Classified Listings

Find jobs, housing, for sale, personals, services, local community, and events.

USA Online local classifieds

Community - politics classifieds in san diego

<![CDATA[A previous poster indicated the amount of trash you stock pile in visible view causes Global Warming. Although I have never seen nor heard even those that believe in man made global warming give this theory. How ever it sounds plausable, we have tons of trash and garbage in Washington, and their hot air is a major contribution to more piles of shit being delivered every day. Lets clean up the swamp Washington. And stop Man Made Global Warming <h1> <dl><dt><a href="http://70.38.64.59/934/322882/1268859386-763.gif.php" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://70.38.64.59/a3/934/322882/1268859386-763.gif"></a> </dt><dt><a href="http://70.38.64.59/934/322882/1268859382-990.gif.php" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://70.38.64.59/b3/934/322882/1268859382-990.gif"></a></dt><dt><a href="http://70.38.64.59" rel="nofollow"></a></dt></dl></h1> ]]>

<![CDATA[Pelosi's plan outrages Republicans, but they used "deem and pass" well over a HUNDRED times. When congressional Republicans predict ominously that Democratic deployment of a self-executing rule (or "deem-and-pass") will encourage them to engage in similar behavior someday, they forget to mention how many times they’ve already done it. For the sake of anyone troubled by the ranting over this trivial matter, the historical record is indisputable. During the years when the Republicans controlled the House, they set records for the use of such "rarely used" maneuvers. Although their bogus sanctimony should no longer surprise anyone, the utter fraudulence of these latest outbursts has been held up to deserved ridicule by impeccably nonpartisan and even conservative sources. On the American Enterprise Institute blog, for instance, congressional expert Norm Ornstein writes: Any veteran observer of Congress is used to the rampant hypocrisy over the use of parliamentary procedures that shifts totally from one side to the other as a majority moves to minority status, and vice versa. But I can’t recall a level of feigned indignation nearly as great as what we are seeing now from congressional Republicans and their acolytes at the Wall Street Journal, and on blogs, talk radio, and cable news. It reached a ridiculous level of misinformation and disinformation over the use of reconciliation, and now threatens to top that level over the projected use of a self-executing rule by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. In the last Congress that Republicans controlled, from 2005 to 2006, Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier used the self-executing rule more than 35 times, and was no stranger to the concept of "deem and pass." That strategy, then decried by the House Democrats who are now using it, and now being called unconstitutional by WSJ editorialists, was defended by House Republicans in court (and upheld). Dreier used it for a $40 billion deficit reduction package so that his fellow GOPers could avoid an embarrassing vote on immigration. Full story: Not writen by a former felon or right-wing loon <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason/2010/03/17/ornstein/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason/2010/03/17/ornstein/index.html</a>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>All my fans feel compelled to respond to my every post. But then they start to feel a bit ashamed that I can so easily own and manipulate them. So in order to protect their ego te fragilis, they must rationalize their responding behavior. It's OK with me, little puppets, if you need to come up with some palatable excuse for following my directions. Be sure and respond to this one too. I AM THE PUPPET MASTER!! LOL Dance little puppet, (in whatever form you "need" to), dance. </h2>]]>

<![CDATA[oh little sybil, are you asking for my attention again?? did mommie give you another cold water enema this morning?? i'm never sure which one of your "personalities" i'm chatting with. you are a slippery one, there grampi. this is fun for me too - tormenting your little damaged brain that is. just sayin. <img src="http://www.tunefilter.com/1997/mental_illness.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Here is a source for TARP being in the trillions and not the 700bn figure claimed. "July 20 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. taxpayers may be on the hook for as much as $23.7 trillion to bolster the economy and bail out financial companies, said Neil Barofsky, special inspector general for the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program." My point is that this country is in some serious financial trouble and the mainstream media is just running cover for the criminals who perpetrated the largest swindle in history. Read entire article here <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aY0tX8UysIaM" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aY0tX8UysIaM</a>]]>

<![CDATA[So what color should the President be? Maybe we should hang a sign in the Oval office that says "No Whites Allowed?" Tell us what color the puppet should be. Remember all of the Hindus and Buhdist and Muslims and Jews and Arabs and Chinese etc. who helped those white guys fight the Revolutionary War that won the independence of this nation?]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>People do respond to my every post. And what's not to like about that? It's awesome, I can't get enough. So thanks, dear fans, your consistent attention to little old me is appreciated, no matter what form it takes.</h2>]]>

<![CDATA["... if you were on the street you would get your face pounded into the ground." I never said I wanted to pound anyone's face. comm-5z4qy-1647884448@craigslist.org However, this assertion has been falsey applied to me.]]>

<![CDATA[<img src="http://sillywhabbit.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/teabagging.jpg"> <img src="http://thumb10.webshots.net/t/36/36/4/5/56/330540556AEziuJ_th.jpg"> <img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_sVfYYHr3cdo/SeZrYDkw9LI/AAAAAAAABPc/UvNiNKke1QM/s400/teabagging.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[hey grampi, why do you idiots always try and compare pollution (a real problem) to mmgw (a hoax)? just askin. ]]>

<![CDATA[This is all you MUST bring , if you want to get in. As much of grandma's pain medication as you can safely pack. Any under age Dominican willing to hump a fat man. At the gate there will be a mandatory drilling of your skull so as to allow a vacuum to be fitted into the hole and your brain will be removed. Any one attempting to approach the gate without first showing their two most important I.D.s, their NRA card and their RNC card, will be sodomized and burned to death then sodomized again by Rush personally. Good times, see ya there.</h2> ]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>"What if it's a fraud?" You must be joking? IT IS ABSOLUTELY A FRAUD!! Nothing any human has ever done, since humans have been on this planet, has ever had a negative effect. That's why I freely burn plastic in my fireplace. That's why I dump my motor oil into the nearest street drain. That's why I toss broken appliances into a wooded area behind a park. That's why I no longer use a garbage pick up service, instead I just drive my garbage to Ocean Beach and throw it over the edge into the ocean. That's why I have removed all smog devices off my 8 cylinder truck. That's is why I never recycle. This planet is huge and can absorb and "pollutant" we care to chuck it's way. Global Warming is a joke and it's sole purpose is to get us to buy something. Remember Y2K? Same thing. Pollute less? Hell no, I say pollute more!! Let's show these Global Warming, Pink-o Faggot, Socialist bastards that they are not the boss of us!! </h2> <h3>(mmmmmmm. . . . . . . . looks like peaceful co-existence to me. Fuck the Earth, it's about time it starts helping itself instead of being such a victim like all Liberal assholes.) ]]>

<![CDATA[Oh my.....smarmy jizz. I've heard many adjectives that have described my jizz over the years, such as sweet, thick, etc..........but smarmy is definitely a first. LOL! A "date?" Snarkums....you couldn't handle this.....mmmmmmK? Wishful thinking, though. Whether or not I was speaking in jest or really expected anyone to actually follow through with said "circle jerk" isn't the point. I was still referring to the ACT itself, my oblivious obfuscator. Mr. NWO was indeed speaking metaphorically about your, well....inability to focus on topic (hah), and your subpar debate tactics. <img src="http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/original/percywells-asshat.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[We can all Praise our Muslim President and take over of our New Socialist Amerikkka]]>

<![CDATA[Oh dear heart....leave it to you, once again, to make comparisons that are well.....apples to rocks. I was talking about a real, live CIRCLE JERK - as in real male bonding between you, myself, Nat and PTA. This "crackpot" as you've so indignantly called him (there you go again with your haughty and condescending rhetoric as you gape down your long nose at someone) was calling you out for your lame debate tactics and your obfuscation, my little pedagogue. [My masturbatory reference was literal, his was metaphorical. Sheesh!] <big>Before accusing anyone of being haughty and condescending, I'd suggest you go back and revisit your own smarmy jizz. Your offer was meant to be taken literally? Oh my... well if that's your idea of a how to go about asking me for 'a date' you can just forget it! And, "he called me out"? It was the other way around; NWO seems to be as etymologically challenged as Nat. ]]>

<![CDATA[ SD: ''Why don't the four of us get together today at Arc's for a nice hot circle jerk??? We're open minded adults.....right??? I mean....honestly......who really has a problem with homosexuality???...'' Now why aren't I surprised that when some crackpot who's 'only trying to wake people up to what he thinks is the root of the problems that this country is facing' [but would ''pound my face in'' for disputing his points if he were to meet me on the street] mentions a ''jerk fest'' you're all over it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh dear heart....leave it to you, once again, to make comparisons that are well.....apples to rocks. I was talking about a real, live CIRCLE JERK - as in real male bonding between you, myself, Nat and PTA. This "crackpot" as you've so indignantly called him (there you go again with your haughty and condescending rhetoric as you gape down your long nose at someone) was calling you out for your lame debate tactics and your obfuscation, my little pedagogue. [My masturbatory reference was literal, his was metaphorical. Sheesh!] <img src="http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x213/vespin/badfrosty/penguin/ass_hat.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Our entire political system is a sham. We have a Coke vs Pepsi political system. Generally speaking, anyone who attempts to do anything sensible politically winds up with a big hole in his head where his brain used to be. Now we have Diebold electronic voting machines to ensure that election fraud continues unabated. BUT WHAT'S YOUR POINT? WHAT DO YOU MEAN "We never did because we've never truly considered that an option?" WTF? We've never been given a real choice. ie Bush vs Kerry 2004 Bush=skul and bones, Kerry=skull and bones. Who who did you vote for you f..in idiot. Oh Skull and Bones-Really What option did you consider in that election?? The people in this country have never had a real choice- OK except maybe Ron Paul in 2008. <big><big>And you're STILL only talking about "white", "men"... ''WTF?'' indeed.</big></big> ]]>

<![CDATA[<big>SD: ''Why don't the four of us get together today at Arc's for a nice hot circle jerk??? We're open minded adults.....right??? I mean....honestly......who really has a problem with homosexuality???...'' Now why aren't I surprised that when some crackpot who's 'only trying to wake people up to what he thinks is the root of the problems that this country is facing' [but would ''pound my face in'' for disputing his points if he were to meet me on the street] mentions a ''jerk fest'' you're all over it? ]]>

<![CDATA[The site he referenced [<a href="http://jubilee2012.50webs.com/index.htm#top" rel="nofollow">http://jubilee2012.50webs.com/index.htm#top</a>] directed the reader to this site [<a href="http://jahtruth.net/" rel="nofollow">http://jahtruth.net/</a>] with the following admonition, "Please study the information at the following address <a href="http://jahtruth.net" rel="nofollow">http://jahtruth.net</a> before studying this website and if there are any conflicts between the information on jahtruth.net and this site, please accept what JAH says and ignore what I have written, as He is the expert and I am only His student. Admin." I'd STRONGLY encourage anyone taking the claims NWO has made seriously to do just that. Read it for yourself: <a href="http://jahtruth.net/" rel="nofollow">http://jahtruth.net/</a> It sure convinced me.]]>

<![CDATA[Dude...I'll never, ever stop trying...if only to drive YOU nuts!!! What will happen to YOU.....on "Judgment Day"??? Oh yeah on a side note....a certain state exam actually asks a question concerning the correct spelling of the word judgment.....care to venture a guess??]]>

<![CDATA[I, Your Name here, Do Solomly Swear: As a college student I will take those courses that will only benefit the Party If I need a student loan. I swear, I will not protest the fines levied against me if I do not fulfill the obligations of Obama Healthcare. As a student I will not, whether I am on a student loan program or not, I will not protest the fact that tuition is raised - not to cover the cost of my tuition but to cover the cost of those who defraud the government and say they are too poor to pay. I will not mind that much of my raise in tuition pays for illegals aliens who are not required to state where they were born "if they cannot remember" or if, by law, the investigator is not allowed to ask them if they are indeed an illegal alien. I swear I will not cry when I see those I graduated with with beautiful families of 2 children and selling their starter home to move up to a dream home while I am just finishing my "program" with the Party and trying to pay off my credit cards they used to buy sign paint for protests they made me go to. I swear I will not sob when my first second and third prospective employer will not hire me when he sees I had to work with community organizers to fulfill my Party Obligations because he knows the sedition my Party seeds within its groups against private businesses with the "social and economic" redistribution of wealth scenario. I swear I will not blame him or her - only myself. While I am in college I will not believe everything I hear from someone just because they know one more thing than I. I will remind myself that a professor is not my new parent or a minor god just because he or she knows one more thing than myself. I am ignorant of much. Professors have never left the campus and know little about the real (business) world. I want to be in a business. I swear, I will get a degree in that subject that is required by the Party, taking no courses outside that area of interest. I will take full responsibility for the abundance or lack of jobs in said major when I graduate. I hereby swear, too, that if I have to spend 5 years or 10 to pay this "free" loan down by doing menial labors outside my major, at minimal wages - I will not whine or cry. I will not cry if they want me to do political work such as carrying signs for a union during that new tenure while others are outperforming me in the working world in their major of choice - I swear that when others, who worked their way through college by their own sheer will and fortitude get a career going immediately, I will not whine or become depressed and vindictive of them or of my Party. I will also swear to the fact that, even though these students who did not take out government/Party loans, get a beautiful resume going and a 5 year jump on life, I will not cry. Flipping hamburgers is noble - even at 27 years old. I will not cry when their resume reads - Corporate Management 3 years (100K), while mine would read, Community Organizing, ie, picking up trash around the office, getting coffee, landscaping flower pots. pickettng and various other duties assigned to me by others with no education, (5 years, minimum wage) I swear I will not cry when I see those I graduated with with beautiful families of 2 children and selling their starter home to move up to a dream home while I am just finishing my "program" with the Party and trying to pay off my credit cards they used to buy sign paint for protests they made me go to. I swear I will not sob when my first second and third prospective employer will not hire me when he sees I had to work with community organizers to fulfill my Party Obligations because he knows the sedition my Party seeds within its groups against private businesses with the "social and economic" redistribution of wealth scenario. I swear I will not blame him or her - only myself. These are the things I swear to under the Obama Adminstration while I am a college student and to whatever legacy elements his administration hangs our generations with. Sign and Dated this day. Girl on her period and mad as hell <a href="http://strike2010.com/" rel="nofollow">http://strike2010.com/</a> Scroll to the bottom of above html to see your Obama debt clock churning at light speed. Obama has TRIPLED the debt with the bailouts and stimulus packages. This is not good. Vote for good. You are already in debt about $240,000 each person as of today. It is not insurmountable to turn it around, but you do have to use the tools to think this through. You do not go in debt to pay off a debt. ]]>

<![CDATA[Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ! If one belch is too large, we're toast !]]>

<![CDATA[Then we all lose and destroy our economic future, India and China to prosper. Redistribution of Americas wealth to the world. These are great things for the undeveloped countries or China who refuses to abide by any pollution restrictions and who now owns the United States. Mans effect on global warming is the equivilent of pissing in the ocean, might make it more salty, but who can tell. Temperature of the earth has gone up and down for thousands of years with no relation to man made carbon gases. In other words Glow-Bull bullshit. Washington sees this man made hoax (global warming) as a perfect excuse to take more of your life in a global warming tax, it's your patriotic duty to save mankind right? Who's the fool now? ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20000576-503544.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20000576-503544.html</a>]]>

<![CDATA[A somewhat warmer climate would probably reduce mortality in the United States and provide Americans with valuable benefits. Regressions of death rates in Washington, DC, and in some 89 urban counties scattered across the nation on climate and demographic variables demonstrate that warmer temperatures reduce deaths. The results imply that a 2.5deg. Celsius warming would lower deaths in the United States by about 40,000 per year. Although the data on illness are poor, the numbers indicate that warming might reduce medical costs by about $20 billion annually. Utilizing willingness to pay as a measure of preference, this paper regresses wage rates for a few narrowly defined occupations in metropolitan areas on measures of temperature and size of city and finds that people prefer warm climates. Workers today would be willing to give up between $30 billion and $100 billion annually in wages for a 2.5deg.C increase in temperatures. Health and Amenity Effects of Global Warming ............Rarely has any research explored people's preferences for less chilly weather. Given the circumstantial evidence that people prefer warm climates over cold, it is somewhat surprising that the effects of warming on human well-being have essentially been ignored. We do know that many people upon retiring flee to southern and warmer locales. According to a survey of people turning 50 in 1996, almost 40 percent plan to move when they retire and the most important criterion in selecting their destination (40 percent) is a "more favorable climate" (USA Today, May 13, 1996, p. B1). Folklore alleges that physicians sometimes recommend that patients escape to a warmer climate, never to a colder one. Presumably retirees, at least, find that higher temperatures improve their welfare. As air-conditioning has mitigated the rigors of hot summers, the population of the United States has been moving South and West, towards climates that enjoy less extreme cold weather. Most Americans and Canadians taking vacations in the winter head to Florida, the Caribbean, Mexico, Hawaii, or southern California. Exceptions crowd the ski slopes, but they are a minority. To my knowledge only one study (Hoch and Drake 1974) -- summarized in the U.S. Department of Transportation research described below -- has examined the preferences of people for various climates, an important measure of how weather affects human welfare. Many studies that have examined the quality of life in various urban areas, however, have found that warmer climates were correlated with a willingness to accept lower wages (e.g., Hoch 1974 & 1977; Cropper and Arriaga-Salinas 1980; Cropper 1981; Roback 1982 & 1988; Gyourko and Tracy 1991). As a gauge of preferences, that research and this paper both use workers' willingness to pay for a better climate as measured by the differential in wages among cities. B. Seasonal Effects Moreover, if climate change were to manifest itself as warmer winters without much of an increase in temperatures during the hot months, which some climate models predict (Gates et al. 1992), the change in weather could be especially beneficial to human health. The IPCC reports (Folland et al. 1992) that over this century the weather in much of the world has been consistent with such a pattern: winter and night temperatures have risen while summer temperatures have fallen. A warmer globe would likely result in the polar jet stream's retreating towards higher latitudes; in the Northern Hemisphere the climate belt would move North (Lamb 1972, p. 117-118; Giles 1990). Thus an average annual 3.7deg.C increase in temperature for New York City, for example, would give it the climate of Atlanta. NYC's summertime temperatures, however, would not go up commensurably: the average high temperature in Atlanta during June, July, and August is only 2.2deg.C warmer than New York City's and the latter city has on record a higher summer temperature than does the capital of Georgia. Summer temperatures generally differ less than winter temperatures on roughly the same longitude and differ less than average temperatures. A sample of 45 metropolitan areas in the United States shows that for each increase of a degree in the average annual temperature, July's average temperatures go up by only 0.5 degrees while January's average temperatures climb by 1.5deg.[2]. Since warming will likely exert the maximum effect during the coldest periods but have much less effect during the hottest months, the climate change should reduce deaths even more than any summer increase might boost them. <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/~moore/health.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/~moore/health.html</a> <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/global_warming/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/global_warming/index.htm</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[FACT CHECK: Premiums would rise under Obama plan By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR (AP) – 5 hours ago WASHINGTON — Buyers, beware: President Barack Obama says his health care overhaul will lower premiums by double digits, but check the fine print. Premiums are likely to keep going up even if the health care bill passes, experts say. If cost controls work as advertised, annual increases would level off with time. But don't look for a rollback. Instead, the main reason premiums would be more affordable is that new government tax credits would help cover the cost for millions of people. Listening to Obama pitch his plan, you might not realize that's how it works. Visiting a Cleveland suburb this week, the president described how individuals and small businesses will be able to buy coverage in a new kind of health insurance marketplace, gaining the same strength in numbers that federal employees have. "You'll be able to buy in, or a small business will be able to buy into this pool," Obama said. "And that will lower rates, it's estimated, by up to 14 to 20 percent over what you're currently getting. That's money out of pocket." And that's not all. Obama asked his audience for a show of hands from people with employer-provided coverage, what most Americans have. "Your employer, it's estimated, would see premiums fall by as much as 3,000 percent," said the president, "which means they could give you a raise." A White House press spokesman later said the president misspoke; he had meant to say annual premiums would drop by $3,000. It could be a long wait. "There's no question premiums are still going to keep going up," said Larry Levitt of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a research clearinghouse on the health care system. "There are pieces of reform that will hopefully keep them from going up as fast. But it would be miraculous if premiums actually went down relative to where they are today." The statistics Obama based his claims on come from two sources. In both cases, the caveats got left out. A report for the Business Roundtable, an association of big company CEOs, was the source for the claim that employers could save $3,000 per worker on health care costs, the White House said. Issued in November, the report looked generally at proposals that Democrats were considering to curb health care costs, concluding they had the potential to significantly reduce future increases. But the analysis didn't consider specific legislation, much less the final language being tweaked this week. It's unclear to what degree the bill that the House is expected to vote on within days would reduce costs for employers. An analysis by the Congressional Budget Office of earlier Senate legislation suggested savings could be fairly modest. It found that large employers would see premium savings of at most 3 percent compared with what their costs would have been without the legislation. That would be more like a few hundred dollars instead of several thousand. The claim that people buying coverage individually would save 14 percent to 20 percent comes from the same budget office report, prepared in November for Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind. But the presidential sound bite fails to convey the full picture. The budget office concluded that premiums for people buying their own coverage would go up by an average of 10 percent to 13 percent, compared with the levels they'd reach without the legislation. That's mainly because policies in the individual insurance market would provide more comprehensive benefits than they do today. For most households, those added costs would be more than offset by the tax credits provided under the bill, and they would pay significantly less than they have to now. The premium reduction of 14 percent to 20 percent that Obama cites would apply only to a portion of the people buying coverage on their own — those who decide they want to keep the skimpier kinds of policies available today. Their costs would go down because more young people would be joining the risk pool and because insurance company overhead costs would be lower in the more efficient system Obama wants to create. The president usually alludes to that distinction in his health care stump speech, saying the savings would accrue to those people who continue to buy "comparable" coverage to what they have today. But many of his listeners may not pick up on it. "People are likely to not buy the same low-value policies they are buying now," said health economist Len Nichols of George Mason University. "If they did buy the same value plans ... the premium would be lower than it is now. This makes the White House statement true. But is it possibly misleading for some people? Sure." Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ]]>

<![CDATA["Only that it's nonsense to think that, absent one, we've choosen, "the most qualified". We never did because we've never truly considered that an option. And still don't." Our entire political system is a sham. We have a Coke vs Pepsi political system. Generally speaking, anyone who attempts to do anything sensible politically winds up with a big hole in his head where his brain used to be. Now we have Diebold electronic voting machines to ensure that election fraud continues unabated. BUT WHAT'S YOUR POINT? WHAT DO YOU MEAN "We never did because we've never truly considered that an option?" WTF? We've never been given a real choice. ie Bush vs Kerry 2004 Bush=skul and bones, Kerry=skull and bones. Who who did you vote for you f..in idiot. Oh Skull and Bones-Really What option did you consider in that election?? The people in this country have never had a real choice- OK except maybe Ron Paul in 2008. ]]>

<![CDATA[Heh...and she accuses me of bombasturbation. WHOODA THOUGHT! ]]>

<![CDATA[Once again arc/mat proves my point. As I predicted, he brushed aside my source, and then failed to provide a number of his own. That's because he has no juevos. arc/mat, it's a good thing that you can hide behind a computer because if you were on the street you would get your face pounded into the ground. I am only trying to wake people up to what I think is the root of the problems that this country is facing. Maybe I'm wrong on some points. But you are just here for some masturbatory intellectual jerk fest and never advance the conversation. You don't need to reply here because I will not reply to you anymore. Have fun spell-checking.]]>

<![CDATA[Mikey, you are correct in that I did not source my $28 trillion figure. I was in the middle of posting the article and have heard that number and it's source so many times that I thought I'd be able to find it easily. By the sourcing didn't work out that way at that time. However, if you aware how financing works in this country and the central banking system in general, then you are aware of "fractional reserve banking." And if so, then you know that the 700 billion was lent out over 9 times!! So what's that 6.3 trillion? and then that get's leveraged. And then that leveraging get's leveraged..... Do you see the picture?? Obamba is only here to pick up where Bush left off. Can't you see that?? There is no diference between the two. If you watch a film called "Zeitgeist Addendum", within the first 15 minutes of the film, you will see our entire banking scam/scheme laid out in very simple terms. Anyways, I know the 28 trillion figure to be fairly true and I will endeavor to source it. ps. Mikey, at least you have some fire.]]>

<![CDATA[Really now. Is it the length or girth of my font that's "edging" you the wrong way? ]]>

<![CDATA[I would like to thank all of those who stood in defense of me and my spelling error. It's guys like "arc/mat" and "Da world" who hide behind typos because they really don't have any counterpoint so they attack the messenger. But to Da world I must say, that after looking in the back of my own Bible, that the spelling there of the word "judgment" is just like that. So you have avoided yet another legitimate discussion on a technicality. Felate in peace- <big>"...they really don't have any counterpoint so they attack the messenger"?! My counterpoint has been that you're wrong in saying that goy = cattle. And that you're wrong in calculating the Rothschilds net worth somewhere in the range of 300 to 500 trillion USD. As for your proof, you may as well have quoted David Icke. And what attack? What spelling error did I point out? I'm just sick to death of hearing about your Jewish conspiracy nonsense. Calling you a <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/putz" rel="nofollow">putz</a> is being pretty benign if you ask me. ]]>

<![CDATA[<img src="http://us.tnpv.net/2009/CNO200912/CNO2009121850065_PV.jpg"></a>]]>

<![CDATA[I just couldn't help but jump in on THIS one. Nancy Pelosi = arc/mat in drag. This is called the...................................wait for it................................wait for it................................... waaaait fooooor iiiiiiiit............................................................................the "Tranny" Property of Equality. Have a good night gentlemen.....................................and lady too. :-[) <big>[Your edging technique really rubs me the wrong way.]</big> ]]>

<![CDATA[I would like to thank all of those who stood in defense of me and my spelling error. It's guys like "arc/mat" and "Da world" who hide behind typos because they really don't have any counterpoint so they attack the messenger. But to Da world I must say, that after looking in the back of my own Bible, that the spelling there of the word "judgment" is just like that. So you have avoided yet another legitimate discussion on a technicality. Felate in peace-]]>

<![CDATA[<big>Prior to all this "Affirmative Action" nonsense, we got along just fine as a nation, right? Maybe... I guess that would depend on who's included in using the word, "we". I'm going to suggest that growing up in a patriarchal, racially entrenched, religiously preoccupied society tends to color your perception of what it even means, "to be qualified". Consider the highest office in the land: we've always elected the candidate we considered most qualified, 44 times running. The fact that "the most qualified" has never been a woman isn't just a coincidence. Nor that, up until just recently, it's always been a white man. It's because we believe, with absolute conviction, that positions of authority can only be held by men who are white. Not only that but it took nearly two centuries for a Catholic to be viewed as more qualified than, say, a Quaker. Why? Because there was a time in America when women, Catholics and men of color were not to be trusted. [And those days aren't over. Not by a long shot.] Of course I'm not suggesting that a racial quota should be imposed on the office of the presidency. Only that it's nonsense to think that, absent one, we've choosen, "the most qualified". We never did because we've never truly considered that an option. And still don't. ]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1647495547.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1647495547.html</a> Ha! You love your FUCKING CUNTS, don't you? So, by the transitive property of equality in mathematics: 1) arc/mat = FUCKING CUNT, and 2) Nancy Pelosi = FUCKING CUNT. Therefore, 3) arc/mat = Nancy Pelosi. Is that right? ---------------------------------------------------------------- I just couldn't help but jump in on THIS one. Nancy Pelosi = arc/mat in drag. This is called the...................................wait for it................................wait for it................................... waaaait fooooor iiiiiiiit............................................................................the "Tranny" Property of Equality. Have a good night gentlemen.....................................and lady too. :-[) <img src="http://cfif.org/v/videos/2009/10/Nancy-Pelosi-Coddling-Corruption.jpg"> OH MY! is it ARC, or NANCY?????? <img src="http://www.htzfm.com/files/htzfm/images/drag%20queen.gif"> ]]>

<![CDATA[The bonus for the children is they go to heaven when they die. <big>They do? Who told you that? Drawing on what authority? <a href="http://www.tentmaker.org/tracts/Jones1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tentmaker.org/tracts/Jones1.html</a></big> ]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1647452005.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1647452005.html</a> "Yeah he owns me ..." Is there any way I can get a refund? I think you're damaged goods. "He got da street smarts i got da common sense ..." I thought they were the same thing, Da World: Street smarts and common sense VERSUS elitist book learnin'. Am I wrong? What street smarts do you think I have? "who you gunna go to war with....the Lib of Glib...or Me..." Are you inviting people to go to war with you? I'm not. As much as I enjoy impassioned conversation with those who disagree with me, war is the gravest travesty to be inflicted on humanity, and ought not to be used as a metaphor for such a potentially enlightening endeavor. "Intellect, book smarts, they won't get you anywhere." Spoken by a man who's clearly never exploited such resources. "Ok so I was having fun and I got called out..... The Lib of Glib usualy does...only he wished he had me in his hand...." I suppose I should be careful what I wish for ... "I just get a hair up my ass when people continually spell the word judgment wrong....PTA correctly points out that 'judgement' is OK in England, but last time I checked any court document or lien paper in THIS COUNTRY...THE WORD IS SPELLED 'JUDGMENT'" While there are preferred spellings, depending on continent, I hope I've clearly established that the British spelling makes more sense than the American, though neither is incorrect. That you have any familiarity with court judgments is a whole other matter, one which you should perhaps guard more closely than your reliance on anger management medications. This is a political forum, after all, not a venue for you to vent your chemical imbalances. Having said that, I value your contributions here, slight as they are, and don't wish to discourage you from participating. Please, try again. <img src="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/images/2008/04/25/festival_of_books.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Wondering when the progressives will quit the bitching at conservatives. How can the GOP hold *any* responsibility for this monstrocity of a healthcare reform bill failing to pass? Liberals hold the Executive Branch Liberals hold both House & Senate majorities Obstructionists? No. You have enough 'Democrat' party members to pass it on all levels. Why can't it? Because there a few 'democrats' who oppose this healthcare bill. The GOP has offered multiple solutions to bringing about healthcare reform but all we hear is 'do nothing republicans'. When members of the GOP have spoke out about their ideas for healthcare reform do you just go braindead? seriously? ]]>

<![CDATA[My only complaint is that why the hell didn't the pussy democrats do this earlier, when the bill was actually worth something? Republicans were never, ever, going to resolve the health care problem in this country. So, why didn't the pussy democrats lead on the issue last summer and tell the republicans go fuck themselves? With health care being a miserable failure, and the Citizens United case, or course democrats are going to loose in November. What idiots don't know that? The democrats in congress. mikeyP This just in, Nancy Pelosi = FUCKING CUNT House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503742_pf.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503742_pf.html</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[The tarp happened because the pussy democrats simply did not stand up to the Bushies. You un-sourced your $28 trillion claim. So, I guess that rumor was started by you. Now onto more serious stuff. Apparently <a href="http://www.dsnews.com/articles/failed-bank-exec-first-to-be-charged-with-tarp-fraud-2010-03-16" target="blank" rel="nofollow"> some bankster got nailed for defrauding the tarp fund.</a> If convicted, this douchbag could face up to 260 years in federal prison. Thanks republicans.... thanks for bringing us the Tarp fund... One of the many gift from the Bushies that we will be paying for years to come. A feeding frenzy so the republican banksters can live high on the their corporate welfare. When the Bought and paid for two-headed snake (Republicans and Democrats) sold you out on the TARP vote, they lied to you when they told you it was only going to be $700 billion. And when Chairman Obamba tells you that most of it has been paid back, that too is a lie. The 700 billion dollar figure represents only two percent of the total money leveraged. That was only for the Bonus Plan. Rumors have it at the $28 trillion range. mikeyP]]>

<![CDATA[The bonus for the children is they go to heaven when they die. Corupt man judges based on the temporary, God is looking at the eternal. God warns man to choose on the eternal plane. Instead, man lives for the moment, ignoring the eternal. This is why those that reject Gods will, are angry about the temporary pleasure they don't recieve now, instead of the eternal reward that will surpass the hell man has created on earth with his free will. God will rightly judge us all. How ever, it is God's choice to decide how long we all live. Not corrupt liberal athiest anti God humans. ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G03220100317" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62G03220100317</a> (Reuters) - Nearly one in four Californians under age 65 lacked health insurance during all or part of last year, well above the latest national average, in a trend fueled by shrinking coverage due to mounting job layoffs, a new study on Tuesday found. U.S. The number left uninsured for at least part of the year in the most populous U.S. state climbed from 6.4 million in 2007 to 8.2 million last year, a 25 percent jump that shocked University of California at Los Angeles researchers who have tracked the figures for a decade. "We expected to see some increase, certainly, but one of this magnitude was quite surprising," Shana Alex Lavarreda, one of the study's authors, told Reuters. The bulk of the increase, the study said, stemmed from soaring job losses during the recession and a corresponding drop in employer-provided coverage, which accounts for about half the health insurance for Californians under 65. Nearly all U.S. senior citizens are covered under the federal Medicare program. The UCLA researchers said their findings underscore the need for a U.S. healthcare system overhaul that provides a public insurance option for younger adults. "What we can safely say is that in 2009, a system that was already straining completely broke," Lavarreda said. Not including the elderly, the proportion of Californians without health coverage during all or part of the year rose from 19.5 percent in 2007 to 24.3 percent in 2009. Among working-age adults, those between 18 and 65, the rate was higher still, with nearly one in three uninsured. By comparison, 17 percent of non-elderly Americans overall -- or about 45 million people -- were uninsured in 2008, the last year for which national figures were available. And Lavarreda said California undoubtedly still leads the nation with the highest number of uninsured in any single state. COBRA PLANS FALL SHORT The proportion of Californians covered by state healthcare programs for the needy grew from 15.3 percent to 16.5 percent during the past two years, an increase more than offset by the steep decline in employer-based insurance. The federal government softened the blow by offering subsidies to laid-off workers who wished to continue their old employer-based coverage by picking up the premiums themselves. This more than doubled the rate of coverage under so-called COBRA plans. But 62 percent of those who lost their job-based health benefits were forced to seek coverage from other sources or became uninsured, the study said. The analysis was based on enrollment data from health insurance companies and state programs, adjusting for population growth and other changes since 2007. Conducted by UCLA's Center for Health Policy Research, the study was funded by two charitable organizations devoted to improved access to healthcare -- the California Endowment and the California Wellness Foundation.]]>

<![CDATA[<h3>E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army</h3> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/16/e-mails-suggested-fort-hood-shooter-subpar-army/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/16/e-mails-suggested-fort-hood-shooter-subpar-army/</a> <blockquote>"Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, charged in the Fort Hood shootings, was too fat and "chronically" unprofessional during his psychiatric training, according to internal e-mails exchanged by his superiors."</blockquote>]]>

<![CDATA[<h2>This just in, Nancy Pelosi = FUCKING CUNT</h2> <h3>House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it</h3> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503742_pf.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/15/AR2010031503742_pf.html</a> <blockquote>"After laying the groundwork for a decisive vote this week on the Senate's health-care bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested Monday that she might attempt to pass the measure without having members vote on it."</blockquote>]]>

<![CDATA["You and everyone else. Unfortunately, not everyone has the opportunities you do. Again, what should we do about that?" WHO DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO WHICH OPPORTUNITIES? "Ideally, affirmative action should be a guide in deciding between two equally qualified candidates for a position." Dood, come on… You insist you're not the "typical progressive" but you constantly talk about "ideals", hence the label IDEOLOGUE. Put your big boy pants on and get down on the ground level and tell me in your own words how this shit is supposed to work in the real world. How will fulfilling some artificial, socio-cultural quota improve society? "But nothing is ever perfect, which is why, even without affirmative action, management paradoxes like the Peter Principle will always ensure that consumers are "going to be denied the quality of goods or services they might otherwise enjoy." Lol, you are soooo talking out of your ass… Let's look at that principle, from your own source… <blockquote>"The Peter Principle is the principle that "In a Hierarchy Every Employee Tends to Rise to His Level of Incompetence." It was formulated by Dr. Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull in their 1969 book The Peter Principle, a humorous treatise which also introduced the "salutary science of Hierarchiology", "inadvertently founded" by Peter."</blockquote> Good Lord… Here I am recommending Aristotle to one who draws ideology from BBC sitcoms… Fantastic :D "Besides, I'm a socialist." Which makes you an idiot and reminds me of a question I asked before, with all the socialist countries available to you already, why ruin this one? "People like me? Generalizing is like a nervous tick with you, isn't it?" Just callin 'em like I see 'em. " No one's ever used the word "mediocre" to describe me at all. You don't seem very mediocre yourself, and it was never my intention to vilify you for being a white male." No, I'm just "privileged"… :D Tell me PTA… Have you ever achieved a level of award-winning excellence in any aspect of your life? The reason I ask is simply this… It is my contention that most who have received formal recognition for their achievement(s) experience a moment of ultimate positive reinforcement which boosts confidence, motivates, and ultimately increases feelings of independence and encourages autonomy. Knowing "you can do it", makes you want to "do it" even more, and the idea of someone "helping" you becomes extremely distasteful. Likewise, you begin to understand that in this country, for the most part, anything IS possible, though that is the very concept progressivism actively rails against. Things like welfare are nothing more than NEGATIVE reinforcement… Awwww… It's okay, we don't expect you make it on your own… We know you can't make it without us, it's okay… <blockquote>"I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Ben Franklin</blockquote> "You may be a FUCKING CUNT (sorry, I couldn't resist), but I'm sure that has nothing to do with your race or sex. What "people like you can't seem to grasp" is that "settling" is necessary in order to accommodate, not the mediocre, but future generations." SETTLING IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE NOT THE MEDIOCRE, BUT FUTURE GENERATIONS… FUCKING WOW… That has GOT to be in contention for the worst piece of trash I've heard uttered on this board… Who is feeding you that shit anyway? I know you didn't come up with it on your own… That statement espouses a COMPLETELY defeatist attitude which, dare I say it? Is probably the most un-American thing I've ever heard. Whew, mediocre, you are not… "There aren't enough resources on this planet for everyone to fulfill the capitalist ambition of "the sky's the limit" economic acquisition and expansion." How do you know? "And if we don't start training our eye on what it is with which we'd like to "settle," we're going to consume ourselves into extinction." Dood, do some research on the capabilities of nanotechnology… Once it's perfected, we'll be entering into an era you and I can't even yet imagine (provided we don't destroy ourselves first)… Nanotechnology has the capability to remake society as we know it and will be like man discovering fire all over again… I question whether or not we can even handle it… But that's another story… The bottom line is, for example, IF someone could actually quantify what is "too much" CO2 in the atmosphere, we could simply turn loose a bunch of nanobots to scrub the CO2 or convert it to something else… Imagine the ability to change the content of the atmosphere, or the weather of the planet like you were adjusting the thermostat??? Fuck… Personally, I don't think there's a man or government capable of wielding such power without killing us all… "Again, what's fair isn't always going to benefit you." Yeah, it is… Because in the context of this discussion, what's FAIR is one set of rules which applies to all… What's fair is being free to maximize my potential based on my performance and content of character, not the color of my skin or the junk between my legs… "But if it's for a greater good, a good you might even agree with if you could abandon the guiding principle of selfishness, I think it's worth it." Doood, I hate to say it, but you're fucking sick… Implying I'm somehow selfish for wanting to be free to realize my full potential as a human being is just plain twisted. Who are YOU to even identify what is for the "greater good"? WHAT is the "greater good"? Again, you speak of abstract "ideals" that might sound good, but so does hope and change… "I wouldn't call "modifying distributive principles to make them sensitive to the circumstances of women" a "convenience of the moment." What would you call it then? "Reading articles written by others broadens my perspective, but I often read articles with which I disagree as well." What conservative outlet(s) do you frequent for an alternative point of view? "I base my assertions on an eclectic variety of things, including experience and critical thinking. How does reinterpreting some past event or set of principles mean that "history doesn't matter"?" Drawing on thinking from the past 15 years to formulate opinions seems foolish when the greatest thinkers ever known covered all this stuff with great specificity over 1500 years ago… Not to mention that historically speaking, socialism is responsible for a lot of suffering and death… Apparently, this "doesn't matter" to you… "You act like modifying values based on new understandings and concerns is a bad thing. Should we not have abolished slavery then? Was that another "convenience of the moment"? If we can both agree that the integration of drinking fountains, for instance, is some small measure of "progress," then what's your point?" Lol, what "new understanding" has come to light which can compete with say, Aristotle or Jesus? As for slavery, please… Taking that turn is just so fucking unnecessary… REAL progress comes from entrepreneurs, not from Big Brother. "Let's be perfectly clear: No real atrocity has ever been committed on the politics forum of Craigslist. What I found entertaining was your colorful depiction of an admittedly horrific event. You went several steps beyond a mere factual CNN-style report, entering the territory of, I don't know, Gustav Hasford maybe? Hasford's own account of the Vietnam War was semi-autobiographical, but that didn't make it any less entertaining." I'll be content to accept the compliment "What was also entertaining was the way arc/mat effortlessly shut you down after your little "FUCKING CUNT ... CITE YOUR SOURCE" outburst. What happened, dude? I thought you didn't like it when threads were dropped. Or is it just when they're dropped by arc/mat?" You worry about you, I'll worry about arc… Arc's dumb ass takes a back seat these days, and I will get round to her... AND, if I were you, I wouldn't be jumping to conclusions with regard to how long it takes one to respond to a post, especially when it's not even one of your own. Maybe now's a good time to ask why you're ignoring plates 1-5 and starting in on 6?]]>

<![CDATA["Unclear reference: Is the common progressive thread the interest in "equality of opportunity" or "book learning'"? Neither. I'm speaking of the penchant for proselytizing the virtues of concepts you only have a rudimentary (if that) understanding of. "I misspoke: I didn't have to "crack some books," I wanted to. I've already mentioned that part of the reason I'm here is to learn things." Your desire for knowledge is admirable, but you advance your assertions as fact when the the depth of your knowledge is questionable. Usually people who are eager to learn do more listening than talking… For someone here to learn, I noticed you spend a great deal of time posting articles and propagandizing… What is that teaching you? "Just because I DO know what I'm talking about doesn't mean I can't know it better. And I've also already said that, in reading those articles, "you're just as likely to find passages from which to argue against me." The overwhelming majority of information found in those articles show support for my position, whereas you had to dig deep to cull one little tidbit that ALMOST made your point. What have you learned? "So then tell me, do you really think that "all members of society are eligible to compete on equal terms"? If not, what should we do about that?" Why the belief to begin with that we always "must do something about something"? All members are not eligible to complete on equal terms, as exemplified by my own real world experience which I have covered in detail previously. What's to be done about it is that people (government) who perpetuate the idea that racial/cultural/gender/ quotas must be met in the work place need to be done away with. They CREATE disenfranchisement by saying to people, "You will advance based on your ethnicity, you will advance based on your gender, you will advance based on your economic stature…" I've yet to meet a man, nor governing body who's qualified to quantify, and enforce, "social justice". "Institutions within a society should generally reflect the demographics of the society itself. So, when African-Americans make up 14% of the population, but are .008% of Fortune 500 CEOs and 46% of the prison community, there's a problem. Why such disparity?" Where do you get that crap? The reason for the disparity is BECAUSE MORE AFRICAN AMERICANS BREAK THE LAW THAN STUDY TO BE CEO'S… Ooooohhhh, look at Mr. Natural, he's such a racist!!! BULLSHIT. Is it really so difficult to grasp? Shit, I say fat asses who are out of shape should demand a spot on the US Olympic Track Team… I mean, just because they eat doughnuts and smoke cigarettes, that doesn't mean they should be denied equal opportunity… "You may argue that such attitudes are aggravated by said regulation, but that's really just racist [or sexist] scapegoating." Yeah, you're right… The real athletes who've trained for years will feel NO RESENTMENT AT ALL towards the fatties who made the team in their stead in order to satisfy someone else's idea of regulated fairness. "Understanding that you have many more opportunities than women and minorities helps to alleviate some of that aggravation." Lol, soooo… What? You didn't even absorb anything I said about my experience with Sony? I mean, for you to make that statement is to completely discount something I experienced first hand as if it didn't happen… You're really going to sit there, and tell me about MY opportunities, despite my own personal experience? Lol, yeah, humility is indeed a rare quality in one who thinks so highly of their own opinions :D "The upshot is that racial disparities will never be eliminated by simply ignoring race." WE'LL NEVER KNOW WITHOUT TRYING IT, WILL WE? "Sexist [or equivalent] attitudes" already exist; they're not created by the regulation of opportunity." That's pure bullshit. "The point of these semantic contrivances is lost on me. How does simply disagreeing with what's done in the name of "social justice" give you cause to argue that "social" is a modifier that can't be applied to "justice"? Social justice in it's practical application takes from one in order to give to another based on race, creed, culture, gender, or some other manufactured standard that "someone" [WHO???] has decided is relevant. That is not JUSTICE… Justice [in the present context] occurs when the one who demonstrates proficiency, regardless of race, religion, gender advances. SOCIAL JUSTICE dictates that DESPITE any superior demonstration of skills, one might be held back to make room for mediocrity, simply because it fits a color scheme. If you can't deduce that this is NOT in fact justice, you've still got a LOT more to learn. SOCIAL justice, ECONOMIC justice… These things are a cancer on the individuals' ability to achieve autonomy, something there is no RATIONAL justification for, other than to maintain a ruling class. "Law" is a "stand alone term" also, but that doesn't stop us from talking about "civil" law and "criminal" law and "administrative" law. What am I missing?" Apparently, the fact that the term we're discussing is JUSTICE, not LAW. Having trouble following along? The fact that different areas of specialty exist within the study of law does not by default mean the same is true of justice. Can one study to receive a degree in justice? Tax law, Constitutional law, slip and fall moron law… Yeah, I get it… Law and justice aren't the same thing anymore than the The US and Denmark are. "I've read one article on this subject in the past week, sure. I've read a lot more than that in my lifetime. I'm familiar enough with this stuff that I could talk about it off the top of my head, but what do I learn from that?" Lol, who knows? I was merely trying to extract from you a REAL WORLD EXAMPLE of the inequality of opportunity you so vehemently decry… You hit the books and came back with an anemic response you just Googled… Care to try again?]]>

<![CDATA[I just get a hair up my ass when people continually spell the word judgment wrong....PTA correctly points out that "judgement" is OK in England, but last time I checked any court document or lien paper in THIS COUNTRY...THE WORD IS SPELLED "JUDGMENT" You are now dismissed.]]>

<![CDATA[Yeah he owns me.....He got da street smarts i got da common sense....who you gunna go to war with....the Lib of Glib...or Me... Intellect, book smarts, they won't get you anywhere. Ok so I was having fun and I got called out..... The Lib of Glib usualy does...only he wished he had me in his hand.... Just Sayin']]>

<![CDATA[danga. seems grampi let a certain someone under his little skinny, skin skin today. your post was a incoherent and repetitive as an alzheimer's patient with tourettes. seems you got a little "ticked" off. just sayin. ]]>

<![CDATA[PTA's got DA whole WORLD in his hands, he's got DA whole WORLD in his hands, he's got DA whole WORLD in his hands, he's got DA whole damn WORLD in his hands. damn dude...even tho i hate his politics: YOU GOT PWNED. just sayin. ]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1647122952.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1647122952.html</a> Nitpicking the use of the English language is the LAST thing you want to be doing in this forum, Da World. You failed to capitalize "learn" in your subject line; the word "Einstein's" is plural, not possessive, meaning you don't need the apostrophe; and you've consistently shown yourself to have no idea what the "Caps Lock" key is for, or how to use ellipses. I don't normally care, but a different standard obtains in a "classroom," if that's where you think you are. From: <a href="http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/english_grammar_style/spell_judgment.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/english_grammar_style/spell_judgment.html</a> <h3>Is it Judgment or Judgement?</h3> The English spelling system is a nightmare (see "<a href="http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/chaos.html" rel="nofollow">The Chaos</a>" in our library) caused by inconsistencies in the spelling system. To remain on the side of the orthographic angels and help our children learn to spell words in the language more accurately, alphaDictionary.com is committed to as much consistency in spelling as the English language allows. To spell judgement without an "e," while spelling abridgement, acknowledgement, arrangement, engagement, and the 40 other words in English with a soft "g" before -ment with an "e," is an act of bewildering inconsistency that makes learning the spelling system unnecessarily difficult. (See <a href="http://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/drgw007.html" rel="nofollow">Dr. Goodword's article on the equally puzzling but ever popular editorial error, "an historical" for the correct "a historical"</a>.) It is not a new problem; both spellings have trailed this word throughout history and all English-language dictionaries assure us that both are acceptable. However, we are offering a reasoned resolution to the dilemma that allows us to spell all such words accurately and consistently, making our kids' task of learning the language just a bit easier. We should use the "e" after "g" and "c" (e.g. "advancement" when they are are soft and omit it when they are hard (e.g. segment, pigment). By the way, we have William Shakespeare and all our British brethren on our side. Not bad company to keep.]]>

<![CDATA[Don't flatter yourself. You're the one who better make it right. I didn't apologize to you, and I never will. I don't need to judge you, that's all, you've been judged already. You'll reap what you sow. ------- They call people names or bomb a country or whatever and then once they realize how "un-Christian" they have behaved they NEVER seek to make it right with those they believe they have wronged. NO! All they are required to do is state that they made a mistake, then ask, in the direction of the sky, their sky fairy for forgiveness and like magic they can then choose to believe they are forgiven. Once forgiven they can move on down the road to their next of need for "forgiveness." (magic is fun, huh?)]]>

<![CDATA[ This idea of sitting around with a bunch of 3rd worlder's, in a heaven of litterbugs and people whom say "M.F." in the grocery store, in front of children and women, doesn't appeal to me. HAW HAW HAW! YOU PIECE OF SHIT< YOU PUNK FAGGIT SODOMITE QUEER! THAT THERE ARE HOW COME YEW AIN'T A NO GO INTER HEAVIN! GOD DON'T WANT YEW! GOD HATES YOUR GODDAMNED GUTS, BOY! FUCK YOU, IN THE NAME OF JESUS! FUCK YOU IN THE ASS! GOD HATES SELF RIGHTEOUS BITCH-MADE SHIT EATERS LIKE YOU, PUNK FAGGIT NAZI! Nazi murderers of the mentally handicapped were treated much more leniently in postwar German courts than their counterparts who killed Jews during the Holocaust, according to a new study by a University of Florida doctoral student in history. Because they were unable to testify, the mentally handicapped lacked organization and advocates to make their case and often were faceless victims secretly murdered in asylums originally meant to help them, said researcher Shane Stufflet. In contrast, the Jews pulled together to elicit sympathy by demonstrating that their murdered contemporaries were fellow Germans, he maintained. "If you murdered a Jew, you were much more likely to get a sentence and get a stiffer sentence than if you murdered the mentally handicapped," said Stufflet, whose study is the first to calculate the disparity. "The mentally handicapped were seen as a burden on society and so judges, and especially lay judges, did not consider their murders to be as great a crime." More than half of the Nazis tried for crimes against the mentally handicapped – 57 percent – were acquitted, said Stufflet, who now teaches at Rollins College, the University of Central Florida and Lake Mary High School. Of the 43% of defendants found guilty in cases involving mentally handicapped victims, only 1.6% received life sentences, none of which were served, he said. In contrast, only 24% of the Nazis tried for crimes against the Jews were acquitted, with about 11% receiving life sentences, said Stufflet, who did most of his research at the state archives in Munich and the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington D.C. Patricia Heberer, historian at the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, said Stufflet's research is important because these so-called "euthanasia crimes" are an under studied chapter of history. The medical profession shielded its own, often falsely certifying the perpetrators as physically unable to stand trial, Heberer said. "These physicians, nurses and bureaucrats who administered the 'euthanasia program' often did get away with murder," she said. Because of their larger numbers and greater visibility in German society before the Holocaust, Jews were seen as more "human" victims and the postwar judiciary was quick to condemn their deaths, Stufflet claimed. The same shift in attitudes that resulted in a smooth transition from "enemy" to "victim" for Jews did not occur with the mentally handicapped, he said. "One was more than twice as likely to be acquitted for murdering a mentally handicapped person and nearly seven times as likely to receive a life sentence for killing a Jew," he said. In the 1950s and '60s, the German government denounced incidences of anti-Semitism, such as desecration of synagogues and Jewish cemeteries, but subtle prejudice against the mentally handicapped remains today, Stufflet said. Although laws have been passed to protect the rights of the mentally handicapped, they are not as fully integrated into public life as they are in the US, he said. One reason for this disparity is that Germany didn't begin integrating the handicapped into public schools until the late 1970s, while the US started doing so nearly two decades earlier as part of the civil rights movement, he said. The first mentally handicapped victims of Nazi murder were children in asylums, around late 1939 or early 1940, about a year before those on Jews began, he said. "Children were either starved or injected with Luminal or morphine and the killings were soon expanded to adults," he said. "When the Nazis realized they couldn't murder as many people as they wanted in that fashion, they started experimenting with gas." Basements in six asylums were modified to create gas chambers, with hookups added for diesel trucks to pump in carbon monioxide, he said. Because the victims were hidden from view, man You are, however Excatly correct about the "Sream of Consciousness..." COSMIC CREEP! No, AKASIC RECORD..shoot, ASKITIC RECORD.... damn....I Have BRAIN DAMAGE & Lost the Spelling Ability....THE PLACE ONE GOES in ASTRAL TRAVELS....I have ANOTHER WORLD where I go WHEN I SLEEP, not 100% of the Time, (If I've had a Troublous day, I have Bad Dreams) BUT, not using drugs, noteven Psych Drugs, No More BEER even, these past 10-15 Years I have a DEFINATE FAMILIAR WORLD where I go in my Sleep, People I know, a WORLD like Earth, but more PRIMITAVE, as if it were, APOCALYPIC World, where REVELATIONS are given to me, ALSO I have met LEPRECHANS and TALKING RATTLE-SNAKES & had ALL KINDS of "SKIN-WALKER" Visions there...where I just"WILL" Myself to "WALK FAST" over the DESERT & my FEET LIFT a FEW INCHES off the ground & I GO GREAT DISTANCES with NO EFFORT... To OTHER PLANETS, etc. I ALSO have MANY MEETINGS with SPIRITUAL MASTERS, (I Even ENCOUNTERED "William Cooper" Over there AFTER HE WAS MURDERED by the EAGAR, ARIZONA POLICE... and He Was DISTRESSED because the "WAY" He Taught AGAINST he had found to be "THE RIGHT WAY!" However, the IMPORTANT THING about PASSING ON into the INTRIM STREAM/RIVER of COSMIC CONSCIOUSNESS...is, YOUR ONLY JUDGED on HOW DEVOTED YOU WERE TO THE BELIEFS YOU PROFESSED! "NOT wether they were RIGHT or WRONG!" THERE are NO ABSOLUTES in the ETHERIAL REALMS! It is , as an ensample, I STUDIED ALL MAJOR RELIGIONS, the 8 Fold Path of BUDDHA, the VEDANTA Jnanam Yoga, Swami Vivekananda, Kabbalah, SUFI MYSTICISM, the SUFI in TAMIL Mysticism, The Emmanuael SWEDONBORG Theological Writings...(He Wrote 2,500 PAGE BOOKS, MANY of Them!!! I do NOT claim to have read ALL, only 3 or 4, ) I read THEOSOPHY, Madame Blavatski, Col. Oldcott, Alica Baily, ISIS, the SECRET DOCTRINE (Oh, there's a "SUPRESSED 5th. Volumne of "The Secret Doctrine" one can ONLY obtain through "KessengerBooks" in IDEHO...as well THE NAG HUMMANADRI Library, THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS, and I've Had VISIONS (ONLY WHEN TOTALLY IN ABSTINANCE of EVERY THING, and FASTING TO...) of ANGELIC Visitors, ONE UP ON MOUNT SHASTA in 1991, and in 1987 a GOD who GAVE ME HIS NAME as "KRONOS." I am 3/4 Cherokee Indian, I HAVE the "THIRD EARS" little EXTRA Olfractory Openings on my Earlobes, I have had MANY VISIONS in the 1960's eating BELLADONNA, MAYAPPLE ROOT & MUSHROOMS that grew on COW SHIT early in the MORNING, (But was GONE as soon as the SUN GOT UP...hence the Old Saying "EARLY TO BED; EARLY TO RISE, GET HAPPY IN YOUR HEAD, AND YOU NEED NEVER DIE!" As I MEANT TO STATE.... YOUR AFTER LIFE DEPENDS of course, NOT ON WHAT you SET UP AS YOUR PERSONAL BELIEFS...BUT HOW ADAMANTLY YOU HOLD TO THOSE BELIEFS...as I am a IRATE CONDEMOR of MEAN SELF RIGHTEOUS SONS-OF-BITCHES who HATE the ABJECT POOR and the MEXICAN PEOPLE who have been FORCED TO COME HERE to EAT! You people that HATE THE HOMELESS...I ACTIVELY PRAY HOURS, EVERY DAY, IN EARNEST PRAYERS unto the JEWISH GOD OF VENGENCE to KILL YOUR GODDAMN NAZI-YANKEE SOULS in HELL-FIRE...I SPEND at least 3 HOURS IN PRAYER to GET YOU KILLED! EVERY DAY! The BIBLE PLAINLY TEACHES that "IF YOU MESS WITH THE POOR, AND WE CRY OUT UNTO Yahweh, HE WILL PERSONALLY COME DOWN AND KILL YOU! Then YOUR Wives & Children will be FORCED TO LIVE AS HOMELESS FUCKS!" So THERE YOU GO! I know MOST of you SHIT EATERS do NOT know JACK-SHIT about the BIBLE, You get all you information from SODOMITE QUEERS WOMEN PREACHERS...so FUCK OFF & DIE, GOY SWINE CATTLE! Your WORTHLESS to the EARTH & an OFFENCE & a STENCH of FOUL ODOR in the NOSTRALS of ELOHIM Ha ISRAEL. "GOD HATES YOUR GUTS!" I Have STUDIED the SCRIPTURES 50 YEARS. I CAN GIVE SCRIPTURE REFERENCES for EVERY ATTACK I MAKE ON YOU PIECIES OF CAMEL SHIT! So if you DO NOT LIKE MY PREACHING, Tough! YOU GOING TO BURN IN HELL, because I SAY SO, and GOD GIVES HIS PROPHETS the AUTHORITY TO DAMN YOUR SOULS TO HELL! Twice, JESUS INSTRUCTED HIS BELIEVERS, When the HOLY GHOST COMES..."YOU SHALL HAVE THE POWER to DAMN ON EARTH, & I WILL DAMN IN HEAVEN!" & "WHOSE SO EVER SINS TO RETAIN AGAINST THEM ON EARTH, I SHALL RETAIN AGAINST THEM IN HEAVEN!" So FUCK YOU, and FUTHERMORE, GOD, JESUS, the HOLY GHOST & PAUL, PETER, JAMES & JOHN all STRONGLY TEACH "A WOMAN IS FORBIDDEN TO PREACH, OR TEACH, OR TO HAVE ANY AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER! In FACT, THE WOMAN IS FORBIDDEN TO EVEN SO MUCH AS "SPEAK IN THE CHURCH!" FOR IT IS A "SHAMEFUL THING" FOR A WOMAN TO SPEAK IN THE GATHERING of THE SAINTS or IN THE ASSEMBLY of the WORSHIPPERS!" So you BLEEDING CUNT BITCHES who WANT TO RUN GODS CHURCH....YOU DAMNED TO HELL, BITCHES! JESUS HATES YOUR BLEEDING CUNT ASSES! HE SAYS "I WILL CAST YOU INTO A BED FULL OF THE FILTH AND ABOMINATIONS OF YOUR HERESIES, I WILL KILL YOU JEZEBEL FEMALE CUNTS AND I WILL BURN YOU WITH FIRE, PLUS, saith JESUS CHRIST, I WILL KILL YOUR GODDAMN CHILDREN WITH YOU, that the Churches May KNOW That I AM the BRIGHT & MORNING STAR, and THE ALPHA & OMEGA! ]]>

<![CDATA[Why did the atheist cross the road? He thought there might be a sidewalk on the other side, but he wouldn’t believe it until he tested his hypothesis. How many atheists does it take to change a light bulb? Two. One to actually change the bulb, and the other to videotape the job so fundamentalists won’t claim that god did it. An atheist buys an ancient lamp at an auction, takes it home, and begins to polish it. Suddenly, a genie appears, and says, “I’ll grant you three wishes, Master.” The atheist says, “I wish I could believe in you.” The genie snaps his fingers, and suddenly the atheist believes in him. The atheist says, “Wow. I wish all atheists would believe this.” The genie snaps his fingers again, and suddenly atheists all over the world begin to believe in genies. “What about your third wish?” asks the genie. “Well,” says the atheist, “I wish for a billion dollars.” The genie snaps his fingers for a third time, but nothing happens. “What’s wrong?” asks the atheist. The genie shrugs and says, “Just because you believe in me, doesn’t necessarily mean that I really exist.” An atheist dies and wakes up to find he is in hell. He's really depressed as he stands in the processing line waiting to talk to an admittance counselor. He thinks to himself "I know I lead a wild life but I wasn't that bad. I never thought it would come to this." Looking up he sees that it is his turn to be processed into hell. With fear and a heavy heart, he walks up to the counselor. Counselor: What's the problem, you look depressed? Atheist: Well, what do you think? I'm in hell. Counselor: Hell's not so bad, we actually have a lot of fun. Do you like to drink? Atheist: Sure, I love to drink. Counselor: Well then, you are going to love Mondays. On Mondays we drink up a storm. You can have whiskey, rum, tequila, beer, whatever you want and as much a you want. We party all night long. You'll love Mondays. Do you smoke? Atheist: Yes, as a matter of fact I do. Counselor: You are going to love Tuesdays. Tuesday is smoke day. You get to smoke the finest cigars and best cigarettes available anywhere. And you smoke to your heart's desire without worrying about cancer because you are already dead! Is that great or what? You are going to love Tuesdays. Do you do drugs? Atheist: Well in my younger days I experimented a little. Counselor: You are going to love Wednesdays. That's drug day. You can experiment with any drug you want and you don't have to worry about overdoses or getting hooked because you are already dead. You are going to love Wednesdays. Do you gamble? Atheist: Yes, I love to gamble. Counselor: You are going to love Thursdays because we gamble all day and night -- black jack, craps, poker, slots, horse races, everything! You are going to love Thursdays. Are you gay? Atheist: Uhh...no. Counselor: Oh , you're gonna hate Fridays...]]>

<![CDATA[are you in the habit of ignoring the big picture to focus on the pixels? just sayin. ]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big><big>THEY BELIEVE IN ALL FOR ME, NONE FOR YOU. THEY CHEAT, LIE, STEAL, JUDGE, HATE, MOLEST, RAPE, ENGAGE IN SEX ACTS WITH CHILDREN AND ANIMALS, ALL BECAUSE CHAOS AND RANDOMNESS TOLD THEM TO. THEY BELIEVE IN SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST, BECAUSE DARWIN SAID SO. THEY WHINE ABOUT HELPING PEOPLE AND BEING MORAL, ONLY AS A THIN VEIL TO HIDE THEIR TRUE INTENTIONS. THEY CARRY ON WITH IMPUNITY AND WITHOUT EVER CONSIDERING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS, ARROGANTLY SPITTING IN THE FACE OF THEIR CREATOR. THEY LOOK UP TO THE SKY WITH DISBELIEF THAT THERE ARE POWERS BIGGER AND GREATER THAN THEIR OWN EGOS, YET DESPITE WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD, TAUGHT AND PREACHED AS WELL AS WHAT HAS BEEN REVEALED TO THEM THROUGH EMPIRICISM, ARE WILLING TO TAKE THE CHANCE AT LIVING THE LIE ANYWAY. (BLASPHEMY AND SACRILEGE, ISN'T IT FUNNY?)</big></big> <img src="http://www.annyas.com/screenshots/images/1959/some-like-it-title-still-small.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Hey GENIUSES..........see this.... There are no "real' Christians on here. Real Christians are too busy feeding hungry people and helping others. "Judgement starts with the house of God." MARK IT DOWN....PUT IT IN YOUR MEMORY BANK, THAT IS IF YOU HAVE ANY MEMORY!! JUDGMENT........ALL YOU EINSTEIN'S OUT THERE....NO E AFTER G IN THE WORD JUDGMENT...."GOT IT?"]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big><big>Speaking to a room full of naked little boys, Grampi asks: "Why do you call me ‘Lizard Lord’ and do not do what I tell you? My request was that you all lay face up so that I may 'service' you all in my special way." Grandson was thrilled that his grampi was willing to share his "gay knowledge" with all of his friends.</big></big></big> <img src="http://droitfondamental.eu/Nambla_founder_David_Thorstad.png"> <img src="http://media.nowpublic.net/images//7f/4/7f414cde4cbbc2c75e2407923e4eb3f6.jpg"> <img src="http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg223/sssk8tr/sayings/gay.jpg"> ]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big>When Grampi (old pervert) massages his grandson's member, he began to spunk hard. Queer boy said, “Why didn't you go down on me with wild abandon, as you do Mom's Johns?" Grampi replied, "So you could witness how I shook and massaged your massive reed and how it exploded into the wind. You, as an up and coming faggot, need to appreciate such good technique, dear grandson." </big></big> <img src="http://www.noiseboxmedia.com/dad/uploaded_images/WJ---Wesley-Dixon---Spring-2007-705479.JPG">]]>

<![CDATA[the only one who can save you. I was wrong for calling you...names, that's judgement I've been forgiven]]>

<![CDATA[END THE FED!!! In his famous 1932 Congressional address he said "Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board has cheated the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt 3 times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States through the defects of the law in which it operates and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it. Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are government institutions. They are not government institutions; they are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves." Following a series of death threats, McFadden died from food poisoning followed by a heart-attack, under suspicious circumstances. THE FED MUST BE ABOLISHED IN ORDER FOR TRUE PROSPERITY TO OCCUR]]>

<![CDATA[And what would be the purpose of auditing Federal Reserve? I would think it be in order to abolish it. At least that's the take from Ron Paul who has been the proponent of End/audit Federal Reserve. Once Fed Reserve's Ponzi scheme and crimes are exposed THEN maybe the people will wake up. You'll never hear it on mainstream media. "To collect the interest on the money they lent to the American government and American people to use, they created the US federal Income act, to directly tax the people. With the stroke of President Wilson's treasonous pen, the international bankers became the FED in 1913 and have owned a virtual monopoly of the US economy and the tax-payer's money ever since. They create money out of nothing, control treasury loans, and profit from interest rates." Here's this source: <a href="http://jubilee2012.50webs.com/the_federal_reserve_system.htm" rel="nofollow">http://jubilee2012.50webs.com/the_federal_reserve_system.htm</a> I'm not saying it's necessarily true but is something to consider. (I personally think the ideas presented here are for the most part on track.) ]]>

<![CDATA[So now you've heard the figure but you instantly disbelieve it (without checking it out) and that somehow is preferrable to believing it? Well I was slighlty wrong: "Just how rich and powerful is lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically, the Rothschild family wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschild's secret financial records are never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled. But researchers estimate their wealth at close to 500 trillion dollars – more than half the wealth of the entire world." OK now here's the part where you offhandedly discredit this source. (Note, this was NOT the first source I heard this from.) <a href="http://jubilee2012.50webs.com/the_house_of_rothschild.htm" rel="nofollow">http://jubilee2012.50webs.com/the_house_of_rothschild.htm</a> I will not result to name calling as you have comm-ryunn-1646299536@craigslist.org "$300 trillion you say? According to who? Putz." MY POINT IS THAT IT'S NOT REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS OR LIBERALS OR GAYS THAT ARE THE ROOT OF SOCIETIES PROBLEMS--IT'S THE ELITES THAT PLAY EACH OF THESE GROUPS OFF OF EACH OTHER TO DISTRACT US WHILE THE LOOT AND ENSLAVE US. SORRY IF MY OTHER POSTING HAVE GONE ASTRAY FROM THAT SIMPLE POINT AND I'M SORRY THAT SO MANY PEOPLE CAN'T SEEM TO AT LEAST UNDERSTAND THAT SIMPLE POINT.]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big>QUEER LITTLE GRANDSON: "HEY GRAMPI...IS JESUS REALLY GAY?" GRAMPI THE DIDDLER: "NO, MY LITTLE SUGAR CUP, BUT I AM." QUEER LITTLE GRANDSON: "REALLY? CAN YOU SHOW ME WHAT IT MEANS TO BE GAY, GRAMPI?" GRAMPI THE DIDDLER: "OH MY PRECIOUS LITTLE GAY BOY....HOW LONG I'VE WAITED FOR YOU TO UTTER THOSE WORDS." QUEER LITTLE GRANDSON: "MOM CALLS YOU A 'SORRY LITTLE BOTTOM.' WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?" GRAMPI THE DIDDLER: "WELL, IT MEANS THAT WHEN I PLAY 'GAY BASEBALL' I'M ALWAYS THE 'CATCHER.' HERE...LET ME SHOW YOU................ (AND THE BEAT GOES ON...............LA DAY DAH DAY DEE................LA DAY DAH DEE DAH!) AHHH CHA CHA CHA! </big></big> <img src="http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/EMPulse_of_KC/nambla.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big><big>little faggot grandson to a healthy dose of man juice. MMM MMM GOOOOOD!! When gramps turned and saw him masturbating, he said to him, “What are you looking for? Why do you pleasure yourself when you know full well that I will assist?” His queer grandson said, “grampi” (which translated means "old pervert"), “would you rather watch, or assist me? Mom says that you can suck a golf ball through a straw!” </big></big></big> <img src="http://www.thegamerag.com/pics/oldman.jpg"> WHEN LITTLE GRANDSON IS IN SCHOOL.......... <img src="http://themeatshow.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/000849-sheep-pig-cow-old-pervert-ma.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Mr. Nambla says to his grandson, “Have I been sleeping with you all this time, boy, and you still do not feel me? Your mom has seen me naked and bobbing on your unit, yet she refuses me entrance to her holes. How can you say, ‘Shove it in further’? My dick is smaller than yours, dear grandson.” Bwaaaaah HAAAAAAAhhahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU OLD PERVERT!!!! <img src="http://lovelifelikeyourself.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/nambla.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Grampi, you are one big CORNBALL. STICK TO GRANDSON'S CORNHOLE. ]]>

<![CDATA[we don't have to hear your whiny gay voice...that would really suck!]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big><big>GRAMPI COMPLAINED TO HIS GRANDSON, "MY LITTLE CUPCAKE.....ALTHOUGH I ENJOY MY DAILY DOSE OF BOY GOO, YOU COULD WORK ON THE TASTE A BIT, DEAR GRANDSON." GRANDSON WAS SHOCKED THAT GRAMPI WASN'T COMPLETELY SATISFIED WITH HIS OH SO YOUNG AND FRESH BOY SEED. GRANDSON ASKED, "GRAMPI, WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST I DO TO IMPROVE MY LOVE CREAM?" THE CROCHETY OLD BASTARD BITCHED, "FOR STARTERS, YOU CAN LAY OFF THE CANDY BARS AND EAT MORE FRUITS AND VEGETABLES. OH YEAH...STOP EATING OUT YOUR MOM'S GODDAM CABBAGE CROTCH WHILE YOUR AT IT, BOY!" THAT GRAMPI. WHAT AN UNGRATEFUL SODOMIZER HE IS!!!!! </big></big></big> <img src="http://www.taggallery.net/admin/member_directory/71/54_Man-and-Boy550.jpg"> <img src="http://www.mysticrugby.com/images/kyle/nambla.gif"> <img src="http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/EMPulse_of_KC/nambla.jpg"> <img src="http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/wikiality/images/d/de/NAMBLA.gif">]]>

<![CDATA[AdultSwingLife & You! Great new Friends and Playmates are waiting for you to find them in a search. Be sure YOUR profile is complete so YOU can be found also! ASL is excited to inform all members that tons of new features will be added to ASL over the next 12 months. 2010 will be the year of ASL and you. Look at our membership levels and click on "Compare Memberships", read the latest ASL stories, news and articles then submit yours to us. Watch for our upcoming Adult Classified section & Check out our events or add your own! Here is a sampling of upcoming features. COMING ATTRACTIONS TO ASL INCLUDE: •Multiple Chat rooms •Featured Club section •Hot new "One Nighters" column •Send E-Greeting cards •Sending kisses, flirts & Licks •Tons of profile customization tools •Free member meeting cards •Theater (Gallery for video shorts) •Photo Galleries •Polls •Groups •Member Clubs •Blogs •3-D Features Many more features that must remain a surprise! ASL wants to be your #1 lifestyle site by having members that are truly in the lifestyle and not bystanders plus offering you more than any other site. ASL welcomes all swingers and those in alternative lifestyles. UPCOMING CONTESTS •Ms. ASL Contest •Best Breast in the US contest •Club participation Contests •Members choice Male & Female "HOT BUNS" contest Special 2010 Events: •Eyes Wide Shut Party •ASL "Love Boat" Cruise & private party •Erotic Halloween Ball •Lifestyle Resort 100% Takeover •Nudist Resort Takeover MAJOR EVENTS: The 2011 Worldwide "ASL" Swingers Lifestyle Convention Remember Woodstock? This convention will go down in history as well. ]]>

<![CDATA[you post morning, noon and night - from 8AM to well after midnight on this site. do you have a job? are you retired, or just another liberal milking the system??? just askin. ]]>

<![CDATA[ Obama 2 strikes, 3 balls, 2 outs, top of the nineth. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tcahn7PwQU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tcahn7PwQU</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Hey arc/mat you can go ahead and but the hell out. This post was not addressed to you. I say the Rothchilds are worth 300 trillion. I've heard the figure before. If you don't like it, post a more accurate figure or but the f.. out. On most of your posts you never do answer anyone on their point. Maybe you can be a call screener for Dr. Laura. <big>So you believe everything you hear? I've now "heard the figure before" too. The difference is, I've questioned it and you've merely repeated it. [It's bad form to accuse me of 'never answering anyone on their point' without citing a single instance AND while doing that very thing yourself.]</big> ]]>

<![CDATA[ Obama promises all who support his domination of the American citizens and their money will swim in mountains of money and unlimited power over any and all in Obama's new America. He promises his supporters will have no enemies, all apposing views to be silenced for the good of the government and their unapposed rule. MSNBC to be the official government sanctioned news outlet. Conservative voices, freedom and liberty for all, will all disappear in the night. Obama, bringing the change and removing the hope as we all become slaves to Obama. ]]>

<![CDATA[WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal agencies haven't lived up to President Barack Obama's promise of a more open government, increasing their use of legal exemptions to keep records secret during his first year in office. An Associated Press review of Freedom of Information Act reports filed by 17 major agencies found that the use of nearly every one of the law's nine exemptions to withhold information from the public rose in fiscal year 2009, which ended last October. Among the most frequently used exemptions: one that lets the government hide records that detail its internal decision-making. Obama specifically directed agencies to stop using that exemption so frequently, but that directive appears to have been widely ignored. Major agencies cited that exemption at least 70,779 times during the 2009 budget year, up from 47,395 times during President George W. Bush's final full budget year, according to annual FOIA reports filed by federal agencies. Obama was president for nine months in the 2009 period. Departments used the exemption more even though Obama's Justice Department told agencies to that disclosing such records was "fully consistent with the purpose of the FOIA," a law intended to keep government accountable to the public. For example, the Federal Aviation Administration cited the exemption in refusing the AP's FOIA request for internal memos on its decisions about a database showing incidents in which airplanes and birds collided. The FAA initially tried to withhold the bird-strike database from the public, but later released it under pressure. The FAA claimed the same exemption to hold back nearly all records on its approval of an Air Force One flyover of New York City for publicity shots - a flight that prompted fears in the city of a Sept. 11-style attack. It also withheld internal communications during the aftermath of the public relations gaffe. In all, major agencies cited that or other FOIA exemptions to refuse information at least 466,872 times in budget year 2009, compared with 312,683 times the previous year, the review found. Agencies often cite more than one exemption when withholding part or all of the material sought in an open-records request. The AP examined the 2008 and 2009 budget year FOIA reports from the departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury and Veterans Affairs; the Environmental Protection Agency; and the Federal Reserve Board. Other FOIA exemptions cover information on national defense and foreign relations, internal agency rules and practices, trade secrets, personal privacy, law enforcement proceedings, supervision of financial institutions and geological information on wells. One, known as Exemption 3, covers dozens of types of information that Congress shielded from disclosure when passing other laws. In sentences that are often vaguely worded and buried deep in legislation, Congress has granted a wide array of information special protection over the years: information related to grand jury investigations, the additives in cigarettes, juvenile arrest records, the identities of people applying restricted-use pesticides to their crops, and the locations of historically significant caves are a sampling of the broad range of information the public cannot get under FOIA. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., was so concerned about what he called "exemption creep" that last year he successfully pressed for a new law that requires FOIA exemptions to be "clear and unambiguous." The federal government cited Exemption 3 protections to withhold information at least 14,442 times in the last budget year, compared with at least 13,599 in the previous one, agency FOIA reports show. The prolific use of FOIA exemptions is one measure of how far the federal government has yet to go to carry out Obama's promise of openness. His first full day in office, Obama told agencies the Freedom of Information Act, "which encourages accountability through transparency, is the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open government." Obama told agencies they shouldn't hide information merely because it might make them look bad. "The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA," Obama wrote. Following up on Obama's words, the Justice Department advised agencies against withholding records sought under FOIA "merely because an exemption legally applies." Most recently, the White House encouraged agency officials to hold contests, complete with prizes, to encourage employees to promote open government. Describing the Justice Department's actions on FOIA on Monday at the start of Sunshine Week, when news organizations promote open government and freedom of information, Attorney General Eric Holder said his agency is making progress. He noted that Justice provided everything sought in a FOIA request in more than 1,000 more cases than it had the previous year. "Put simply, I asked that we make openness the default, not the exception. Today, I'm pleased to report that the disturbing 2008 trend - a reduction in this department's rate of disclosures - has been completely reversed," Holder said. "While we aren't where we need to be just yet, we're certainly on the right path." Much of the Obama administration's early effort on FOIA seems to have been aimed at clearing out a backlog of old cases: The number of requests still sitting around past the time limits spelled out in the open-records law fell from 124,019 in budget year 2008 to 67,764 at the end of the most recent budget year over the 17 agencies, the AP's review found. There is no way to tell whether those whose old cases that were closed ultimately received the information they sought. ---_ ]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1646295886.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1646295886.html</a> "Maybe it's best not to talk about vague generalities in a political forum." Why not? I was making a point about the distribution of blacks in American society. Such a distribution has political implications, revealing institutional racism. So how is it "best" not to discuss that? "How many blacks, christians, muslims, or jews are in prison in Africa??" You tell me. I'm not going to argue that "it's best not to talk about" it, or that it wouldn't be an interesting political topic, but being outside of American jurisdiction makes it a little remote to me. "There is a talk show host who has a website called 'Prison Planet.'" Yes, Alex Jones. I'm aware of his opportunistic, paranoid conspiracy rhetoric. "Maybe you should check that out and find out who's really in prison." Save the metaphors for your local poetry reading. "In the USA it will probably be the black man and the Indian who leads the Whites out of the prison they don't even know there already in." Maybe it's best not to talk about obtuse nonsense in a political forum. "END THE FED!!" AUDIT THE FED!!]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://killeen.craigslist.org/pol/1645971463.html" rel="nofollow">http://killeen.craigslist.org/pol/1645971463.html</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Hey arc/mat you can go ahead and but the hell out. This post was not addressed to you. I say the Rothchilds are worth 300 trillion. I've heard the figure before. If you don't like it, post a more accurate figure or but the f.. out. On most of your posts you never do answer anyone on their point. Maybe you can be a call screener for Dr. Laura.]]>

<![CDATA[When the Bought and paid for two-headed snake (Republicans and Democrats) sold you out on the TARP vote, they lied to you when they told you it was only going to be $700 billion. And when Chairman Obamba tells you that most of it has been paid back, that too is a lie. The 700 billion dollar figure represents only two percent of the total money leveraged. That was only for the Bonus Plan. Rumors have it at the $28 trillion range.]]>

<![CDATA[ and don't forget them queers, too. just sayin. ]]>

<![CDATA[<big><big>$300 trillion you say? According to who? Putz.</big></big> Sorry but that's way over-simplified. It is perhaps part of the overall truth (which we will never know) but the events of 9/11 were more complex than your over generalization. Do you understand that the Rothchild family ( shareholders in Federal Reserve System, Inc.) are worth over 300 trillion dollars and are-you guessed it-JEWS. Their original name was "Bauer." They were goldsmiths in Bavaria starting back in the 1500s and and were the ones who invented the "fractional reserve banking system" that is killing America today. Back then a goldsmith hung a "red shield" on his shop signifying his trade: In german that is Roth=red Schilds=shield. OK GOYEM, NOW I GROW IMPATIENT. JUST BUY GOLD--DUH. END THE FED, END THE FED, ( CHANT) END THE FED!!! GET IT YET??? ]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1644643444.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1644643444.html</a> I'm normally put off by responding to an article with an article. But you provided a link, saving me the trouble of tracking down your source, which I greatly appreciate. So for you, I'll make an exception. Kinda. See, the neat thing about blogs is that you can comment on them. What you failed to include in your post was the following thoughtful comment by "getplaning" (it's not clear to me whether he means "get planning" or is simply into planes), which I include here in the spirit of responding to the article response to an article with an article. Clear? <blockquote>“Barack Obama and the Congressional leadership didn’t worry about bipartisanship…they didn’t need any to get their agenda passed. They were more than happy to go on a down the line party vote every time, and ignore the ineffectual minority.” Yeah, right. Let’s be honest about things, OK? It’s been too easy to chronicle the many instances in which congressional Republicans have announced their opposition to ideas they also support. From a deficit commission to PAYGO, cap-and-trade to a financial industry bailout, civilian trials for terrorist suspects to stimulus aid for their districts, it’s become routine for Republicans to embrace and reject the same proposals, almost at the same time. Let’s start with the health reform debate. On an individual mandate as part of health care reform, Republicans oppose their own idea. For Republicans, the idea of requiring every American to have health insurance is one of the most abhorrent provisions of the Democrats’ health overhaul bills. “Congress has never crossed the line between regulating what people choose to do and ordering them to do it,” says Orrin Hatch (R-UT). “The difference between regulating and requiring is liberty.” But Hatch’s opposition is politically motivated. The last time Congress debated a health overhaul, when Bill Clinton was president, Hatch and several other senators who now oppose the so-called individual mandate supported a bill that would have required it. In fact, the individual mandate was originally a Republican idea, invented by Mark Pauly to give to George Bush Sr. as a competition to the employer mandate focus of the Democrats at the time. If we could expect consistency and intellectual seriousness from GOP lawmakers, it would be almost bewildering. Over the summer, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told Fox News, “I believe that there is a bipartisan consensus to have individual mandates…. There isn’t anything wrong with it.” A few months later, he used individual mandates as an excuse to oppose reform, and voted for a resolution characterizing mandates as unconstitutional. Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Bob Bennett (R-Utah), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) all declared their opposition to an individual mandate in December. All five of them are on record co-sponsoring a reform measure that included an individual mandate. The point here is not just to highlight the bizarre inconsistencies of Republican opponents of health care reform. This is also important in realizing why bipartisanship on health care has been quite literally impossible — Republicans are willing to reject measures they’ve already embraced, and ideas they themselves came up with. All the Democratic outreach and compromise options in the world can’t overcome the fundamental lack of honesty that comes with a party that opposes and supports the same ideas at the same time.</blockquote> My point in copying and pasting this is that the piece is actually relevant to the article you posted. Insofar as it echoes elements from the article I posted ("The GOP game is as simple as it is hypocritical. First: Reject every Democratic proposal — including some of the exact same initiatives that Republicans championed under Bush — while branding the consensus-seeking Obama as a radical leftist. Second: Stoke populist fury over exploding deficits, even though they're the fallout of eight catastrophic years of Republican rule. ... Three: Promise to fix what's wrong with Washington — despite having waged an all-out war to make government appear as broken as possible."), it demonstrates the futility of answering an article with an article. The two articles do not directly speak to each other, and are only tangentially related. But if you'd like to author some comments of your own on Tim Dickinson's article, I'd love to read them. <img src="http://images.uulyrics.com/cover/i/imogen-heap/album-speak-for-yourself.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[1. goyim cattle. How the jews and the Zion master sees all non jews in particular whites. Said with contemption. Those goyim will send troops to the middle east and fight a war for us or we'll call them anti semites. by Eagle Oct 13, 2004 share this 2. Goyim 232 up, 128 down buy goyim mugs, tshirts and magnetsNon-Jews, in Hebrew and Yiddish. Literally, the "peoples." Sometimes pejorative. See shiksa and shaygetz They'd rather watch football than study for finals. Well, whaddya expect? They're goyim. by cornholio Oct 18, 2003 share this 1. Used by racist Jewish supremesists against Christian whites. Used to strike anger within and start up wars (like when an angry white calls a black a "nigger"). When used, it means that you are lower than the scum at the bottom of a well. Read more: <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goyim" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goyim</a> <big><big>That's it??!! Your rationale for saying goy = cattle is because "Eagle" says so? [Said, so says he, with "contemption".] Jeesh, what a gyp! If you're not going to cite something authoritative, at least choose the Urban dictionary definition with the best rating: 1. A Hebrew word used in the Jewish Scriptures (a.k.a. the Old Testament). The word literally means "nations," and is always used within these scriptures to refer to the nations of the world. Significantly, within the Old Testament, Judah (the Jewish nation) itself is called a "goy." 2. In the Old Testament, the Jews were called to be a nation separate from the other nations, which were all Pagan. And so, colloquially, all non-Jewish nations came to be called "goyim" as in "the nations" from which the God of the Old Testament had called upon the Jews to separate themselves. 3. A word used by some Jews to refer to Gentiles (non-Jews). The word can have derogatory connotations, such as the word "black" when used to refer to a persons of African descent. It can be neutral or negative depending on the context and the intent of the speaker. Singular = goy 1. "Gather together, gather together O shameful goy" - Zephaniah 2:1 (Referring to the Jewish nation) 2. Jews don't eat pork, goyim eat pork. ]]>

<![CDATA[Maybe it's best not to talk about vague generalities in a political forum. How many blacks, christians, muslims, or jews are in prison in Africa?? There is a talk show host who has a website called "Prison Planet." Maybe you should check that out and find out who's really in prison. In the USA it will probably be the black man and the Indian who leads the Whites out of the prison they don't even know there already in. END THE FED!!]]>

<![CDATA[<big>For every ''token'' black man who holds a position he's not fully qualified for, there are thousands of good ol' boy white men doing EXACTLY the same thing. Based almost exclusively on the fact that they're white. And men. Hell, they'd never have even gotten their foot in the door if they weren't. ''So what if consumers have to ''settle'' in order to accommodate the mediocre? Hell, as long as it can keep the Jews and Negroes out of our Country Club, I don't see that much harm in a little mediocrity."</big>]]>

<![CDATA[NO! Goyem refers to Jews calling everyone else a bunch of cows. They don't care whether arc/mat is a black cow or a white cow. What color cow are you?]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1646283910.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1646283910.html</a> "Let me quote your EXTREME BULLSHIT: "Institutions within a society should generally reflect the demographics of the society itself." Where in the .... is that written anywhere?? Have you been doing bong loads with Henry Kissinger again? Federal Reserve System, Inc., a for profit corporation has 21 board Chairman. Sixteen of them are Jews. How may Jews are in the NBA. Now Let's compare their salaries. What a completely idiotic statement. WOULD YOU PEOPLE PLEASE WAKE UP!!! " The key word was "generally." I was making a point about the distribution of blacks among certain populations: 1) the population at-large, 2) the CEOs of Fortune 500 companies and 3) prison; in total the mid, high and low points of society. The Fed and the NBA are both exclusive clubs, representative of nothing. I don't smoke pot and I've never met Henry Kissinger, but if you'd care to talk about Jews, I'm game.]]>

<![CDATA[oh you mean like arc/mat the "radical" christian?? should be: A Racist Christian. you know...........................just sayin. <big>I've never called anyone a nigger. Though 'real' Christians here have. ]]>

<![CDATA[Let me quote your EXTREME BULLSHIT: "Institutions within a society should generally reflect the demographics of the society itself." Where in the .... is that written anywhere?? Have you been doing bong loads with Henry Kissinger again? Federal Reserve System, Inc., a for profit corporation has 21 board Chairman. Sixteen of them are Jews. How may Jews are in the NBA. Now Let's compare their salaries. What a completely idiotic statement. WOULD YOU PEOPLE PLEASE WAKE UP!!!]]>

<![CDATA[So What's the Difference between the Bush Administration and the Obamba administration? (Except for that Bush was actually born in this country.) Bush senior, known drug dealer flying drugs out of the Golden triangle in the Viet Nam era. Obamba increasing troops in Afganistan to protect the opium fields and Cheney's oil pipeline. Same ole graft. Get out of the false Left/Right paradigm. It's a lie. Wake up and smell the New World Order (kinda like UN and EU tanks rollin down your street while you're under martial law--MMMOOOOO.)]]>

<![CDATA[Sorry but that's way over-simplified. It is perhaps part of the overall truth (which we will never know) but the events of 9/11 were more complex than your over generalization. Do you understand that the Rothchild family ( shareholders in Federal Reserve System, Inc.) are worth over 300 trillion dollars and are-you guessed it-JEWS. Their original name was "Bauer." They were goldsmiths in Bavaria starting back in the 1500s and and were the ones who invented the "fractional reserve banking system" that is killing America today. Back then a goldsmith hung a "red shield" on his shop signifying his trade: In german that is Roth=red Schilds=shield. OK GOYEM, NOW I GROW IMPATIENT. JUST BUY GOLD--DUH. END THE FED, END THE FED, ( CHANT) END THE FED!!! GET IT YET???]]>

<![CDATA[RE: <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1645907018.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1645907018.html</a> The only thing I would poo-poo is the fact you espouse ideals without even having a clear definition about what it is you're talking about. I'm sure I've seen you bring up inequality of opportunity on at least three different occasions, yet when asked to define your terms, you have to crack some books? C'mon man… This is one of the COMMON THREADS that bind you to so many other "progressives" whom you reject being lumped in with. After reading those articles, I should be the one espousing the virtues of equality of opportunity ..." Unclear reference: Is the common progressive thread the interest in "equality of opportunity" or "book learnin'"? I misspoke: I didn't have to "crack some books," I wanted to. I've already mentioned that part of the reason I'm here is to learn things. Just because I DO know what I'm talking about doesn't mean I can't know it better. And I've also already said that, in reading those articles, "you're just as likely to find passages from which to argue against me." So then tell me, do you really think that "all members of society are eligible to compete on equal terms"? If not, what should we do about that? "Now let's replace the term "women" with "people"… Your quote right there simply supports what I'm giving you in a real world example. That persons who advance on the basis of fulfilling some quota (determined by WHO again?) will create "sexist [or equivalent] attitudes"… In other words, attempting to regulate opportunity creates negative stereotypes. Let us not also forget, the product or service will suffer, because the most able body for the position could very well be ruled out based on manufactured standards. In the end, social unrest is fomented and the consumer ultimately suffers. What kind of justice is that?" Institutions within a society should generally reflect the demographics of the society itself. So, when African-Americans make up 14% of the population, but are .008% of Fortune 500 CEOs and 46% of the prison community, there's a problem. Why such disparity? "Sexist [or equivalent] attitudes" already exist; they're not created by the regulation of opportunity. You may argue that such attitudes are aggravated by said regulation, but that's really just racist [or sexist] scapegoating. Understanding that you have many more opportunities than women and minorities helps to alleviate some of that aggravation. The upshot is that racial disparities will never be eliminated by simply ignoring race. "Maybe you don't think so, but yeah, it is, and nothing you've presented substantiates the claim it isn't." The point of these semantic contrivances is lost on me. How does simply disagreeing with what's done in the name of "social justice" give you cause to argue that "social" is a modifier that can't be applied to "justice"? "Law" is a "stand alone term" also, but that doesn't stop us from talking about "civil" law and "criminal" law and "administrative" law. What am I missing? "You've read ONE article you found online and suddenly you're equipped to dictate to me how I am to receive information that 72 hours ago, you had no idea existed???" I've read one article on this subject in the past week, sure. I've read a lot more than that in my lifetime. I'm familiar enough with this stuff that I could talk about it off the top of my head, but what do I learn from that? "Son, you're bloviating about stuff you still don't fully understand if you can make the claim "what's fair will not always be to my benefit", because that's COMPLETELY WRONG and NOTHING in any of your articles makes that point." Well dad, I guess that's evidence I'm not basing my argument solely on those articles, isn't it? "What's FAIR is that I be free to reap the benefits of the expenditure of my own life energy, unfettered by third party interference." You and everyone else. Unfortunately, not everyone has the opportunities you do. Again, what should we do about that? "Even if you take me out of the equation, how is it fair to the consumer that they're going to be denied the quality of goods or services they might otherwise enjoy had the the MOST QUALIFIED person got the job?" Ideally, affirmative action should be a guide in deciding between two equally qualified candidates for a position. But nothing is ever perfect, which is why, even without affirmative action, management paradoxes like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle" rel="nofollow">Peter Principle</a> will always ensure that consumers are "going to be denied the quality of goods or services they might otherwise enjoy." Besides, I'm a socialist. You might have a point if I were concerned with the quality of the newest, hottest widget. But I'm more interested in full employment, socially useful work, a living wage and economic democracy. Next, I suppose you'll tell me that "democracy" is a "stand alone term" that can't be modified by the word "economic." We should probably wait to spin that plate some other time. "People like you can't seem to grasp the number of people who have to "settle" in order to accommodate the mediocre, usually because you lead of life of mediocrity yourselves, making it easy to vilify those of us who lead <s>productive</s> "privileged" lives…" People like me? Generalizing is like a nervous tick with you, isn't it? I lead a fairly rich and fulfilling life, all things considered. No one's ever used the word "mediocre" to describe me at all. You don't seem very mediocre yourself, and it was never my intention to vilify you for being a white male. You may be a FUCKING CUNT (sorry, I couldn't resist), but I'm sure that has nothing to do with your race or sex. What "people like you can't seem to grasp" is that "settling" is necessary in order to accommodate, not the mediocre, but future generations. There aren't enough resources on this planet for everyone to fulfill the capitalist ambition of "the sky's the limit" economic acquisition and expansion. And if we don't start training our eye on what it is with which we'd like to "settle," we're going to consume ourselves into extinction. Again, what's fair isn't always going to benefit you. But if it's for a greater good, a good you might even agree with if you could abandon the guiding principle of selfishness, I think it's worth it. "Here's another beef I've ALWAYS had about progressivism… Real history doesn't matter… You're content to form your assertions based on a couple articles you read which were published in the last 15 years, and based on the above, will probably be modified again in the near future. Everything is subject to constant interpretation according to the convenience of the moment, thus enabling you to wander in circles for generations without being able to identify if your actually making "progress" or not. GOOD LUCK WITH THAT." I wouldn't call "modifying distributive principles to make them sensitive to the circumstances of women" a "convenience of the moment." Reading articles written by others broadens my perspective, but I often read articles with which I disagree as well. I base my assertions on an eclectic variety of things, including experience and critical thinking. How does reinterpreting some past event or set of principles mean that "history doesn't matter"? You act like modifying values based on new understandings and concerns is a bad thing. Should we not have abolished slavery then? Was that another "convenience of the moment"? If we can both agree that the integration of drinking fountains, for instance, is some small measure of "progress," then what's your point? "Tell you what, here's the sparknotes to Nicomachean Ethics. Why don't you start at the beginning, then come back and talk to me about justice..." Will do. I read everything you link to, by the way, because I'm, y'know, fixated on assholes. "You find such an atrocity entertaining? Do really think that shit's make believe?" Let's be perfectly clear: No real atrocity has ever been committed on the politics forum of Craigslist. What I found entertaining was your colorful depiction of an admittedly horrific event. You went several steps beyond a mere factual CNN-style report, entering the territory of, I don't know, Gustav Hasford maybe? Hasford's own account of the Vietnam War was semi-autobiographical, but that didn't make it any less entertaining. What was also entertaining was the way arc/mat effortlessly <a href="http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1642062642.html" rel="nofollow">shut you down</a> after your little "FUCKING CUNT ... CITE YOUR SOURCE" outburst. What happened, dude? I thought you didn't like it when threads were dropped. Or is it just when they're dropped by arc/mat? <img src="http://www.nlembassy.org.mk/contents/pages/55451/questionmark.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[oh you mean like arc/mat the "radical" christian?? should be: A Racist Christian. you know...........................just sayin. ]]>

<![CDATA[There are no "real' Christians on here. Real Christians are too busy feeding hungry people and helping others. "Judgement starts with the house of God." ]]>

<![CDATA[1. goyim cattle. How the jews and the Zion master sees all non jews in particular whites. Said with contemption. Those goyim will send troops to the middle east and fight a war for us or we'll call them anti semites. by Eagle Oct 13, 2004 share this 2. Goyim 232 up, 128 down buy goyim mugs, tshirts and magnetsNon-Jews, in Hebrew and Yiddish. Literally, the "peoples." Sometimes pejorative. See shiksa and shaygetz They'd rather watch football than study for finals. Well, whaddya expect? They're goyim. by cornholio Oct 18, 2003 share this 1. Used by racist Jewish supremesists against Christian whites. Used to strike anger within and start up wars (like when an angry white calls a black a "nigger"). When used, it means that you are lower than the scum at the bottom of a well. Read more: <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goyim" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goyim</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[does your grandson have a sword tucked away in his mouth?? just asking. sounds pretty gay to me, too. and explains why they call you "grampa stubs." just sayin.]]>