy with the new world order. But Al n Arnold, (hopefully keep your fingers crossed), team up to defend Americans and our Constitution from this threat before 95% of the people ever knew it existed! Just Google... theglowingamigo ]]>

<![CDATA[.]]>

<![CDATA[LIKE the ones that jump off the san fran bridge . the ones that get drunk or stoned and drive right into a wall. or the poor 96 yr old guys / gals in the old age homes . LIKE THE ONES WHO HAVE HAD CANCER FOR 16 YRS .OR LIKE THE AIDS PEOPLE or the drug overdoes people . . AND THE LIST goes on and on . OF PEOPLE WHO DIE BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE INSURANCE .or could it be their number is up . lol . take everyone who dies this yr and say it is because they had no insurance . lmfao. WE NEED TO PASS THIS HEALTH CARE CRAP BILL as the insurance companies need more money . = THIS MESSAGE APPROVED BY YOUR LOCAL INSURANCE COMPANY . ]]>

<![CDATA[.]]>

<![CDATA[It is good that obama gets the chance to go back home and visit the place where he was born . ]]>

<![CDATA[Meet the 'chubby boy with the curly hair': New photographs of Barack Obama's childhood in Indonesia emerge By Mail Foreign Service Last updated at 12:42 PM on 17th March 2010 * Comments (19) * Add to My Stories Grinning happily at the camera, this is Barry Soetoro, the cherubic little boy who went on to become America's first black president. The charming images taken at a child's birthday party in Jakarta 40 years ago were released as Indonesia prepares to welcome Barack Obama back to the country for the first time since he became president. The Asia-Pacific tour will also take in Australia and Guam and has been described as an 'extremely important trip' involving 'important partners', a White House spokesman said. Chubby: Barack Obama, then known as Barry Soetoro, centre, is pictured at a classmate's birthday party in Jakarta, Indonesia, in 1971 Chubby: Barack Obama, then known as Barry Soetoro, centre, is pictured at a classmate's birthday party in Jakarta, Indonesia, in 1971 Regional security is expected to be a major focus of the visit. Ahead of the visit, Mr Obama's former teacher Israella Pareira, described the neighbourhood's reaction to the youngster's arrival. She said: 'His mother was white, his father was Indonesian, and here was a black, chubby boy with curly hair. It was a big question mark for us.' But if the neighbours were initially curious, it didn't take long for them to accept Mr Obama, his American mother and Indonesian stepfather. They now speak with pride and affection about the child who stayed for just four years but who left a big impression, before going on to make an even bigger mark in history. The forthcoming visit will also highlight Mr Obama's multicultural upbringing, his early exposure to Islam and his lasting family connections to Indonesia, a mostly Muslim, Southeast Asian nation of some 230 million people. Mr Obama's childhood and family history would be an interesting start in life for anyone, but are all the more striking in an American president. The first black American head of state, he is also the first to spend a significant part of his childhood abroad since Theodore Roosevelt, who travelled widely in Europe and the Middle East with his family. 'He was exposed to American black culture, American white culture and Indonesian culture,' said Kay Ikranagara, who worked with Mr Obama's mother in Jakarta and knew the family well. 'He learned that people in all groups should be listened to.' Popular: The man who would become president of the USA was well-liked in his neighbourhood of Menteng Dalam Popular: The man who would become president of the USA was well-liked in his neighbourhood of Menteng Dalam No schedule has been released of his trip, which was delayed a few days so as not to clash with a crucial moment in the US health care debate. As a result, his wife and children, who were originally going to join him during their spring break, will not be accompanying him. Born to a black Kenyan father, Obama moved to Indonesia when he was seven after his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married her second husband, Lolo Soetoro, whom she met when they were studying at the University of Hawaii. His half-sister, Maya, was born in Indonesia, but after four years Dunham - her marriage slowly breaking up - sent him back to Hawaii, where he lived with his maternal grandparents and attended school. His mother had 'learned the chasm that separated the life chances of an American from those of an Indonesian. She knew which side of the divide she wanted her child to be on,' he wrote in his autobiography 'Dreams from My Father.' 'I was an American, she decided, and my true life lay elsewhere.' Dunham became fluent in the Indonesian language and her career as an anthropologist and development worker would often take her back to the country for long periods until her death in 1995. Last year, a book based on her dissertation on blacksmiths in Indonesian villages was published. Mr Obama and his mother first set up home in the Menteng Dalam neighbourhood. Now a jumble of houses and narrow streets in the shadow of tower blocks, at the time it was on the edge of the city and fruit trees were landmarks. Many families still live there, and they shared memories of the boy they knew as Barry. Slipping his way to school along muddy lanes, holding onto his mother's hand; trying salted fish from a neighbourhood shop and mistaking it for cheese; playing with the pet crocodiles that were kept in the back garden. Barack Obama First Lady Michelle Obama Just look at him now: Mr Obama delivers remarks on health insurance reform in Ohio earlier this week. First Lady Michelle Obama was pictured during her campaign to improve fitness and combat obesity in children in Washington, yesterday 'He went to everyone's house, played kites with local kids, got stuck in swamps,' said Coenraad Satja Koesoemah, who allowed Dunham to use his front room to teach English - for free - to locals. 'He was a Menteng Dalam kid, what more can I say?' The family's life in Indonesia came less than a year after one of the most traumatic and bloody periods in the country's history - the massacre of up to 500,000 alleged communists by forces loyal to the American-backed Gen. Suharto, who took over the country on the back of the purge. During the presidential campaign, Mr Obama's team had to fight back against false reports that he attended a hard-line Muslim boarding school while in Jakarta. His father was raised a Muslim, but abandoned his faith before he met Dunham. His stepfather was a secular Muslim who was rarely, if ever, seen in the neighbourhood prayer house, according to locals. Mr Obama's first school in Jakarta was a Catholic one a short walk from his home that had been built just two years earlier by a priest from the Netherlands, the country's former colonial rulers. For the first five months, Mr Obama struggled with the Indonesian language but soon became proficient. By all accounts, he quickly became a favourite of the teachers and the pupils there, but endured some teasing on account of his looks. Those early experiences have been cited as key moments that shaped his view on life. 'One of the reasons that he is so cool and non-combative is that he learned to deal with this teasing culture,' said Ikranagara. 'It is a game here, and the trick is not to show you are bothered.' Soetoro got a job working for an American oil company. Dunham found work teaching English at the American Embassy and shared company with a mixed Indonesian, expatriate academic and artsy crowd. 'After these years I can still see her clearly among the people at the party,' said John McGlynn, a long time Jakarta resident. 'More than anything she was a person who stuck out from the crowd.' After three years, the family moved to a better neighbourhood on the other side of railroad tracks that divide that part of Jakarta. There, they rented a colonial-era house in the garden of a large villa. When Mr Obama returns next week, he will find that this part of his past has remained much as he left it, right down to the 'Beware of the dog sign' on the fence, the bench where he used to do his homework and the art deco stained-glass windows on his old house. Read more: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1258543/Meet-chubby-boy-curly-hair-New-photographs-Barack-Obamas-childhood-Indonesia-emerge.html#ixzz0iTJ6nRzs" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1258543/Meet-chubby-boy-curly-hair-New-photographs-Barack-Obamas-childhood-Indonesia-emerge.html#ixzz0iTJ6nRzs</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[So......... You don't think our present health care system leaves hard working American citizens out of the loop, not because of poor work ethic or excessive credit card spending on luxuries, or bad financial planning? The conservative model is that, we're all free to buy anything we want. OK, so next time you're on a subway, or being served dinner, or someone packs your groceries, or washes your car or sweeps the hall of your building and you interact, it won't matter that this class of decent working Americans may soon be completely without health care. How will that work? The kid in school? I guess, just buy private education is your answer. As to the rest of us, where the number don't add up, it's tough luck. While it's true that no one is turned away from emergency rooms, (now), it's also true that without insurance or money to pay for it, you are likely to not receive any or adequate care and medicines. This isn't about the classic poor. It's about what was once a dynamic middle class. Clearly you're either too young to be affected by it, or too rich to care. Either way, you're outside. Good for you.]]>

<![CDATA[It's only B.O. talking more shit]]>

<![CDATA[Illuminati Banksters Implementing State of Permanent Siege! Many still doubt that this economic collapse is engineered by the Illuminati banksters. Richard Cook comments : THE LEVEL OF PUBLIC IGNORANCE on the topic of the U.S. and world monetary system is astonishing. This is part of the plan, of course, because the monetary elite control not only the financial system but also the news media, the publishing industry, and the educational system. The blueprint for control was put together over a century ago by Cecil Rhodes and his friends, including British financier Nathan Rothschild, as documented by Professor Carroll Quigley. During the 20th Century the power shifted to the U.S., with the Rockefellers playing the dominant role as they continue to do today. It is no accident that J.P. Morgan Chase—the Rockefeller family bank—dominates the U.S. derivatives market; nor that Exxon-Mobil, the Rockefellers’ oil company, is the most profitable corporation in history. The basic plan was to place all of mankind in a state of permanent mental and emotional siege so that in the end we would trade all our liberties to the controllers in return for protection; even freedom of thought would be traded for physical safety. That plan is well advanced. The sheeple have been prepared for the final shearing. Meanwhile, every attempt at real reform has been strangled in the cradle. Past voices for monetary sanity like those of Congressmen Louis McFadden and Jerry Voorhis were silenced. Starting in the 1970s, functionaries like Kissinger, Brzezinski, and Volcker carried out David Rockefeller’s plan to outsource manufacturing to China and eliminate the U.S. as the world’s greatest industrial democracy, replacing it with a financier oligarchy. Barack Obama obviously works mainly for the financiers, as did Bill Clinton before him. The job of the Democrats is to keep the sheeple quiet by now and then implementing some “reforms”; the Republicans were a more blatant gang of looters. During the 2008 election campaign, Ron Paul called for the end of the Federal Reserve, the bastion of financier control, but no one effectively organized the millions of people who responded to his call or had a viable plan to put in place. With the financial crash of 2008-2009, the noose is tightening everywhere in the world. The International Monetary Fund is announcing, “The current global recession is likely to be ‘unusually long and severe, and the recovery sluggish.’” (BBC News, “IMF Sees Long and Severe Slowdown,” April 16, 2009.) In reality, as the IMF knows, it would be possible to put every nation in the world on the road to recovery by allowing them to prime the economic pump through sovereign control of their own monetary systems, with freedom to utilize their own natural resources. The IMF announcement is in fact the start of a worldwide program of genocide similar to what was done to Russia in the 1990s, with crushing poverty, slashing of incomes, reduction of benefits for the poor and elderly, rising levels of disease and malnutrition, and reduction of life expectancy. We in the West will view the carnage with alarm from our own stripped-down economies but remain docile out of fear the same will be done to us. Awareness of the hideous evil of the financiers’ plans to destroy the soul of humanity is growing. This is being accomplished through the internet and the work of a number of writers who understand what is at stake. I doubt this channel of expression will be available indefinitely. Already alternative websites are being isolated and marginalized. But the fight must be waged. ….. Destruction of human consciousness is the real goal of the financiers and their minions. It is lies above all that do this. The financiers’ power is the biggest lie of all. end ]]>

<![CDATA[ Round Two - Who Owns This Country? By Jim Kirwan 3-17-10 "The US Census Bureau has awarded IBM (NYSE IBM) Global Business Services a contract to provide data tabulation and dissemination services in support of the 2010 United States Census and other key Census Bureau Surveys. The project was awarded to IBM on September 20th and the value of the contract is $89.5 million over 9 years. This is the same company that undertook the 1890 U.S. Census; the same company that was contracted by Germany's Third Reich to undertake census operations and similar advance people counting and registration technologies. IBM Germany not only head-counted the populace, but invented the racial census. They not only listed religious affiliation, but blood lines going back generations. This was the same company that was contracted to lease the whole-earth machine to the Nazis from 1933 to 1945. " (1) Many Americans have been surprised to learn that the 2010 Census is not being run by the federal government of the United States, but by a private corporation using a registered version of that company's Logo for the 2010 Census, as was outlined in yesterday's article "Owning the United States ®." (2) There is, it turns out, a somewhat awkward conflict between the mark they chose to register and the one they actually used. Here's what they registered: <a href="http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4008:beajte.4.608" rel="nofollow">http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4008:beajte.4.608</a> It appears that they chose NOT to use the image they "registered." The "wings" (Or feathers) shown in the link above do not appear on the official papers, which of course only compounds the problems inherent by choosing to 'register' this logo in the first place. Apparently they created something which they obviously did not expect would cause much of a reaction. Now that these problems have been pointed out graphically - and this registered mark is now "in national use," this is provoking more questions than they will likely choose to answer. The question herein is; 'might there be a violation of Federal law for misuse of a registered mark,' given that the United States would seem to indicate that the 2010 Census is being undertaken by the government of the United States: Not by some private corporate interests that has a very long and ugly history where collecting census data is concerned? What happened to the U. S. Census Bureau which is listed on the return address of the envelope in which the Census forms arrived - why weren't they used to print and distribute this 2010 Census? And how can this be explained given that this envelope is clearly marked "OFFICIAL BUSINESS Penalty for Private Use $300" The OFFICIAL envelope looks very official, and there is no other indication that the 2010 Census is being run by a privately contracted corporation except for the symbol "®", just to the top right side of the Logo? Everything else about this envelope reeks of a government document. Even the metered stamp refers to the U. S. CENSUS BUREAU, and not to IBM (NYSE IBM). The contract for this Census is large enough so that one might think that IBM could pay for the postage at least: but instead we get to do that on top of their $89.5 million contract. Why all the SECRECY, why all the conflicts that need not be conflicts: There would not be any conflict if there were no secret-contract with this private-corporation that has a very long reputation of collecting data on whole populations of people which somehow end up being very dead by the end of the contract. And the key to all of this confusion seems to have started with that tiny little symbol "®" that apparently is becoming very difficult to explain, in plain English! Here's part of a Q & A that happened yesterday: Apparently I was wrong in thinking that the mark covered only the words United States; it was intended to cover the entire Logo as "the mark legally covers the whole phrase "United States 2010 Census"." Question: 'The question remains, what authority does the United States Census Bureau have to obtain trademarks? The post office has been doing the Census for years, or so many believed; but it was recently "privatized". I'm sure their attorney Green would say that they do not want con men taking and using that phrase to defraud folks and they believed a trademark would give them more legal standing to go after any cons.' Kirwan: "An interesting thought, but then why bother with that, being that the Census is no longer adhering to their original mandate which was to simply 'count' the people of this country once every ten years. In fact they now "count people" every year, and in some interviews they ask a great deal more of those being interviewed than just the literal number of people in the household. My point is there would be no 'reason' for anyone to attempt to hijack the "CENSUS" if the Census takers were not actually seeking and collecting, a whole lot more information that is not legally open to any census taker, by law." Question: "Are you aware how far this 2010 census strays from Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution which allows enumeration (counting) only. Are you aware that the fine for non-compliance with the Census was secretly and recently raised from $100 to $5,000?" Kirwan: "Yes, I am also aware that no such figures for failure to comply were included in the "by mail" version that was sent to me. In brief is this because there is a corporate use for the information that is not on the simple people-counting forms: Information such as income, medical histories, and virtual all areas of everyday life that might present problems for those people who choose to share that information with the government. The pamphlet does mention that it will keep whatever is gathered confidential - yet no mention is made of what will happen if that information is sold or leaked to another user, whether that's a government agency or a private entity?" Question: Is the government attempting to set up folks who resist for prosecution, fines and taking away more rights. It seems like a covert set up to me. Kirwan: "That would probably be a fairly credible assertion - so that they could then make examples of those individuals - as there might also be a prison term associated with the FAILURE TO COMPLY order?" These were just some of the little things that this odd-ball Census-form seems to be raising. Lots of people have sent abbreviated versions and links trying to explain this whole thing as a misunderstanding on my part-a stretch too far some believe. But: 'It is the job of this government to explain this doublespeak, in plain English, if they want to have a nation that is not seen as a total fabrication or as a place that is being held hostage to private and to very corporate interests - that is NOT MY JOB - it is the job of this thoroughly corrupted government to answer the public's questions and to satisfy their questions with clear and candid responses. There is certainly enough information available to enlighten anyone that wants to believe that their government is "not guilty" of any crime herein. I say let us treat them as they have been treating us now for the last ten years: Let the government prove that they have not broken any laws, otherwise whoever is at fault needs to face the most severe penalties: just as ordinary citizens must face, whenever they find themselves in one of our now totally-biased courtrooms around this nation. Many people believe the double-talk and the mountains of legalese that half-assed lawyers try to cite to cover up this mess; but I'm staying with the basics - which until these questions become clearly a settled matter of law; then they must be answered publicly and on the record by whatever creatures now claim to speak for the US government. I've been at this for over half-a-century and this has never been anything like a clear-cut affair to anyone outside the corridors of power! Cite all the obscurities you like - the fact is that when theCensus bureau issued this logo with that registration mark upon it they opened this steam of questions that could well threaten all their other lies - unless this matter is clearly positioned in an immediate and completely clear place in both our history and settled law. The original question is still out there "Who owns us now?" The US government is supposedly owned by the people of this country. So when the government undertook to do this that way, in effect, it was as if we (the American people) were doing something for ourselves. However when a corporation is allowed to seize and use an agency of the public as if it were still the public's own agency; when in fact the project has become a private-for-profit contract with an agenda of its own: That is an entirely different thing from what the public has been led to believe is the case, at least when it comes down to actually 'taking' the 2010 Census! Every single household in this country is about to get one of these things, if they haven't received one already: Study the contents and make up your mind as to whether or not you believe the lawyers and the corrupted government that has been lying to you all your lives: Or whether you think that this 'secret' contract for taking the 2010 Census is really just a front for something potentially much worse. There is an IBM microchip that will be placed in people, it will give you a human IP address and it will plug you into the grid. It's sometimes been called the DEADSCAN and it's been out there for over 10 years now yet people are just waking up to it, I wonder how much that might have to do with this hush-hush contract for counting people-if anything? kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net 1) One Mainframe to Rule Them All - video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVWNlvI-eB4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVWNlvI-eB4</a> 2) Owning the United States ® <a href="http://www.kirwanesque.com/politics/articles/2010/art38.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kirwanesque.com/politics/articles/2010/art38.htm</a>]]>

<![CDATA[J.F.K. Loved this country and what our Constitution represented. He Loved our country so much he was willing to take a risk. The risk of warning us about a threat to our freedoms. A threat to what our founding forefathers sought to protect us from by forming the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. You really have to give credit to those willing to risk it all to help the common good of Man. God Bless those of such spirit! Could you imagine Obama declaring London's control of The Federal Reserve unconstitutional!? Imagine Obama declaring that America was going to print our own money? When you understand the powers that help to put him to where he is today, when you see the team of insiders he has surrounded himself with, you can all to soon realize he groomed bought and paid for by the banksters. Obama is in their pockets. He is the bone to throw the angry masses after they had stolen two elections in a row by one of the worst crime families in the history of this country. A bone to throw the masses as our economy is brought to ruin. Do you know JFK put Executive order 11110 into effect and was killed because he was anti fed. Did you know Garfield denounced the Fed and was killed. Lincoln started his own currency the green backs and was killed. No proof just seems odd. Why is executive order 11110 still on the books yet no President will use it. Maybe they are afraid. Banksters... The Economic and Political Truths of Our Time can be found at theglowingamigo , www.jesus-is-savior.com/.../federal_reserve_is_evil.htm and banksterstruth.blogspot.com. The latest plausible guestamation of the amount generated thus far, Rockefeller's 11 Trillion, Rothschild's 100 Trillion. Please understand that we are much easier for them to conquer while we are divided. It is time for all Americans and the common people though out the world to shine the light on the dark secret societies. ]]>

<![CDATA[ godfathers Rothschild godfathers of the earth Today, public money is in the private hands of the illuminati ruling families who own all of the world's leading banks including the privatized central banks. How did they do it? It started with the very first banks. In the beginning, banks were a safe place for people to store their gold. When the bankers discovered that people left most of their gold in the bank for safe keeping, they started lending out the gold that didn't belong to them and charging interest on it. Soon, Kings and royalty were borrowing gold from the bankers to finance their wars. Since wars were extremely good for business, the bankers started stirring up conflicts that led to more wars...then they lent out money to both sides of the wars and collected interest at loan shark rates. Out of every $1000 that each of their customer's deposited in their banks, the bankers kept only $100 on hand. They took the rest of their customer's money and made loans with it, invested it and started up other businesses – like the steel business to create rails for their railroad companies to transport oil for their oil companies. Pretty soon, their businesses grew into giant corporations. Those giant corporations turned the world's oceans, lakes, rivers, air and soil into corporate toilets. Eventually, the banksters got so rich that they built banks all over the world. They made millions in interest just by loaning out other people's money that didn’t belong to them. They bought mansions and fancy clothes and hosted extravagant parties. The royal families of Europe were the banksters biggest customers and granted them high society titles like ‘baron’ and ‘lord’ and ‘sir’. The banksters used their money and royal influence to sponsor corrupt politicians into power so that they could change the laws of nations. By changing laws, they were able to put the world's central banks, mints and the money supply into private hands - their private hands. When profits from all of their oil, mining and drug companies soared, the banksters became the world's richest men...but their greed had no limits. They wanted to own the entire world…so they put their heads together and came up with an ingenious scheme to take control of all of the world's money and riches. They figured out that whoever owns all of the world's money - owns the world! The banksters eventually became the owners of the world’s biggest publishing, TV, radio, music, movie, telecommunications and advertising companies. Using their media monopolies, they launched a huge advertising campaign. “Why save up your money and wait to get all the things you want in life? You can have everything you ever dreamed of having right now! All you need is a shiny plastic card.” People rushed to fill up their wallets with shiny plastic cards instead of money. Like lottery winners, they went on drunken buying sprees and bought everything in sight – all the things they couldn't afford. Nobody even noticed when their hard earned pay cheques were automatically deposited in the bank without even being cashed. Paying by cheque soon became unfashionable. “Why bother paying by cheque when your bills, fines, taxes and purchases can be automatically deleted from your account?” Eventually, money was phased out all together and replaced with “units of credit” which amounted to nothing more than numbers on a computer screen. The banksters next scheme was to phase out plastic and phase in their newest inventions - bar code tattoos and microchips. “Why use a plastic card when you can get a bar code invisibly tattooed onto your wrist or a tiny microchip implanted under your skin with all of your credit information? It’s like having an invisible debit card. Nobody can steal it from you!” Everybody rushed to get one. All people had to do to buy whatever they wanted in life is scan their wrist tattoo or microchip over a scanner. No more line-ups! When people sobered up from their drunken spending sprees, they realized too late that their power to buy the most basic necessities in life had fallen completely into the hands of the banksters. Suddenly they couldn't buy gas, food, medicine, clothes or even a cup of coffee without scanning their wrist tattoo. They had traded in their hard earned cash for nothing more than a bunch of digits on a computer screen. Their real money had became virtually ‘unreal’. Not only did the banksters own all of the world's ‘real’ money supply, they now had the power to delete a person's lifetime of savings. But why would these friendly banksters commit such an evil deed? To force people's cooperation under their New World Order. This futuristic scenario is not as futuristic as it sounds. Invisible wrist tattoos containing all of a person's credit information have already been developed for monetary and credit transactions. A patent was issued in March, 1999 titled, "Method For Verifying Human Identity During Electronic Sale Transactions," patent number US5878155. Motorola’s new "microchip" will replace all of the cards in your wallet. Without your chip implant, you will not be able to withdraw money from a bank, receive benefits from the government, buy or sell food or take care of yourself and your family. The chip will include data on your family history, address, occupation, medical, military, criminal and psychiatric record, credit history, income tax information, etc. In 1997, the “Digital Angel” microchip was implanted into humans in the U.S. and could send and receive signals using the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS). Applied Digital Solutions which produced the controversial "Digital Angel" tracking device as well as the "Verichip" has developed the technology using satellites to track people. FILTHY RICH Read more…. Just how rich and powerful are the bankster families? Historically, the Rothschild banksters hid their wealth in underground vaults. Their secret accounting books were never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled over the centuries but researchers estimate their wealth at close to five hundred trillion dollars - more than half the wealth of the entire world. Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, racehorses and exotic resorts, the Rothschilds bought Reuters in the 1800's which bought the Associated Press which selects and delivers the same news stories to the entire world day after day. They have controlling interest in three major television networks and easily avoid publicity since they own them. Until recently, they owned and operated England's royal mint and continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England which they also direct. They control the LBMA, London Bullion Marketing Association, where 30 to 42 million ounces of gold worth over 11 billion dollars are traded daily. The Rothschilds earn millions daily just on transaction fees alone. They also fix the world price of gold on a daily basis and profit from its ups and downs. Over the centuries, the Rothschilds have amassed trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world's gold supply. They own controlling interest in the world’s largest oil company, Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility and the Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts and holding companies Although Evelyn “goldfinger” Rothschild looks like a harmless, grey haired old man, make no mistake about it, Rothschild and his family bloodline have hand picked Presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of millions. The wealth hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe and shelter every human being on earth. How did Lord Evelyn Rothschild become the filthy rich grand vizier to Queen Elizabeth II and godfather of the black nobility? By birth. Evelyn Rothschild is the great, great, great grandson of Mayer Rothschild and has recently passed the godfathership down to David de Rothschild. DIRTY SECRETS Read more… The story of the Rothschild banksters began in 18th century Frankfurt Germany on a cobblestone street called Frankfurt-on-the-Main. Mayer Amschel Bauer was a goldsmith and a loan shark. He hung a red hexagon shield over his doorway and changed his name from Bauer to Rothschild which means “red shield” in German. The red hexagram shield is the symbol for the world revolutionary movement. Family biographers deceptively describe Mayer Rothschild as a poor man who lived with his family above a goldsmith shop and sold rare coins to royal customers. Mayer stashed a big supply of gold, precious coins and jewels in special hiding places inside his Frankfurt house and shop. One special hiding place was beneath the back courtyard where he accessed his strongbox through an underground passageway. Mayer taught his five sons the tricks of the trade. In 1773, Mayer Rothschild invited 12 revolutionary minded men to his goldsmith shop. Together they formulated an ambitious plan to seize control of the world’s wealth. They made a pact to secretly pool their money and influence in order to bankrupt the nations of the world and create a new world order. Mayer teamed up with royal Prince William (Wilhelm IX) who became ruler of Germany’s Hesse-Cassell district. William had a reputation as a cold blooded loan shark who trained and rented out his Hessian soldiers as mercenary troops. It was a profitable blood-for-money business that made Prince William one of Europe’s richest men. Working as Prince William’s agent, Mayer Rothschild, collected fees for each dead Hessian soldier killed on the battlefield. Collecting blood money from renter nations required arm twisting persuasion, so Mayer hired his sons as debt collectors. Since wars were good for the rent-a-troop business, Prince William used his royal connections in Denmark and England to provoke new wars. Mayer Rothschild and Prince William struck it rich on a grand scale when King George III of England rented their mercenary Hessian troops to sail to American shores and fight the American colonists. The forked tongue colonists had already shot down millions of North American Indians whose spears and arrows were helpless against their deadly gunfire.The colonists found themselves battling the British and Hessian troops with deadly canon fire and hand to hand combat. When the battle ended and the peace Treaty of 1783 was signed, the colonists believed they had won their independence from Britain. What they had really won was a permanent and crippling debt to the King of England and to all of his successors. The big winner was Mayer Rothschild who collected rivers of blood money for the heads of each and every Hessian soldier killed on American soil. Meanwhile, back in Europe, Napoleon with his mighty French army became master of Europe. When Napoleon and his troops stormed into Frankfurt Germany, Prince William feared for his life and his vast fortune. He left 3 million dollars in the hands of Mayer Rothschild (reportedly to pay the Hessian soldiers), then he escaped to Denmark to stay with his royal relatives. Instead of paying the Hessian soldiers with the 3 million dollars that William had left, Mayer Rothschild bet the bundle on a stock market tip from his revolutionary network. . With his fortune in blood money, Mayer Rothschild set up five family banks, each to be run by his five sons in London, Paris, Naples, Frankfurt and Vienna. On September 19th, 1812, Mayer Rothschild died at the age of 68. He left instructions that the amount of the inheritance must never be made public, that secrecy and ruthlessness must be used in all business practices and that family members must marry their own blood relatives to keep the family fortune all in the family. All five brothers dedicated themselves to their father’s world revolutionary dream. That dream was to control the entire world under one world government by disarming the nations of the world. The Rothschilds knew the dream could not be accomplished in a single lifetime. It would take generation after generation of family dedication. Mayer Rothschild’s most successful sons were Nathan Rothschild who ran the London bank and James Rothschild who ran the Paris bank. Together, they changed the face of history and became known throughout Europe as the “demon brothers”. Their father had given them a detailed New World Order plan for global control. Adam Weishaupt wrote and completed the plan on May 1st, 1776 with Rothschild financing. Adam Weishaupt’s plan was a futuristic plan that would put New World Order members over the next centuries into political power positions. It was a plan to divide and conquer the nations of the world by provoking wars, then profiting from war loans and from the sale of weapons to both sides. Exhausted by war, terror and chaos, humanity would eventually bow down to one world army (NATO) as a solution. It was a plan to control public opinion by purchasing shares in TV networks, newspapers, publishing houses and film studios. Sports, games and alcohol would be used to distract the masses so that laws are changed. Banks would be monopolized and people and nations would be made into obedient debt slaves. THE DEMON BROTHERS Read more… With Rothschild financing, Adam Weishaupt formed a secret world revolutionary group called the ‘illuminati”. He recruited thousands of influential members by convincing them that only men of superior ability have the right to rule over the ignorant masses. French police exposed the plan when they found documents on an illuminati courier who was struck by lightening while traveling from Germany to France. Exposure of the illuminati forced them underground. They took refuge in the lodges of a secret brotherhood called the “freemasons” who practiced death and rebirth rituals and whose history dates back to the Knight's Templar (Knight's of the Temple Of King Solomon) and to the construction of King Solomon’s temple. Nathan and James Rothschild came up with a diabolical scheme that would put the illuminati plan for world control into action. It would also make them filthy rich. The brothers helped finance both sides of the infamous Battle of Waterloo between Napoleon’s French army and the Duke of Wellington’s British army. Napoleon was brought to his knees by the Britosh in a blood soaked battle that wiped out the French army. Nathan Rothschild ’s private courier informed him of the British victory over the French. Instead of reporting the British victory, Nathan Rothschild and his consorts spread lies that the British had lost the Battle of Waterloo against the French. Why? Because he knew that “the lie” would cause a British stock market crash. The news pushed panicked English investors to sell off their life savings and that’s when Nathan Rothschild moved in for the kill. He bought up their market shares for just pennies on the dollar. When the official news was announced that the British had won, not lost, the Battle of Waterloo against Napoleon, the British stock market skyrocketed - and so did the Rothschild family wealth. In one foul swoop, the demon brothers had double crossed the English masses and taken control of the Bank of England. Flaunting their stupendous wealth, the brothers went on a lavish spending spree. They bought mansions, fashionable clothes and hosted extravagant parties. By 1818, they picked the pockets pf French investors in another scam that crashed the French government bond market and wiped out investors. According to plan, the brothers formed the first international bank and named it N.M. Rothschild & Sons. The Pope became their most famous customer. The catholic church which had financed the wholesale slaughter, torture and looting of hundreds of thousands of Muslims during the Christian Crusades, were now doing business with the demon brothers. By 1823, the Rothschilds were guardians of the entire Papal treasures and took over financial operations of the Catholic Church. Enraged citizens accused the Rothschilds of conspiring to control the world’s money markets. Fearing for their lives, the Rothschilds retreated into the shadows and cast their eyes on the youthful United States of America. To avoid publicity, they made themselves invisible by creating and hiding behind two front companies: J.P Morgan and Kuhn and Lobe. More and more power was becoming concentrated into fewer and fewer hands. By 1906, J.P. Morgan’s bank controlled one third of America’s railways and almost 70% of the steel industry. He eventually had a stake in the major companies of the 20th century. Among them, AT&T, ITT, General Electric, General Motors and Dupont. The success of Morgan’s industrials was quickly reflected in the Dow Jones industrial average. At one point, Morgan made the off handed comment, “America is good enough for me”. The newspaper of William Jennings Bryan retorted, “whenever you’re tired of it, you can give it back. That was the image of Rothschild agent J.P. Morgan - the owner of the United States. OPIUM DRUG DEALS Read more… The United States flag was designed after the British East India company flag with 13 red and white stripes. Both flags copy the red and white striped sails of the Viking ships which were the color standard for the Hebrew tribe of Dan. The Rothschilds bought controlling interest in the British East India Shipping company and the illegal opium trade with China. They offered junior partnerships to New England’s leading American families. The Russell, Coolidge, Delano, Forbes and Perkins families became fabulously rich smuggling opium aboard their speedy clipper ships into China. In 1820, Samuel Russell bought out the Perkins syndicate and ran the opium smuggling operation with his partner, Warren Delano Jr., who was the grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Franklin D. Roosevelt). Finally Britain found a commodity that China would take. Opium imported from India. Just a few chests of opium were delivered at first and then thousands. When the Chinese authorities tried to stop the opium trade, the British sent in their gun boats. After nearly twenty years of turmoil, the Treaty of Tientsin was signed in 1858 which not only allowed opium to be imported but handed over China’s ports and all of China’s international trade to western control. After the war, opium poured into China on an even greater scale and her Emperors were powerless to stop it. The British stole Hong Kong from China in 1842 with an opium drug deal called the Treaty of Nanking. The Russell family who controlled the U.S. arm of the Rothschild drug smuggling operations, set up the Skull and Bones fraternity at Yale University. America’s drug money families formed the fraternity’s inner power circle. Taft, Russell, Schiff, Harriman, Bush, Warburg, Guggenheim, Rockefeller, Stimson, Wayhauser, Vanderbilt, Goodyear and Pillsbury were all members. These families intermarried over the generations to form America’s big money aristocracy. MAFIA, SKULL AND BONES AND FREEMASONRY Read more... Skull and Bones member, Alphonso Taft, catapulted his son, William Taft right into the top job at the white house. President Taft’s 17th amendment to the United States constitution guaranteed the right of big money insiders to hand pick senators and buy control of the United States senate. Today, the most influential members of the CIA, the U.S. government and big finance are Skull and Bonesmen. The Skull and Bones brotherhood is rooted in cabalism and in European freemasonry which practices similar death and re-birth rituals. Freemasons are blindfolded, symbolically slain with a noose around their neck and lowered into an open grave. Once raised from the grave, they must look towards a light called “the morning star”. The Latin translation for morning star is “Lucifer”. The phoenix bird and double headed eagle are important symbols in freemasonry. In Egyptian mythology, the phoenix bird is a god who rose to heaven in the form of a star like Lucifer after his fire immolation of death and re-birth. Death and re-birth themes and satanic witchcraft are marketed to youth in movies like Harry Potter and Lord of The Rings. The Hollywood movie lots are owned by the illuminati Lehman Brothers, Rothschild agent, Kuhn & Loeb, and Goldman Sachs. Freemasonry has a pyramid structure. The highest level is a 33rd degree mason. It is no coincidence that Solomon’s Temple in Israel was built at the 33rd parallel. Most Masons remain at the 3rd degree and provide a cover through their community charitable activities. The illuminati at the top of the pyramid is the all-seeing-eye. At the voluminous bottom are the unthinking, hard working, law abiding, tax paying, god fearing debt slaves who they call the “goyim’ or sheep. Giuseppe Mazzini (1805-1872) was a 33rd degree mason who replaced Adam Weishaupt as head of the Illuminati in 1834. Mazzini was a member of the Italian Carbonari and created the Mafia, the blood rituals and the secret oath. He gave the dreaded Cosa Nostra the name “Mafia”. MAFIA is an acronym spelling the names of the original mafiosa godfathers. “M” for Mazzini. “A” for Autorizza. “F” for Furti. “I” for Incendi. “A” for Avelenameti. The Mafia arrived on American shores in the 1890’s with Illuminati financing to establish underground networks and the black market system. Hollywood movies and the media routinely criticize the Italian Mafia, yet they are not accused of being “anti-Italian”...but anyone who dares to criticize the Jewish Mafia is labelled anti-Semitic or a neo-Nazi. The Anti-Defamation League was formed as a front organization for Israel’s Mossad (Israel’s CIA) and became active in the United States and elsewhere. The job of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was (and still is) to condemn anyone who gets too close to the truth by labeling Jewish mobsters "anti-Semitic".. One of the ADL’s favorite targets was New York City Police Commissioner, Theodore A. Bingham. In September of 1908, Bingham tried to crack down on New York’s Jewish mobsters. He wrote an article for the prestigious "North American Review", titled "Foreign Criminals in New York. ". The article detailed the rise of gambling, prostitution, and drugs on New York’s Lower East Side and emphasized the role of Jewish and Italian immigrant gangsters in that crime explosion. Two of the most notorious gangsters were Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky (Maier Suchowljansky) and Italian mobster, Charles "Lucky" Luciano. To deal with the public exposure of gangsters with Jewish surnames, The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was founded. Its goal was not to protect the Jewish people against racism but to protect the Jewish criminal element. The ADL, which is part of B'nai B'rith, is based at United Nations Plaza in New York. After the ADL successfully ousted New York City Police Commissioner, Theodore A. Bingham, the bankster sponsored network of organized crime spread across the USA like wildfire. Mazzini appointed America’s Albert Pike as sovereign Pontiff of universal freemasonry and the coordinator of the Illuminati’s U.S. activities. Pike was a Tennessee Ku Klux Klan judicial officer. A known Satanist, Pike indulged in phallic worship and the occult. He wore a satanic Baphomet symbol around his neck and used his bracelet to summon Lucifer. Pike used the KKK to keep blacks out of the Masonic lodges. In August, 1924, Imperial wizard, Hiram Wesley Evans organized a parade of 40,000 KKK members down Washington’s Pennsylvania Avenue to the Washington monument. This event proved that the Klan had achieved power not just in the south and the Midwest but on a national level. In a letter to Mazzini dated August 15th, 1871, Pike graphically outlined a blueprint for three planned world wars. World war I would weaken, topple and destroy the powerful Czarist government in Russia. World war II would pit Great Britain against Germany, destroy naziism and create the Zionist state of Israel. World War III would be ignited by fueling aggression between the Zionists of Israel and the Arab world who would eventually destroy one another. Social, political and economic chaos would then force the masses to accept one world army and one world government ruled by the Illuminati. In Pike’s famous Masonic guide book called “Morals and Dogma”, he writes; “Lucifer, light bearer. Strange and mysterious name to give to the spirit of darkness. Lucifer, the son of the morning. Is it he who bears the light? Doubt it not”. Albert Pike was a Confederate General. The Rothschild’s sent British agents to conspire with Pike and with U.S. politicians to provoke the rebellion that started the American Civil war. Following the civil war, Albert Pike was charged and convicted of treason and sent to prison but President Andrew Johnson, a 33rd degree Mason, pardoned him. One of Johnson’s first acts as President was to veto the Civil Rights Act for blacks who had been shipped in chains to their wealthy American slave owners. Stealing slaves was a criminal offense but torturing and beating them was not. A statue of Albert Pike, a convicted traitor, Satanist, 33rd degree mason and Ku Klux Klan racist stands today in the heart of Washington, D.C. An honorary statue of Guiseppe Mazzini, the Illuminati MAFIA boss who put the letter “M” for Mazzini into the name MAFIA stands today in New York’s central park. Close by is another statue donated by the French Grand Orient Temple Masons to the Masons of America celebrating the first Masonic Republic called the United States of America. Fourteen U.S. Presdents including George Washington are known to be 33rd degree Masons. ARE THE RULING FAMILIES EVIL? Read more… The illuminati ruling families have their own unique set of core beliefs. They believe they are the chosen ones, the privileged, the intellectually and culturally illuminated, the genetically and racially superior bloodlines. They believe they are the direct descendants of "the gods" and are therefore divinely entitled to inherit and rule the physical realm and possess all of its wealth. Over the millennia, they have passed their wealth and influence down from one family generation to the next. These zionist extremist families are monopolists. In the physical world of duality, they have monopolized the power of evil and they believe they have a monopoly over the power of good as well. They view themselves as noble martyrs sacrificing their time to accomplish the dream of their ancestors who were members of the Hebrew tribe of Dan. That dream is to build a temple and a throne for their King in Jerusalem - a throne that will never fall to invaders. Historically, the temple of King Solomon in Jerusalem was destroyed by King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon (Iraq) in 586BC. The temple was rebuilt but in 70BC, it was once again destroyed and the city of Jerusalem was burned to the ground by the Romans. The tribe of Dan ancestors of today's ruling crime families were forced to disperse from Israel and migrated to different parts of the world. They reunited and settled in the United Kingdom ( the united kingdom of the reunited tribes of Israel). Their flag, the Union Jack (Jacob), symbolizes the union of the tribes of Jacob (Jack) who was the patriarch of the twelve Hebrew tribes of Israel. The sworn mission of today's ruling zionist families is to rebuild the temple of King Solomon in Jerusalem where their King will rule the world from his eternal throne as god of the earthly Kingdom (New World Order) and the physical realm. This third and final temple of King Solomon has already been designed. Construction of the temple awaits the fulfillment of the New World Order agenda which will guarantee the survival of the temple and of the chosen King who will be protected by a one world army. On October 7th, 1998, the Temple Mount and the Land of Israel Faithful Movement brought the cornerstone for the third temple of King Solomon to the gates of the Temple Mount and the City of David. When the Arabs who still control the Temple Mount (but do not have sovereignty over the Temple Mount) threatened to riot, the Israeli authorities closed the gates of the Temple Mount before the cornerstone could be laid. The Temple cornerstone was hauled close to the gates and ritually carried around the walls of the Temple Mount and the Old City seven times. ]]>

<![CDATA[HEY FUCK FACE!!! Most of the American people do not want this shit period!!! AND BY THE WAY SOCIAL SECURITY IS BROKE!!!! What do you mean like other civilized western countries do? IF YOU WANT IT THAT BAD MOVE TO ONE OF THEM!!!! RE: Same old crying by the GOP. This was the cry of the GOP about Medicare in the early 1960s: "The legislation will lead to deteriorating service! ” Washington bureaucrats will invade the privacy of the examination room! We are on the road to rationed care and patients will lose the freedom to choose their own doctor! The costs will ruin our great country!" These same arguments were used even earlier, to attack President Franklin Roosevelt’s call for Social Security. It was denounced as a socialist program. GOP cried: "With Social Security, Americans would come to feel the lash of the dictator. It would end the progress of a great country! Never in the history of the world has any measure been brought here so insidiously designed as to prevent business recovery, to enslave workers.” Sounds a bit ridiculous, doesn’t it? Social Security passed, and the republic survived. Healthcare will pass. Problems with it will be addressed and corrected as it goes along. In time, Americans will just see another deduction on their paychecks, and have health coverage...as do all the other civilized western countries do. It will be done. Deal with it. ]]>

<![CDATA[ First Contact The Star People <a href="http://realufos.net/2010/02/ufo-punches-hole-in-sky.html" rel="nofollow">http://realufos.net/2010/02/ufo-punches-hole-in-sky.html</a> Wormhole Under The Moon <a href="http://allnewsweb.com/page1199999325.php" rel="nofollow">http://allnewsweb.com/page1199999325.php</a> " Golden Spiral " <a href="http://crystalinks.com/ufohistory.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/ufohistory.html</a> StarMan <a href="http://ianeye.com" rel="nofollow">http://ianeye.com</a> Alien Arrival : The Star People Have Landed.Our New Day Has Come" U.S. Architect Mason : The Star Council North West USA <a href="http://simulation-argument.com" rel="nofollow">http://simulation-argument.com</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainforest" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainforest</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/holographic.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/holographic.html</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/cropcircles2009.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/cropcircles2009.html</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/quetzalcoatl.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/quetzalcoatl.html</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/fractals.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/fractals.html</a> <a href="http://ufodigest.com/news/1206/alienbigcats.html" rel="nofollow">http://ufodigest.com/news/1206/alienbigcats.html</a> <a href="http://wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/norway-spiral-in-the-sky/" rel="nofollow">http://wired.com/wiredscience/2009/12/norway-spiral-in-the-sky/</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/rof.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/rof.html</a> <a href="http://alien-ufo-pictures.com/" rel="nofollow">http://alien-ufo-pictures.com/</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/36around1.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/36around1.html</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_geometry" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_geometry</a> <a href="http://jerrypippin.com/crop_circles.htm" rel="nofollow">http://jerrypippin.com/crop_circles.htm</a> Code of Life <a href="http://absolutearts.com/portfolios/i/ianeye" rel="nofollow">http://absolutearts.com/portfolios/i/ianeye</a> <a href="http://occultblogger.com/proof-of-paranornal-lights-making-crop-circles/" rel="nofollow">http://occultblogger.com/proof-of-paranornal-lights-making-crop-circles/</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/merkaba.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/merkaba.html</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mowing-Devil" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mowing-Devil</a> <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090615-stonehenge-tombs-crop-circles.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090615-stonehenge-tombs-crop-circles.html</a> <a href="http://thephoenixlights.net" rel="nofollow">http://thephoenixlights.net</a> <a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod" rel="nofollow">http://apod.nasa.gov/apod</a> <a href="http://nasca.org.uk/Ancient_Nuc_War/ancient_nuc_war.html" rel="nofollow">http://nasca.org.uk/Ancient_Nuc_War/ancient_nuc_war.html</a> <a href="http://allnewsweb.com/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://allnewsweb.com/index.php</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral</a> <a href="http://realufos.net/2009/12/norway-spiral-ufo-lights-did-you-see.html" rel="nofollow">http://realufos.net/2009/12/norway-spiral-ufo-lights-did-you-see.html</a> <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/photogalleries/giant-crystals-cave/" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/photogalleries/giant-crystals-cave/</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/crystalskulls.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/crystalskulls.html</a> <a href="http://colinandrews.net/UnexplainedPhenomenaAlert.html" rel="nofollow">http://colinandrews.net/UnexplainedPhenomenaAlert.html</a> <a href="http://crstalinks.com/bird.html" rel="nofollow">http://crstalinks.com/bird.html</a> <a href="http://ufosnw.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ufosnw.com/</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio</a> <a href="http://lucypringle.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://lucypringle.co.uk</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopi_mythology" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopi_mythology</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kalkin" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kalkin</a> <a href="http://ran.org/" rel="nofollow">http://ran.org/</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_big_cats" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_big_cats</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talling_animals" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talling_animals</a> <a href="http://crystalinks.com/godgoddesses.html" rel="nofollow">http://crystalinks.com/godgoddesses.html</a> <a href="http://bltresearch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bltresearch.com/</a> <a href="http://ufocasebook.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ufocasebook.com/</a> <a href="http://earthfiles.com/" rel="nofollow">http://earthfiles.com/</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bee_die-off" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bee_die-off</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Man" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Man</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goddess" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goddess</a> <a href="http://cropcircleconnector.com" rel="nofollow">http://cropcircleconnector.com</a> First Contact The Star People]]>

<![CDATA[Same old crying by the GOP. This was the cry of the GOP about Medicare in the early 1960s: "The legislation will lead to deteriorating service! ” Washington bureaucrats will invade the privacy of the examination room! We are on the road to rationed care and patients will lose the freedom to choose their own doctor! The costs will ruin our great country!" These same arguments were used even earlier, to attack President Franklin Roosevelt’s call for Social Security. It was denounced as a socialist program. GOP cried: "With Social Security, Americans would come to feel the lash of the dictator. It would end the progress of a great country! Never in the history of the world has any measure been brought here so insidiously designed as to prevent business recovery, to enslave workers.” Sounds a bit ridiculous, doesn’t it? Social Security passed, and the republic survived. Healthcare will pass. Problems with it will be addressed and corrected as it goes along. In time, Americans will just see another deduction on their paychecks, and have health coverage...as do all the other civilized western countries do. It will be done. Deal with it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is what happens if the Health Care bill passes thanks to the liars and criminals on the left. First America is already broke as it is so we cannot pay for it so EVERYONES taxes go way way up! Second, we end up with 30 MILLION or more new people including illegals using and abusing "thier" new found FREE health care. This will be what we will get: Oh I have a cough...call my doctor. Oh I have a tickle in my throat...call my doctor. Oh I have a headache...call my doctor. We all know how these parasitic freeloaders will behave don't we? You could call it Welfare Drama Queens Gone Wild. Third, facter in the 45% of all doctors who say they might quit...quittting. Now do the math: In summary EVERYONE IS FUCKED and our health care will then look like we live in Pakisatn or Calcutta!! Dead bodies on the side of the road covered with flies.! Yes you dumb stupid fucked up America hating rejects...demand your free health care. Yes do the math retards...do the math. P.S. One time I want to hear a real reason why all these phony cocksucing leftwingers who have coverage sooooo care about other peoples health care? WHO THE FUCK ARE THESE LIARS KIDDING WITH THIS CON JOB? Oh it couldn't be because they want to control your life and be the big boss man could it? Do you jerks realize that what we spend on health care is bigger then the economy of ant one of the other G7 nations? Oh yes, it will be so comforting with the government having your persoanl health care records. Indeed! We all trust the IRS don't we????????????? ]]>

<![CDATA[Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don't Let Freedom Slip Away By: Kitty Werthmann What I am about to tell you is something you've probably never heard or will ever read in history books. I believe that I am an eyewitness to history. I cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history. We elected him by a landslide - 98% of the vote.. I've never read that in any American publications. Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force. In 1938, Austria was in deep Depression. Nearly one-third of our workforce was unemployed. We had 25% inflation and 25% bank loan interest rates.. Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily. Young people were going from house to house begging for food. Not that they didn't want to work; there simply weren't any jobs. My mother was a Christian woman and believed in helping people in need. Every day we cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry people - about 30 daily. The Communist Party and the National Socialist Party were fighting each other. Blocks and blocks of cities like Vienna , Linz , and Graz were destroyed. The people became desperate and petitioned the government to let them decide what kind of government they wanted. We looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany , where Hitler had been in power since 1933. We had been told that they didn't have unemployment or crime, and they had a high standard of living. Nothing was ever said about persecution of any group -- Jewish or otherwise. We were led to believe that everyone was happy. We wanted the same way of life in Austria . We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of unemployment and help for the family. Hitler also said that businesses would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back. Ninety-eight percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have Hitler for our ruler. We were overjoyed, and for three days we danced in the streets and had candlelight parades. The new government opened up big field kitchens and everyone was fed. After the election, German officials were appointed, and like a miracle, we suddenly had law and order. Three or four weeks later, everyone was employed. The government made sure that a lot of work was created through the Public Work Service. Hitler decided we should have equal rights for women. Before this, it was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home. An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldn't support his family. Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for marriage. Hitler Targets Education - Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children: Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools.. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler's picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn't pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang "Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles," and had physical education. Sunday became National Youth Day with compulsory attendance. Parents were not pleased about the sudden change in curriculum. They were told that if they did not send us, they would receive a stiff letter of warning the first time. The second time they would be fined the equivalent of $300, and the third time they would be subject to jail. The first two hours consisted of political indoctrination. The rest of the day we had sports. As time went along, we loved it. Oh, we had so much fun and got our sports equipment free. We would go home and gleefully tell our parents about the wonderful time we had. My mother was very unhappy. When the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldn't do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful. There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun - no sports, and no political indoctrination. I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing. Their loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler. It seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn't exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy. Equal Rights Hits Home: In 1939, the war started and a food bank was established. All food was rationed and could only be purchased using food stamps. At the same time, a full-employment law was passed which meant if you didn't work, you didn't get a ration card, and if you didn't have a card, you starved to death. Women who stayed home to raise their families didn't have any marketable skills and often had to take jobs more suited for men. Soon after this, the draft was implemented. It was compulsory for young people, male and female, to give one year to the labor corps. During the day, the girls worked on the farms, and at night they returned to their barracks for military training just like the boys. They were trained to be anti-aircraft gunners and participated in the signal corps. After the labor corps, they were not discharged but were used in the front lines. When I go back to Austria to visit my family and friends, most of these women are emotional cripples because they just were not equipped to handle the horrors of combat. Three months before I turned 18, I was severely injured in an air raid attack. I nearly had a leg amputated, so I was spared having to go into the labor corps and into military service. Hitler Restructured the Family Through Daycare: When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers. You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole generation of children.. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology. By this time, no one talked about equal rights. We knew we had been had. Health Care and Small Business Suffer Under Government Controls: Before Hitler, we had very good medical care. Many American doctors trained at the University of Vienna . After Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government. The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full. If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn. There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries. As for healthcare, our tax rates went up to 80% of our income.. Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household. We had big programs for families. All day care and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing. We had another agency designed to monitor business. My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables. Government officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar. He couldn't meet all the demands. Soon, he went out of business. If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control. We had consumer protection. We were told how to shop and what to buy. Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it. "Mercy Killing" Redefined: In 1944, I was a student teacher in a small village in the Alps . The villagers were surrounded by mountain passes which, in the winter, were closed off with snow, causing people to be isolated. So people intermarried and offspring were sometimes retarded. When I arrived, I was told there were 15 mentally retarded adults, but they were all useful and did good manual work. I knew one, named Vincent, very well. He was a janitor of the school.. One day I looked out the window and saw Vincent and others getting into a van. I asked my superior where they were going. She said to an institution where the State Health Department would teach them a trade, and to read and write. The families were required to sign papers with a little clause that they could not visit for 6 months. They were told visits would interfere with the program and might cause homesickness. As time passed, letters started to dribble back saying these people died a natural, merciful death. The villagers were not fooled. We suspected what was happening. Those people left in excellent physical health and all died within 6 months. We called this euthanasia. The Final Steps - Gun Laws: Next came gun registration.. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily. No more freedom of speech. Anyone who said something against the government was taken away. We knew many people who were arrested, not only Jews, but also priests and ministers who spoke up. Totalitarianism didn't come quickly, it took 5 years from 1938 until 1943, to realize full dictatorship in Austria . Had it happened overnight, my countrymen would have fought to the last breath. Instead, we had creeping gradualism. Now, our only weapons were broom handles. The whole idea sounds almost unbelievable that the state, little by little eroded our freedom. After World War II, Russian troops occupied Austria . Women were raped, preteen to elderly. The press never wrote about this either. When the Soviets left in 1955, they took everything that they could, dismantling whole factories in the process. They sawed down whole orchards of fruit, and what they couldn't destroy, they burned. We called it The Burned Earth. Most of the population barricaded themselves in their houses. Women hid in their cellars for 6 weeks as the troops mobilized. Those who couldn't, paid the price. There is a monument in Vienna today, dedicated to those women who were massacred by the Russians. This is an eye witness account. "It's true..those of us who sailed past the Statue of Liberty came to a country of unbelievable freedom and opportunity. America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don't Let Freedom Slip Away "After America , There is No Place to Go" ]]>

<![CDATA[Bloomberg News story here; just three little paragraphs. It starts this way: "Students who regularly eat school-furnished lunches are more likely to be overweight and have higher levels of cholesterol than those who eat meals brought from home, a study found." The University of Michigan study was presented at an Atlanta meeting of heart specialists this past weekend. A bunch of middle school students were the subjects; 39 percent who always or almost always had school cafeteria meals were found to be obese or overweight. That compares to 24 percent who bring their lunch from home. The study also found kids who mooch on school lunch programs also don't exercise enough. The sole conclusion in the Bloomberg article is that "the research adds to evidence that schools, at worst, do too little to fight obesity in American youths." Well, my friends, that simply will not do. There are other conclusions to be drawn from this groundbreaking study... Who sponsors school lunches? That's right, the federal government does. And the loudest advocates for school lunches are -- right again -- liberals! Therefore we have to conclude that big nanny state liberals have screwed up the works again! The government is creating generations of kids with pre-conditions: lazy, fat kids who someday will grow into lazy, obese adults who vote Democrat -- clamoring to be first in line for Obamacare. And their obesity precondition is government sponsored! Government pork lunches, beget government porker kids, who beget more government pork health care. It's just one big pork-fest here! ]]>

<![CDATA[New England Journal of Medicine The New England Journal of Medicine reports in its March-April 2010 issue that 46.3% of Primary Care Physicians will likely leave the practice of medicine if ObamaCare passes. What a raging endorsement for Obama’s health care reform plan from the liberal leaning NEJM. The Dear Leader and leading socialists – I’m sorry, Democrats – should be so proud. They should also be so proud for finding every parliamentary trick available to back door into passing this legislation. Back door being a key phrase, because that’s where they are sticking it to Americans. The Democrats clearly don’t have the courage of their convictions, which is no surprise, because they have no convictions. Before you Democrats out there cast your final vote on ObamaCare this week, consider the results of the New England Journal of Medicine study; just another of the unintended consequences of the worst legislation ever in America. Also, consider the rest of the results of the survey: Physician Support of Health Reform in General 62.7% of physicians feel that health reform is needed but should be implemented in a more targeted, gradual way, as opposed to the sweeping overhaul that is in legislation. 28.7% of physicians are in favor of a public option. 3.6% of physicians prefer the “status quo” and feel that the U.S. health care system is best “as is. Health Reform and Primary Care Physicians 46.3% of primary care physicians (family medicine and internal medicine) feel that the passing of health reform will either force them out of medicine or make them want to leave medicine. Health Reform, Public Option, and Practice Revenue (Physician Income) 41% of physicians feel that income and practice revenue will “decline or worsen dramatically” with a public option. 30% feel income will “decline or worsen somewhat” with a public option. 9% feel income will “improve somewhat” with a public option, and 0.8% feel income will “improve dramatically” with a public option. Health Reform, Public Option, and Physician Supply 72% of physicians feel that a public option would have a negative impact on physician supply, with 45% feeling it will “decline or worsen dramatically” and 27% predicting it will “decline or worsen somewhat. 24% of physicians think they will try to retire early if a public option is implemented. 21% of physicians would try to leave medicine if a public option is implemented, even if not near retirement age at the time. Health Reform and Recommending Medicine to Others as a Career 36% of physicians would not recommend medicine as a career, regardless of health reform. 27% would recommend medicine as a career but not if health reform passes. 25% of physicians would recommend medicine as a career regardless of health reform. 12% would not recommend medicine as a career now but feel that they would recommend it as a career if health reform passes ]]>

<![CDATA[Here is what happens if the Health Care bill passes thanks to the liars and criminals on the left. First America is already broke as it is so we cannot pay for it so EVERYONES taxes go way way up! Second, we end up with 30 MILLION or more new people including illegals using and abusing "thier" new found FREE health care. This will be what we will get: Oh I have a cough...call my doctor. Oh I have a tickle in my throat...call my doctor. Oh I have a headache...call my doctor. We all know how these parasitic freeloaders will behave don't we? You could call it Welfare Drama Queens Gone Wild. Third, facter in the 45% of all doctors who say they might quit...quittting. Now do the math: In summary EVERYONE IS FUCKED and our health care will then look like we live in Pakisatn or Calcutta!! Dead bodies on the side of the road covered with flies.! Yes you dumb stupid fucked up America hating rejects...demand your free health care. Yes do the math retards...do the math. P.S. One time I want to hear a real reason why all these phony cocksucing leftwingers who have coverage sooooo care about other peoples health care? WHO THE FUCK ARE THESE LIARS KIDDING WITH THIS CON JOB? Oh it couldn't be because they want to control your life and be the big boss man could it? Do you jerks realize that what we spend on health care is bigger then the economy of ant one of the other G7 nations? Oh yes, it will be so comforting with the government having your persoanl health care records. Indeed! We all trust the IRS don't we?????????????]]>

<![CDATA[of the democrats using these pathetic people with diseases as cheap exploited human props they try this idea. The leftwing liars claim that 14,000 people die every year due to lack of health care. Well why not show us who they are. If they are claiming the fact then it must be documented, if is not documented how can they claim the fact??? Hmmmnnnnn? So let us see the list of names of real people who die due to lack of health care? Pssst...Know why they don't do this boys and girls? Because it is a lie...they can't! After they pass this bill for their own political agenda the people who will die will be your own family. That is the reality of this fucked up bill.]]>

<![CDATA[DIRTBAGS FAGBAGS AIRBAGS GASBAGS SCUMBAGS BODYBAGS LOL ]]>

<![CDATA[real # 25% for health care 25% want nothing to do with it 48% want us to start over . 200 SHOWED UP at obama s last rally for health care . 500 showed up for last tea party in dc . 300 of them walked into the halls of the white house to try to save this country from this health care bill bankrupting this country . YES OUR VOICE MUST BE HEARD . ]]>

<![CDATA[do your part to screw the working class . pass the health care crap bill;. no one wins but the insurance companies .but remember it will cost as much time and money to dismantle it next yr as it does to get it in play this yr . TAX and spend does not work ;never worked and never will work. ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/MichaelGerson/2010/03/17/democrats_true_colors" rel="nofollow">http://townhall.com/columnists/MichaelGerson/2010/03/17/democrats_true_colors</a> The final outcome of the health care reform debate is uncertain -- who can predict where a writhing eel will land? -- but we have learned a few things already. First, we know that President Obama and the Democratic congressional leadership could not persuade a majority of Americans of the wisdom of their plan -- and have largely ceased to try. As of this writing, a president who seems willing to interrupt prime-time programming on the slightest pretext has not scheduled a speech from the Oval Office to make his final health reform appeal. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is working her parliamentarians overtime to achieve the congressional equivalent of the Immaculate Conception -- a law without a vote. One gets the impression that Democrats would prefer health reform to slip by the House in a procedural maneuver on a Friday night during the NCAA basketball tournament -- which it might. The most visible Democratic domestic priority of the last 40 years must be smuggled into law, lest too many Americans notice. Politicians claiming the idealism of saints have adopted the tactics of burglars. Victory, if it comes, will seem less like a parade than a heist. Liberals tend to blame this state of affairs on the brilliance of Republican fear-mongering. Meaning the slashing wittiness of Sarah Palin? The irresistible charisma of Mitch McConnell? The more likely explanation: Americans are engaged in a serious national debate about the role and size of government, in which the advocates of government-dominated health care are significantly outnumbered and vastly outmatched in enthusiasm. America, despite liberal fear-mongering, has not become "Glenn Beckistan." But it is not yet Europe. A second thing we have learned during the health care debate is that the Democratic Party's commitment to abortion rights is even more central to its identity than health reform. Pelosi's initial concession to pro-life Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak -- preventing federally subsidized health plans from covering abortion -- was made for show. The Senate-passed bill allows subsidized plans to cover abortion by collecting an extra payment from every enrollee, as long as at least one other insurance option in a region doesn't cover abortion. This is a departure from the status quo, which not only prohibits the use of federal funds for elective abortions but also prohibits the use of federal funds for health plans that cover such abortions. Says Stupak: "I really believe that the Democratic leadership is simply unwilling to change its stance. Their position says that women, especially those without means available, should have their abortions covered." But this stance by the Democratic leadership violates an informal social agreement that has existed for decades, in which abortion is generally legal but citizens who object to the practice are not required to pay for it. Those who support the Senate bill are participating in the largest expansion of federal involvement in abortion since the Hyde Amendment limited that role in 1976. Third, we have learned that the president and congressional leaders are not serious about entitlement reform. The problem here is not only accounting tricks and the assumption of unprecedented courage on the part of future Congresses when it comes to Medicare cuts -- though these are bad enough. The main source of irresponsibility is that the revenue-gaining measures in the health bill -- particularly Medicare cuts and taxing Cadillac health plans -- would be used to create a new entitlement instead of repairing an existing one. The greatest cost of the current health care reform is its opportunity cost. The unfunded liability of America's current entitlements is more than $100 trillion. Medicare will eventually require a massive infusion of cash under a congressional entitlement fix. Both the Congressional Budget Office and the Medicare actuary have pressed the point that Medicare savings can either be used to pay future Medicare benefits or to finance new spending outside Medicare -- not both. When the entitlement crisis arrives, Obama will have already spent much of the resources required to meet it, leaving growth-killing new taxes as the main, remaining option. A value-added tax anyone? For some elected Democrats, the prospect of expanding health coverage is a moral goal worth the compromise of any principle and the adoption of any necessary method. But they need to enter their vote with open eyes. The passage of this legislation would decisively confirm an image of the Democratic Party that many have worked to change: partial to big government, pro-abortion and fiscally reckless ]]>

<![CDATA[Conservatives love their corporations more then their mothers and fathers and children. Hate your government. Distrust anything for the common good. But love love love Exxon Mobil, Blue Cross, Dupont and Halliburton. Those companies care about us! Death care? lol. how true. Tis what we have now dear misinformed propagandist poster boy. These ignorant conservatives have been led to believe that if we have universal health care that they'll die in the hallways of government medical clinics, but like they do in Canada, Israel and France. No one lives there I guess, they're all dying from their inferior pharmaceuticals, and waiting for operations. I guess that means they must have a shorter life span and higher infant mortality rate? Do they. The answer dear neo con brainless sheep is NO. Do we have the best medical science here? Yep. Got cancer? Go to Sloan Kettering. No one's arguing that dumkupf. What we are saying is that why should a family lose their home, their health and possibly their lives on the basis of a non existent middle class working economic system. But no. It's you neo cons who support business as usual, the status quo of insurance company death panels, while telling your ignorant radio listening followers that it's libs and Obama who want to put granny to sleep. ]]>

<![CDATA[Obama Is Being Destroyed By Rahm Emanuel And AIPAC Jump to Comments It is all very darkly amusing watching the struggle for power between Jewish members of the Obama administration and the Jewish owners and reporters in the media. The circus this produces is entirely made in Tel Aviv. Jewish financial supporters (and yes,they exist and there are rather quite a few of these AIPAC people!) of Obama needed a strong controlling hand on the Obama till so they gave generously when an Israeli officer (Mossad agent) was put forth as Obama’s top handler. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩWell, when Obama came into the White House, he dutifully did two things: he bailed out the billionaires and he kept his lip zipped while Palestinian children and mothers were first bombed to oblivion and then put on starvation rations. Some Jews in academia have even debated the issue, is it OK to starve mothers so they can’t have children and thus, keep the Palestinians as a possible minority population. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩObama, pressured by the rulers of a billion Muslims, promised to be sort of fair to the Palestinian people and so, after the butchering and during the starvation regime, he made a few timid noises that he had some slight sympathy with the victims of Zionist expansions. This so very alarmed Jewish financial supporters of the Democratic (AND Republican) parties, Obama’s chain around his neck was yanked so hard, he nearly chocked to death. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩNow, he is a spectre in the White House, flitting nervously from room to room, unable to control the army of Zionists who run the political party he supposedly heads. Indeed, his only act as leader of the party has been to depose Dean, a fair and balanced man who led the party to a historic victory. Dean even said openly in 2004, the US should be fair and balanced in relation with Israel. This pretty much doomed his attempt at being nominated in the election. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩAIPAC now has a total stranglehold on the DNC and uses this ruthlessly to prevent even the pretense of being even slightly fair with any Palestinians of any sort. Here it some very recent headlines showing clearly what is going on. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩJoe Biden and George Mitchell arrive to kick-start Israeli-Palestinian talks | World news | The Guardian: George Mitchell’s claim to fame is how he got the UK government to grant normal civil rights to captive Irish in Northern Ireland but he didn’t get Ireland reunited. This was a patch job which the Irish accepted mainly because Ireland became a major US destination for job offshoring of computer work. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩThis is something that confuses many people. Many Americans imagine we do things because we are either strong or noble or both. Instead, this is always a trade-off for trade and job deficit relationships. That is, we chop off a finger, a toe, an arm or a leg and this makes everyone very happy except for the American people who suddenly are mired in a Great Job Depression caused by offshoring or allowing unlimited imports to flow into the sovereign nation. ΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩΩ ΩΩThe Jews running AIPAC do not trust Mitchell at all. He was too neutral! So they forced Joe Biden, the AIPAC VP controller on Obama’s left hand side, pinning in Obama with Rahm, the Mossad agent, on the right, keeping him on the very narrow path laid out by AIPAC and Democratic Congressional leaders.]]>

<![CDATA[ TO THE UNEMPLOYED, I'M SURE HE'LL DO VERY WELL! OR, MAYBE SELL LAST YEARS XMAS TREES IN HADES! HOW 'BOUT, WRITING A PAPERBACK NOVEL, TITLED; "THANKS FOR YOUR 2008 VOTES AMERICA, I REALLY DEPRECIATE IT"! FRANK THE WRITER]]>

<![CDATA[What Makes Barack Hussein Obama Really Mad? Obama was supposed to be beloved. The world was going to embrace us once again. The world hates us! Worldwide leaders have contempt for Obama, starting in the UK. Now Obama's not going to fly the American flag in Haiti 'cause he doesn't want it to look like we're "occupiers." So he's gotta apologize for us yet again. The fact that you don't have a job and that millions more of your citizens don't have a job, that doesn't make him mad. The fact that Greece is a foreboding sign of what may happen in some states in this country, that doesn't upset him. The deficit? The mounting national debt? No. None of that upsets him. Americans being murdered in Mexico? Eh! Hardly a word. What really bothers him, what really gets him to lose his cool, is when the Jews build 1,600 new homes in Jerusalem. That makes Barack Hussein Obama mad. <a target="_top" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/obama-runs-out-of-patience-with-israel-1921812.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/obama-runs-out-of-patience-with-israel-1921812.html</a> Netaniahu has more balls (He is a fighting general at the end) in taking care of his country as he pledged. than Marxist lecturer in chief about his(or is America his country really?) ]]>

<![CDATA[America's waking up. We do not want this garbage!]]>

<![CDATA[Pure Evil]]>

<![CDATA[Where are the people that will get rid of the socialist members of house and senate. Stand up New York, throw them out!!!!]]>

<![CDATA[Remember one thing. Obamacare gives the gov the same power ( NAZI Germany had ) over your life. better read it before it happens]]>

<![CDATA[GET REAL PEOPLE! THERE WAS NO “CHANGE” OUT THERE! OBAMA KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING WHEN HE BROUGHT IN ALL OF BUSH’S ARCHITECTS OF BANK WELFARE, BAILOUTS AND (NO REAL) REGULATION! THE BANKSTERS BOUGHT OBAMA BEFORE HE LIED HIMSELF INTO THE WHITE HOUSE! * Treasury Secretary Geithner faces harsh criticism from legislators over bailouts By David Cho Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, January 27, 2010; A01 When Timothy F. Geithner emerged as the leading candidate for Treasury secretary in late 2008, he privately urged Barack Obama to think twice about whether to hire him. Geithner had been a key architect of the government's bailout of Wall Street and would carry that history into the new job, he reminded the incoming president. The warning proved prescient. Nearly a year after Geithner was confirmed, his actions to rescue the financial system -- first as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and then as Obama's initial Treasury secretary -- have made him a lightning rod for discontent with the Obama administration. Geithner will come under fire again Wednesday when he faces questions at a hearing on Capitol Hill about his role in bailing out the insurer American International Group while he was New York Fed president. The grilling comes as lawmakers from both parties are becoming more aggressive in challenging Obama over federal rescue efforts, which have helped bring huge profits to Wall Street but have failed to significantly trim the ranks of the jobless. With populist fervor putting Democrats in electoral jeopardy, lawmakers took aim in recent days at Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, another key figure behind the bailout, threatening his confirmation for a second term. The White House and Senate Democratic leaders seem to have succeeded in shoring up support for Bernanke ahead of a Senate vote expected this week. Now the Obama team is closing ranks behind its embattled Treasury secretary, saying that his actions likely averted a global financial meltdown. President Obama called him a "terrific" adviser in a television interview this week. "Whoever is in these key economic positions becomes a bit of a lightning rod, especially after the extraordinary year we've been through, but the truth is [Geithner] has been a very steady hand in that crisis and he's been the author of many of the reforms that the president has championed," said David Axelrod, Obama's senior adviser. "Tim's been a great advocate for the economy and for the public interest." Speculation about Geithner's job security spiked last week in blogs and on cable television after Obama broke with his Treasury secretary's long-standing advice on how to address risky behavior at the biggest banks. The president announced a tougher approach that would limit the size and activities of financial firms. No other member of Obama's Cabinet has taken as much heat as Geithner. His first months in the job were rocky as he dealt with questions about his failure to pay some personal taxes and confronted doubts on financial markets about his plans for reviving the economy. But by summer, he appeared to be hitting his stride. Geithner's team rebuilt confidence in the nation's financial system by orchestrating a "stress test" of the largest financial firms, which affirmed their health and allowed them to raise private capital and repay their bailouts. The stock market soared. The worst of the financial crisis seemed to be over. But as banks began to report startlingly high profits -- and pay enormous bonuses to their executives -- Geithner was back in the political crosshairs. As the public face of Obama' economic team, he took the brunt of the blame for the dichotomy between Wall Street's prosperity and the struggles of many ordinary Americans. His critics tried to tar him as a friend of the banks. Geithner said in an interview he is not surprised by the anger. "I don't think there's anything exceptional in this. It's perfectly understandable. It's the price of holding this office," he said. "I am here to help the president make good judgments about what policy makes sense, what's fair and what's going to work to make things better." He added: "We ran a financial rescue operation that was much more effective; it took hold much more quickly and at a much lower cost than anyone had anticipated." But now, he said, people are frustrated over the unemployment rate and are worried about whether Washington will deliver on a new bill to create jobs. Administration officials challenged critics who say Geithner is an ally of the banks, stressing his role in getting many large firms to pay back their federal bailout money. Geithner has said the goal of the rescue program was not to help financial firms themselves but to put them in a position to help stimulate the rest of the economy through lending. The first phase of that approach was successful, but the second half has not fared as well. The Treasury's program to address rising foreclosures has struggled. The unemployment rate remains in double digits. And bank lending continues to decline. The trickle from Wall Street down to Main Street has not yet occurred. Anger over the struggling economy is likely to be on full display Wednesday at a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which has called Geithner to testify Wednesday as part of an investigation into the New York Fed's role in the rescue of AIG, which received a federal aid package of more than $180 billion. Some lawmakers said they will narrowly focus on the New York Fed's actions. But others are planning to ask broader questions about Geithner's involvement in the bailout after he joined the Obama administration. "Tim Geithner has had two problems: He has to take bullets for the failure of the economy on behalf of the president, and that makes him unpopular in public," said Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who has taken the lead in pushing for the hearings. "The other thing is . . . he got confirmed in January, but he owns everything that happened 18 to 24 months before that, including a very unpopular activity coming out of New York." In an interview last year, Geithner recalled telling Obama shortly after the presidential election to think carefully about appointing him to Treasury. Acknowledging at the time that many people disagreed with elements of the financial rescue, Geithner said, "I wanted to make sure he understood what he was getting." Obama was not dissuaded. "The president, when he asked me to do this, he knew that I was going to come with a history because of all I had done previously, but I'm proud of that history," Geithner said in an interview this week. It remains to be seen whether the political darts aimed at Geithner will hobble his credibility or undercut his ability to accomplish Obama's priorities, which include winning congressional approval for a new bill to create jobs and legislation to reform the regulation of financial markets. Said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) of the anger at Geithner: "The criticism is partly political; it's partly the banks tried to have their cake and eat it, too." A few lawmakers from both parties have called for Geithner's resignation, though this demand has not moved into the mainstream on Capitol Hill. "One has to wonder, given the new tone at the White House and what seems to be their new agenda given the elections . . . how long we're going to need to keep a Treasury secretary who was hired because Wall Street was comfortable with him," Rep. Peter A. DeFazio (D-Ore.), who has been critical of Geithner in the past, said on a conference call with reporters. Obama himself came to Geithner's defense this week. When asked by ABC News on Monday whether he had asked Geithner and his closest administration ally, National Economic Council Director Lawrence H. Summers, to stay until the end of the year, Obama responded: "You know, we haven't had the conversation because my presumption is that they are staying." He continued: "But the fact of the matter is that when you look at the cards that we were handed at the beginning of last year and where we are now, a lot of that has to do with sound, steady economic leadership." * Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054). BARACK OBAMA HAS COLLECTED NEARLY TWICE AS MUCH MONEY AS JOHN McCAIN BY DAVID SALTONSTALL DAILY NEWS SENIOR CORRESPONDENT July 1st 2008 Wall Street firms have chipped in more than $9 million to Barack Obama. Zurga/Bloomberg Wall Street is investing heavily in Barack Obama. Although the Democratic presidential hopeful has vowed to raise capital gains and corporate taxes, financial industry bigs have contributed almost twice as much to Obama as to GOP rival John McCain, a Daily News analysis of campaign records shows. "Wall Street wants change and wants a curtailment in spending. It wants someone who focuses on the domestic economy," said Jim Cramer, the boisterous host of CNBC's "Mad Money." Cramer also does not discount nostalgia for the go-go 1990s, when Bill Clinton led the largest economic expansion in history. "It wants a Clinton like in 1992, but not a Hillary Clinton," he said. "That's Barack Obama." For both candidates, Wall Street's investment and banking sectors have become among their portliest cash cows, contributing $9.5 million to Obama and $5.3 million to McCain so far. It's a haul that is already raising concerns that, as the nation's faltering economy has become issue No. 1, the two candidates may have a hard time playing tough on issues like market regulation or corporate-tax loopholes. "No matter who wins in November, Wall Street will have a friend in the White House," said Massie Ritsch of the Center for Responsive Politics, which crunched the data for The News. Wall Street's generosity toward Obama, in particular, would seem to run counter to its self-interests. In addition to calling for corporate and capital gains tax hikes, Obama has proposed raising income taxes on those earning more than $250,000. But Wall Street is often motivated by something more than money - winning. "In general, these are professional prognosticators," said Ritsch. "And they may be putting their money on the person they predict will win, not the candidate they hope will win." Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054). McCain's top five include Wall Street's Merrill Lynch ($230,310) and Citigroup ($219,551). Obama's Wall Street haul is not the biggest ever. That distinction belongs to President Bush, who as an incumbent in 2004 raised $10,852,696 from Wall Street interests through April that year - about $1 million more than Obama. ]]>

<![CDATA[REALITY: OBAMA IS COLD AND CALCULATING. HIS THEME OF “CHANGE” WAS GENERATED BY AN AD AGENCY AND HAS NO REAL RELATION TO BARACK OBAMA. BEFORE HE WON THE WHITE HOUSE, THIS ACTOR HAD ALREADY ACCUMULATED PILES OF BIG BANKSTER MONEY, IN PARTICULARLY ARCH-BANKSTERS GOLDMAN SACHS WHICH HAS DONE QUITE NICELY FROM THEIR INVESTMENT IN OBAMA. OBAMA, ALWAYS LISTED ON JUDICIAL WATCH’S 10 MOST CORRUPT, FIRST BROUGHT IN BUSH’S ARCHITECTS FOR BANKSTERS RAPE, PILLAGE, BONUSES AND NO (REAL) REGULATION. THEN HE SURROUNDED HIMSELF WITH THE MOST CORRUPT OF THE BANKSTERS’ BOUGHT WHORES, INCLUDING FEINSTEIN, BARNEY, AND DODD. THEN HE SPEND HIS FIRST YEAR SERVICING BANKSTERS WITH EVERYTHING THEY WANTED AFTER WHICH OBAMA DECLARED THE NATION IN RECOVERY, BUT ALSO THAT THERE WAS NO MONEY LEFT FOR JOBS. DESPITE THE JOB CRISIS, OBAMA STARTED HIS NEXT SELLOUT FOR WALL ST: AMNESTY! 38 MILLION ILLEGALS IN OUR COUNTRY, ALONG WITH THE CRIME WAVES, AND THE LA RAZA DEMS WANT TO SELL US OUT ALL OVER AGAIN. DO YOU REAL BUY INTO THE CURRENT PERFORMANCE OF OBAMA’S PLAY “CHANGE”? ACT 11 “THE POPULIST”???? * THIS IS OBAMA’S REAL “CHANGE” January 25, 2010 OP-ED COLUMNIST The Bernanke Conundrum By PAUL KRUGMAN A Republican won in Massachusetts — and suddenly it’s not clear whether the Senate will confirm Ben Bernanke for a second term as Federal Reserve chairman. That’s not as strange as it sounds: Washington has suddenly noticed public rage over economic policies that bailed out big banks but failed to create jobs. And Mr. Bernanke has become a symbol of those policies. Where do I stand? I deeply admire Mr. Bernanke, both as an economist and for his response to the financial crisis. (Full disclosure: before going to the Fed he headed Princeton’s economics department, and hired me for my current position there.) Yet his critics have a strong case. In the end, I favor his reappointment, but only because rejecting him could make the Fed’s policies worse, not better. How did we get to the point where that’s the most I can say? Mr. Bernanke is a superb research economist. And from the spring of 2008 to the spring of 2009 his academic expertise and his policy role meshed perfectly, as he used aggressive, unorthodox tactics to head off a second Great Depression. Unfortunately, that’s not the whole story. Before the crisis struck, Mr. Bernanke was very much a conventional, mainstream Fed official, sharing fully in the institution’s complacency. Worse, after the acute phase of the crisis ended he slipped right back into that mainstream. Once again, the Fed is dangerously complacent — and once again, Mr. Bernanke seems to share that complacency. Consider two issues: financial reform and unemployment. Back in July, Mr. Bernanke spoke out against a key reform proposal: the creation of a new consumer financial protection agency. He urged Congress to maintain the current situation, in which protection of consumers from unfair financial practices is the Fed’s responsibility. But here’s the thing: During the run-up to the crisis, as financial abuses proliferated, the Fed did nothing. In particular, it ignored warnings about subprime lending. So it was striking that in his testimony Mr. Bernanke didn’t acknowledge that failure, didn’t explain why it happened, and gave no reason to believe that the Fed would behave differently in the future. His message boiled down to “We know what we’re doing — trust us.” As I said, the Fed has returned to a dangerous complacency. And then there’s unemployment. The economy may not have collapsed, but it’s in terrible shape, with job-seekers outnumbering job openings six to one. Nor does Mr. Bernanke expect any quick improvement: last month, while predicting that unemployment will fall, he conceded that the rate of decline will be “slower than we would like.” So what does he propose doing to create jobs? Nothing. Mr. Bernanke has offered no hint that he feels the need to adopt policies that might bring unemployment down faster. Instead, he has responded to suggestions for further Fed action with boilerplate about “the anchoring of inflation expectations.” It’s harsh but true to say that he’s acting as if it’s Mission Accomplished now that the big banks have been rescued. What happened here? My sense is that Mr. Bernanke, like so many people who work closely with the financial sector, has ended up seeing the world through bankers’ eyes. The same can be said about Timothy Geithner, the Treasury secretary, and Larry Summers, the Obama administration’s top economist. But they’re not up before the Senate, while Mr. Bernanke is. Given that, why not reject Mr. Bernanke? There are other people with the intellectual heft and policy savvy to take on his role: among the possible choices would be my Princeton colleague Alan Blinder, a former Fed vice chairman, and Janet Yellen, the president of the San Francisco Fed. But — and here comes my defense of a Bernanke reappointment — any good alternative for the position would face a bruising fight in the Senate. And choosing a bad alternative would have truly dire consequences for the economy. Furthermore, policy decisions at the Fed are made by committee vote. And while Mr. Bernanke seems insufficiently concerned about unemployment and too concerned about inflation, many of his colleagues are worse. Replacing him with someone less established, with less ability to sway the internal discussion, could end up strengthening the hands of the inflation hawks and doing even more damage to job creation. That’s not a ringing endorsement, but it’s the best I can do. If Mr. Bernanke is reappointed, he and his colleagues need to realize that what they consider a policy success is actually a policy failure. We have avoided a second Great Depression, but we are facing mass unemployment — unemployment that will blight the lives of millions of Americans — for years to come. And it’s the Fed’s responsibility to do all it can to end that blight. * August 9, 2009 OP-ED COLUMNIST Is Obama Punking Us? By FRANK RICH “AUGUST is a challenging time to be president,” said Andrew Card, the former Bush White House chief of staff, as he offered unsolicited advice to his successors in a television interview last week. “I think you have to expect the unexpected.” He should know. Thursday was the eighth anniversary of “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.,” the President’s Daily Brief that his boss ignored while on vacation in Crawford. Aug. 29 marks the fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s strike on the Louisiana coast, which his boss also ignored while on vacation in Crawford. So do have a blast in Martha’s Vineyard, President Obama. Even as we wait for some unexpected disaster to strike, Beltway omens for the current White House are grim. Obama’s poll numbers are approaching free fall, we are told. If he fails on health care, he’s toast. Indeed, many of the bloviators who spot a fatal swoon in the Obama presidency are the same doomsayers who in August 2008 were predicting his Election Day defeat because he couldn’t “close the deal” and clear the 50 percent mark in matchups with John McCain. Here are two not very daring predictions: Obama will get some kind of health care reform done come fall. His poll numbers will not crater any time soon. Yet there is real reason for longer-term worry in the form of a persistent, anecdotal drift toward disillusionment among some of the president’s supporters. And not merely those on the left. This concern was perhaps best articulated by an Obama voter, a real estate agent in Virginia, featured on the front page of The Washington Post last week. “Nothing’s changed for the common guy,” she said. “I feel like I’ve been punked.” She cited in particular the billions of dollars in bailouts given to banks that still “act like they’re broke.” But this mood isn’t just about the banks, Public Enemy No. 1. What the Great Recession has crystallized is a larger syndrome that Obama tapped into during the campaign. It’s the sinking sensation that the American game is rigged — that, as the president typically put it a month after his inauguration, the system is in hock to “the interests of powerful lobbyists or the wealthiest few” who have “run Washington far too long.” He promised to smite them. No president can do that alone, let alone in six months. To make Obama’s goal more quixotic, the ailment that he diagnosed is far bigger than Washington and often beyond politics’ domain. What disturbs Americans of all ideological persuasions is the fear that almost everything, not just government, is fixed or manipulated by some powerful hidden hand, from commercial transactions as trivial as the sales of prime concert tickets to cultural forces as pervasive as the news media. As Democrats have pointed out, the angry hecklers disrupting town-hall meetings convened by members of Congress are not always ordinary citizens engaging in spontaneous grass-roots protests or even G.O.P. operatives, but proxies for corporate lobbyists. One group facilitating the screamers is FreedomWorks, which is run by the former Congressman Dick Armey, now a lobbyist at the DLA Piper law firm. Medicines Company, a global pharmaceutical business, has paid DLA Piper more than $6 million in lobbying fees in the five years Armey has worked there. But the Democratic members of Congress those hecklers assailed can hardly claim the moral high ground. Their ties to health care interests are merely more discreet and insidious. As Congressional Quarterly reported last week, industry groups contributed almost $1.8 million in the first six months of 2009 alone to the 18 House members of both parties supervising health care reform, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer among them. Then there are the 52 conservative Blue Dog Democrats, who have balked at the public option for health insurance. Their cash intake from insurers and drug companies outpaces their Democratic peers by an average of 25 percent, according to The Post. And let’s not forget the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which has raked in nearly $500,000 from a single doctor-owned hospital in McAllen, Tex. — the very one that Obama has cited as a symbol of runaway medical costs ever since it was profiled in The New Yorker this spring. In this maze of powerful moneyed interests, it’s not clear who any American in either party should or could root for. The bipartisan nature of the beast can be encapsulated by the remarkable progress of Billy Tauzin, the former Louisiana congressman. Tauzin was a founding member of the Blue Dog Democrats in 1994. A year later, he bolted to the Republicans. Now he is chief of PhRMA, the biggest pharmaceutical trade group. In the 2008 campaign, Obama ran a television ad pillorying Tauzin for his role in preventing Medicare from negotiating for lower drug prices. Last week The Los Angeles Times reported — and The New York Times confirmed — that Tauzin, an active player in White House health care negotiations, had secured a behind-closed-doors flip-flop, enlisting the administration to push for continued protection of drug prices. Now we know why the president has ducked his campaign pledge to broadcast such negotiations on C-Span. The making of legislative sausage is never pretty. The White House has to give to get. But the cynicism being whipped up among voters is justified. Unlike Hillary Clinton, whose chief presidential campaign strategist unapologetically did double duty as a high-powered corporate flack, Obama promised change we could actually believe in. His first questionable post-victory step was to assemble an old boys’ club of Robert Rubin protégés and Goldman-Citi alumni as the White House economic team, including a Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, who failed in his watchdog role at the New York Fed as Wall Street’s latest bubble first inflated and then burst. The questions about Geithner’s role in adjudicating the subsequent bailouts aren’t going away, and neither is the angry public sense that the fix is still in. We just learned that nine of those bailed-out banks — which in total received $175 billion of taxpayers’ money, but as yet have repaid only $50 billion — are awarding a total of $32.6 billion in bonuses for 2009. It’s in this context that Obama can’t afford a defeat on health care. A bill will pass in a Democrat-controlled Congress. What matters is what’s in it. The final result will be a CAT scan of those powerful Washington interests he campaigned against, revealing which have been removed from the body politic (or at least reduced) and which continue to metastasize. The Wall Street regulatory reform package Obama pushes through, or doesn’t, may render even more of a verdict on his success in changing the system he sought the White House to reform. The best political news for the president remains the Republicans. It’s a measure of how out of touch G.O.P. leaders like Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are that they keep trying to scare voters by calling Obama a socialist. They have it backward. The larger fear is that Obama might be just another corporatist, punking voters much as the Republicans do when they claim to be all for the common guy. If anything, the most unexpected — and challenging — event that could rock the White House this August would be if the opposition actually woke up. * The Mexican occupation of 38 million illegals depress wages $200 - $300 billion per year for Americans. These same Americans are forced to pay the staggering welfare costs of the occupation as well. Welfare paid to illegals in Mexican occupied Los Angeles, is nearly $40 MILLION PER MONTH. In Los Angeles, 47% of those employed are ILLEGALS. * January 26, 2010 OP-ED COLUMNIST Obama’s Credibility Gap By BOB HERBERT Who is Barack Obama? Americans are still looking for the answer, and if they don’t get it soon — or if they don’t like the answer — the president’s current political problems will look like a walk in the park. Mr. Obama may be personally very appealing, but he has positioned himself all over the political map: the anti-Iraq war candidate who escalated the war in Afghanistan; the opponent of health insurance mandates who made a mandate to buy insurance the centerpiece of his plan; the president who stocked his administration with Wall Street insiders and went to the mat for the banks and big corporations, but who is now trying to present himself as a born-again populist. Mr. Obama is in danger of being perceived as someone whose rhetoric, however skillful, cannot always be trusted. He is creating a credibility gap for himself, and if it widens much more he won’t be able to close it. Mr. Obama’s campaign mantra was “change” and most of his supporters took that to mean that he would change the way business was done in Washington and that he would reverse the disastrous economic policies that favored mega-corporations and the very wealthy at the expense of the middle class and the poor. “Tonight, more Americans are out of work, and more are working harder for less,” said Mr. Obama in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in August 2008. “More of you have lost your homes and even more are watching your home values plummet. More of you have cars you can’t afford to drive, credit card bills you can’t afford to pay, and tuition that’s beyond your reach.” Voters watching the straight-arrow candidate delivering that speech, in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Depression, would not logically have thought that an obsessive focus on health insurance would trump job creation as the top domestic priority of an Obama administration. But that’s what happened. Moreover, questions were raised about Mr. Obama’s candor when he spoke about health care. In his acceptance speech, for example, candidate Obama took a verbal shot at John McCain, sharply criticizing him for offering “a health care plan that would actually tax people’s benefits.” Now Mr. Obama favors a plan that would tax at least some people’s benefits. Mr. Obama also repeatedly said that policyholders who were pleased with their plans and happy with their doctors would be able to keep both under his reform proposals. Well, that wasn’t necessarily so, as the president eventually acknowledged. There would undoubtedly be changes in some people’s coverage as a result of “reform,” and some of those changes would be substantial. At a forum sponsored by ABC News last summer, Mr. Obama backed off of his frequent promise that no changes would occur, saying only that “if you are happy with your plan, and if you are happy with your doctor, we don’t want you to have to change.” These less-than-candid instances are emblematic of much bigger problems. Mr. Obama promised during the campaign that he would be a different kind of president, one who would preside over a more open, more high-minded administration that would be far more in touch with the economic needs of ordinary working Americans. But no sooner was he elected than he put together an economic team that would protect, above all, the interests of Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry, the health insurance companies, and so on. How can you look out for the interests of working people with Tim Geithner whispering in one ear and Larry Summers in the other? Now with his poll numbers down and the Democrats’ filibuster-proof margin in the Senate about to vanish, Mr. Obama is trying again to position himself as a champion of the middle class. Suddenly, with the public appalled at the scandalous way the health care legislation was put together, and with Democrats facing a possible debacle in the fall, Mr. Obama is back in campaign mode. Every other utterance is about “fighting” for the middle class, “fighting” for jobs, “fighting” against the big bad banks. The president who has been aloof and remote and a pushover for the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries, who has been locked in the troubling embrace of the Geithners and Summers and Ben Bernankes of the world, all of a sudden is a man of the people. But even as he is promising to fight for jobs, a very expensive proposition, he’s proposing a spending freeze that can only hurt job-creating efforts. Mr. Obama will deliver his State of the Union address Wednesday night. The word is that he will offer some small bore assistance to the middle class. But more important than the content of this speech will be whether the president really means what he says. Americans want to know what he stands for, where his line in the sand is, what he’ll really fight for, and where he wants to lead this nation. They want to know who their president really is. ]]>

<![CDATA[OBAMA WAS BOUGHT BY BIG BANKSTERS EVEN BEFORE HE GOT THE WHITE HOUSE. HOW’D THESE BANKSTERS KNOW HE’S PERFORM SO WELL FOR THEM? BILLIONS IN BONUSES, NO PRISON TIME FOR HAVING DESTROYED HALF-TRILLION IN HOME VALUES, MILLIONS IN FORECLOSURES, AND NOW THE PROMISE OF NO (REAL) REGULATION AS THE BANKSTERS CONTINUE TO RAPE A NATION. ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO BE CONNED BY OBAMA AGAIN? THREE YEARS FROM NOW OBAMA WILL ONCE AGAIN HAVE POCKETS FULL OF BANKSTER MONEY, AND WITH HIS LA RAZA AMNESTY, THE VOTES OF 38 MILLION MEX FLAG WAVERS! * WSWS.org get on their free no ads email new The banks and socialism 14 January 2010 In the midst of the greatest economic and social crisis since the Great Depression, the major US banks are about to announce multimillion-dollar year-end bonuses for their top executives and traders. Bankers are able to resume full tilt their mad pursuit of personal enrichment due to the plundering of the treasury carried out for the sole purpose of bailing out the “financial wizards” whose speculative practices precipitated the crisis. This is a global phenomenon. In all the major centers of world capitalism, the financial elites are emerging from the economic wreckage stronger and more powerful than ever, and are dictating the terms of their own enrichment to servile governments. In the US, Goldman Sachs is expected to announce bonuses totaling more than $20 billion, about the same amount as California’s state budget deficit. One analyst estimates that the average Goldman bonus will approach $600,000, and that some executives may take home more than $10 million. It is anticipated that Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citibank, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley will together pay out $90 billion in 2009 executive compensation, with more than half in the form of bonuses. In a transparent attempt to preemptively divert and contain public outrage, President Obama will announce on Thursday a proposal to put in place a surtax on 20 banks that received funds through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). According to the administration, this would raise $120 billion over ten years—not much more than the five biggest banks will pay their executives for 2009 alone. The surtax proposal comes together with another public relations stunt—the hearings held this week by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, the toothless body set up for the purpose of whitewashing the criminal activities of the bankers. Whatever the precise details of “Obama’s gentle bank tax,” as the Wall Street Journal calls the measure, it can be said with certainty that it will result in no significant penalty for Wall Street. The proposal will be blocked or watered down to the point of irrelevance by a Congress comprised of politicians who depend on campaign contributions and other bribes from the very banks they purport to regulate. Such has been the fate of the much-vaunted proposals for pay restrictions, the bank regulatory overhaul, credit card “reform,” and Obama’s so-called housing rescue. The response of the princes of Wall Street to even the slightest encroachment on their right to salaries hundreds of times greater than those of mere mortals is to bristle with indignation. Much like the powdered wig-bedecked aristocrats of the French Ancien Regime, these modern-day lords and ladies insist on their unchallengeable right to unlimited personal enrichment. “I am a little tired of the constant vilification of these people,” an indignant JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said this week of the furor over bonuses. “I don’t think it’s just whining,” another unnamed executive said of the bankers’ protestations. “There are legitimate liquidity issues that people have.” These are people who produce nothing of value. Unlike the captains of industry of an earlier period—associated with names such as Carnegie, Rockefeller, Edison and Ford—whose enormous personal wealth was bound up with the creation of vast industrial empires, today’s robber barons have made their fortunes through parasitic financial operations bound up with the destruction of industry and a relentless attack on the living standards of the working class. In the midst of soaring foreclosures and growing hunger and poverty, the financial elite flaunts its wealth. “As traders and investment bankers near the finish line of what looks like a boom year for pay, some are spending money like the financial crisis never happened,” the Wall Street Journal recently reported. “From $15,000-a-week Caribbean getaways to art auctions to $200,000 platinum wrist watches...signs of the good life are returning.” New York’s elite real estate brokers are “outright giddy” over the bonuses, which will “boost sales, particularly in the $2 million to $5 million range.” More than a year after the near-collapse of the US and world economy at the hands of the bankers, nothing has been done to reform the financial system. Nobody has been held accountable. On the contrary, the banks have exploited the crisis of their own making to make more money than ever, and the government, the courts and the media have revealed themselves as mere handmaidens of what can rightly be called a financial aristocracy. This demonstrates that the concentration of wealth in the hands of a tiny elite and its unbounded pursuit of personal enrichment are not mere excesses or aberrations of an otherwise rational and healthy system. These characteristics are rooted in the very nature of capitalism as it limps into the 21st century. It is not a question of “reforming” the US and global banking system. The death grip of the banking elite over the wealth of society must be smashed. The answer to the plundering of society by the financial aristocracy is the expropriation of the bankers, the nationalization of the banks and finance houses, and their transformation into public trusts under the democratic control of the working population. The alternative to the tyranny of the bankers is socialism, i.e., the abolition of private ownership of the banks and the major industries and the replacement of the capitalist market with rational planning and democratic control, geared to social need, not private profit. The books of the banks must be opened to public inspection, and all predatory and illegal activities prosecuted. The ill-gotten wealth of the financial elite should be seized and used to meet pressing social needs—health care, education, housing, jobs. This requires the independent political mobilization of the working class in the US and internationally, a struggle against the Obama administration and the two parties of US big business, and the formation of a workers’ government. This is the program of the World Socialist Web Site and the Socialist Equality Party. Tom Eley * * The American ruling class 6 February 2009 On Wednesday President Barack Obama announced measures that purport to restrict executive compensation to $500,000 at financial institutions receiving billions in government assistance. The figure does not include stock options, which could be redeemed after financial firms pay back loans from the federal government. Nor does it apply to the original recipients of tens of billions in TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) money. The measures are essentially a public relations exercise. Their aim is to provide political cover for a new and even larger Wall Street bailout, which Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will unveil next week. Yet the discussion that has emerged in the wake of Obama’s announcement sheds light on the domination of government by a tiny financial elite and the increasingly threadbare pretense of democracy in the US. This financial aristocracy, the episode reveals, is a power to be approached on bended knee. The media have responded to Obama’s proposal of a $500,000 limit on executive compensation, which would affect only a handful of firms, as though this were a severe and astonishing punishment. Yet the figure represents approximately 12 times the annual salary of the typical worker. To the majority of the population, a salary of a half million dollars is a staggering amount of money. Obama’s servility before the financial aristocracy was summed up by the reassurances he gave it in announcing his limits on executive pay. “This is America,” Obama said. “We don't disparage wealth. We don't begrudge anybody for achieving success.” Such a vision of America is at odds with both its present circumstances and its history, which has been characterized by deep democratic and egalitarian traditions that date back to before the Jeffersonian democracy of the early Republic. And while liberals are busy attempting to equate Obama to Franklin Roosevelt, the latter, in the midst of the Great Depression, attempted to capitalize on the tremendous contempt for the rich in the population at large by regularly issuing bromides against the “money changers.” Indeed, Obama’s obsequiousness stands in sharp contrast to the anger of the working masses, who find it incomprehensible that the same executives who are responsible for ruining the economy and squandering trillions in taxpayer money are now presented with pay “limits” of a half million dollars. Workers are wondering why there haven’t been criminal indictments and television scenes of handcuffed executives frog-marched from their offices. But on Wall Street, $500,000 is considered a pittance. The New York Times reports that executives felt cheated by taking home “only” $18 billion in collective bonuses in 2009. “I feel like I got a doorman’s tip, compared to what I got in previous years,” an investment banker with Citigroup told the Times. The Financial Times reported on Wall Street’s opposition to the largely token measures. “Senior bankers were quick to warn the plans would cause a ‘brain drain’ from the profession as top executives seek more rewarding jobs out of the public eye,” it wrote. “Unlike other careers where job satisfaction and other considerations play a part, finance tends to attract people whose main motivation is money.” “‘The cap is a lousy idea,’ complained one top Wall Street executive. ‘If there is no monetary upside, who would want to do these jobs?’” Andrew Ward, a University of Georgia professor and specialist on corporate boards and management, told the Financial Times that executives could respond to Obama’s measure by calling his bluff—refusing to allow their firms to accept a bailout that would in any way limit their personal enrichment. “One of the potentially unintended consequences is that executives might try and hold off asking for government assistance until it is too late,” Ward said. Media and academic figures who have tried to argue that the massive pay packages of the Wall Street executives are somehow legitimate, or even rational, succeed only in revealing the rot that characterizes intellectual life in the US. Their central argument—that the same CEOs who have driven their companies and the economy as whole into the ground are worthy of remuneration in the tens of millions—is so absurd it is almost an embarrassment to answer. The immense power of the financial elite is revealed by the case of Bernard Madoff, the investor who squandered more than $50 billion in wealth in a giant Ponzi scheme. While working class Americans are arrested and spend years in prison for far lesser offenses, Madoff remains ensconced in his Manhattan penthouse. For nearly a decade, a whistleblower named Harry Markopolos, who had uncovered Madoff’s scheme, attempted to draw the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the federal regulatory agency ostensibly tasked with policing the securities and stock industries. Instead, the SEC ran interference for Madoff. Rather than being applauded for his efforts, Markopolos feared for his safety. “We knew that he was one of the most powerful men on Wall Street and in a position to easily end our careers or worse,” he said. The social psychology and physiognomy of the financial elite—with its wealth, special privileges and its control over the organs of public opinion—resembles nothing so much as a modern aristocracy. Any discussion of a rational attempt to find a solution to the economic crisis runs immediately into the ferocious opposition of this elite. Similarly, in the 18th century the aristocracy of the French ancien regime precipitated a financial crisis through its avarice and wars. When the aristocracy convened the Estates General in 1789, it was to demand that the Third Estate, the commoners, bail the aristocracy out of the crisis of its own making. But the monarchy and nobility refused to cede a bit of its power and privileges. This set the stage for the great French Revolution. The odious subjective characteristics of the US financial aristocracy—its greed, arrogance, stupidity and decadence—are themselves deeply rooted in objective historical developments, the social expression of an underlying economic process. The rise of this narrow social layer with its obscene levels of accumulation is inextricably bound up with the decline of American capitalism in the world market and the gutting of its domestic industrial base. Indeed, what makes the whole process so filthy, what imparts to it such a decadent and repulsive character, is the degree to which this wealth is unconnected to any progressive economic process. It is in every sense destructive and reactionary. In an earlier period of history the US had its “robber barons,” such as Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller. As brutal and greedy as these men were, their wealth was bound up with the creation of enormous industrial empires. The latter-day robber barons of Wall Street, on the other hand, have made their billions from the destruction of the industry and productive capacity built up over decades. The staggering wealth accumulated in the top one percent of American society over last 25 years is directly bound up with the deterioration of the economy, the decline of industry and the impoverishment of the working class. The enormous personal fortunes of the elite have been built up on hedge funds, the leveraging of debt and other forms of financial speculation. This has entailed an enormous transfer of resources out of manufacturing and into finance, and out of the working class and into the pockets of those who have played the critical role not only in destroying living standards, but in setting the stage for the present disaster. The fortunes that grew on this basis at a certain point assumed a dynamic of their own. Their sheer scale assumes a malignant character that becomes an insurmountable obstacle to any rational policy coming from within the confines of bourgeois politics. It follows that there is no solution to the crisis without a direct and massive assault on social inequality, and thus the wealth and privileges of the financial and business aristocracy. This cannot be carried out by pressuring the Democratic Party. The Obama administration’s meager rules on executive pay shows that it will not consider any policies that even hint at the redistribution of wealth. The American political elite, Obama included, is tied by a thousand strings to the financial aristocracy. The Obama administration is populated by individuals who have parlayed their political positions into lucrative positions in finance. Virtually the entire cabinet fits this billing—not only Tom Daschle, the former senator who withdrew his nomination for the Secretary of Health and Human Services amidst revelations that he had withheld tens of thousands in taxes owed on payments he received from his corporate sponsors. Yesterday it came to light that Leon Panetta, Obama’s nominee for chief of the Central Intelligence Agency, took home more than $1 million last year through payments from corporations for consulting, speaking appearances and through his membership on corporate boards. He was paid handsomely for speeches by financial firms that have since collapsed, including $56,000 by Merrill Lynch and $28,000 by Wachovia. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have also used their political connections to make millions from the same financial elite that would ostensibly be targeted by Obama’s rules on executive pay. Obama knows very well that when he leaves office he will be able to make millions of dollars, as Bill Clinton, the last Democratic president, and countless other leading politicians have done. Nor would this be a departure for Obama, whose career was taken into hand early on by leading financial and political figures in Chicago. The subordination of the whole of society to the financial aristocracy is most clearly expressed in the massive bailout of Wall Street. Its political representatives, Democrats and Republican alike, hand over trillions to the biggest banks, while providing no provisions for the masses of people who have lost their jobs and homes. Millions of workers who voted for Obama are now coming face to face with the fact that his administration will defend the interests of the financial elite every bit as ruthlessly, if with a slightly different presentation, as the Bush administration. The solution to the economic crisis is not a technical question but a social, political and revolutionary settling of accounts, and a historical necessity. At a certain point in the late 18th century, it became necessary for the oppressed classes of France to rise up and destroy the power and privileges of the nobility. In the America of the 1860s, the only resolution to the “irrepressible conflict” was the destruction of the “slave power” in the South. At this point it is necessary to destroy the political and economic power of the financial aristocracy. A resolution to the economic crisis can only begin with an independent mass movement of the working class that aims to break the political stranglehold of the financial elite over society; the development, to be blunt, of a revolutionary movement. Tom Eley * * Wall Street CEOs testify before financial crisis commission By Andre Damon 14 January 2010 The testimony of four Wall Street CEOs Wednesday before a congressional commission of inquiry showed clearly where the power lies in America. The four men—Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, James Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, John Mack of Morgan Stanley, and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America—were given free rein to equivocate, evade and lie. One of them, Blankfein, took the opportunity to shout down the committee chair. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which will hold additional hearings tomorrow, convened amid growing official nervousness that the announcement of year-end bank bonuses will provoke a popular backlash. The origins, operations and personnel of the commission, as well as the timing of its first hearing, all expose the pretense that it represents a serious attempt to investigate the banks and present a serious explanation to the American people of the reasons for the financial crash that has had such devastating social consequences. The commission was formed under a bill signed into law in May 2009, and has until December 15, 2010 to produce a report. The very fact that the commission has been in existence for eight months without holding any hearings or conducting any investigation points to its fraudulent character. There is a reason for this unexplained delay. The commission was initially mandated by Congress to conduct a probe and make recommendations for legislation to reform the financial system. Instead, with the knowledge and support of Congress and the Obama Administration, it remained inactive, so that proposals for banking “reform” could be worked out behind closed doors between the White House, congressional leaders, and Wall Street executives and lobbyists. There was a deliberate decision made not to hold hearings while the bank overhaul bills were being drawn up, and the government bailout had not yet led to a revival of the banks’ profits. This was to ensure that nothing would emerge publicly that would interfere with the joint efforts of the bankers and the government to fashion an “overhaul” that, in fact, does absolutely nothing to limit the speculative activities of the banks or the vast profits and bonuses which they reap from their parasitic operations. As reported by the press in advance of Wednesday’s hearing, the commission itself has foresworn any effort to make recommendations on reforming the financial markets. The timing of its first hearing underscores the commission’s real function—to defuse popular anger while carrying out a whitewash. It is hardly an accident that top bankers were brought to testify and be, according to the media, “grilled” on the eve of the release of year-end bonus figures. The personnel of the commission are indicative of its token role. The chairman is a little-known politician. No one with any significant public following sits on the panel, and no respected economists were chosen. Congress allocated a paltry $8 million for what was supposed to be a major inquiry. This is less than the combined amount spent by Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America for lobbying during the first nine months of 2009. In his opening remarks, the commission’s chairman, Phil Angelides, the former state treasurer of California, set the stage for Wednesday’s hearing, saying that “the most important task in front of us is to shed light, not heat; for us to take stock of what has happened and give a true accounting so the important work of restoring faith in our economic system can begin.” In other words, the commission’s task was to restore credibility to the profit system. The prospect of holding anyone accountable was off the table. After Angelides’ opening remarks, the floor was yielded to the four CEOs, who, one after the other, argued that the financial crisis was the product of a series of innocent miscalculations by bankers and regulators. Goldman Sach’s Blankfein and his colleagues said that the best solution would be to introduce some minimal regulatory measures, while keeping intact the system that pays the financial elite billions of dollars in salaries, perks and bonuses. The arrogance of the Wall Street barons and subservience of the government were fully on display. Each of the bankers praised his own company. JP Morgan’s Dimon declared, “Throughout the financial crisis, JPMorgan Chase never posted a quarterly loss, served as a safe haven for depositors, worked closely with the federal government, and remained an active lender.” Moynihan observed that “we as an industry caused a lot of damage,” but he made no apology, either for his industry, his company, or himself. The closest the humdrum affair came to a confrontation occurred when Angelides asked Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein why his firm secretly betted against the mortgage-backed securities it packaged and sold into the market. Angelides compared Goldman’s actions to “selling a car with faulty brakes, and then buying an insurance policy on the buyer of that car.” > Blankfein was indignant at such effrontery. He raised his voice and repeatedly interrupted the commission chair. “We represent the other side of what people want to do,” said Blankfein, implying that if people bought toxic securities from Goldman, it was their own fault. After this exchange, Angelides asked Blankfein, “Did you always disclose to every investor that you were taking contrary positions? Yes or no?” Blankfein blustered something incomprehensible, and Angelides timidly moved on. This became the procedure for any question Blankfein chose not want to answer. Angelides later said he was “troubled” by Blankfein’s inability to answer basic questions about his firm’s activities. But since it was not his intention to make the Wall Street CEOs “say uncle,” as he put it, he accepted the banker’s evasions. The basic argument of the four men was that they had no way of grasping the dangers inherent in the vastly inflated housing market. Dimon said his bank carried out internal “stress tests” of every possible adverse scenario. However, when asked whether he had considered the impact of a decline in housing values, he admitted that he had not. The CEOs’ argument is worth considering. In the (unbelievable) event that they were being honest, their statements amounted to an admission of incompetence and recklessness that constitutes, at the very least, criminal negligence, and utterly undermines the claim that they and their fellow financial “wizards” are entitled, by virtue of their unique wisdom and talent, to astronomical pay checks. In fact, their incompetence was combined with fraud on a gigantic scale, which brought their own firms and the US and world economies to the brink of collapse and precipitated an economic crisis that is consigning untold millions to unemployment, homelessness and poverty. About the WSWS | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Top of page ]]>

<![CDATA[I DON’T BEGRUDGE THE BANKSTERS’ FILTHY BONUSES, EVEN AS MILLIONS OF AMERICANS HAVE LOST THEIR LIFE SAVINGS AS INVESTED IN THEIR HOME! I KNOW WHO I WORK FOR! THE FUCKERS THAT BOUGHT ME FROM THE START. SURE I’M A CLOSET REPUBLICAN! GET WITH THE GAME. IT’S ALL ABOUT WALL STREET’S CORPORATE RAPE AND PILLAGE. IT’S THE AMERICAN WAY! BUY POLITICIANS, AND FUCK OVER THE PEOPLE. WHEN WAS IT DIFFERENT? Barack Obama, One Term Bankster President * “I’m not here to punish my filthy bankster donors! I’m here to service them!” * Obama doesn’t “begrudge” bankers their multi-million-dollar bonuses By Andre Damon and Barry Grey 11 February 2010 In an interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, President Barack Obama said he does not “begrudge” the bonuses of Wall Street tycoons Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein, who together were awarded $26 million last week. Bloomberg.com published Obama’s remarks on the bonuses Wednesday in a preview of an interview that will appear on the newsstands Friday. The interview is evidently part of an effort by Obama to placate Wall Street executives who have complained about his occasional exercises in anti-banker rhetoric and his announcement of token proposals to rein in speculative practices by commercial banks and impose a modest surtax on financial firms that received government bailout funds. “Obama sought to combat perceptions,” Bloomberg.com wrote, “that his administration is anti-business and trumpeted the influence corporate leaders have had on his economic policies. He plans to reiterate that message when he speaks to the Business Roundtable, which represents the heads of many of the biggest US companies, on Feb. 24 in Washington.” In response to a question about the 2009 year-end bonuses announced last week—$17 million for JPMorgan Chase CEO Dimon and $9 million for Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein—Obama said, “I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen. I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free-market system.” He went on to make light of the bankers’ pay packages, saying that while $17 million is “an extraordinary amount of money” for Main Street, “there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don’t get to the World Series either, so I’m shocked by that as well.” These remarks expose the hypocrisy and cynicism of Obama’s scripted denunciations of Wall Street, invariably timed to coincide with signs of popular outrage against the banks and his administration’s role in plundering the treasury to cover their bad debts. They come in the context of reports that financial firms have shifted their political donations—which played a huge role in bankrolling Obama’s election campaign—to the Republicans. Recent news stories have cataloged the attempts by the Obama administration to get back into the bankers’ good graces. Obama had lunch with business executives at the White House last Thursday and invited another group of corporate CEOs to watch the Super Bowl at the White House, according to a February 5 Wall Street Journal article entitled “Obama, Business Leaders Inch Toward Rapprochement.” The New York Times on February 2 reported: “Chief executives of big banks have been in Washington for meetings with White House and Treasury officials and lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, had lunch with Mr. Obama last Tuesday, and then met separately on Friday with the Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, and the treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner. And industry lobbyists and chief executives have been lining up outside the doors of senators.” Only a few weeks ago, as his poll numbers were plunging, Obama condemned the “fat cat bankers on Wall Street,” complaining that they were “drawing down 10, 20 million dollar bonuses after America went through the worst economic year ... in decades, and you guys caused the problem.” He stepped up his fake populism around the time of last month’s Senate election in Massachusetts, delivering a demagogic stump speech two days before the vote in a vain attempt to prevent the humiliating loss of a seat that had been held since 1952 by members of the Kennedy family. That was preceded by his announcement of a tax on bailed-out banks, during which he denounced the “obscene” bonuses of the bankers. Obama’s remarks to Bloomberg BusinessWeek reflect the real relationship between Wall Street and his administration—already amply demonstrated in the record of his first year in office—and the political system as a whole, including both parties. They also expose Obama’s personal dishonesty, contempt for the American people, and servility toward the financial aristocracy. As for his claim to speak for “most of the American people,” one can only say: “Speak for yourself, Mr. Obama!” Most of the American people are disgusted and appalled at the spectacle of financial parasites awarding themselves seven- and eight-figure bonuses after bringing the US and world economy to its knees, throwing millions into unemployment and poverty, and shifting their bad debts onto the government. Working people know that they are losing their jobs and seeing their wages and social services cut to pay for the criminal activities of the likes of Dimon and Blankfein. They would like to see these people frog-marched to jail and prosecuted for their predatory and illegal banking practices. When Obama goes on to casually declare, “That is part of the free-market system,” he is saying more than he means to say. The plundering of society by a rapacious plutocracy is indeed an integral part of the “free-market system,” which is why that system must be overthrown and replaced with a socialist system based on the satisfaction of human needs, not the personal enrichment of a wealthy few. * * WHAT DID THE BANKSTERS KNOW ABOUT OUR ACTOR OBAMA THAT WE DIDN’T KNOW? Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054). * OBAMA’S CON JOB ON REGULATION WILL NOT IMPACT HIS LARGEST BANKSTER DONORS! WHO’D OF THOUGHT??? “Obama's rhetoric covered the whole financial industry, but the key changes will affect only a few high-profile players, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., while sparing investment banks like Goldman Sachs Group Inc.” * Lou Dobbs Tonight Thursday, July 9, 2009 And Harvard economics professor JEFFREY MIRON will weigh in on the state of the U.S. economy—and why the only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination. * "There is a populist and conservative revolt against Wall Street and financial elites, Congress and government," Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg warned in an analysis this week. "Democrats and President Obama are seen as more interested in bailing out Wall Street than helping Main Street." * Lou Dobbs Tonight Monday, November 12, 2007 Mortgage giants Wells Fargo and Countrywide Financial are accused of slapping dubious fees on homeowners struggling to save their homes. With fewer new mortgages being written, these companies appear to be leaning on these lucrative fees to stay profitable—with devastating consequences for homeowners. We’ll have that report. ]]>

<![CDATA[Do not move into apartment 1, second floor front of 3573 East Tremont Avenue (between Lafayette and Sullivan) Bronx, NY 10465, above the so called Quality Chef Restaurant. (There are also violations at Quality chef at 1595 Williamsbridge Road.)The neighborhood is decent and relatively quiet if you don’t mind the traffic noise especially during business hours. The inside of this private house (the back of its restaurant) on the second is another story – a ghetto. Check www.nyc.gov/hpd, www.nyc.gov/dob, www.nyc.gov/fdny, www.pubadvocate.nyc.gov, www.bronxmall.com for all the violations at this camouflaged house. Most of the violations are still pending. Check also the reports from the Mental Health and Hygiene (12/8/09 = mice vermin, improperly prepared foods et cetera.) The landlord, Kam Wu Cheung called me a liar in January when I discovered mice and vermin (dust mite, roaches, wormlike insects) coming out from the seedy tenant, David Diaz, who lives in Apt. 2. (I’m the fifth Lady in less than two years who lived in the low class house.) David Diaz is an immoral thug who owns nuisance, untrained and unkempt animals that pollute the public area with its stench and dander. (Geraldine Kelpin, the so-called Director of DEP is a useless and irresponsible city worker. More than 70 calls from October 2008 to September 2009 and she had done nothing to correct the problem, despite that not only was I allergic to animals, but my lease stated no animals. Geraldine is the same as Kam Wu Cheung and David Diaz, disgusting and mindless of decent human beings health. While Kam Wu Cheung claims it’s a woman’s job to clean the public area. Law Enforcement Bureau is on this case now. David Diaz’s mother was ordered by Kam Wu Cheung to mop the public area regularly until his mother felt that I should share in cleaning her son’s animal messes. David Diaz creates an unsafe environment with his string of unruly traffic day and night. He has no regard for the quality of life, safeness or health of others, because he’s an uneducated, lazy welfare bum. The landlord, Kam Wu Cheung is of the same cloth as David Diaz. Kam Wu Cheung will not provide you with any of the services he is required by law to give a paying tenant – high gas and electric despite the inadequate heat and hot water during the winter months. (Housing Preservation and Developments corrected this “illegal tapping” from my apartment to the restaurant.) The landlord has no contract with an exterminating company, cannot communicate and is a thief and a cheater with no moral conscious as much as David Diaz is, if not worse. Decent, respectful, hardworking (women) people are Kam Wu Cheung’s and David Diaz’s targets. Imagine how much the landlord makes renting out the same Apt 1 over and again like some kind of sick revolving door. (One would be lucky to get back the security.) If not for HPD, The Dept of Buildings, the Civil Court, the police, law enforcement bureau, welfare inspectors, Public Advocate, City Wide Task Force, The Fire Department’s Fire Prevention Bureau, Bronx Community Committee Board #10 and the Bureau Chief at the District Attorney’s office, I would have taken matters into my own hands. People like Kam Wu Cheung and David Diaz are despicable, the same as the thing that grows underneath the pus covered with pond scum. Do your research. Help your loved one. Stay away from 3573 East Tremont Avenue. You will definitely regret the move. The $1,000.00 is not worth the dime, especially when Kam Wu Cheung will not tell you but surprise you by wintertime that you have to (illegally) pay for the gas – heat, water, stove gas, and the hallway lights which David Diaz prefers day and night. The punk is afraid of the mice that he creates by polluting the environment. These are both unscrupulous, immoral people. It’s an apartment fitting for those with no regard for human decency, house rules, and the law. It’s a place for thuggish, ghetto people with nothing but a welfare mentality who thrives on handouts. Through the Grace of God and the wonderful city officials/agencies, despite the horrible 8 months, it’s almost over. I won’t be there much longer. (Kam Wu Cheung had no choice through his lawyer to settle in Civil Court.) The decent human people need to know the truth about Kam Wu Cheung – a fraud who enjoys playing the victim, misrepresenting, camouflaging and lying, stealing, deceiving. David Diaz is a manipulator, con artist, thug, drug user and a welfare bum, as is his co-partner, Kam Wu Cheung. They really deserve each other. Check out the New Green Dragon Restaurant at 4111-4113 East Tremont Avenue ((Throggs Neck, NY 10465 at the center of Miles Avenue – 718-597-3500/4601.) Green Dragon has no Housing Code, HPD, Board of Health or Mental Health and Hygiene violations and for a few cents more, the quality of their food, classy environment, and communicative staff is top notch. Google – History – Kam Wu Cheung, David Diaz in East Tremont Avenue in the Bronx, NY, Geraldine Kelpin, DEP located in Queens, NY.]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>A vote? We don’t need no stinking vote!</h2> March 16th, 2010, 9:45 am · 3 Comments · posted by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer The official and semi-official vote counters in Babylon-on-the-Potomac are being close-lipped and inscrutable as to whether the Democrats have enough votes to pass the Senate health care bill in the House and get the process of increasing government involvement in our health care (as if there weren’t enough already) started in earnest. But we can probably infer that they don’t from the fact that Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi is openly talking about a “deem and pass” rule. A what? It’s been done before but never on legislation so far-reaching. It seems Rep. Louise Slaughter , a member of the House Rules Committee, first surfaced the idea in connection with health care deform. The idea is that the Rules Committee would pass what is called a “self-executing rule” for the package of fixes to the Senate bill — getting rid of the Cornhusker Kickback, the Cadillac Tax and other stuff the House supposedly doesn’t like through the utterly polarizing process laughingly called “reconciliation” — that would declare, or “deem” that if the fix package is passed the health-care bill is considered passed. Presto! No vote required! Give Nancy Pelosi a certain amount of credit for frankness. She says of the three possible ways to come to a vote, at this point she is leaning toward this one because it doesn’t require lawmakers in vulnerable districts to cast a potentially unpopular vote. They can hide behind process. “It’s more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know,” she said in a roundtable with bloggers on Monday, “But I like it, because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.” Give her points for openness in acknowledging that evasion of accountability is a prize greatly to be valued in today’s Congress. Of course it might be unconstitutional, but who pays much attention to that old scrap of parchment anyway? The entire discussion points up the unseemliness of making major changes that are still opposed by a majority of the public – and where opposition is notably more intense than support — to a sector that accounts for 1/6 of the economy by a bare and strictly partisan majority. Our system was designed to make such far-reaching changes difficult: divided government had the purpose of trying to assure that large-scale changes would only occur when a fairly strong consensus in their favor existed. It obviously doesn’t exist now, but the administration and congressional Democrats are willing to make themselves look absurd and possibly risk losing their majority in November (though Ms. Nancy herself is unlikely to be in danger) to get something passed that can be deemed reform. This isn’t politics or policy, it’s religion. This week is exposing Congress as duplicitous, arrogant and utterly contemptuous of public opinion. But maybe that isn’t news. Share this post:]]>

<![CDATA[is what the blind man said when he paid your mother $5 to lick her smelly pussy ha ha ha ha ha ha.]]>

<![CDATA[don't call me Frontal Lobber anymore...I can't stand it!!! I hate hearing how stupid I am from such a smart asshole like you. You make me hate myself. You make me want to kill myself. I beg you Mr. Asshole sir PLEASE stop calling me fronatl lobber I can'tstand it anymore. I just can't take it anymore. I beg of you Mr. Asshole...I beg you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]>

<![CDATA[re:THREE HUNDRED TEABAGGERS SHOWED UP AT THE CAPITOL! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-17, 12:30AM EDT Reply to: comm-5tyhu-1647789364@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's so hard to disagree with your articulate, coherent arguments, I must admit. I mean, who could challenge this: "WHEW you stupid jerk off. Okay go back to licking your picture of Obamas cock you little freak whew." Hands down, when it comes to making a case for why you are called "Frontal Lobers," you are the champ! Thanks! Whew!!! P.S.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now that you are done with your pointless insults I am still waiting for a real answer based on fact to the original question which was: Tell me why when your kenyan lord and massa won with 52.7 percent we heard all day and night for months that he won with a mandate for change. He won a landslide victory. He won a historic election. Yet when 55% or more of the same American people including many of his own voters are opposed to his health care plan they no longer matter. They are racists. They are teabaggers. They are angry mobs. They are relics longing for yesteryear. Could you please enlighten this curious frontal lobber and please do so without lies. I know that is a tough request but give it a try. We will all be waiting to hear, we can use a laugh in these trying times. ]]>

<![CDATA[how in the world can we put these two things in the same picture . health care has 25 % for it 25% want nothing to do with it . and 48% want it to be started all over . . what a joke . !! Tax and spend has never worked and it is time the democratic party learn that. And this bill will not pass .even with all the bribes to try to get it passed . it will go in the backdoor . And it will cost just as much time and money to dismantle it next yr as it cost to jam it in the backdoor .this yr . . The lady losing her home and all is the fault of the people who always go to the hospital and see dr s and dont want to pay their bills . that is why the medical bills are so high. and the insurance companies want you to pay and pay and never use the system . if you do they will screw you . ]]>

<![CDATA[It's so hard to disagree with your articulate, coherent arguments, I must admit. I mean, who could challenge this: "WHEW you stupid jerk off. Okay go back to licking your picture of Obamas cock you little freak whew." Hands down, when it comes to making a case for why you are called "Frontal Lobers," you are the champ! Thanks! Whew!!!]]>

<![CDATA[The Democrats have shown who they really are. Without exaggeration they are full-blown Communists led by Obama, Pelosi and Reid. They despise the US Constitution.]]>

<![CDATA[She is a lying corrupt CUNT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]>

<![CDATA[that is a really effective way to make your point about health care. Let mne go cry now LOLOL. Hey maybe Michelle will get breast cancer and then you can use her like a worthless prop LOLOL]]>

<![CDATA[Health Care reform bill should and must pass (the people spoke in 2008) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-16, 8:55PM EDT Reply to: comm-tq8c2-1647508481@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Trillion dollar, unfunded, Highly questionable, controversial, Iraq War had its costs passed onto future generations by the GOP-controlled House and Senate with very little objections and then, mostly from democrats who were totally marginalized during the two terms of GW Bush administration, and the twelve years since the republicans took the Congress back in 1994. The Republicans and conservatives who allowed this to happen have no credibility when it comes to fiscal responsibility. That doesn't stop them from posturing; they ought to work in Hollywood. The republicans and their far-right wing attack dogs could give a rat's tail about health care reform of any kind but they will be first on line to benefit from anything the democrats do to improve the nation as a whole. Ask them if they were in power or had their way, they would not have done TARP or the stimulus bill and ask them how exactly what would they have done differently when the nation and the world was on the edge of a massive financial collapse unseen since 1929! What would they have done? Considering all these bad things happened ON THEIR WATCH, WITH PEOPLE THEY PUT INTO POSITIONS OF POWER AND RESPONSIBILITY and we didn't get any accountability, any apologies any solutions and there certainly were no tea parties. Tea party rallies are sooooo manufactured. Sure there are unhappy and miserable even desperate people who just have no other way to vent....but these teaparty people are mostly just spoilers who won't accept the fact their person lost in 2008. They are just unhappy at being marginalized by the democrats but more importantly, the majority of the American people who voted them out in 2008. OUT. The only agenda getting done in Washington right now should be the democratic agenda because it is very clear the republicans have made a mockery out of bipartisanship. Shame on them. ...But they have no shame. There have never been a sorrier bunch of self-centered and selfish people. Health Care reform is essential if this country is going to retain its greatness and its long overdue and really should pass. We are already slipping in many areas where similar western countries look at us like we are a nation of rich morons obsessed only with our short term needs. The republicans are soooo pathetic but their tactics often work because there are so many simple-minded Americans who are incredibly naive, gullible and who habitually vote against their own best interests. Among other things, the Republicans passed the unfunded Iraq War legislation with reconciliation, a method or tactic they used frequently....even to pass their huge tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. BTW, Mayor Bloomberg was worth about $4.4 Billion dollars back in 2002 but now he is worth about $53 Billion! The GW Bush Administration and their republican dominated House and Senate played a big role in relieving him of some of his obligations to the IRS. I bet most New Jerseyans don't get that kind of favorite treatment. Everything the Republicans say is calculated hyperbole, lies, distortions and outrageous rants, but they will say anything and do anything to stop the Obama Administration from accomplishing anything. I PRAY THE HEALTH CARE BILL PASSES ANY WAY THE DEMOCRATS CAN GET IT DONE WITH THE POWER, MANDATE AND MAJORITY THEY HAVE. THE PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY SPOKEN, OBAMA HAS POINTED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION NOW THE DEMOCRATS, who truly have nothing to lose but their balls, MUST GET THIS DONE! ]]>

<![CDATA[And just 200 losers mostly union memebers showed up at Obamas "last" health care rally in St. Louis LOLOLOL. And he is the president...now that really is a WHEW you stupid jerk off. Okay go back to licking your picture of Obamas cock you little freak whew.]]>

<![CDATA[If this lying piece of mulatto shit actually gets his thugs and henchmen to pass this bill it will have the same effect on America as the civil war did under Lincoln. It will be rich against poor. It will be normal against freaks. It will be white against black. it will be pro life against baby killers. It will be God loving against Darwin cultists. It will be productive against parasites. It will be business against union. Irt will be right against wrong. It will be freedom against tryany. Etc etc. etc. And...this is EXACTLY what this cocksucker Obama wants! Doubt me moron? Go read his mentors Saul Alinsky, Cloward & Pivem, Frank Marshall Davis, Karl Marx etc. Turn off the Simpsons and wake the fuck up America!!! In the end we will fight you leftwing cocksuckers and will not stop until you are nothing. You fuck with the wong people you lying vicious little faggots. You fuck with the wrong people. By the way we do not mean violence, we mean will fuck you in ways you could never imagine because in the end WE the real Americans controll this nation. Not Pelosi, not Obama and not you freaks in Seiu, Acorn and the rest of you Obama cult members. You got nothing except liars, poor people, racist negros, criminals, "professors", druggies, queers, freaks etc. This will actually be fun ha ha ha ha. FUCK YOU ALL!!!]]>

<![CDATA[Why don't we just give them at least half of our nukes. In 3 months there would be no Al Qaeda, no Iran, no terrorism...no nothing. Unlike us Israel would get the job done. One time we could do the job but then we got infected with a terrible mental disorder that leaves one lying, stupid and delusional and has disabled a once great nation...it is called progressive leftwingers. Perhaps they could also get rid of the DNC, Acorn, SEIU, Center for American Progress and half of the congress and senate.]]>

<![CDATA[hey man I'd like to helpbut Im too stoned and fucling hubgry and my oldlady is bitching so next time dude.]]>

<![CDATA[That every time they sneak a fucked up vote through it is late Friday or Saturday night? One time I would like to see them do it at 3PM on a Tuesday or Thursday etc. Then again you would have to have morals so what else could we expect from this scum!]]>

<![CDATA[Liberalism is a Mental Disorder! (No doubt about it !) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-16, 4:05PM EDT Reply to: comm-bfruc-1647114200@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Believe the lie, built on a lie, fostered upon a lie, and promoted as truth. Pathetic! ]]>

<![CDATA[To quote the asshole..."it's not true". Let me guess you get your facts from Meida Matters, a blog for "intellectuals. Glad you find me calling you an intellectual funny because I find you thinking you are one even funnier. My friend, you are simply a dumb stupid lying worthless asshole as are all leftwingers. Go back to Cuba okay creep and take your "boyfriend" with you LOLOLOL. Now that's funny ha ha ha. I have another question. Do all "educated, well spoken, spell checker intellectuals" call every smarter person who tells the truth frontal lobbers? By the way the fact that you think that frontal lobber is a nifty phrase makes my point about you. It is as awkward as watching Obama thinking he is connecting with real people when we all know he is only comfortable around rejects like you. Kind of like the successful guy hanging with rejects to feel important. Anyway, once again...EVERY POLL SHOWS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE OPOSSED TO THE BILL so go stick your cock in your mouth okay you queer freak LOLOL.]]>

<![CDATA[Obama says that employer provided insurance would go down 3,000% if his Bullshit care is passed. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY0ve87vQMs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY0ve87vQMs</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Then he woke up]]>

<![CDATA[NO they were the tea partiers. You are the teabagger!!! WOW!!! LOOK!!! your messiah Obama is getting tea bagged NOW THAT'S A MOVEMENT WITH SOME AUTHORITY! WHEW!! ]]>

<![CDATA[Don't worry they won't lose their balls. their balls are in Obama's mouth RE: THE PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY SPOKEN, OBAMA HAS POINTED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION NOW THE DEMOCRATS, who truly have nothing to lose but their balls, MUST GET THIS DONE! ]]>

<![CDATA[YOU ARE SO PATHETIC!!! YOU ARE SAYING JUST BECAUSE THE REPUBLICANS RAN UP DEBT THEN IT IS OK THAT DEMOCRATS DO THE SAME???!!! YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON!!! YOU STUPID PIECE OF SHIT!!!! BOTH PARTIES ARE EQUALLY GUILTY.anyone that would support this bill is a fucking idiot. it is so obvious that this bill has nothing to do with health care reform. anybody in support of this bill is just as much of a crook as Congress is. IF THIS HEALTH CARE BILL IS SO GOOD. THEN WHY IS IT THE SCUMBAG B.O. AND CUNTBAG PELOSI HAVE TO MAKE BRIBES TO GET VOTES!!! WHY IS IT B.O HAS TO GO ON TOUR TRYING TO SELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HIS LOAD OF SHIT CARE. AND BY THE WAY THE TEA PARTIES WERE NOT STARTED BY THE REPUBLICANS AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO WON. The Tea party movement was started by the Libertarian Party long before Obama came into Office. <a href="http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=6628" rel="nofollow">http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=6628</a> In fact, the idea began as the Boston Tea Party in 2006. It was founded by a group of former Libertarian Party members who criticized the party for its “abdication of political responsibilities,” declaring that “Americans deserve and desperately need a pro-freedom party that forcefully advocates libertarian solutions to the issues of today.” The Boston Tea Party opposed statism at all levels. “The Boston Tea Party supports reducing the size scope and power of government at all levels and on all issues, and opposes increasing the size, scope and power of government at any level, for any purpose.” <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party_" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party_</a>(political_party) The Boston Tea Party is an American political party, named after the original Boston Tea Party of 1773. It is composed of political candidates and espouses a libertarian ideology. The new party was founded in 2006 by a group of former Libertarian Party (LP) members who criticized the LP for its "abdication of political responsibilities", saying that "Americans deserve and desperately need a pro-freedom party that forcefully advocates libertarian solutions to the issues of today".[1] ]]>

<![CDATA[The Deceiver has been revealed. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/31592459@N08/4439052531/" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4030/4439052531_0ea47d65a0.jpg"></a>]]>

<![CDATA[Trillion dollar, unfunded, Highly questionable, controversial, Iraq War had its costs passed onto future generations by the GOP-controlled House and Senate with very little objections and then, mostly from democrats who were totally marginalized during the two terms of GW Bush administration, and the twelve years since the republicans took the Congress back in 1994. The Republicans and conservatives who allowed this to happen have no credibility when it comes to fiscal responsibility. That doesn't stop them from posturing; they ought to work in Hollywood. The republicans and their far-right wing attack dogs could give a rat's tail about health care reform of any kind but they will be first on line to benefit from anything the democrats do to improve the nation as a whole. Ask them if they were in power or had their way, they would not have done TARP or the stimulus bill and ask them how exactly what would they have done differently when the nation and the world was on the edge of a massive financial collapse unseen since 1929! What would they have done? Considering all these bad things happened ON THEIR WATCH, WITH PEOPLE THEY PUT INTO POSITIONS OF POWER AND RESPONSIBILITY and we didn't get any accountability, any apologies any solutions and there certainly were no tea parties. Tea party rallies are sooooo manufactured. Sure there are unhappy and miserable even desperate people who just have no other way to vent....but these teaparty people are mostly just spoilers who won't accept the fact their person lost in 2008. They are just unhappy at being marginalized by the democrats but more importantly, the majority of the American people who voted them out in 2008. OUT. The only agenda getting done in Washington right now should be the democratic agenda because it is very clear the republicans have made a mockery out of bipartisanship. Shame on them. ...But they have no shame. There have never been a sorrier bunch of self-centered and selfish people. Health Care reform is essential if this country is going to retain its greatness and its long overdue and really should pass. We are already slipping in many areas where similar western countries look at us like we are a nation of rich morons obsessed only with our short term needs. The republicans are soooo pathetic but their tactics often work because there are so many simple-minded Americans who are incredibly naive, gullible and who habitually vote against their own best interests. Among other things, the Republicans passed the unfunded Iraq War legislation with reconciliation, a method or tactic they used frequently....even to pass their huge tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. BTW, Mayor Bloomberg was worth about $4.4 Billion dollars back in 2002 but now he is worth about $53 Billion! The GW Bush Administration and their republican dominated House and Senate played a big role in relieving him of some of his obligations to the IRS. I bet most New Jerseyans don't get that kind of favorite treatment. Everything the Republicans say is calculated hyperbole, lies, distortions and outrageous rants, but they will say anything and do anything to stop the Obama Administration from accomplishing anything. I PRAY THE HEALTH CARE BILL PASSES ANY WAY THE DEMOCRATS CAN GET IT DONE WITH THE POWER, MANDATE AND MAJORITY THEY HAVE. THE PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY SPOKEN, OBAMA HAS POINTED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION NOW THE DEMOCRATS, who truly have nothing to lose but their balls, MUST GET THIS DONE! ]]>

<![CDATA[Hundreds of Palestinians clashed with Israeli security forces across east Jerusalem on Tuesday in the worst rioting in years, as a senior Hamas leader called for a new "intifada," or uprising.(AFP/Marco Longari) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Partly, blame that dumb ass Obama and Biden, for this. It's no big deal for our only friend in the Middle East but still a pain. Don't understand why in the hell Israel puts up with all the bullshit. They really don't try to defend their actions. Suppose it's because they feel like people that are sympathetic to Hamas and the Palestinians have to be the dumbest bastards in the world so why bother. Why don't you fucking idiots watch the U-Tube Vid then try to defend Hamas. (that would be a good trick like Obama pulls over and over again) Rocko @ 310-358-6286 - ass holes that like Muslim Terrorist, call, we meet, we talk. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKpoqVMcVcA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKpoqVMcVcA</a> <a href="http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/.../video-hamas-terrorists-kill-innocent-palestinians-in-gaza/" rel="nofollow">http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/.../video-hamas-terrorists-kill-innocent-palestinians-in-gaza/</a> - Cached - Similar =========================================================== <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhxKPhZpQF8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhxKPhZpQF8</a> <a href="http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/video-hamas-terrorists-kill-innocent-palestinians-in-gaza/" rel="nofollow">http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/video-hamas-terrorists-kill-innocent-palestinians-in-gaza/</a> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------]]>

<![CDATA[NOW THAT'S A MOVEMENT WITH SOME AUTHORITY! WHEW!!]]>

<![CDATA[President Barack Obama had a Dream that God had spoken to him about it being Very unconstitutional to allow foreign control of Americas central banks the Federal Reserves. God also noted that it was not loving or providing a free will path for most of humanity; to allow one very small group of crafty manipulative bankers to have such a drastic negative effect on this Miraculous Divine Creation Earth. God stated his concerns for the many paths that people can find him through might be manipulated down to a controlled few if we continue to disregard our Constitution. Gods main message to Obama for now, was to allow Americans to start printing and controlling our own money and economy. And like Iceland, set an example for the rest of the worlds governments, that are also currently controlled and manipulated by the, ( banksters) as God likes to call them. He also hinted as to the probability of the Anti Christ being amongst the lot. He also wanted to make it clear that we were all equal and capable of being just like Christ and more! And that perhaps we should consider the returning of Christ in representing the wave of love infusing throughout the world, coming from everyone that was in accordance with The Divine Principles and walking a path of love. A reconnecting with the God that is within all of us and has always been. He is mainly concerned for now while Barrack is President, about the global economic deceptions. That is why God will have the Truth be made very clear outside the corporate owned media outlets. Spreading it like the light from the sun on our planets new day. Obama had a Dream. We Are One. Just Google... theglowingamigo for 1 through 7 .Also... banksterstruth.blogspot.com ]]>

<![CDATA[The Biggest Little Known Economic Truth, Corporate owned media secret! As you continue to loose your homes, your lands, your jobs, your freedoms traded for safety, your constitutional rights: there is a global strategy unfolding behind the curtains of every government. The time has come for the good common people of the world to unite against the unjust schemes the international banksters are playing out. Just Google all these. #1. Congressional report done in the 70's on (corporate and banking influences in the US). Dry and straight forwards it maps the history of the main banksters , power playing corporations and families.#2. Zeitgeistmovie.com #3. Money Changers. #4. iamthewitness.com. #5. Secret rulers of the world, (not so secret anymore). We as a people in the US and around the world are way to divided. By party lines, race, religion, borders ect. When we are so divided, we are easily conquered. It is a time to realize our oneness with each other. By becoming aware of the truths of our times, we can wrestle away from the grasp the corporate banking power hungry families have on our destiny. Uniting the people of all cultures for the common good, we could start collectively creating a future that benefits all life on earth. The revolution can be very peacefully orchestrated. We vote everyday with our dollars and what ever else we support, consciously or unconsciously. So pass this letter on please. As the children of our divinely inspired fore fathers that helped to create our Constitution of The United States of America, we owe it to them , to each other and to our children to maintain the virtues of Freedom and Democracy. I have spent a lot of time researching information about the subject matters I have presented and the dots have connected. I am on a mission to share these truths! We Are One. God Bless Everything! ]]>

<![CDATA[“Capital must protect itself in every possible manner by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages must be foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through a process of law, the common people lose their homes they will become more docile and more easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of government, applied by a central power of wealth under control of leading financiers. This truth is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of Capital to GOVERN the WORLD. By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance. Thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves what has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.” – US Bankers Magazine, Aug 25, 1924 They saw your family comming hundreds of years before they got here. Welcome to the era of We The People VS the new world order! Continued ignorance will be the end of democracy. What would your founding forfathers think of you just going down without a fight? Give me liberty or give me death! Just Google... theglowingamigo for intire BANKSTERS Series make copies and spread the word! “The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating.” - Thomas Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes, 1813 ]]>

<![CDATA[Just Google... theglowingamigo for the rest of the banksters series. Cut and paste them all and send them to everyone you know that wants to know the economic and political truth! Thanks ]]>

<![CDATA[ "Bankster" Cabal Conspiracy Going Mainstream? | Print | E-mail Written by Steven Yates Monday, 01 February 2010 17:45 Claims that cabals of “banksters” control much of the world’s economy from behind closed doors have, for years now, been mainstays of those usually dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.” But since Fall 2008, which saw billions funneled into banking and other institutions deemed “too big to fail,” and since hundreds of billions remain unaccounted for; and especially since the Federal Reserve has successfully resisted efforts to make its activities more transparent — especially its dealings with foreign banks — such claims have gained both visibility and at least some credibility. While not exactly pointing fingers at the Rothschild-Rockefeller axis, a Congressional hearing last week made it clear that a culture of secrecy pervaded the Federal Reserve Bank of New York during that period. Bloomberg.com recently reported on the hearing, convened to investigate the bailout of American International Group Inc. (AIG), the insurance giant. Revelations from that meeting include behind-closed-doors activities which funneled billions of dollars to favored banks, with no Congressional or other oversight. Revealed was that in November 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York used $30 billion to buy out insurance contracts AIG sold on toxic debt securities to several of the largest banks, including Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch in the U.S. and Societe Generale and Deutsche Bank AG in Europe, among others. The banks received 100 cents on the dollar for contracts that would have been considerably less if AIG had been allowed to fail. Timothy Geithner, now U.S. Treasury Secretary, was at the helm of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York at the time. Geithner continued to maintain that the collapse of AIG would have threatened a financial Armageddon. Both Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke (just reappointed to a second four-year term) and former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson denied involvement in the bank bailouts. Geithner said he had recused himself following his November 24 appointment to then-President-Elect Obama’s cabinet. In that case, who was in charge? It appears as if New York Fed staffers and outside lawyers had hoped to thwart the efforts of Congress to gain access to details of the purchase of the toxic assets, known as credit default swaps. One staffer, James Bergin, sent out an email reading, “I have to think this train is probably going to leave the station soon an we need to focus our efforts on explaining the story as best we can. There were too many people involved in the deals — too many counterparties, too many lawyers and advisors, too many people from AIG — to keep a determined Congress from the information.” In other words, given our inability to keep Congress in the dark, let us prepare to do whatever damage control is necessary. The Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors oversees twelve Federal Reserve Banks, including the New York Fed. These twelve banks, quasi-governmental entities, are appointed by boards, whose members are further appointed mostly by other bankers. There is very little accountability to Congress or the public even as the bankers make decisions to lend and guarantee trillions to prop up the financial system—trillions that taxpayers are expected to cover. On the other hand, there is abundant evidence that those on the inside will try to cover their tracks. Small wonder that outside observers get the impression that a cabal of upper-echelon “banksters” owns and controls the financial life of this country, operating through the Federal Reserve system. Photo of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben ]]>

<![CDATA[First of all the Obama administration lied to the people. They also want to keep spending more of our money. Instead of saying this should be for people who don't have health care, they are adding things that are harmful to people. Which includes abortion, which is murder in the bible; also euthanizing which the gov't wants to decide who will live or die, also the health care chip which is the mark of the beast. The gov't wants to control everyone and if you don't do what they tell you, you will be in big trouble. This will also be a way to take people's right to bear arms away. I don't trust their motives and their forked tongue. Someone ought to boot their butts out of office. They also took away the seniors paycheck raise in Soc Sec and then wonder why the seniors can't afford anything being on a fixed income. I think they should be on a fixed income. And if they're for abortion and they think it's not bad, then let them be the first to be aborted. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. ps I think alot of people would like to slap their face. ]]>

<![CDATA[ The reasons why are rapidly becoming know by all... banksterstruth.blogspot.com . Also... theglowingamigo ]]>

<![CDATA[WE ARE NOW UNDER MARTIAL LAW Try to copy the long article to keep a draft copy. Do you repeatedly get a "Windows Internet Explorer...Permission denied to copy" sign? On the Google list: RED ALERT: We Are Now Living Under Martial Law -- House Democrats ...Mar 12, 2010 ... In the Slaughter Solution, the rule would declare that the House "deems" ... Constitutional attorney Mark R. Levin asks, "They're going to ... directorblue.blogspot.com/.../red-alert-we-are-now-living-under.html - Cached (Mark Levin said the Slaughter Solution is Unconstitutional & Louise Slaughter should be sacked!) See The Dangers of ObamaCare by Dr Betsy McCaughey, expert & patient advocate. THE NATIONALIZATION OF HEALTH IS IRREVERSIBLE, HARDCORE SOCIALISM :Mark Levin, author of Liberty & Tyranny; Conservative Talk Radio host. Call your congressmen TOLL FREE: 800 965 4701 or 800 828 0498 Find out their names at Code Red, the Republican web site :Rush. ]]>