Classified Listings

Find jobs, housing, for sale, personals, services, local community, and events.

USA Online local classifieds

Community - politics classifieds in san francisco

<![CDATA[WASHINGTON –– Historians someday will piece together precisely what happened in Jerusalem last week when Vice President Joe Biden visited Israel to encourage renewed negotiations between the Israeli government and the Palestinians. Of a sudden, an announcement that Israel was proceeding with the construction of a small number of residential units –– 1,600 in a section of Jerusalem with more than 400,000 inhabitants, roughly 181,500 being Jewish and 229,000 being Muslim –– was interpreted as a slap in the face to the United States. Read More: <a href="http://www.newsbalance.com/moving-past-hillary-2010-03-18.article" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsbalance.com/moving-past-hillary-2010-03-18.article</a>]]>

<![CDATA[<img src="http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/0gaKcDr7cr8TJ/610x.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[I predicted the 911 Truth Movement would grow just based on common sense. There are too many unanswered questions and the plausibility of the whole scenario is so utterly preposterous as to defy logic, and I have stated that I believe the recent underwear bomber, the San Jose Pentagon Shooter, Jihad Jane, etc. are just patsies to discredit what many Americans know as the truth, ie, that 911 is a lie and that Muslims are not our enemies. These events are being staged for a more nefarious purpose in the future. I furthermore posited that Jews were purposely implicated (the dancing Israelis, the 200 or so Israeli art students, etc.) in 911 to specifically connect Jews with 911 to make anyone out to be an antisemite that questioned 911. That is, connect Jews to 911 and you will immediately be labelled an anti-semite to discredit the movement for there is no worse term in the Western World but to be labelled an anti-semite. I think this was brillinatly done by the perps though I know there is involvement anyway. The Laws of Phyics were broken on 911, Mr. Underhill. Rest assured of that and my Mythbuster Experiment would prove it. Very easily. As surely as the sun will set tonight and rise tomorrow, the Laws of Physics were broken. That is the main reason I know 911 is a lie. I have argued, to keep matters simple and forget all the hoopla about 911 and other conspiracies to a minimum, including thermite (a non-issue to me) so I have chosen the No Plane Theory as the simplest way the perpetrators pulled off 911. If commercial airliners crashed into the Pentagon and the WTCs there would be no contradictory eyewitness accounts. Go near to any airport and watch the jets take off and land. There is no mistaking a commercial airliner iwth a missle or a smaller military jet. We have eyes and we can see what is real. Yes, magicians can fool us but there are always tricks to their trade. You try to come off as the reasoned debater here on the matter 911, reasonably eloquent aned reasonably reasonable. But I think you are a fake. The bottom line to all of this is that this country is in such disarray for many reasons and out of synch. It is very weird to live in America today, ie, wars based on lie, conspiracies, orchestrated financial crashes, foreclosures, unemployment, Tea Parties, etc. that the country is running amok. Life could be so much simpler with full employment and no wars if our politicians wanted to achieve this. They don't. And there lies the rub. I laugh as I watch liberals fight conservatives, Democrats fight Republicans, etc. and nothing is accomplished. There is no progress of any sort in America. None. Nothing gets done. America is now a living joke and disgustingly ignorant, although I know people are waking up to this fact. This, the government fears, and why I fear or supsect you write your nonsense as you do.]]>

<![CDATA[Truthers are sick motherfuckers]]>

<![CDATA[you need to get a life! over 5 million people out of work, the dems ramming thru an unconstitutional h/c bill, and you want to do the o'l rosie o'donnell? she said the same lame thing"fire doesnt melt steel" well you must not have been around any kind of welding!!!!!! how the hell do you think welding takes place? rubbing two sticks together? its total bunk! and anyone else who believes in this tripe needs to see a doctor immediately! fire DOES MELT STEEL!!!!!!!!!!! JOBS ! BUB! JOBS!!!!]]>

<![CDATA[translation: I hate jews, I hate black people, I hate mexicans, I hate Obama, I hate gays, I hate and hate and then when I get my second wind...... I hate some more. So what if I have to conjure up some fantasy conspiracy to disguise the true inner feelings I have of inadequacy. I love hate and hate loves me. I am hate and hate is me. I am a sore loser. I am a loser period. I pretend to be somebody that I am not. I am caught and now I don't even care who knows. I will just bully and threaten them. It's what I have always done. In my warped disturbed mind, I control the politics forums in dozens of cities. Everyone knows me. Now they even know that I am a double party poster to weed out my enemies "the liberals" who I threaten several times a day. My hateful posts are my favorite though. I love to hate. Sucks to be you doesn't it Mr. Hate? Sucks to be exposed for who you really are and what you have been up to huh Mr. Hate? Yes indeedy Mr. Hate it surely does suck to be you. ]]>

<![CDATA[A little about how the new "health care" will work. First, you "register" yourself and every single bit of medical information about yourself. As you know already, YOU do NOT own or control any of YOUR medical information. It is not yours. You do NOT own it, at all, ever. Now that you know that much, it's possible to continue. The next step is "analysis" of your existing policy and provider, if any. In other words, it's a big problem at this point should you have a policy because others don't. Everything is now going to be geared to the have-nots in life, not to those who are able to pay. Skipping some steps here, for a reason. Now down to assigning you to a carrier. In so many words, you are now like an "assigned risk" with ultra high premiums, BUT you MUST buy the policy because everyone MUST have one under the new laws. No joke. You WILL have a policy. Should you decide you can't afford it, too bad! Failure to buy is a penalty and as such even is a felony. You'll really like reporting to work, if you work, and getting that little call from HR that you, well, need to come on down. You'll never work again over this entrapment! A “lie” you say? What "lie" do you mean? The one the gov is putting off on you? Have you even thought about that "lie?" Oh, just some other stuff that can and will be shoved so that you remain in “good health” always. You will be evaluated for gun ownership, you must, because a gun can kill you and no one can tolerate that. CDC has been dying for the chance to have some vehicle to shove this agenda. It’s a slam dunk. One argument is that “all the nuts with guns out there” like uncontrolled idiots ala the Ft. Hood shooter who merely shot his way onto a totally unarmed unprotected base, by law, unarmed and unprotected. YOU are responsible for such things, so YOU must be disarmed. Understand just a little of what they could do to YOU? It’s a “lie?” Who’s “lie” today? Did the government tell you the truth on anything in your life so far? If so, when? Why would you deserve the “truth?” Why would you ever qualify for that? What makes you imagine you would ever get the “truth” from anything governmental? ]]>

<![CDATA[ANY THINK THE BANKSTERS’ RAPE AND PILLAGE WAS OVER? YOU THINK FORECLOSURES WERE HISTORY? THEY BANKSTERS KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING WHEN THE BOUGHT DIANNE FEINSTEIN AND BARACK OBAMA! FORECLOSURES UP and SO ARE BANKSTERS’ MASSIVE PROFITS. IT’S THE AMERICAN WAY! FUCK THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS. IT’S WHAT DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS BEEN DOING FOR 18 YEARS, AND GETTING FILTHY RICH FROM DOING IT! JUST AS HER PAYMASTERS WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA! OR OBAMA’S PAYMASTERS GOLDMAN SACHS, AND J.P. MORGAN! Real victims of banks' misdeeds seek bailouts Andrew S. Ross Thursday, March 18, 2010 If banks behaving badly can get billions in federal bailout relief, what about their victims? That's the question San Mateo County is taking to Washington in its quest to claw back the $155 million lost to local schools, community colleges, and transportation and prison projects when Lehman Bros. went bankrupt in 2008. Seeking help on getting back the money invested with Lehman, county officials met with Bay Area lawmakers last week. The meetings, fortuitously, took place one day before a devastating report from Lehman's court-appointed bankruptcy examiner on how the investment bank had secretly hidden $50 billion in debt before it went under. The chief suggestion, from Sen. Dianne Feinstein's office, involves a forgivable loan (conditional on the county demonstrating an equivalent economic return) from the still-abundantly financed Troubled Asset Relief Program. At the same time, the Treasury Department would put the county's $155 million loss on its books as, yes, a "troubled asset." Nice try, I thought. "And we hope they buy it," Deputy County Manager Mary McMillan said optimistically. Brick walls: Trouble is, county officials have tried the TARP card before - if not quite so imaginatively - only to be rebuffed by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and his predecessor, Henry Paulson. This, despite references in the enabling TARP legislation to helping out municipalities burdened by the financial meltdown - under which San Mateo County would certainly qualify. According to a May 2009 analysis by Beacon Economics, the damage, "in real terms," caused by Lehman's collapse to the county included "the loss of 1,658 local jobs, an overall loss of $216 million to the local economy, including $100 million in income for local workers, and major delays in the completion of projects necessary for the growth of the economy." As of last month, Treasury officials remained unmoved. "There are countless well-intentioned ideas for deploying TARP funds," a Treasury Department spokesman told the Wall Street Journal. "But we determined that making Lehman Bros.' creditors whole is not consistent with what Congress intended for TARP funding." Make whole? San Mateo County and other local governments, which lost an estimated combined total of $1.7 billion to Lehman, will be lucky to get 25 cents on the dollar when the Bankruptcy Court disgorges whatever's left over from the ruins. Full court press: On another front, the county is suing ex-Lehman executives, including CEO Richard Fuld, along with the bank's accountants, Ernst & Young, for "fraud, deceit and misleading accounting practices." Allegations, incidentally, to which the bankruptcy examiner's 2,200-page report comes mightily close to repeating. "We're working on all these fronts," McMillan said, but Washington is the most immediate. "We're just asking the government to use the authority envisaged by Congress to help," she said. "Local governments, and local taxpayers, should be treated at least as fairly as bailed-out financial institutions that did so much to create the problems in the first place." Sure, sure: It perhaps wasn't the most convenient week for a San Francisco Chamber of Commerce delegation to get some quality face time in Washington, what with the health care drama reaching its climax. "Sounds good, we'll do all we can," summed up the no-doubt sincere responses from Bay Area solons, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, when pitched on federal money for local projects like the Mission Bay/Interstate 280 interchange and extending the proposed Central Subway into Chinatown. "This would be money earmarked in the next fiscal year," chamber CEO Steve Falk said before hastily substituting "prioritized" for the lingua non grata term. And, the topic du jour? Despite public expressions of optimism, Falk said there were concerns among people he talked to that the latest Congressional Budget Office estimate on health care legislation costs might be more than Democratic leaders are anticipating. And, if so, what that might do to Pelosi's roundup of votes. "One issue we brought up with everyone is that there are not enough details on how small business will be impacted. We told them that's what makes it difficult for the chamber to actively support a particular proposal." The response from Bay Area Democratic leaders? "We certainly understand the lack of details makes it difficult," Falk was told. "But you have to trust us on this. With the spiraling cost of health insurance, we have to do something." -- The three-day trip wasn't all "educating and lobbying." The delegation got to partake in an evening of Scotch-tasting (single malts), and a private tour of the White House, where they met President Obama's Portuguese water dog, Bo. * WHORES FOR BANKSTERS NOW WORKING ON NO REGULATION, AND MORE MASSIVE NO-STRINGS BANKSTER BAILOUTS: JUDICIAL WATCH.org … GET ON THEIR FREE EMAILS The “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians for 2009” list has been announced by Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, The list is compiled at the end of each year. The list, in alphabetical order, includes: * Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT): This marks two years in a row for Senator Dodd, who made the 2008 "Ten Most Corrupt" list for his corrupt relationship with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for accepting preferential treatment and loan terms from Countrywide Financial, a scandal which still dogs him. In 2009, the scandals kept coming for the Connecticut Democrat. In 2009, Judicial Watch filed a Senate ethics complaint against Dodd for undervaluing on his Senate Financial Disclosure forms a property he owns in Ireland. * Senator John Ensign (R-NV): A number of scandals popped up in 2009 involving public officials who conducted illicit affairs, and then attempted to cover them up with hush payments and favors, an obvious abuse of power. The year's worst offender might just be Nevada Republican Senator John Ensign. * Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA): Judicial Watch is investigating a $12 million TARP cash injection provided to the Boston-based OneUnited Bank at the urging of Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank. * Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner: In 2009, Obama Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner admitted that he failed to pay $34,000 in Social Security and Medicare taxes from 2001-2004 on his lucrative salary at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), an organization with 185 member countries that oversees the global financial system. * Attorney General Eric Holder: Tim Geithner can be sure he won't be hounded about his tax-dodging by his colleague Eric Holder, US Attorney General. Judicial Watch strongly opposed Holder because of his terrible ethics record, which includes: obstructing an FBI investigation of the theft of nuclear secrets from Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory; rejecting multiple requests for an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by then-Vice President Al Gore in the Clinton White House; undermining the criminal investigation of President Clinton by Kenneth Starr in the midst of the Lewinsky investigation; and planning the violent raid to seize then-six-year-old Elian Gonzalez at gunpoint in order to return him to Castro's Cuba. * Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)/ Senator Roland Burris (D-IL): One of the most serious scandals of 2009 involved a scheme by former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich to sell President Obama's then-vacant Senate seat to the highest bidder. Two men caught smack dab in the middle of the scandal: Senator Roland Burris, who ultimately got the job, and Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. * President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. * Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): At the heart of the corruption problem in Washington is a sense of entitlement. Politicians believe laws and rules (even the U.S. Constitution) apply to the rest of us but not to them. Case in point: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her excessive and boorish demands for military travel. * Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) and the rest of the PMA Seven: Rep. John Murtha made headlines in 2009 for all the wrong reasons. The Pennsylvania congressman is under federal investigation for his corrupt relationship with the now-defunct defense lobbyist PMA Group. PMA, founded by a former Murtha associate, has been the congressman's largest campaign contributor. * Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY): Rangel, the man in charge of writing tax policy for the entire country, has yet to adequately explain how he could possibly "forget" to pay taxes on $75,000 in rental income he earned from his off-shore rental property. He also faces allegations that he improperly used his influence to maintain ownership of highly coveted rent-controlled apartments in Harlem, and misused his congressional office to fund raise for his private Rangel Center by preserving a tax loophole for an oil drilling company in exchange for funding. There are further explanations about corruption why each politician was chosen at Judicial Watch. * ]]>

<![CDATA[Am surprised rental property owners aren't alerting their representatives that appliance companies as of a decade or so ago have started to sell kitchen stoves as well as their standard water heaters which are DESIGNED...yes...designed...to fail after six years. The old water heaters would last for 40 or 50 years and so the manufacturers could NOT sell new product. So they designed the water heaters to fail at six years. That has been so succesful with minimal outcry, so they are doing the same thing with kitchen stoves now. So the landfills are filling ....]]>

<![CDATA[SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, BUSH’S WAR PROFITEER, AND HER PIMP-HUSBAND, RICHARD C BLUM, HAVE TAKEN MORE MONEY FROM PG&E, THAN EVEN HER BANKSTER DONORS, WELLS FARGO AND BANK of ILLEGALS! ONLY RED CHINA HAS PAID THE OLD WHORE MORE TO BE THEIR ADVOCATE IN THE SENATE... AND BOY HAS SHE! FEINSTEIN, THE WHORE’S LATEST TRICK FOR PAYMASTERS PG&E IS TO SABOTAGE SOLAR POWER. THE PG&E MONOPOLY KNEW A GOOD WHORE WHEN THE BOUGHT FEINSTEIN! PUC listens to Proposition 16 debate David R. Baker, Chronicle Staff Writer Thursday, March 18, 2010 Critics of a PG&E-backed ballot measure that would hamper public power efforts want California energy regulators to jump into the fray. At an unusual hearing of the California Public Utilities Commission, public officials and consumer advocates on Wednesday urged the commissioners to oppose Proposition 16. The initiative, on the June 8 ballot, would amend the state Constitution, requiring local governments that want to enter the electricity business to win the approval of two-thirds of their voters first. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. has provided all of the measure's funding to date and has promised to pump as much as $35 million into the campaign. Opponents implored commissioners, who oversee the state's investor-owned utilities, to take a position against the initiative, calling it PG&E's attempt to block competition. "Never before in the history of this commission has one of your regulatees decided to write its own business advantage into the state Constitution," said John Geesman, a former member of the California Energy Commission who has emerged as one of the initiative's fiercest critics. The utilities commission did not stake out a position Wednesday. The hearing was designed as a debate between the measure's backers and foes to educate the public - not to produce a resolution from the commission. But commission President Michael Peevey said after the hearing that he and his colleagues would probably take up the matter this spring. The commissioners have occasionally weighed in on ballot measures that deal with the industries they regulate. "Based on past precedent, it's likely the commission will take a position on this," Peevey said. New type of system Representatives of PG&E and other groups supporting the initiative argued on Wednesday that California needs the measure. A new type of public power being pursued in San Francisco and Marin County - called community choice aggregation - requires approval from local elected officials but not from voters. Under community choice aggregation, local governments buy electricity on behalf of their residents and set their own rates, while traditional utilities such as PG&E continue to own and operate the power grid. "Proposition 16 does not decide between public power and no public power," said PG&E Senior Vice President Nancy McFadden. "It simply gives people the right to vote." That argument, however, met with skepticism from Peevey. "I can understand the frustration when you see something go forward without a vote of the people," he said. "But if that is the case, why require a two-thirds vote and amend the Constitution? ... It bothers me that we would amend the Constitution." Both McFadden and former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, who spoke in support of PG&E, argued that requiring a two-thirds vote did not create an insurmountable barrier for public power projects. "Prop. 16 ensures that where any local government envisions taking over and running a utility, you go to the voters, lay out your case and prove you can do it," Brown said. Doubts about votes Opponents replied that California's requirement that the state budget pass with a two-thirds vote in the legislature had paralyzed Sacramento. "You don't have to look anywhere but the state Capitol to see that the two-thirds vote requirement has not served the people of California well," said Mill Valley city Councilwoman Shawn Marshall, who is the vice chairwoman of Marin County's community choice aggregation effort. The battle over Prop. 16 is just the latest skirmish in California's long fight over public power. PG&E has repeatedly beaten back attempts by various cities, including its hometown of San Francisco, to break free from the utility and enter the electricity business. "PG&E has demonstrated many times that it can control local elections by spending excessive amounts of money," said San Francisco Supervisor Sophie Maxwell. "We're seeing that now on an unprecedented scale." Most speakers at Wednesday's meeting opposed Prop. 16, and some staged an anti-PG&E demonstration outside. And yet the hearing was far from one-sided. Steamrolled in Marin Several Marin County residents told the commission that they felt steamrolled by Marin's community choice aggregation effort, which starts delivering power to its first customers in May. The forms that let residents opt out of the system and stay with PG&E are too complicated and easy to mistake for junk mail, they said. A representative of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers questioned the claims of community choice supporters who say the local systems can provide a higher percentage of renewable power than PG&E at a lower cost. And Marc Burgat, vice president of government relations for the California Chamber of Commerce, said taxpayers need to be able to vote on such potentially expensive projects. "The public deserves a public debate," he said, "and right now, that debate is not required." ]]>

<![CDATA[This is interesting. Emma thinks he's dead, this guy thinks he's alive. As the top commander in Afghanistan, can he be less well informed than Emma? Or maybe he's lying; but if so, why? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WASHINGTON — The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan said Wednesday that it remains the goal of U.S. troops to capture Osama bin Laden alive and "bring him to justice." Read More... <a href="http://www.newsbalance.com/mcchrystal-goal-is-to-capture-bin-laden-alive-2010-03-18.article" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsbalance.com/mcchrystal-goal-is-to-capture-bin-laden-alive-2010-03-18.article</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[Physics is my avocation. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wait hold on here! you said about a week ago you were an accountant. Is the physics business slow ou are you not good at it. Before you said you're German, now a German born in Poland, you got more stories than Carter has peanuts! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-18, 1:49PM PDT Reply to: comm-k8szw-1650277670@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, I'm the physics guy. As I state in another post, I think the standards of evidence should not be any less stringent in the world of politics than in that of science. There is no excuse for ignoring a mountain of doubts and misgivings by a sizable group of people in a number of different fields: science, engineering, politics, law enforcement, the intelligence community. I agree with you that secret deals might have been cut by various political and business operators. This whole mess should come out into the open as soon as possible. As I keep reiterating, the government is the prime breeder of conspiracy theories, any chance of stopping which depends on full disclosure. The American people deserve no less. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]]>

<![CDATA[BY BY MARXIST]]>

<![CDATA[Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks 67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating the anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7 Kansas City, MO (Zogby International) September 6, 2007 - As America nears the sixth anniversary of the world-churning events of September 11, 2001, a new Zogby International poll finds a majority of Americans still await a Congressional investigation of President Bush's and Vice President Cheney's actions before, during and after the 9/11 attacks. Over 30% also believe Bush and/or Cheney should have been immediately impeached by the House of Representatives. BUT..... Thanks To NACY PELOSI who just decided that she didn't need to keep her Oath she pledged to uphold the laws of of the Constitution of the United States and unconstitutionally declared that "Impeachment is off the table." To This day, NANCY PELOSI is in Contempt of the US Constitution of the United States of America!! NOTE:=================================================================================== The 911truth.org–sponsored poll also found that over two-thirds of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the still unexplained collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001. WTC 7 housed the mayor's emergency bunker and offices of the SEC, IRS, CIA and Secret Service and was not hit by any planes but still completely collapsed into its own footprint nearly eight hours after the Twin Tower attacks. FEMA did not explain this collapse, the 911 Commission ignored it, and the promised official study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is now 2 years overdue. Janice Matthews, executive director of poll sponsor 911truth.org, observes: "The supermajority response to the WTC Building 7 question signals an increasing public concern about this remarkable event --- up from 38% last year. We can perhaps credit this rising awareness to the millions who have recently witnessed videos or Youtube clips of this skyscraper's descent and the outspoken demands for a new WTC inquiry from over 150 architects and engineering professionals, including NIST's own former Fire Science Division Chief, Dr. James Quintiere. Another contributory factor is the increased questioning among Hispanics, Blacks and Asians whose responses appear significantly more critical of the 9/11 Commission than Whites, sometimes twice as critical." ========================================================================================================= Strategy aide W. David Kubiak adds, "While only 32% seek immediate Bush and/or Cheney impeachment based on their current personal knowledge, a clear majority of citizens still seems hungry for a full exposure of the facts. The results suggest widespread public support for legislators like Rep. Dennis Kucinich who pledge to investigate unanswered 9/11 questions in the relevant congressional committees this fall. We hope more of our representatives find the spine to respond to this escalating dissatisfaction with the dubious accounting we have received thus far." 9/11 family member and 911truth.org advisor Donna Marsh O'Connor notes, "I’m not sure this poll is at all surprising. Over half of those polled want more answers from Congress, from those they hired to represent them. One quarter of the country knows enough to want to impeach both. Doesn't it just mean people need figures they consider credible to tell them whether key details add up or not? Truth advocates need to press their case in Congress, on college campuses, in church groups with reason and absolute discipline regarding what can and cannot be proven. The strongest evidence needs to reach the people—including people who hate computers. We must present it calmly. Like whispering so that people reach in to hear." Poll Sponsor The Zogby poll was conceived and commissioned by 911truth.org and paid for with generous assistance from individual project donors and Visibility911.com. 911truth.org is a national information clearing house and grassroots resource center for the US 9/11 truth movement. The group is dedicated to investigation, education, organizing, and accountability regarding the recent criminal misuse of government to promote fear, repression and endless war. Survey Methodology This is a telephone survey of adults nationwide conducted by Zogby International from August 23 to August 27, 2007. The target sample is 1,000 interviews with approximately 71 questions asked. Samples are randomly drawn from telephone cd’s of national listed sample. Zogby International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and exchanges. As many as six calls are made to reach a sampled phone number. Cooperation rates are calculated using one of AAPOR’s approved methodologies and are comparable to other professional public-opinion surveys conducted using similar sampling strategies. Weighting by region, party, age, race, religion, and gender is used to adjust for non-response. The margin of error is +/- 3.1 percentage points. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups. For the full poll and demographic breakdown of results, see: <a href="http://www.911truth.org/images/ZogbyPoll2007.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.911truth.org/images/ZogbyPoll2007.pdf</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[WASHINGTON — The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan said Wednesday that it remains the goal of U.S. troops to capture Osama bin Laden alive and "bring him to justice." Read More... <a href="http://www.newsbalance.com/mcchrystal-goal-is-to-capture-bin-laden-alive-2010-03-18.article" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsbalance.com/mcchrystal-goal-is-to-capture-bin-laden-alive-2010-03-18.article</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Wait hold on here! you said about a week ago you were an accountant. Is the physics business slow ou are you not good at it. Before you said you're German, now a German born in Poland, you got more stories than Carter has peanuts! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2010-03-18, 1:49PM PDT Reply to: comm-k8szw-1650277670@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes, I'm the physics guy. As I state in another post, I think the standards of evidence should not be any less stringent in the world of politics than in that of science. There is no excuse for ignoring a mountain of doubts and misgivings by a sizable group of people in a number of different fields: science, engineering, politics, law enforcement, the intelligence community. I agree with you that secret deals might have been cut by various political and business operators. This whole mess should come out into the open as soon as possible. As I keep reiterating, the government is the prime breeder of conspiracy theories, any chance of stopping which depends on full disclosure. The American people deserve no less. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]]>

<![CDATA["The lives of ordinary people are of no consequence." "It's really a matter of quantity, not so much in the quality." "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. It left me." ]]>

<![CDATA[ Yes, I'm the physics guy. As I state in another post, I think the standards of evidence should not be any less stringent in the world of politics than in that of science. There is no excuse for ignoring a mountain of doubts and misgivings by a sizable group of people in a number of different fields: science, engineering, politics, law enforcement, the intelligence community. I agree with you that secret deals might have been cut by various political and business operators. This whole mess should come out into the open as soon as possible. As I keep reiterating, the government is the prime breeder of conspiracy theories, any chance of stopping which depends on full disclosure. The American people deserve no less. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I suppose you are Berkeley the German Physics genius, not the other one, ultra far right. I've been a cautious skeptic for a long time, though I may not have appeared to have been one. I don't buy everything that Bush/Cheney told us. I think the truth is deep, surprising and shocking, that these terrorist killers represent a blowback that the CIA originally created to fight the Soviets and then morphed into a Frankenstein that turned on them. And there were a lot of dirty double deals with the Saudis and Kuweit, some of the same people who were our "allies" against Saddam were backing the Taliban, and Texas Oil was way in deep with these creeps too. We have not been told the whole story, and there have been cover ups galore. But the Truthers are just too damn nuts with their space alien fairy tales that there were "no airplanes" and "thermite was planted in ther Towers to start a war" are just such a turnoff to anybody with the slightest rationality. Same goes with their idiocy suggesting that "al Qaida doesn't exist" and "every single (of thousands) of suicide bombings in many nations is a counterfeit fake, there are no real ones!" Where do you separate the real honest deep investigative reporting as in Woodward and Bernstein ferreting out Nixon's criminalty from loons like Joe Sixpack? And I'm deeply offended at the Holocaust deniers and Jew baiters that have infiltrated every aspect of the Truther Movement. Where can we go to really question a bunch of corporate political hacks who have jobbed us quite badly without going down a rabbit hole to to a bunch of zany Moonbats who think Buzz Aldrin was in on it all somehow? If the Truthers had just had the tiniest most microscopic piece of common sense, maybe I would have listened. But they don't and I won't. Cordially, Mr. Underhill ]]>

<![CDATA[idonts needs noedcatin nohou]]>

<![CDATA[OUR COUNTRY NEEDS OUR HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.....NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please educate yourself. If you too believe, as i do, then we deserve a real independent 9/11 investigation with Supeona Powers to pursue true accountability, and justice . . . then have the courage to: 1) INFORM OTHERS 2) Take Action EVIDENCE: Watch All Of The Videos on the link below.....scroll down the site and: {Brace Yourself, You're In For A Rude Awakening} <a href="http://world911truth.org/ae911truth-press-conference-video/" rel="nofollow">http://world911truth.org/ae911truth-press-conference-video/</a> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3) Sign the Petition and Join Firefighters, and the 1,000 plus Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth who Are DEMANDING A NEW Independent 9/11 Investigation!! <a href="http://www.911Truth.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.911Truth.org</a> and <a href="http://www.AE911Truth.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.AE911Truth.org</a> 4) Contact your representatives and your Senators and demand a real investigation with SUBPEONA POWERS. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ US Patriots, NATIONWIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . taking back America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .one post at a time!! {And So Should YOU!!} Remember, Remember the 11th of September. I see no reason why the smell of NEO-CONS Conspiring to Commit Mass Murder of Americans in New York on 9/11 and HIGH TREASON should ever be forgot!! PEACE!! ]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://prosecutebushformurder.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://prosecutebushformurder.blogspot.com/</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiOAtGWqS8E" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiOAtGWqS8E</a> Absolutely, according to Vincent Bugliosi, whose book, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder," sets forth the legal architecture and incontrovertible evidence that President Bush took this nation to war in Iraq under false pretenses, a war that has not only caused the deaths of American soldiers but also over 100,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children. US Patriots, NATIONWIDE . ..................taking back America .....................................And So Should YOU!! PEACE! ]]>

<![CDATA[You're losing it, bro. This info has been out for a while. It's just the next step towards total communism by the DICKtator Oblunder. My huge question is.....why didn't the CBO estimate change any considering they put student loans in there? Um....perhaps the CBO estimate is a complete farce piece of shit waste of time.]]>

<![CDATA[To be told that this is not up for debate is immorally servile, but also treasonist to the US Patriots, NATIONWIDE . . . . . To be told that we should just go shopping..... <> To be told that you should believe a Crime was Not committed by those in the Bush administration and the Cover up of the 'Controlled Demolition' of building number 7 of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 is like being told by the mob that the money you earned is partially theirs!! <> To be told that the Pentagon was struck by a 757 on Septemer 11, 2001 is the truth when EYEWITNESSES .... Including Pentagon Security Officers.... that a large aircraft was seen flying up to and over the Pentagon at the time of the EXPLOSION of the Pentagon is the REAL Outrageous Conspiracy Theory!! <> To be told that the truth is what the 911 Commission Report says is TREACHERY..... and is IMPOSSIBLE!! <> To be told that we should just go on living our lives as if Nothing Criminal happened within the Bush regime ......then somebody should tell you that there is Something Terribly Wrong With This Government!! {< If you believe as I do, and if you are sick and tired of the President of the United States telling YOU what you should believe is the truth When the Facts and Eyewitness testomonies by firefighters and Pentagon Security Officers say is quite different to the so-called 'Official' b.s...., then You Should Also Be Voicing Your Disbelief and OUTRAGE!! US Patriots, NATIONWIDE. . . . . . . taking back America ....................................And So Should YOU!! While there's Still Time, i.e....... <a href="http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pol/1650019415.html" rel="nofollow">http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pol/1650019415.html</a> PEACE!! ]]>

<![CDATA[These phony corrupt so called leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are un-american pieces of shit. Just being disclosed is the fact that they snuck in student loans in the health bill. What the fuck do student loans have to do with health bill?]]>

<![CDATA[Limited enrollment, must be a gov. sci. or political aff. major. Tentative guest speaker N. Pelosi, U.S. House or Knute Gingrich: Gov. Today, Tomorrow]]>

<![CDATA[We will not rest until this marxist vermin is eraticated]]>

<![CDATA[The most corrupt un-american whore Nancy Pelosi should do our great country a favor. Immediately injest two cyanide pills. You corrupt cunt, you will not be missed. You will give this country a reason to rejoice. Fact is give two to Harry Reid. He is a piece of shit just like you. THANKS IN ADVANCE.]]>

<![CDATA[When Albert Einstein stated that gravity bends rays of light, scientists were understandably skeptical because such a theory had never been encountered before. So they designed an astronomical experiment to prove or disprove the hypothesis. And, lo and behold, their observations showed that Einstein was right. Now a number of prominent persons, including some members of the 9/11 commission, have doubts about the official story as summarized in the commission's report. From a scientist's perspective, there is every reason to begin a fresh investigation to attempt to answer these doubts once and for all. The question at this point is whether there is the political will to approve such an investigation. Indications are that there is not. President Obama has not moved on this and shows no signs of doing so. Nor does Congress, with a few exceptions, show interest. Well, I don't know exactly why this is happening, but one notion I will not accept is that there is such a low standard of evidence-gathering in politics that it is not necessary to reopen the investigation.]]>

<![CDATA[Taliban fighters more than doubled the number of homemade bombs they used against U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan last year, relying on explosives often far more primitive than the ones used in Iraq. Read More... <a href="http://www.newsbalance.com/talibans-homemade-bombs-stymie-us-2010-03-18.article" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsbalance.com/talibans-homemade-bombs-stymie-us-2010-03-18.article</a>]]>

<![CDATA[I suppose you are Berkeley the German Physics genius, not the other one, ultra far right. I've been a cautious skeptic for a long time, though I may not have appeared to have been one. I don't buy everything that Bush/Cheney told us. I think the truth is deep, surprising and shocking, that these terrorist killers represent a blowback that the CIA originally created to fight the Soviets and then morphed into a Frankenstein that turned on them. And there were a lot of dirty double deals with the Saudis and Kuweit, some of the same people who were our "allies" against Saddam were backing the Taliban, and Texas Oil was way in deep with these creeps too. We have not been told the whole story, and there have been cover ups galore. But the Truthers are just too damn nuts with their space alien fairy tales that there were "no airplanes" and "thermite was planted in ther Towers to start a war" are just such a turnoff to anybody with the slightest rationality. Same goes with their idiocy suggesting that "al Qaida doesn't exist" and "every single (of thousands) of suicide bombings in many nations is a counterfeit fake, there are no real ones!" Where do you separate the real honest deep investigative reporting as in Woodward and Bernstein ferreting out Nixon's criminalty from loons like Joe Sixpack? And I'm deeply offended at the Holocaust deniers and Jew baiters that have infiltrated every aspect of the Truther Movement. Where can we go to really question a bunch of corporate political hacks who have jobbed us quite badly without going down a rabbit hole to to a bunch of zany Moonbats who think Buzz Aldrin was in on it all somehow? If the Truthers had just had the tiniest most microscopic piece of common sense, maybe I would have listened. But they don't and I won't. Cordially, Mr. Underhill]]>

<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SPjZjACbRQ&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SPjZjACbRQ&feature=related</a> Too many questions, Too many lies! If you can watch this video and it's response "911 Commission Co-Chair Explains Need for New Investigation" and not demand a new investigation of the events that happened leading up to during and after 9/11/2001 then America is lost. ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Bush administration tells the 9/11 Commission Meeting's Smoking Gun Geroge Tenent Hides 911 Bipartisianship conspired and now this STATE OF DENIAL Truth Bob Woodward Olbermann WTC bin Laden Pentagon World Shanksville Bush Conspiracy Al Qaeda CIA FBI ISI Cheney Condi Rice Afghanistan Dick Clark Richard Clark. ]]>

<![CDATA[You didn't see anything about it in the mainstream media, but at a recent conference in San Francisco, more than 1,000 architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9-11. That's right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy -- because they don't buy the government's version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the twin towers and WTC Building 7. Richard Gage, [AIA], a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, put it like this: "The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction." He's especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 47 stories came down in "pure free-fall acceleration" that afternoon, even though it was never hit by an aircraft. This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies, published by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows: Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9-11 were going 440 and 550 mph. Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don't claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy's underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a "gravity driven collapse" without demolition charges defies the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately 10 seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there's the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet. NIST started its investigation on Aug. 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn't have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9-11, with Gov. Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn't mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We're talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here's what the paper's lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he's convinced brought down the twin towers and the nearby Building 7: "Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2,500 degrees Centigrade [4,532 degrees Fahrenheit]. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel." Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: "Once you get to the science, it's indisputable." A former Navy Seal, professional wrestler and actor Jesse Ventura was elected governor of Minnesota on the Reform Party ticket in 1998 where he served until 2002. Today, Ventura is best known for hosting the popular television show Conspiracy Theory, which airs on cable television. He is also the author of five books. <a href="http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm</a>]]>

<![CDATA[Obama: Arrogance Run Amuck ShareThis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send to a Friend -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send Letter to Editor Posted by Bobby Eberle Following the election victories in New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts and Obama's continuing slide in the polls, I thought it would be a waste of time for Republicans to participate in Obama's healthcare dog and pony show -- a.k.a. Health Care Summit. Let him continue on his free fall... pushing policies that run counter to the essence of what it means to be an American. That was my thought. I stand corrected. Yes, the so-called Health Care Summit is nothing that will go down in history. It basically accomplished nothing from a policy standpoint, and was a legislative waste of time. However, from a political perspective, the summit gave the American people a glimpse of two items that will help Republicans in the long run: Republicans actually speaking out and not backing down, and Obama's arrogance. Item #1 was my main cause of concern regarding the summit. Obama has been on television so many times. He feels he owns the members of the media. Remember his health care townhall? What a joke. There was no debate. No serious opposition. It was a glorified infomercial sanctioned by the media. No thanks. We don't need Republicans to fall into that trap, especially with the momentum we have. But, the Republicans came armed and ready. With the AP story on GOPUSA -- Obama, Republicans clash at heated health summit -- the headline says it all. With tempers flaring, President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans clashed in an extraordinary live-on-TV summit Thursday over the right prescription for the nation's broken health care system, talking of agreement but holding to long-entrenched positions that leave them far apart. "We have a very difficult gap to bridge here," said Rep. Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican. "We just can't afford this. That's the ultimate problem." House Republican Leader John Boehner took Obama to task on the massive cost of the health care plan: "The first thing is we've heard from the two budget directors about our fiscal condition. We have Medicare that's going broke. We have Social Security going broke. We have Medicaid that's bankrupting not only the federal government but all the states and yet, here we are having a conversation about creating a new entitlement program that will bankrupt our country. And it will bankrupt our country. It's not that we can't do health insurance reform to help bring down costs to help save the system. This bill, this 2,700-page bill will bankrupt our country." Boehner went on to call Obama's plan a "dangerous experiment" and said it would amount to a "government takeover of health care." Then, there is Obama. In a meeting that lasted nearly six hours, Democrats dominated the time over 2 to 1. According to timekeeping at National Review Online, Democrats spoke for 114 minutes, and Republicans spoke for 110 minutes. However, Obama added another 119 minutes with his own rhetoric. As noted in Obama: No tight scorekeeping needed at summit, "Barack Obama told Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell that time wasn't equally divided between GOP and Democratic talk at the health care summit because 'I'm the president.'" Obama then counters a point made by Sen. John McCain by saying, "The election's over." First, McCain makes a point in a respectful way, and Obama's first response is to call him "John." I wonder what the reaction would be if McCain called him Barack? Then, this dig about the election being over only underscores Obama's arrogance and complete lack of respect, not only for McCain, but the American people. If Obama truly respected the American people and the American way of life, he would not be pushing through policies that run counter to what the public wants. The American public does not want this bill, and yet Obama keeps pushing. Obama also "scolded" Rep. Eric Cantor for actually bringing a copy of the Senate bill to the meeting. Obama called it "the type of political stunt that gets in the way of lawmakers having a serious conversation." This was a serious conversation? Obama and the Democrats continue to shut out Republican ideas. They continue to push forward a bill the American people do not want. And now they talk about using legislative tactics to force it through despite Republican and some Democrat opposition. And so, the summit wasn't a complete waste of time. Republicans did not back down, which has been their pattern for years and years. And Obama continues to show his elitist nature, and that will certainly not endear him to the American public. Now, let's just defeat this bill once and for all. Maybe then, we can focus on medical malpractice reform and other issues that really will bring down health care costs without taking power away from hard-working Americans and putting it in the hands of the federal government. The Loft | Recommend to Friend ]]>

<![CDATA[Doom of the Democrats in 2010 By Dick Morris In U.S. politics, all elections are not created equal. It's OK to lose the state legislative and gubernatorial elections held on years ending in 2, 4, 6 or 8. But you can't afford to lose those held in years that end in 0. Those are the reapportionment elections. With the governorships evenly divided and almost all of the state legislatures, the party that loses the decadal election stands to lose control over congressional reapportionment. And, therefore, to lose control of the House of Representatives for a decade. When Obama persists with his unpopular healthcare proposals, he is dooming his party not just to defeat in 2010, but to losses throughout the coming decade. The reapportionment of 2000 was a kinder, gentler reapportionment. Except in Texas, where former Rep. Tom DeLay (R) took no prisoners, the two parties concluded sweetheart deals to draw lines that favored the incumbents on both sides of the aisle. In California, for example, the lines so protected Democratic and Republican opponents that there is only one vulnerable Democrat (Jerry McNerney) out of 54 congressmen from that state. In Iowa and Arizona, reapportionment was handled, as it should be everywhere, by a nonpartisan commission that is prohibited from considering party preferences or incumbency in drawing the lines. But in the other 48, don't count on the kinder and gentler reapportionment rules of 2000 to apply. The partisan divide, fostered by Obama's ruthless use of his majorities, has become so wide and embittered that Republican legislative leaders and governors will press every advantage they can to gain ascendancy. And they should! Tip O'Neill said that all politics is local. Not anymore. In 2010, all politics is national. The merits or demerits of each individual candidate count for little. Party counts for all. Voters have come to understand and debunk the Myth of the Moderate Democrat. The fiscal-conservative-sounding, pro-life Democrat who campaigns for office promising to balance the budget, hold down taxes and fight for our values is the same one who marches right into the halls of the House on the first day of the session and votes for Nancy Pelosi for Speaker, Charlie Rangel for chairman of Ways and Means and Henry Waxman for Energy and Commerce. It is that one vote that permits Obama's radical agenda to pass. Voters realize that it does not matter if their local moderate Democrat breaks ranks on this bill or that one. That first vote to let the Democrats organize the House is the crucial one. From then on, Pelosi doesn't really need him and will let him vote no to assuage his district and get reelected. Presidents only lose when they get stuck in scandal or in their own misguided convictions. So it was with Johnson and Vietnam, Nixon and Watergate, Ford and the pardon, Reagan and Iran-Contra, Bush and the recession, Clinton and Lewinsky and Bush-43 and Iraq. Now Obama is repeating the lamentable history of his predecessors by getting stuck in the mire of his own ideology over healthcare. So in the elections of 2010, Republicans, independents and even some Democrats (Obama's rating is now down to 43 percent in Rasmussen) will vote a straight Republican ticket. Gone is the chic notion that party doesn't matter and one should vote for the individual. Obama has ended those days. Now Democrats can expect the same kind of swath of destruction that will obliterate their congressional and Senate majorities to destroy their hold on statehouses and legislatures. And on the 2011 reapportionment. -------------------- ]]>

<![CDATA[Pelosi Backwards On 'Tea Parties' and GOP By Christopher G. Adamo March 4, 2010 Democrats continue to bounce between occasional brief attempts at pandering to grassroots America, and their more innate reversion to unrestrained contempt for the beliefs and sentiments of the heartland. In the process, they reveal a willingness to resort to any concocted lie in hopes of fooling enough of the people, enough of the time, to advance their insidious agenda. In a February 28 interview on ABC, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-CA) engaged in the sort of doublespeak that has earned her the anger and nearly universal distrust of the American people. It hardly seems believable that, only a mere three years ago, Pelosi was a virtual unknown among common citizens. Yet since her ascendancy to the speakership of the House of Representatives in 2007 Pelosi's name, like that of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-NV) and Barack Obama, has become synonymous with the dangerous radicalism of the American left. At times all three have attempted to hide their anti-American agenda behind a pathetic veneer of "centrism." And on every occasion that they revert to such behavior, they reveal a disingenuousness so extreme, and so rife with contempt for the intelligence of their target constituency, that they become an embarrassment to all but their most blindly devoted minions. Pelosi's appearance this past weekend was classic. But despite being a predictable repeat of past appearances as an exhibition of arrogance and deceitfulness, her frequently contradictory remarks need to be deciphered to fully expose the reality of modern liberalism, and the sordid tactics she will use to implement it. Like Barack Obama and Harry Reid, while intermittently presenting seemingly reasonable platitudes, Nancy Pelosi inadvertently paraded the leftist agenda in all of its self-exalting ugliness. In the latest Democrat attempt to divide and conquer real America, Pelosi advanced the notion that the "Tea Party" movement has been "hijacked" by the Republican Party. Her obvious intent was to create an ideological schism in the conservative movement that has coalesced during the past year, and now arguably threatens to serve a much needed eviction notice to the Democrat dominated political machine currently running Washington. Yet her claim could not be any more inverted from reality. If anything, it is the "Tea Party" movement that has expanded its influence within the Republican Party, emboldening conservatives from Mainstreet to the Senate floor to stand resolute for the principles on which the party and the nation were founded. And it is undeniable that the effect on the GOP has been overwhelmingly positive. In stark contrast to the general acquiescence and timidity of a year ago, several bright stars are arising, who may well succeed in reshaping the character of the party. No longer defined by its "moderate" wing, such outspoken conservatives as Representatives Michelle Bachman (R.-MN) and Paul Ryan (R.-WI) are increasingly putting the Democrats to flight with their scathing, bold (and accurate) assessments of the dire repercussions of the Democrat agenda. Admittedly, some among the Republican "Old Guard," who gave the party such a bad name in recent years, have recognized the magnitude of this groundswell and are now attempting to morph into it just as they would any other political bandwagon. Senator John McCain, whose "centrism" was soundly rejected by America in the 2008 presidential election, clearly sought to establish just such an image at the Obama health-care circus last week. This was not the "bipartisan" McCain who so frequently infuriated conservative Republicans with his regular betrayals of the party when making deals with the Democrats. But McCain's sudden "awakening" should surprise no one. Back home in Arizona, he faces a primary challenge from former Congressman J.D. Hayworth, a real conservative whose past record clearly aligns with the concerns and sentiments of the "Tea Party" movement. Yet as undeniable as it is that the upsurge of grassroots conservatism has now gotten McCain's attention, it is glaringly obvious that the Democrats are absolutely terrified of it. Pelosi's "back and forth" during the interview could not be construed in any other manner. In an exemplary instance of the projection that so typifies liberalism, Pelosi perpetrated her own attempt at the very sort of "hijacking" of which she accused the Republicans. While maintaining in one breath that the "Tea Party" phenomenon is not truly representative of a grassroots movement, and having accepted the despicably derisive characterization of the movement as "tea baggers" (a reference to perverse sexual acts) by fellow Democrat Chuck Schumer of New York, Pelosi then made a lame attempt to build a bridge. Perhaps hoping that the intelligence of "Tea Party" constituency equaled that of her own party's most gullible members, she asserted that the conservative coalition "shares some common ground with Democrats, such as their dislike of the special interests in Washington." Real America knows how much genuineness and sincerity it can ultimately expect from the Democrats the moment they think they have the upper hand. Once the initial shock of the Scott Brown election in Massachusetts wore off, any vestiges of Democrat penitence over their arrogance and indifference to the nation similarly dissipated. Now they are back to using every foul means at their disposal to inflict socialized medicine on America. So, while pillaging the national treasury, destroying the free and capitalistic system that once propelled America to the pinnacle of world economies, and daily attacking traditional freedoms with the threat of government intrusion, Pelosi and her cohorts want to cast doubts on the intentions of the Republicans and offer themselves as the better alternative? It promises to be an interesting 2010 election season. --- Christopher G. Adamo has been active in Wyoming politics for many years and is a managing partner in Best American Buy (www.bestamericanbuy.com), an e-commerce business that markets American made products including the incomparable Abigail Adams Bedspread Set from Bates Mills. Contact information for Chris Adamo, and his archives, can be found at www.chrisadamo.com -------------------- ]]>

<![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi just unveiled Plan B. If she can't strong-arm the votes she so desperately needs to shove ObamaCare down your throat, she's going to simply "deem" the Senate version of ObamaCare passed in the House of Representatives without actually voting on it. House Minority Leader John Boehner called this latest development a "controversial trick." Rep. Thaddeus McCotter used the phrases "acme of arrogance" and "shredding the U.S. Constitution" to describe what is going on right now. But even Boehner's and McCotter's descriptions might be gross understatements. Think about it... why stop at allowing radical leftists in Congress to "deem" that laws have passed without votes? Why not disband the Senate and the House of Representatives altogether and allow Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to simply invoke laws the American people oppose by direct declaration? Isn't that, after all, what they are now attempting to do with ObamaCare? This latest scheme to pass ObamaCare without voting on it further proves Pelosi's, Obama's and Reid's arrogance and desperation. They will stop at nothing to pass this government takeover of health care against the wishes of the American people. But we can still defeat ObamaCare. As we go into the home stretch, however, we must continue to bombard our elected officials with calls and Blast Faxes. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our best, and perhaps last, chance to stop ObamaCare is to stop Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi from strong-arming the votes in the House of Representatives they so desperately need to pass it. Obama is Pledging To Shove ObamaCare Down Your Throat... Even If It Kills Him. So says the Associated Press; "Barack Obama says he will persuade Congress to pass his health care overhaul even if it kills him." A final vote on ObamaCare is now imminent... it can come at any time. That means if we are going to stop it, we cannot let up the pressure. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) confirmed what we are being told from sources in Congress when he said to FOX News' Greta Van Susteren that Pelosi may bring ObamaCare up for a vote any day now. Ryan said, "She'll do that if she thinks she has the votes. They might even come to the floor without having the votes locked in because what they typically do is announce the vote to try and get the fence sitters off the fence and on board. And so they're putting huge amounts of pressure on their members to vote for this." And, we now know that Pelosi and Company may even pass the Senate version of ObamaCare without even holding a vote on it. And we don't need to tell you what's at stake. You already know about the extreme cuts in Medicare... the rationing... the crippling taxes... and the long waiting lines that we may all be forced to endure for substandard medical care. But, truth be told, as former-presidential candidate Gary Bauer recently reminded us, the battle we are waging is not about health care, it's about preserving our way of life: "... bankrupting the insurance industry and undermining the free market is a stated goal of some healthcare reform advocates. ... the goal of healthcare reform is to create a system that bankrupts private industry and leads to socialized medicine. And that is a goal shared by Barack Obama." The Horse Trading And Hardball Tactics Being Employed To Shove ObamaCare Down Our Throats Are Unprecedented. How Low Will They Go? Obama and Pelosi may be down for the moment, but they are not out for the count... far from it. They've got their eyes on the prize and they're working overtime to make government-run health care the law of the land. Congressman Ryan also told Van Susteren that there's "lots of horse trading taking place" and further warned that Pelosi's an expert at "muscling votes." "[Y]ou can never count the Speaker out. On cap-and-trade, she was down 24 votes the night before, but she muscled it through and passed it by eight. She's very good at cutting deals, at muscling votes and using the carrot and the stick to get the votes she needs. She's been very successful so far this year." Make no mistake, if we do not act, Pelosi WILL strong-arm those votes. The back-room wheeling-and-dealing and political dirty tricks will only increase. A short time back, Obama arrogantly told the American people that the fight is over and that we should just step aside and let him have his way. Specifically, Obama told us: "Everything there is to say about health care has been said," just before he, rather ironically, hit the road one last time on his ObamaCare Traveling Snake-Oil Show. Well, we've got some news for Barack Obama. This fight isn't over... not until ObamaCare is defeated once and for all. It's clear... proponents of ObamaCare are playing hardball and they're playing for keeps. Every patriotic American in receipt of this urgent appeal must do the same. If not, then all could be lost. ObamaCare Was Never About Creating Greater Access To Health Care Or Making It More Affordable. Let's be frank, this attempt to push ObamaCare down the throats of the American people was never about making health care more affordable and accessible to everyday Americans like you and me. It was never about helping Americans... it's all about control and a never-ending quest by politicians to gain more power... power over you... the power to make your decisions for you... power over all of our lives. To repeat what Gary Bauer said, "the goal of [so-called] healthcare reform is to create a system that bankrupts private industry and leads to socialized medicine. And that is a goal shared by Barack Obama." Even Congressman Ryan said as much. According to Ryan, this attempt to push ObamaCare down your throat is about ideology: "[T]his is more about ideology than health care policy, because if this was about health care policy, we can get a bipartisan agreement tomorrow. It's not about health care policy." "They're trying to ram it [ObamaCare] through as fast as they can before their power slips away from them, and that is why they're trying to create this brand-new entitlement which really does have the government take over 17 percent of our economy." And Ryan also said that this surreal push to shove ObamaCare down our throats is really about creating "a cradle to grave social welfare state." And that Obama, Pelosi and the other proponents of ObamaCare are determined to push it through "whether the American people want this or not...." Make no mistake, we are in the home-stretch of this fight. And the only people who can defeat ObamaCare are the American people. Congressman Ryan again: "The American people have a huge role to play in this. This will be decided this week or next week, and the American people can make a big difference." Remember, the Associated Press reports that Barack Obama is determined to shove ObamaCare down your throat "even if it kills him." And if Obama is willing to go that far (even figuratively) that means that every patriotic American reading this urgent appeal should be willing to do something... anything... to stop him. And that means (even if you've done so before) that now is the time to pump out the calls and faxes. Only patriotic Americans like you can make a difference but we can't make a difference sitting on the sidelines. It's crunch time... the time to make your voice heard is now. ]]>

<![CDATA[No matter the "new" numbers, why so late if the deal so good? Something is drastically wrong with the picture. Start over, if it's so good. That shouldn't be too tough if it is so good. ]]>

<![CDATA[That should really go without saying, but some people, including some of the posters here, don't see it that way. They think that if you have the slightest doubt about the official 9/11 story, you're lost to the side of the loonies. That is a fallacy and they should know better.]]>

<![CDATA[ISLAMABAD, Pakistan | A Pakistani court Wednesday charged five young Americans with planning terrorist attacks in the South Asian country and conspiring to wage war against nations allied with Pakistan, their defense attorney said. Read More... <a href="http://www.newsbalance.com/5-americans-charged-with-terrorism-2010-03-18.article" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsbalance.com/5-americans-charged-with-terrorism-2010-03-18.article</a>]]>

<![CDATA[ "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Albert Einstein EVIDENCE: {What the Government and Main Stream Media Don't Want Us American people To Know!} Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen 9/11 EVIDENCE: Exotic Accelerants used to Destroy WTC on 9/11 Found Just Press play here: >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a2qmY_iXhQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7a2qmY_iXhQ</a> <a href="http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=911980" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=911980</a> <a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf</a> - Prof. Niels Harrit, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen This site presents the key arguments and evidence that have been most significant in changing the way we view 9/11. There is also a FAQ covering the most common questions people ask when they encounter the 9/11 truth movement. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x73G2eMkBpw&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x73G2eMkBpw&feature=related</a> .................................................... Questioning the 'official' account <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvF7FnYEdIE&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvF7FnYEdIE&feature=related</a> In February 2003, Colin Powell made submissions to the UN about Saddam Hussein's comprehensive weapons of mass destruction program. These submissions later turned out to be based on dubious intelligence and outright falsehoods. In a similar way, the official version of what happened on 9/11 has been "sold" to us rather than proven. Take a moment to think about what you know about 9/11, and your sources for that information. Everyone has seen the images of a Boeing 757 crashing into the south tower of the World Trade Centre (WTC), and the subsequent collapse of the twin towers. But who was responsible for this attack and what is the evidence that proves this? "Within days of the attacks, we were told that the perpetrators were from a terrorist network known as Al Qaeda. When reporters and members of the public asked for details, then Secretary of State Colin Powell promised that it would all be made clear to the world in a White Paper. Nearly four years, and two wars later, we still have no official statement from the Bush administration on the specifics of who did it, who aided and financed them or what their origins are." - Rep. Cynthia McKinney's opening statement at the July 22nd, 2005 Congressional Briefing ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Were the alleged hijackers really capable of navigating and flying these sophisticated aircraft? How were the authorities able to so quickly identify them, and based on what evidence? Why did each of the twin towers completely disintegrate in a top down explosion? Why did WTC building 7 collapse, and why has the video footage received almost no media coverage? How could the US intelligence services and military fail so dismally in their duty to protect the American people, and why has no disciplinary action been taken? Could the alleged hijackers really have acted alone and without inside help or support? "The 'Official Story' of what actually took place on 9-11 is a lie. We do not pretend to have put together a full and definitive account of how, and by whom, the attacks were carried out. But information reported in mainstream media, and viewed in the light of common sense and the laws of physics, demonstrate that the 'Official Story', examined closely, is not credible." - Attorney Phil Berg (www.911forthetruth.com) ......................................................................................................................................................................... Our aims Our aims are to: * make people aware of this important global movement * demonstrate that there are very serious questions that need to be answered We encourage people to: * have an open mind and feel the weight of the arguments rather than dismiss them out of hand * investigate and think for themselves, rather than relying on statements from the same official channels which deceived us about Iraqi WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) * join with us in spreading this vital information and working to achieve political reform - locally and globally "[We] believe that the government not only permitted 9/11 to occur but may even have orchestrated these events to facilitate its political agenda." - <a href="http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org</a> ============================= There are two groups of people in the world: * those who have a very superficial knowledge of what happened on 9/11, and * those who have concerns that we may not have been told the whole truth If you think you have more than a superficial knowledge about 9/11, try answering these questions: * What was the evidence that the USA presented to NATO governments, prior to military action in Afghanistan, to justify that action? * How were the US authorities able to so quickly identify the 19 alleged hijackers? * What links have been proven between the hijackers and Osama Bin Laden? * What is the name of the 47-story office tower that also collapsed on 9/11, and what caused its collapse? <a href="http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/home.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/home.htm</a> "The attack on the World Trade Center was a tragedy for the people in the towers and in the airplanes, and a tragedy for their families. It also marked the beginning of the tragic war on terror. The current trends in Western society towards greater surveillance and the loss of civil rights can also only be called tragic. If we have also been lied to, the tragedy is complete." ........................................................................................... ........................................................................................... "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Albert Einstein EVIDENCE: {What the Government and Main Stream Media Don't Want Us American people To Know!} <a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf</a> Question: ====== Would You Really Want To Know If Our Own Government Were Responsible For The Deaths Of Over 3 Thousand People on September 11, 2001 at the World Trade Center? Question: ====== Where IS Your Line In The Sand? Remember, Remember the 11th of September. I see no reason why the smell burning of humans by Molten Metal by those who plot and Conspired to commit Mass Murder on 9/11 and HIGH TREASON should ever be forgot. US Patriots, NATIONWIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . taking back America . . . . . . . . . . . . one post at a time! { And So Should YOU!! } PEACE! ]]>

<![CDATA[View Evidence: Check out the flashes coupled with smoke puffs. These flashes are indicative of Controlled Demoltion. Bright quick 'Flashes' of Charges Being Detonated: >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu_qct5gp-M&NR=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu_qct5gp-M&NR=1</a> >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCAoJuDw2Ic&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCAoJuDw2Ic&feature=related</a> >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQYFABSlCQ4&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQYFABSlCQ4&feature=related</a> >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elYw7MHf7GQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elYw7MHf7GQ</a> >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUhyS7i7TnI&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUhyS7i7TnI&feature=related</a> >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx0xu0MKQTI&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx0xu0MKQTI&feature=related</a> >> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=913Am7ZScVM&feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=913Am7ZScVM&feature=related</a> US Patriots, NATIONWIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . taking back America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . And So Should YOU!! Peace! ]]>

<![CDATA[Anyone familiar with 'prolonged detention'? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uuWVHT1WUY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uuWVHT1WUY</a> <a href="http://vodpod.com/watch/2845622-thanks-patriot-act-obama-implements-precrime-prolonged-detention-rachel-maddow-reports" rel="nofollow">http://vodpod.com/watch/2845622-thanks-patriot-act-obama-implements-precrime-prolonged-detention-rachel-maddow-reports</a> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about.... 'Habeas Corpus'? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWD0sIqJtyc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWD0sIqJtyc</a> <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=yfp-t-892-s&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF8&rd=r2&p=habeas%20corpus" rel="nofollow">http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=yfp-t-892-s&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF8&rd=r2&p=habeas%20corpus</a> Just ask Barack Obama, he'll tell you all about it. Unless you have been in solitary confinement or a dark closet for the past 20 years, then you have probably noticed the outright attack on and destruction of the Constitution. Everyone knows the old saying about the frog, "If you throw a frog into boiling water it will immediately jump out but if you put him in cool water and gradually turn up the heat, he will stay in until he dies." This analogy can be applied to the good ole US of A as well. We are a country that was founded in "cool water" on the principles of personal property, privacy, and individual liberties, but our water has been increasingly getting warmer over time. Some of us have jumped out of this pot and have been trying to encourage others to do the same. However, there is now a mighty propaganda campaign being waged, designed ostensibly for your protection but realistically quelling dissent and trying to boil that water even faster. We are a free society. The First Amendment guarantees that "Congress shall make no lawabridging the freedom of speech." For the most part we can still practice this inalienable right. Except for free speech zones, Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD), Riot storm troopers who beat down innocent kids, the use of military against our own citizens, and just your everyday police state brutality. Okay, so maybe not so much. The Fourth Amendment guarantees that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." For the most part we still have this inalienable right. Except for illegal, supposed, DUI Checkpoints, roving wiretaps, and the fact that now it is illegal in Oklahoma to put bars on your windows because they might be "preventing or delaying entry or access by a law enforcement officer." Really?? I can't protect MYself in MY house because it might hinder the ability of a cop to come inside MY house? These are just a few of the atrocities being carried out in our country. The philosophy that our government is applying here is dangerous and hypocritical. They advocate protecting our freedoms and liberties by taking away our freedoms and liberties. Am I the only one that sees that this hypocrisy will never work? One cannot claim to be protecting freedom by attacking that very freedom. I will give you an example. Prior to September 11th 2001, the PATRIOT Act was not the law. Now, after 9/11, the government claims that it needs to conduct random searches of old ladies and children at the airports, spy on its own citizens, and hold people indefinitely without charging them with a crime. Some will say this is necessary to keep up safe. I will say to those people, where in the Constitution does it state that the government is responsible for keeping you safe? Also, how do you suppose that taking your shoes off at an airport or police tracking you without a warrant keeps you safe anyhow? Now we have naked body scanners in the airports, US military being used against our own citizens, and mobile mind reading security stations. Seriously, the Department of Homeland Security has mobile mind screening checkpoints used for public events in which everyone is treated as a potential threat. Click the link and watch their own video. Now there is JihadJane, JihadJamie and a myriad of other American citizens being brought to the vanguard of mainstream media. You can do five minutes of research and see how most of these people are mentally diminished fruit cakes who couldn't blow up an ant bed in their front yard, much less pose any threat whatsoever to the American people. But the media and the government do not care about these facts. They use these "domestic terrorists" to incite irrational fear in the populace in order to pass legislation detrimental to the Constitution, such as the "Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010" as currently proposed by Senators McCain and Lieberman. This is the most daunting piece of legislation that this country has ever seen. It removes the right to a trial for American Citizens and gives the government the authority to detain American Citizens indefinitely for "suspected terrorist activity." The legislation states that any citizen could be an "Enemy Belligerent" if you are of "potential intelligence value" or in "matters as the President considers appropriate." WHAT??!! How chilling is that? The President can deem anyone he wants to as an Enemy Belligerent and have them "detained" with no rights, no trial, indefinitely. What made America "Land of the Free"? How did we achieve "Liberty and Justice for All"? It was most assuredly not this ever expanding Police State that we are now experiencing. "Liberty and Justice for All" is not extraordinary rendition. How exactly does the "Home of the Brave" relinquish personal liberty for state sponsored security? The answer is complacency, detachment, and media control. It has not gotten bad enough for most people to care. And the ones for whom it has gotten bad enough (i.e. the near 17% in this country who are unemployed) have no idea how they made it to this point. The sooner people realize that the establishment does not have their best interests in mind, the sooner we can move past this growing tyranny and get back to progress. There really is not an overnight solution to this ever expanding bureaucracy and despotism. But there are some steps one can take that will improve matters and lead to the diminution of this autocratic oligarchy. Step one: Think past the LEFT/RIGHT PARADIGM Realize that there is NO SUCH THING as left and right in this government. This is a diversionary tactic employed throughout history from Caesar to Hitler. There is a dramatization of party extremities in order to polarize the audience into a bureaucratic rivalry. It is psychological warfare designed to divert attention from furtive establishment agendas. The mindless populace argues over irrelevant issues while global tyranny is put into action. Think about it, all global tyrannical policies are pushed through with bipartisan support. Example: The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (The Bailout) that was rammed down the collective throats of Americans by both parties despite huge opposition from constituent bases. This allowed the Federal Reserve to triage their private bank's irresponsible acts and cost the tax payers 25 trillion and counting. Step two: Turn off your Televisions Actually there is no need to turn off the TV if you can see it for what it really is. We have the ability to communicate freely with the entire world, yet we rely on television to bring us our information. We rely on television to feed us our views of the world around us. It is a system of propaganda out for its own interests. It is dedicated to keeping you tuned in so it can sell you a product, a politician, a war, or a bill of goods regardless of the outcome or effect on the population. This we know is true from the thousands, seriously thousands, of studies that show the harmful effects of TV. Those who know me may call me a bit of a conspiracy theorist, but I would like to pose this question. If there is a global conspiracy to dumb down the population and create a world government, all via propaganda and lies disseminated through, but not limited to, television, could you say with complete conviction that it is not true? And if you cannot, wouldn't TV be a great avenue of approach for said disinformation? And would it not seem like this conspiracy was working? Step Three: Know Your Enemy The enemy here is not the Republicans and it is not the Democrats; it is the establishment. To understand what the "establishment" is, you must go back through history and look at what brought down nearly all governments--the central bank known as The Federal Reserve in the U.S. Here are a couple of quotes from Thomas Jefferson that will put things into perspective. "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered..." Secondly, "A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army...We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt." The Federal Reserve is owned by private banks, some of which are foreign. It is not Federal and is not a Reserve. It is a banking cartel that has seized control of our monetary supply and policy, and profits off of the deliberate expansion and contraction of our economy. Ever wonder why there is a recession every couple of decades? It is because the FED can profit off of the "Boom" and the "Bust" by printing money out of thin air. The FED operates through secrecy and allows very little oversight from the American people. Without the FED we could not go into a black hole of debt financing endless wars simply because the tax payers would be responsible for the costs. Think about it, the wars in the Middle East have cost $971,681,977,321.00 since 2001. That is about 7,500 bucks per taxpaying citizen. Doesn't seem like that much? Add that to the other $500,000,000,000.00 in the annual defense budget plus the SGLI (Military Life Insurance) payouts, private contractors, and disability and you get a number closer to around $50,000.00 per taxpaying citizen in just the last 9 years. And that number does not include taxes for schools or roads or anything else, only war. How about that for some perspective? Would you pay for an occupation in Iraq if the cost was directly passed to you instead of your children and their children's children? Step Four: Care Care. Take a part in what affects you. Just over 500 people control what you can say, do, eat, drink, smoke, sleep with, etc, etc. The simple fact is that we would not be in this position if people just cared more about what their government is doing. We should be having conversations with our neighbors instead of spying on them for suspected terrorist activity. We should not be scared to talk politics with one another; talking politics is how resolutions are made. I disagree on most issues with a lot of people but I don't consider them wrong and me right. Maybe I can open their eyes to something or maybe they can do the same for me. The easiest way to have a rational conversation is to eliminate these idiotic labels that the establishment places on us, such as "liberal" or "Republican." These are designed to incite ridicule and make one dismiss the other's information without actually contemplating said information. Apply critical thinking skills to all pertinent situations, and most of the time the correct decision will be made. Do not blindly support candidates because their rhetoric appeals to you. Look at real issues and not just media talking points. And most of all, form your own opinions based on real truths that you yourself have researched and thought about. Free thinkers are a danger to the establishment because the petty tactics of infighting and fear do not work on someone who has the ability to pose the question. Once you can see the deceit for what it is you are much less susceptible to be fooled next time. The media is saying that we are out of the economic crisis and that things are looking up, "everyone go back to blindly consuming." However these are lies. Unemployment is still over 17 percent and climbing, the dollar is failing and will continue to do so, the government borrows billions daily in your name and cannot pay it back, social security is bankrupt, and the Federal Reserve continues counterfeiting money driving up inflation! Unless something drastic is done to stop this downward spiral, we will see an economic collapse and depression far worse than this country has ever witnessed. There is a reason that the military has been training for the last few years to suppress civil unrest. When your savings account is worthless because of hyper-inflation you will be upset. Stop buying the lies that the media is selling and wake up to reality. Take an interest in what your Senators and Congress people are doing, because you are their boss. You have the power to replace your representation if you deem that representation inadequate. Instead of watching "Wheel of Fortune" read about how the Federal Reserve secretly planned to infiltrate the United States in 1913 on Jekyll Island. Read the proposed legislation that will actually affect your life instead of buying in to pipe dreams on the boob tube. Trust me, it is much more interesting once you turn off, tune in, and take interest. Essentially you must do this, you must take interest, you must stand up to tyranny, and you must not be afraid of speaking out. For if no action is taken, by the people, rest assured that action will be taken, against the people. <a href="http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/general-political-discussion/110402-natzi-tactics-favored-republicans-now.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/general-political-discussion/110402-natzi-tactics-favored-republicans-now.html</a> <a href="http://community.allhiphop.com/showthread.php?17119-The-most-dangerous-bill-in-congress" rel="nofollow">http://community.allhiphop.com/showthread.php?17119-The-most-dangerous-bill-in-congress</a>!!!-S-3081/page2 US Patriots, NATIONWIDE . . . . . . . . . . . taking back America . ....................... And So Should YOU!! PEACE!]]>

<![CDATA[If Jews are the masters of this country, then how do you explain these facts: Until fairly recently, Jews couldn't use certain public facilities. Jews couldn't become CEO's of major corporations until recently. Until Michael Milken came along, Jews were not welcome in the investment community. There still are special covenants restricting Jews from buying or renting real estate.]]>

<![CDATA[Palestinian Terrorists in Gaza Launch Attack on Israel, Kill Worker During Visit by EU Foreign Policy Chief List of Qassam rocket and mortar fatalities Expert sources for comment Sderot and southern Negev contacts Israel’s humanitarian aid to Gaza Amb. Michael Oren in the NY Times: “For Israel and America, a Disagreement, Not a Crisis” (March 18, 2010) Palestinian terrorists affiliated with al Qaeda took credit for firing a rocket from Gaza into Israel that killed a foreign worker Thursday (March 18) just as European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton was visiting the Iran-backed, Hamas-controlled Strip.[1] The victim, a 30-year-old foreign worker from Thailand, was working in a greenhouse in Netiv Ha'asarah, an agricultural community located just north of the Gaza border, when the rocket struck.[2] Ansar al-Sunah, a terrorist group that associates itself with the global jihad network al Qaeda, claimed responsibility for the attack.[3] Following the attack, Ashton, the European Union’s new high representative for foreign policy and security affairs, said, "I condemn any kind of violence, we need to move forward to get the peace process moving toward a successful resolution."[4] Dana Galkowicz, a 22-year-old Israeli student killed in 2005 by a Qassam rocket Photo courtesy Edi Israel Ashton arrived in Israel Wednesday for a four-day visit with Israeli officials, Palestinian Authority (PA) officials and to visit Gaza.[5] Ashton has been highly critical of Israeli policy since taking her post on Dec. 1, 2009.[6] While in Gaza, she visited a UN-run girls' school in the Jabaliya refugee camp and held talks with UN officials in the Strip.[7] The foreign worker killed Thursday is not the first person in Netiv Ha’asarah who has died from Gaza attacks. On July 14, 2005, 22-year-old student Dana Galkowicz was killed by a Qassam rocket when it exploded next to her as she was sitting on her porch. Dana was a communications student at Sapir College in Sderot.[8] This week, a number of Qassam rockets were fired from Gaza, including two that fell on the southern Israeli town of Sderot on Wednesday (March 17).[9] Recent rocket attacks include: • March 17: A Qassam rocket fired from Gaza lands between the southern city of Sderot and a kibbutz belonging to the Shaar Hanegev Regional Council. A second rocket hits north of Sderot. Four people, including a child, are treated for shock.[10] • March 13: A Qassam rocket fired from the Gaza Strip lands in the Eshkol region. A terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda, calling itself “The Supporters of the Sunah on the Wings of Jerusalem” claims responsibility for the attack.[11] • March 11: A Qassam rocket is fired from the Gaza Strip and hits a kibbutz storage room in the Eshkol regional. Ansar al-Sunah Brigades claim responsibility.[12] The victim of the rocket attack is the first fatality since the end of Israel’s three-week defensive operation in January 2009 carried out to halt rocket fire.[13] Gaza-based terrorists fired more than 25 rockets and mortars into Israel in 2010.[14] Jihadi terrorist groups have gained prominence since Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in August 2005, removing all Jews who had been living there for decades as well as all Israeli security forces. Israel made this unilateral move with hopes it would advance the peace process with the Palestinians. But following the withdrawal, Iran-backed Hamas stepped up its rocket and mortar attacks, firing nearly 8,000 rockets, mortars and missiles at Israeli civilians.[15] Israel repeatedly called on the international community to convince Palestinians terrorists to stop rocket and missile attacks and take action to stop their weapons deliveries. However, as the world community watched more rockets hit Israel, Israel was forced to take defensive action by carrying out Operation Cast Lead in January 2009. During that operation, Hamas terrorists took cover behind civilian shields and more than 1,200 Palestinians died. Israel subsequently has enforced a blockade to try to prevent more arms smuggling into Gaza while still allowing in humanitarian aid.[16] A UN mission issued the Goldstone report in September 2009, criticizing Israel’s defensive actions.[17] On Dec. 14, 2009, senior Hamas leader and former Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said at a rally in Gaza, “This movement [Hamas] liberated the Gaza Strip with the help of the militant factions...Brothers and sisters, we will not be satisfied with Gaza...Hamas looks toward the whole of Palestine.”[18] Gaza is controlled by Hamas, an organization whose charter says that it wants to “kill the Jews.” Many saw Israel as unsuccessful in its attempt to pave the way for peace with the Palestinians through the withdrawal from Gaza. After Palestinians in Gaza began instead using the opportunity to turn Gaza into a launching pad for attacks on Israel, Israelis elected a more right-wing government they hoped would do more to protect them from terrorism and the threat of Iran.[19] ]]>

<![CDATA[ You can make fun of Franken if you want to, but he wrote a brilliant book titled "The Truth with Jokes." Read it and expand your mind. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey, whatever happened to Air America? Did the listener die? And speaking of talk show hosts, here's the best one the liberals could come up with: ]]>

<![CDATA[More Proof Gaza Palestinians looking to kill whoever they can in Israel JERUSALEM – Palestinian militants fired a rocket at Israel from the Gaza Strip on Thursday, killing a Thai farm worker, Israeli medics said, in the first death from such an attack since the Gaza offensive last year. Magen David Adom, the emergency service, said the man was about 30 years old and was working in an agricultural community just north of Gaza, one of the tens of thousands of foreign laborers doing menial jobs in Israel. The rocket ripped through the roof of a greenhouse, spraying small potted plants in all directions. Rescue crews sprayed water to clean away a large pool of blood, as the twisted remains of the metal rocket lay nearby. A small Islamist faction calling itself Ansar al-Sunna claimed responsibility for the attack. Similar hardline groups, which are inspired by al-Qaida's radical ideology and see Gaza's Hamas rulers as too moderate, have been responsible for most of the attacks since the Gaza war ended in January 2009. A second group, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, also later claimed responsibility. Thursday's attack came on the same day as a visit to Gaza by Europe's top diplomat, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who had just crossed into the territory when the rocket was fired. "I condemn any kind of violence. We have got to find a peaceful solution to the issues and problems," she said. Ashton is the most senior international official to visit Gaza in more than a year. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also condemned the attack. "All such acts of terror and violence against civilians are totally unacceptable and contrary to international law," he said in a statement. In a statement e-mailed to reporters in Gaza, the Ansar al-Sunna faction said the attack was a response to Israel's "Judaization" of Islamic holy places in Jerusalem and elsewhere in the West Bank. Earlier this week, Palestinians in the West Bank and Jerusalem held protests amid unfounded rumors that Jewish extremists were planning to take over a key Muslim holy site in Jerusalem. Israel's military said it was the third rocket fired from Gaza in a 12-hour stretch. Thousands of crude rockets launched from Gaza at Israel over a seven-year period sparked the Israeli military's three-week offensive in the Gaza Strip. The brief war devastated the Palestinian territory, killing 1,400 Palestinians, including hundreds of civilians. Thirteen Israelis were killed. Rocket attacks and border ambushes have dropped dramatically since the war. Hamas itself has largely refrained from carrying out attacks and has ordered rival groups to maintain the calm. Thursday's dual claims of responsibility, which could not be independently verified, came from Hamas rivals. In Gaza, Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum accused Israel of provoking the attack. "The Zionist enemy holds responsibility for the results of the recent escalation against our people and our holy places," he said. Israel's deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, meanwhile, said Hamas was responsible for the attack and threatened a tough response. "Israel will not allow terrorism and Palestinian terrorists continue their attacks and to kill Israelis," he said during a visit to the site of the attack. Israel later fired shells into an open area of Gaza, causing no injuries, according to Palestinian officials. The Israeli army had no comment. Ashton was touring Gaza to get a firsthand look at the hardships caused by the war and by a punishing Israeli-Egyptian border blockade that has been in place since Hamas' violent take over of Gaza in 2007. Thousands of homes were razed or damaged during Israel's offensive, but reconstruction is on hold because building supplies cannot reach Gaza. The West also shuns Gaza's Islamic militant rulers as terrorists, while Hamas refuses to renounce violence and recognize Israel to win acceptance. Ashton did not meet with Hamas officials. Last year, the international community pledged some $4.5 billion for Gaza's reconstruction, but little has been spent because of the blockade, aid officials say. In Abed Rabbo, a neighborhood close to the border with Israel that was one of the hardest-hit areas in the war, men leading donkey carts full of rubble from destroyed buildings watched Ashton's convoy pass. "What we have been saying to the Israelis for a long time is that we need to allow aid into this region, to be able to support the economy to grow for people," she told reporters. With the standoff continuing, Gaza's 1.5 million people become increasingly dependent on foreign aid. Europe spends some euro500 million ($688 million) a year — or half its annual aid to the Palestinians — to help keep Gaza afloat. ]]>

<![CDATA[Uh...no. Clinton has earned millions of dollars from speaking engagements, but Bush doesn't have the talent. He could demonstrate how to blow up frogs or brand fraternity pledges, though.]]>

<![CDATA[Hey, whatever happened to Air America? Did the listener die? And speaking of talk show hosts, here's the best one the liberals could come up with:]]>

<![CDATA[What a fucking joke this liar-in-chief is. Asked some pointed questions yesterday by Bret Baier from Fox, Obama couldn't answer shit. What a fucking jerk with no telepromter. Now the corrupt lying media is trying to protect Obama by saying Bret Baier was rude. Fuck you media, if you had asked the tough questions, this lying moron would not be president. Chris Matthews would have asked Obama if I could suck your cock after the interview.]]>

<![CDATA[Erkle is a character in a TV show. He's incredibly nerdy and inept. Calling Obama by this name is a big insult and the poster who's doing it deserves to get the crap beaten out of him, in my opinion. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some people seem to be in hysterics over somebody named Erkle (kind of like "Killroy was here" back in WWII), but who the heck is he/she? Funny. I try a Google, and I get nada. Explain this, somebody. ]]>

<![CDATA[Some people seem to be in hysterics over somebody named Erkle (kind of like "Killroy was here" back in WWII), but who the heck is he/she? Funny. I try a Google, and I get nada. Explain this, somebody. ]]>

<![CDATA[Burn in hell]]>

<![CDATA[You have some of your facts wrong. Republicans and many Democrats both promoted the claim that Saddam had WMD during the Clinton Administration and many of Clinton's behaviours seemed tailored to provoke a pretext for war. However "the world" knew better. There was no doubt in much of the world that Saddam had no militarily significant stores of any WMD. It is striking how limited the American media is at providing anything other than a microphone for an ever-contracting number of powerful Americans. That is less true in other countries, where objective information is available along with the pronouncements of domestic and occasionally foreign statesmen. In addition, may of their leaders were not caught up in the need to back up this particular deception. The UN Special Commission which was tasked with inspecting and removing Iraq's WMD was headed by an American military officer and included other American inspectors. However those individuals who had actually been to Iraq and reviewed Saddams records and inspected his facilities for 8 years were given almost no time here in the US to inform the public. As the second wave of inspections took place, the utter failure to find any significant problems was taken as evidence that he had hidden the weapons he had destroyed in front of international inspectors a decade before. ]]>

<![CDATA[Finally! It shows just how easy Erkle has had it because of the "Political activists" formerly known as journalists!! The only response from the drones today wasa constant theme of.." Fox was Rude to Obama" NOW? They want the press to be civil to our president? LOL! Just a small reminder of how they taught us well on how to treat a president!! Remember? Homie ain't shit without his teleprompter eh? LOL!]]>

<![CDATA[As a "no good white person" you don't get it by this point in time? ONLY "minority" need seek anyone in elected office. The "health care" bill is exclusively for preservation of "minorities" at the extreme expense to everyone else, BUT there're only so many people paying the high taxes it will take to fund. You don't count at all, even as a verbal minority. The office holder is always "out." Fuck yourself today for passively electing this trash by sitting on your ass until it's far too late to do anything. Double fuck yourself. ]]>

<![CDATA[You may not like President Barrack Hussein Obama or his policies, and may not enjoy his health bill (whatever it is, who can actually read it?), but Jack, this is not going to be a People's Republic. It is not nearly as radical as the socialized medicine practiced in Canada, Britain and Europe, and those people, if not always 100% pleased, are in the main perfectly happy, content and FREE, living in nations with more choices in democratic elections, scads of parties, than we enjoy. Obamacare, which could have been a lot better, will pass, and then you'll wake up to the same old America as ever, love it or leave it. Relax your sphincter muscles, all of them, GOPs. Try not always being so anal retentive. You'll feel much better and be much more happy. Just lighten up. ]]>

<![CDATA[G. Gordon Liddy served time for his role in the Watergate break-in. He's now a talk radio host. Mancow Muller blocked traffic on the Bay Bridge. He's got a show in Chicago. James Traficant served time for corruption. He's got a radio program. Hey, I've got an idea! Let's give shows to Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Libby, even Jeff Gannon! Why wait until they're out of jail when we know that's where they belong?]]>

<![CDATA[Put up or shut up. Arrest and prosecute him or shut the hell up, peckerpuffer.]]>

<![CDATA[That's like executing a suspected murderer first, then holding a trial after he's dead.]]>

<![CDATA[The Blacks have taken over]]>

<![CDATA[The left managed to do what Russia and Japan could not]]>

<![CDATA[your an idiot! your girlfriend, polosi,along w/ the majority,demoncrats and rebs. along w/ the rest of the civilized world ALL agreed saddam had wmds and to remove him from power dipstick]]>

<![CDATA[JOE CORTINA IS AN EX GREEN BERET, a former airborne special operations officer and US Army Training Center commander. Joe Cortina’s subsequent experiences as an intelligence investigator and anti-terrorist adviser brought him to such hotbeds of turmoil as the State of Israel, adjacent Middle East nations, and Central America. Joe Cortina’s hard hitting Web Site, “My Name Is Joe Cortina,” is a showcase of crimes committed against humanity by the Zionist global elite. Brother Nathanael Kapner: What was your military background? Joe Cortina: I was initially attached to the XVIII Airborne Corps at Fort Bragg, NC, with the Strategic Army Command (STRAC) as an artillery officer. The time frame of my military leadership began in 1960 during the Vietnam war and the outset of the Berlin crisis. I later was assigned to the USATC as a training instructor at hand grenade and machine gun ranges, infiltrating courses, bayonet training, and many other traditional basic soldiering drills. Subsequently, I was made a USATC Basic Training company commander. Br Nathanael: Was civilian killing taught? Joe Cortina: Absolutely not. Every trainee understood that the murdering of innocent defenseless civilians was one of the most loathsome acts imaginable and attributable only to Godless barbarian animals. I trained soldiers to DEFEND our nation against aggressors – not to murder innocent civilians and created-enemies by another foreign power like the illegitimate State of Israel that brought us into the immoral war and slaughter of the Iraqi people. Br Nathanael: Are home and business invasions a normal part of basic Army training? Joe Cortina: No. Urban warfare training - a war going on in a civilian neighborhood which implies inevitable suffering and the immoral terrorizing of innocent civilians - should have absolutely NOTHING to do with US ARMY basic training. ONLY for unique incidents such as freeing hostages could it even be considered in Advanced Infantry Training Schools. Br Nathanael: Official USATC post cards appear to indicate that inexperienced soldiers will be asked to conduct violence against civilian homes and establishments as policy. Can you elaborate on this? Joe Cortina: The Basic Training Postcards promote special military operations known as “MOUT” – “Military Operations in Urban Terrain.” In other words – home invasions which have resulted in the worst military war crimes in the history of the US such as looting, pillaging, raping, and murder - is now part of basic training. We provided no such controversial training in any of the companies or battalions or regiments I was associated with during my military tenure. Br Nathanael: Can you describe the nature of the card you showed me that was a ‘red flag’ to what you have experienced as normal basic infantry training? Joe Cortina: I saw several cards, all reminiscent of my experiences as a basic trainee myself. BUT ONE CARD drew my attention and I found it alarming. As I began connecting the dots of the offensive card, it led me to the 29 Palms Military Survey which I will soon discuss. The card showed soldiers forcing their way into private businesses not unlike those you might find in your OWN HOME TOWN. These were of course fabrications in the Training Center built to simulate an urban environment. It showed a “Fish Market” in Fallujah alongside of another business which could be located in any American city, “The Palace Night Club.” The front of the post card was marked URBAN WARFARE - as if it were some sort of Disney attraction. Br Nathanael: What about the reverse side of the card? Joe Cortina: Comments on the back of the card by a current trainee reads as follows: “MOUT – Military Operations in Urban Terrain.” What is interesting about it – my own home will be considered something abstract and impersonal: “URBAN TERRAIN.” The psychology of war teaches that before an American soldier can kill a perfect stranger, a non-combatant - the first thing you do is dehumanize that person into a faceless ‘thing.’ Now devoid of all those qualities we cherish in ourselves, the US soldier does not have to deal with the dictates of his conscience when murdering a civilian in cold blood. Thus we find the use of dehumanizing terms: “hostiles” -”insurgents” - “extremists” - “terrorists.” As the post card MOUT heading states, it can be a matter of months in which the arrival of a “civilian trainee” - (YOUR SONS) and their deployment to an “urban combat situation” becomes a real life event. Your very own 18 year old son’s first assignment may be to terrorize people in their homes or businesses – kick in their doors – smash their property. Apparently that was EXACTLY what the trainee who wrote the post card was taught. Br Nathanael: What exactly was stated on the postcard’s reverse side? Joe Cortina: The sender wrote in ink: “We were trained to enter a house – kick in a door – clear a room – check for explosives – create a foothold – engage hostiles – and call for a medevac.” Now – if a fellow soldier had described these presumed orders to me – the following is what it means. The trainee was to forcefully smash his way into a civilian’s home – kill anyone who even looked like they would defend their home - search for their weapons to neutralize anything they may use to defend themselves - and if anybody survived their terrorist invasion to send them to sick bay for questioning. Br Nathanael: What is the 29 Palms Military Survey you mentioned above? Joe Cortina: “29 Palms,” named after the US military base in which the survey was made, is one of the most frightening and most disgusting testimonies to the ACCEPTANCE of military brutality and cold-blooded murder of one’s OWN citizens by American military ever revealed anywhere. A significant percentage of the Marines interviewed admitted that if ordered to do so they would kill their own neighbors. Br Nathanael: How can we be sure that the US Army’s Basic Training has degraded to the alarming degree you claim? Joe Cortina: Because the example I cited of the young trainee who seemed so eager to perform his ‘duty’ and carry out orders without question happens to be my own son. What we are teaching our children at this horrible place is unconscionable. You will hear arguments from these war mongers to counter my concerns that: “It is necessary.” NECESSARY FOR WHAT? To murder more civilians here in our own country? So that these young men will now blindly follow orders and attack their OWN neighbors if Zionist-puppet Obama orders them to? IT MAY BE TOO LATE to save my son’s soul from those who wish to transform him into a mindless murderer. But for the Love of Christ – please do not let these greedy Godless war mongers destroy your sons’ lives as well. Just Say “No” To This Evil! Forget about Al-Qaeda or Osama Bin Laden. The chances are that VERY soon (with the declaration of martial law as the catalyst) you will be brutalized - murdered - raped – arrested – your home confiscated - by YOUR OWN SONS who have been taught that YOU are the enemy of the State and that THEY MUST follow orders. Sound familiar?… <a href="http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=484" rel="nofollow">http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=484</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[Absolutely, according to Vincent Bugliosi, whose book, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder," sets forth the legal architecture and incontrovertible evidemce that President Bush took this nation to war in Iraq under false pretenses, a war that has not only caused the deaths of American soldiers but also over 100,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children.]]>

<![CDATA[CBO estimates do not include any money for lawsuits or resources to fight law suits. There are other law suits lined up too. Yeah, they are screwing up bad. ************** No one is happy and a slew of states are getting ready to join in a collateral suit against the fed if required to buy health insurance. That's thirty-seven at this point. Still think "health care" for the masses is what the people wanted? It's really bad news for dems. ]]>

<![CDATA[Fuck you Chillyboy]]>

<![CDATA[No one is happy and a slew of states are getting ready to join in a collateral suit against the fed if required to buy health insurance. That's thirty-seven at this point. Still think "health care" for the masses is what the people wanted? It's really bad news for dems. ]]>

<![CDATA[Fiddle, fiddle, fiddle while the market burns, recovering just fine for the next big blowout. ]]>

<![CDATA[Where do these fools come from]]>

<![CDATA[Who needs the Republicans anyway. Eight years of Bush and the Republicans brought on the greatest recession since the Great Depression, and now they're not willing to take responsibility for their actions and help the recovery along. They really are a useless, outdated political party that serves no function... unless you consider obstruction a function. They could care less that that the corporate greed that they fostered and encouraged, has reeked havoc on millions of Americans. Under Obama's stewardship, the Democrats and concerned Americans have done a pretty good job of doing what's right for America and re-vitalizing the stock market and the economy. And isn't it funny that a party that claims to be christian and family-oriented is the the party that denies health care to men, women,and children in need of it. I don't remember that the Jesus that the hypocritical Republicans keep invoking ever said..."help the needy and sick, but only if they can pay exorbitant prices for that help".]]>

<![CDATA[Bottom line, Tom is the successful brother. Successful at what? Both his brothers hate him - and both of his brothers despise the incestuous relationship he, Tom, the oldest, has with his mother. His mother's quite the criminal, too. (I refer to Eleanora, AKA 'Penny', Salanave - if there is any question.) She did a bait-and-switch on her own father ... tricked him into signing a power of attorney, while telling him it was a medical power of attorney ... then, stripped him of his assets, sold his house out under him, abandoned him in a hospital, and flew back to the West Coast, to wait for him to die - which took about three years. Back on the West Coast, when her second son rebelled against what she was doing, she evicted him, and sold the house he was living in, out from under him. She never paid him the thousands of dollars she owed him for the months of work, and travel, he had invested, on her behalf - indeed, she denied that she owed him anything, under oath, during the eviction. She abandoned her own grandchildren, too - Tom's real nieces - they have never met their own grandmother. Or their Uncle Tom. for that matter. Tom's mother, Penny, evicted her own daughter-in-law - Tom's only sister-in-law - who was seven months pregnant with Penny's second grand-daughter - Tom's niece - at the time of the eviction. Exactly how much evidence does one need, of malice, before one is willing to call it evil? Tell us - you seem to have a lot of experience in this realm. I'm pretty sure Tom's mother broke into her own mother's - that is, Tom's grandmother's - safe and stole her own mother's last will and testament ... just to be sure that she had no competition from her own children, and grand-children. It's a fact - backed up by photographic evidence - that an open, empty safe was found, in the room with her ... when the firemen broke in to the house ... three days later ... after the dog had started eating the corpse. The house was locked, it is said - from within, the firemen had to force their way in - and so, one is left with the conclusion that this elderly lady opened her safe, expecting to find something there ... and died from the shock of finding that it was not. What was missing? We can only guess. But it's noteworthy that Penny had visited her mother, only a few weeks before these horrible events took place. Those whom are more closely acquainted with the events and circumstances have drawn their own conclusions - and they have evidence upon which to base their inferences. I know this to be true - because it was in the police report ... and because there are dated, timestamped photographs - and I have them. This evil woman lives in Marin County, now, near her son, Tom Childers. She pretends she doesn't remember what she did ... so that she can't be held responsible for it. But try switching something that she cares about, and I promise you ... suddenly, her memory works just great. Allow me to introduce you to the Next Generation of elderly - people who abandon their own parents ... people who abandon their own children ... people who abandon their own grandchildren ... people who play their parents, and their children, off against each other ...people who care more about money, and prestige, than they do about human lives, or the quality of existence. If you want to think of that as successful, you're welcome to it. I hear Tom's in the market for some brothers, along with some nieces, to fill the gap in his credibility. Please apply. ]]>

<![CDATA[Oh praise the Holy Marxist State and the Royal Collectivist Priests of Power. As I gaze upon their self-proclaimed superiority, I feel a tingle going up my leg. It is clear to me now that this group of people have evolved by natural selection into Plato's Philosopher Kings - justly ruling over less evolved pond scum like us - for our own good - against our will - without our consent. Their knowledge is high and mysterious - not self-evident - often refuted by what is observable - but true nevertheless as a starting point we are told. Oh Praise God. Strike that - Praise our un-Declarational and un-Constitutional, yet Holy and Infallible, Marxist Government.]]>

<![CDATA[If you want to help in the campaign to replace Nancy Pelosi in Congress, here are some support items that would help get the word out about conservative businessman John Dennis. <a href="http://SatireWorks.com" rel="nofollow">http://SatireWorks.com</a> has the largest selection of slogans on the internet to tell people you are not pleased with Washington.]]>

<![CDATA[The presupposition of biblical faith is the truthfulness of God.Faith must have a cognitive content.View the video at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JJ7CjH9qIQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JJ7CjH9qIQ</a>]]>

<![CDATA[But Truthers are just too stupid. ]]>

<![CDATA[ I have a strong enough background in science to know that when scientists think something doesn't look right, they do more experiments to settle the issue. Unfortunately, things are different in politics. It seems to take an awful lot of prodding to get politicians to move on something that clearly requires a fresh investigation because there are a plethora of doubts and discrepancies. Part of the problem, of course, is that sometimes these politicians have an interest in concealment, whether it's because of incompetence or malice. I have pointed out this interest in a cover-up before. It's also natural for the average citizen to disbelieve that his government would behave this way, so I know my message will be resisted by some on this board. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 41 US Counter INTEL Challenge Official 911 <a href="http://www.voltairenet.org/article160100.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.voltairenet.org/article160100.html</a> 41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 by Alan Miller Following in the footsteps of well over 1,000 scientists and other professional groups who have already gone on record questioning the official theory, more than 40 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency veterans have come forward to challenge the Government’s rendition of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Their behind-the-scenes knowledge and experience of sensitive and classified issues places them in a uniquely authoritative position. In this sense, their critical stance is all the more damning for the government. Conspicuously absent from the landscape are the mainstream media professionals, as they continue to provide cover for the government’s totally bankrupt theory and fail to report on landmark developments such as this. Official Account of 9/11:“Terribly Flawed,” “Laced with Contradictions,” “a Joke,” “a Cover-up” More than 40 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and most have called for a new investigation. It is outrageous that most Americans are entirely unaware of their publicly stated concerns — a direct result of the refusal of national print and broadcast news organizations to cover this extremely important issue. There is no denying the credibility of these individuals or their loyalty to their country as demonstrated by their years of service collecting and analyzing information and planning and carrying out operations critical to the national security of the United States. These 41 individuals formerly served in the U.S. State Department, the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the branches of the U.S. Military. They are listed below by their branch of service. [To read their individual statements and full complementary information, see attached document "Counterterrorism Veterans"]. U.S. State Department Terrell E. Arnold, MA - Former Deputy Director of Counter- Terrorism and Emergency Planning, U.S. State Department. Mr. Arnold is a leading expert on terrorism and counter-terrorism and the author of several books on the subjects. Angelo Codevilla, PhD - Former U.S. State Department Foreign Service officer specializing in U.S. intelligence operations in Western Europe. Member of President-elect Ronald Reagan’s State Department transition team and principal author of the team’s report on intelligence. Former Staff Member, U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee dealing with oversight of the intelligence services 1977 - 1985. Former U.S. Navy officer. Currently Vice Chairman of the U.S. Army War College Board of Visitors. Edward Peck – Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs, U.S. State Department. He later served as Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under President Ronald Reagan. Mr. Peck, a 32-year veteran of the U.S. Foreign Service, also served as U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission in Iraq 1977 - 1980. National Security Agency Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski - A Pentagon eye-witness and a former member of the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency, Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret). Maj. John M. Newman, PhD - U.S. Army (ret). Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. Central Intelligence Agency Raymond McGovern - A 27-year veteran of the CIA, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates during the 1970’s William Christison - A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis. Melvin Goodman, PhD - Former senior CIA official who served as Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs and Senior Analyst from 1966 - 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College 1986 - 2004. Robert Baer - A 21-year CIA veteran and specialist in the Middle East, he was awarded the Career Intelligence Medal upon his retirement in 1997. Robert David Steele - Is currently the CEO of OSS.net, a proponent of Open Source Intelligence. He has 25 years of combined service in the CIA and the U.S. Marine Corps. He also served as the second ranking civilian (GS-14) in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence from 1988 - 1992 and was a member of the adjunct faculty of Marine Corps University. David MacMichael, PhD – Former Senior Estimates Officer at the CIA with special responsibility for western hemisphere affairs at the CIA’s National Intelligence Council. Prior to that, he served as a U.S. Marine Corps officer for ten years and for four years as a counter-insurgency advisor to the government. Lynne Larkin – Former CIA Operations Officer who served in several CIA foreign stations before being assigned to the CIA’s Counter-Intelligence Center where she co-chaired a multiagency task force for coordinating intelligence efforts among the many intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Federal Bureau of Investigation Edward J. Costello, Jr. - Former Special Agent, Counterespionage, FBI. Former Judge pro tem., Los Angeles, CA. John M. Cole – Former Intelligence Operations Specialist, in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. In charge of FBI’s foreign intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. 18-year FBI career. Mr. Cole currently works as a senior counterintelligence analyst. Sibel D. Edmonds – Witness before the 9/11 Commission. Former Language Translation Specialist, performing translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations, FBI. She is founder and president of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition. Rosemary N. Dew – Former Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence, FBI. Former member of The President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) and the Electronic Commerce/Cyber Crime Working Group. 13-year FBI career. Gilbert M. Graham – Retired Special Agent, who served in the FBI’s Washington Field Office Counterintelligence Division. 24-year FBI career. Behrooz Sarshar – Witness before the 9/11 Commission. Retired Language Translation Specialist, performing Farsi translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations dealing with Iran and Afghanistan, FBI. Jane A. Turner – Retired Special Agent, FBI. 24-year FBI career. John B. Vincent – Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI. 27-year FBI career. Fred Whitehurst, JD, PhD – Retired Supervisory Special Agent / Laboratory Forensic Examiner, FBI. 16-year FBI career. Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer. Coleen Rowley – Former Special Agent and Minneapolis Division Counsel, FBI. 24-year FBI career. Agent Rowley was selected one of Time Magazine’s three 2002 Persons of the Year for revealing FBI headquarters’ efforts to “throw up roadblocks and undermine” FBI field investigations of al-Qaida operatives in the four weeks prior to 9/11. Robert G. Wright, Jr. – Special Agent, International Terrorism Unit, FBI. The only FBI agent to seize terrorist funds (over $1.4 million) from U.S.-based Middle Eastern terrorists using federal civil forfeiture statutes, prior to 9/11. 17-year FBI veteran. Federal Aviation Administration Bogdan Dzakovic – Witness before the 9/11 Commission. 14- year Counter-terrorism expert in the Security Division of the Federal Aviation Administration. Team leader of the FAA’s Red (Terrorism) Team, which conducted undercover tests on airport security through simulated terrorist attacks. Former team leader in the Federal Air Marshal program. Former Coast Guard officer. Steve Elson – Former Special Agent with the U.S. Navy, DEA and FAA. Specialist in Counterterrorism, Intelligence, and Security. Twenty-two years military experience, primarily in Naval Special Warfare. Retired Navy SEAL. Nine years service with the FAA and DEA. Mr. Elson holds a Masters Degree in National Security Affairs/Naval Intelligence with a focus on terrorism. Lt. Col. Brian F. Sullivan - U.S. Army Military Police (ret). Former Special Agent for the FAA’s New England Region Security Division, where he was a Risk Program Management Specialist. A graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Mark Conrad, JD – Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations. Former Federal Sky Marshall. 27-year U.S. Customs career. Raymond Ciccolilli – Former U.S. Sky Marshal and Senior U.S. Customs Inspector, retired after 33 years. Department of Defense and U.S. Military Intelligence Veterans Major General Albert Stubblebine - U.S. Army (ret). Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). Morton Goulder (1921 – 2008) - was appointed Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Warning under President Richard Nixon and continued in that capacity under Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. In World War II, he served as a Lt. Commander in the U.S. Navy. He was a cofounder of Sanders Associates, a large defense contractor. Senator Mike Gravel – Former U.S. Army officer, serving as the Adjutant in the Communications Intelligence Service in Germany and as a Special Agent in the Counter Intelligence Corps in France. Former U.S. Senator from Alaska, best known for entering over 4,000 pages of the Pentagon Papers into the U.S. Senate record, thus making public the secret official study that revealed the lies and manipulations of successive U.S. administrations that misled the country into the Vietnam War. Wayne Madsen – Former U.S. Navy Intelligence officer, specialist in electronic surveillance and security. Formerly assigned to the National Security Agency and the State Department. Currently, investigative journalist, nationally distributed columnist, and author. Senior Fellow, Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), a non-partisan privacy public advocacy group in Washington, DC. John Loftus – Former U.S. Army Intelligence officer. Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Justice Department under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer - former Chief of the Army’s Controlled HUMINT (Human Intelligence) Program, overseeing Army Intelligence and Security Command’s global controlled HUMINT efforts. A 23-year military intelligence veteran, Lt. Col. Shaffer was recently awarded the Bronze Star for bravery in Afghanistan. Capt. Scott J. Phillpott - U.S. Navy, former head of the Able Danger data mining program that targeted al-Qaida’s global structure and former Commanding Officer of the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf. Maj. Scott Ritter – Former U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence officer who also served as Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991 - 1998. Capt. Eric H. May – Former U.S. Army Intelligence officer who also served as an inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team. Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD – Former U.S. Army Intelligence officer. William G. Weaver, JD, PhD – Former U.S. Army Signals Intelligence officer. Currently Director of Academic Programs, Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas, El Paso, specializing in executive branch secrecy policy, governmental abuse, and law and bureaucracy. Commander Larry J. Tortorich - U.S. Navy (ret); 24-year Navy career in the fields of aviation and counterterrorism. Former Deputy Program Manager for Logistics – Tomahawk Cruise Missiles. Two years as a federal employee with DHS/TSA in the fields of security and counterterrorism. Theodore J. Pahle – Former Senior Intelligence Officer with the Defense Intelligence Agency. His 37-year intelligence career was exclusively as a HUMINT (Human Intelligence) operations officer with DIA, Office of Naval Intelligence and U.S. Army Intelligence. He is a Middle East and Latin American operations specialist. Today, he continues to support the HUMINT effort as a contract instructor. Statements questioning the official account of 9/11 and calls for a new investigation by over 1,000 credible individuals can be found at the author’s website: <a href="http://PatriotsQuestion911.com" rel="nofollow">http://PatriotsQuestion911.com</a>. <a href="http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Counterterrorism_Veterans-2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Counterterrorism_Veterans-2.pdf</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[10/5/2009 11:18AM FBI Veteran Executive Calls For Special Counsel Investigation, Prosecutions in Sibel Edmonds Case Details panic inside the Bureau, executive effort to 'keep this whole thing quiet' when matter first came to light in 2002 Further confirms FBI translator/whistleblower's allegations, credibility... An 18-year Counterintelligence and Counterterrorism Manager for the FBI has called for a Special Counsel to be appointed to investigate the allegations of FBI translator-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. John M. Cole, who now works as an intelligence contractor for the Air Force, made his comments during an audio interview released late last week with radio journalist Peter B. Collins. He also offered a detailed insider's look at the concerns among high-level officials inside the Bureau as Edmonds' disturbing allegations began coming to light back in 2002, before they would be quashed for seven long years by the Bush Administration's unprecedented use of the so-called "State Secrets Privilege" to gag her. Earlier last week, following the publication of a remarkable American Conservative magazine cover story interview with Edmonds --- detailing a broad bribery, blackmail, and espionage conspiracy said to have been carried out between current and former members of the U.S. Congress, high-ranking State and Defense Department officials and covert operatives from Turkey and Israel, resulting in the theft and sale of nuclear weapons technology on the foreign black market --- Cole had been quoted by the magazine confirming one of Edmonds' key allegations. "I am fully aware of the FBI's decade-long investigation of" Marc Grossman, he said in response to the AmCon article/interview. Grossman had served as the third-highest ranking official in the Bush State Department and was alleged by Edmonds in the interview, and in a sworn, video-taped deposition a month earlier, to have been the U.S. ringleader for a massive Turkish espionage scandal reaching through the halls of power and into top-secret nuclear facilities around the country to the benefit of allies and enemies alike. Cole said that the FBI's counterintelligence probe "ultimately was buried and covered up," and that he believes it is "long past time" for an investigation of the case to "bring about accountability." In his subsequent interview with Collins last week (audio and text excerpts posted below) Cole elaborated on those comments in much greater detail, noting that Edmonds has been "one hundred percent right on the money, on the mark" and confirming the existence of an "ongoing and detailed effort by Turkey to develop influence in the United States" through various illegal activities. "Yes, I can confirm that," Cole told Collins, "That's true." The FBI veteran executive also offered an insider's account of the panic that ensued inside the highest echelons of the bureau following Edmonds' first disclosure of information in 2002, recounting how an executive assistant director admitted to him at the time, just after the story first broke, "Well, all I know is that everything that Sibel is stating is true. I read her file. Everything she stated is, in fact, accurate." "Everybody at headquarters level at the bureau knew that what she was saying was extremely accurate. ... They were trying to figure out ways of keeping this whole thing quiet, because they didn't want Sibel to come out." Cole further describes how the concerns about Edmonds ultimately led to the Bush Administration's two-time use of the Draconian "State Secrets Privilege" in hopes of keeping her extraordinary information from becoming public. "Everybody at headquarters level at the bureau knew that what she was saying was extremely accurate." "I know they didn't want her to go out and speak about it at all," Cole revealed, "and I know they were trying to figure out ways of keeping this whole thing quiet, because they didn't want Sibel to come out." He also offered information which directly counters one of the criticisms of Edmonds' allegations as frequently offered by skeptics. Namely, that as a short time FBI contract translator --- even though she was tasked to review some seven years of counterintelligence wiretaps made from 1996 to 2002 --- she couldn't have had enough understanding of the full scope of the investigations to understand what was really going on. "The thing is," Cole explained to Collins, "the position that Sibel was in, she had access to extremely sensitive information. The translators have access to some of the most sensitive information that we receive." He detailed how first-hand information goes first from the translators to the investigators who then act on it, as some of the most important information collected by FBI language specialists could have "implications that may affect even the White House, or policy." "So what I'm saying is, I know she had access to some very sensitive stuff, and I could see why the Bureau would squirm over her coming out and speaking about some of the things that were going on." The interview concluded with Cole's reiteration of both his confidence in Edmonds' credibility, and his call for accountability. "I would love to see, especially with the allegations that Sibel has come out with, her allegations --- which I believe are in fact true, I have no reason to doubt what she's saying --- I would love to see somebody take that, a Special Counsel or whatever, some group of people that you could trust, have them investigate those allegations and have people's feet held to the fire. Have them be held accountable for their actions --- and prosecuted if they've done wrong." "You know, no one's above the law, and no one should be above the law," he added, along with one more chilling thought: "You know, it really irritates me that people are getting away with murder, in some cases. They should not be allowed to get away with that. There needs to be accountability. And that's what I'd love to see." ..........................Continues: <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7449" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7449</a>]]>

<![CDATA[James Traficant From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search James Traficant -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Ohio's 17th district In office January 3, 1985 – July 24, 2002 Preceded by Lyle Williams Succeeded by Tim Ryan -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Born May 8, 1941 (1941-05-08) (age 68) Youngstown, Ohio Political party Democratic (1981-2010) Independent (2010-present) Spouse(s) Patricia "Tish" Choppa Traficant Religion Roman Catholic Website Traficant Speaks James Anthony Traficant, Jr. (born May 8, 1941) is a former Democratic Representative in the United States Congress from Ohio (from 1985 to 2002). He represented the 17th Congressional District, which centered around his hometown of Youngstown and includes parts of three counties in northeast Ohio's Mahoning Valley. He was expelled after being convicted of taking bribes, filing false tax returns, racketeering, and forcing his aides to perform chores at his farm in Ohio and on his houseboat in Washington, D.C.,[1] and was released from prison on September 2, 2009, after serving a seven-year sentence.[2] Traficant's wife, Tish, has reportedly stated[3] that he did not accept the DOJ's invitation to be supervised on early release by Richard J. Billak (the CEO of CCA). Billak had testified against him during Traficant's 2002 Federal Bribery trial.[4][5] Traficant began work as a talk radio host for WTAM in January 2010. His contract permits him to quit if he runs for office. [6] On February 23rd, 2010, Traficant indicated that he will run for Congress, possibly as an independent. ]]>

<![CDATA[eH! jOE.... Calm down, dude... US Patriots, NATIONWIDE .... (ME) PUT up that post. I did it to make fun of the 9/11 debunkers.....that's all. I'm sorry if it wasn't obvious that i was making a Joke of them..... the JOKE that the Are!! Peace!!]]>

<![CDATA[ <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3863043,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3863043,00.html</a> Rethinking Palestine Martin Sherman offers a paradigm shift from the political to the humanitarian Martin Sherman Published: 03.17.10, 11:22 / Israel Opinion It is time for the proponents of the two-state solution to admit that the Palestinians have failed the test of history in staking their claim for statehood. A dispassionate evaluation of the events of the past two decades inexorably compels one towards an increasing evident conclusion: The Palestinians seem far more focused on annulling Jewish political independence than on attaining Palestinian political independence; far more committed to deconstruction of the Jewish state than to construction of a Palestinian one. Accordingly, further pursuit of a Palestinian state is likely to prove both futile and detrimental. For as past precedents strongly suggest, it will advance neither peace nor prosperity, but only serve as a platform for further violence against Israel. Thus, both political prudence and intellectual integrity inevitably militate towards the distinctly politically-incorrect conclusion that establishment of a Palestinian state must be removed from the international agenda as an objective that is either desirable or feasible – and certainly as an objective that can be reconciled with long-term survival of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. However, even if the Palestinians spurious political demands for statehood are removed from the discourse, this will not obviate the grim realities of the Palestinians humanitarian predicament. This is the issue that Israel and the international community should focus on. This op-ed piece aims to sketch the outlines of the proposal, in the hopes that this will spark a wider, more detailed debate of its feasibility, economic costs, international acceptability and relative merits compared to other currently espoused alternatives. To be comprehensive, this alternative paradigm would need to entail three constituent elements, all of an eminently libertarian nature. Two involve the elimination of discriminatory practices against the Palestinians as (a) refugees and (b) as residents in Arab countries. The third involves facilitating free choice for individual Palestinian breadwinners to determine their future and that of their families. Time to shut down UNRWA A brutally condensed tour-de-raison of the substantive elements of the proposal begins with refugee issue and the body responsible for dealing with it, UNRWA (UN Relief & Works Agency), a highly anomalous organization that perpetuates a culture of Palestinian dependency and the unrealistic narrative of "return." All the refugees on the face of the globe are under the auspices of the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) - except for the Palestinians. For them, a separate special institution exists - UNRWA. Yet if the universally accepted UNHCR criteria for refugees were applied to the Palestinian case, the number of "refugees" would shrink from close to 5 million to around 200,000! These figures starkly illustrate that both the scale and the durability of the Palestinian refugee problem is fueled by the anomalous and distorted parameters of it definition. There is growing consensus that without the abolition of URWA and folding its operations into those of UNHCR, no way-out of the Palestinian-Israeli impasse is possible. The issue of citizenship Folding UNRWA into the framework of UNHCR would of course have significant ramifications for large Palestinian populations resident in the Arab countries, who would no longer receive the anomalous handouts paid to them. This leads to the second element of the proposal: the grave ethnic discrimination against the Palestinians resident in the Arab world, where Palestinians have severe restrictions imposed on their freedom of movement, employment opportunities, and property ownership. But most significantly, they are denied citizenship of the countries in which they have lived for decades. The acquisition of citizenship of the countries of their long-standing residency is something overwhelming desired by the Palestinians - as numerous opinion surveys indicate. Accordingly, with the abolition of UNWRA and the accompanying changes in scope of the population eligible for refugee aid, a diplomatic drive must be mounted to pressure Arab governments to end their ethnic discrimination against the Palestinians; to desist from perpetuating their stateless status and allow them to acquire the citizenship of countries in which they have resided for decades. Offering compensation This brings us to the third and final element of the proposal: Allowing individual Palestinians under Israeli administration the exercise of free will in determining their destiny. While the first two elements of the proposed solution are directed toward easing the plight of the Palestinians in the Arab world, this measure is aimed at those inside Israeli administered areas. In essence it involves enabling individual Palestinians free choice as to how to chart their future and that of their families. The thrust of these efforts should focus on two major elements: (a) Generous monetary compensation to effect the relocation and rehabilitation of the Palestinian residents in territories across the 1967 "Green Line", elsewhere in world, presumably predominantly - but not necessarily exclusively - in the Arab/Muslim countries. (b) "Atomization" of the implementation by making the offer of compensation and relocation directly to the heads of families and not through any Palestinian organizational entity that may well have a vested interest in foiling the scheme. Time for imaginative new initiatives Although some may raise a skeptical eyebrow as to the acceptability of the proposal to the Palestinians and its economic feasibility, two points should be underscored. Firstly, substantial statistical data exist indicating that such a measure would be enthusiastically embraced by a large portion of the Palestinian population. According to one poll only 15% would refuse any financial offer that allows them to seek a better life elsewhere, while over 70% would accept it. Indeed, given the choices of a life either under the rigors of Israeli control or worse, under the regressive regime that the Palestinians have hitherto provided, who could blame them? As for that overall economic cost, it is easy to show that the cost of the proposed plan would be comparable than any alternative under discussion, involving the establishment of a new state, developing its infrastructures and presumably absorbing a large portion of the Palestinian diaspora within its constricted frontiers. Finally, it should be remembered that for the prospective host nations, the scheme has distinct economic upside. Given the scale of the envisioned compensation, the Palestinian immigrants would not be arriving as destitute refugees, but, as relatively wealthy families in terms of average world GNP per capita. Their absorption would entail significant capital inflows into the host economies - typically around half a billion dollars for the absorption of every 2,000-3,000 family units. The time has come for imaginative new initiatives to defuse one of the world's most volatile problems, one for which remedies hitherto attempted have proved sadly inappropriate. Accordingly, there seems ample reason to seriously address an alternative proposal, which at least, prima facia, will: * Defuse the Palestinian humanitarian predicament * Inject billions of dollars of funds into the economies of host nations * Ensure the continued survival of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people Israel, the Palestinians and the international community can ill afford to dismiss it without a serious debate of its potential payoffs as well as its possible pitfalls. ]]>

<![CDATA[And proud of it]]>

<![CDATA[Jerusalem has been inhabited and ruled by Israel millennia before the beginnings of Islam. East West North or South, its all Jerusalem, it all belongs to Israel. The arabs are seriously mistaken if they think they are going to move the Jews off the land. Israel has the right to build homes and temples on the land occupied by its ancestors. End of story.]]>

<![CDATA[No one expected this one. The U.S. Constitution does not allow for recalls but many states like NJ do. A judge yesterday okayed the recall signature gathering, but did not decide if it is constitutional. However, s/he have to do that if they get the 1.3 million signees! This is a dem on the line too.]]>

<![CDATA[Over the past 10 elections in San Francisco, our city has averaged an abysmal turnout of 47.2% voter turnout. With a city as politically savvy, educated, and involved as ours, we should expect more from our registered voters. We are leading a campaign to explore the idea of voting on Saturday. WhyTuesdaySF aims to increase voter turnout by allowing you to vote at your neighborhood polling place, a day with fewer obligations when families can participate in the democratic process together. This campaign is privately funded (at no taxpayer expense) and non-partisan, and we are looking to our volunteers, interns, and staff to generate 10,000 petitions in support of the Saturday Voting Act by July 6th. If you would like to join us to make election history in America, in our own backyard, please send an email with resume to info@whytuesdaysf.org. Thank you and we look forward to working with you. Best, Why Tuesday SF ]]>

<![CDATA[Any idea of where these two bitches go to church? I bet they don't and just claim to be Catholic. We need to discuss things with these whores' priests. Abortion + Catholic = Don't Mix Maybe we can get these botox bitches kicked out of their churches?]]>

<![CDATA[I'll bet if McCain offered a plan identical to Obama's, Republicans would accept it. It's all partisan posturing.]]>

<![CDATA[Jackie Speier is a useless San Mateo representative. She does and votes for whatever the corrupt whore Pelosi tells her to. She is voting yes on this fucked up phony senate health bill. She and whore Pelosi are catholics and are voting for federal abortion funds. Shame on you two assholes. We need to get rid of Speier. She is a useless piece of shit. I voted for her, but never again. FUCK YOU JACKIE.]]>

<![CDATA[HA! We already did this conversation last week. You were the one calling gay on everyone and now you are doing it AGAIN. Every post you make calls someone gay. Listen, I don't care what you tell your liberal friends but we are smarter than that around here. Someone that always calls gay = GAY HOMOPHOBE. Yeah, sure you voted no on Prop 8. I know some homophobes like you and they all voted yes on 8 because their gayness scared them. Oh, don't count on Obama to repeal Dont ask, don't tell. He just said that to get the gay votes. He has no plans of repealing it....just like the patriot act he keeps renewing. Dude, you need mental help. They can teach you to embrace your gayness and you will live happier. Do it so we don't have to keep listening to your desperation for homosexuality. Nobody in this area will poke fun at you for being gay. It's OK! ----------- Not a Homophobe Just pointing out the closet case Republican claiming (liberals are the ones into anal play) Date: 2010-03-17, 2:15PM PDT Reply to: comm-dsfrv-1648775069@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?] you lose! Liberals don't attack gay people or try to trample on their rights! That's what Republican in the closet Homophobes like you do calling liberals faggots when the truth is that you yourself are Gay and can't handle it! I voted No on Prop 8 and voted for a President that will end "don't ask,don't tell" in the military and support all our troops that are fighting for your right to be a cowardly shitstain! It's OK you can come out of the closet and the Republicans will reject you! ]]>

<![CDATA[you lose! Liberals don't attack gay people or try to trample on their rights! That's what Republican in the closet Homophobes like you do calling liberals faggots when the truth is that you yourself are Gay and can't handle it! I voted No on Prop 8 and voted for a President that will end "don't ask,don't tell" in the military and support all our troops that are fighting for your right to be a cowardly shitstain! It's OK you can come out of the closet and the Republicans will reject you!]]>

<![CDATA[Pelosi will smoke a toast to all the fuckin American losers. Puff, puff, puff it's rough, rough, rough and it's tuff, tuff, tuff while she's in the buff, buff, buff. Everyone all fucked over again! ]]>

<![CDATA[Just saying. Scientologists don't believe in mental illness or medication. John Travolta's son will still be alive if John wasn't a Scientologist.]]>

<![CDATA[Universal Declaration of Human Rights = Scientology <a href="http://www.theta.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theta.com/</a> ]]>

<![CDATA[The mental health industry dominated by psychiatric influences does not work because there are several fundamental defects in psychiatry itself. Psychiatry never has and never will deliver the results it promised because 1. They shy away from teaching traditional values. They do not teach right from wrong probably because they do not know right from wrong. In fact, quoting co- founder of the World Federation of Mental Health ,psychiatrist G.Brock Chisholm announced that the key aim of psychiatry is “reinterpretation and eventual eradication of right and wrong.” This tendency to stay away from right and wrong permeate every literature of psychiatry. 2. They shy away from teaching responsibility. The psychiatric system is geared to blame all things on chemical imbalances, genetics and indefinite childhood experiences. If a person does something wrong, it ’s because he has a mental disease; he is prescribed medications, not responsibility. This is another fundamental attitude of the psychiatric profession. And that is why when we take a failing student to a psychiatrist,he does not do better in school (Our education system is failing despite years of psychiatric involvement in our schools),and when we take a criminal to a psychiatrist ,he is likely to commit another crime. (Current rate of inmates returning to jail is 60%.)Responsibility level was never increased by psychiatric treatments. 3. They are purely profit driven. They make $69 billion annually paid by insurance companies alone. They hire thousands upon thousands of lobbyists to seek governmental protection of their interests and grants. They form financial relationships with drug companies. Yet we find uncaring attendants, unavailable doctors and psychiatrists who charge hundreds of dollars to insurance companies for just listening to someone for a short interval and then prescribing some medications. They are not there to help people; they are there to make money because there is easy money in this field. 4. They do not keep their noses clean. Probably because of the above points 1-3,the psychiatric industry is filled with fraudulent and criminal activities. A study showed that at least 10% of the 650,000 psychiatrists and psychologists worldwide admit to sexually abusing their patients. A factual review of more than 800 convictions over a six-year period, shows 43%were convicted of fraud, theft and embezzlement;32% for sex crimes; 7%for patient assault and violent crimes;6%for drug offenses and 6% for manslaughter and murder .Unethical activities have been part of the picture in the field of psychiatry from its earliest days. 5. They use a system of voting mental illnesses into existence which makes the whole subject ludicrous. Disorders voted into existence included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM),the most authoritative book on officially recognized mental disorders, include “reading disorder,” “disruptive behavior disorder,” “disorder of written expression,” “mathematics disorder,” “caffeine intoxication,” and “nicotine withdrawal disorder ”.The increase of mental disorders listed in the book coincides with U.S.government insurance becoming available to the mental health industry in 1968. Because of these reasons, psychiatry did not make it. These are fundamental flaws. They are embedded in the basic theories of psychiatry itself and these are what's wrong with the mental health system in this country. If you want to learn more about this or do more about this, go to www.cchr.org. ]]>

<![CDATA[Have you ever heard of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? No? Well, you see, that's the problem. Not enough people even know they have those basic rights because nobody had ever told them. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was created by the United Nations in 1948. Today there are 192 countries that are part of the United Nations. In theory, every member nation has agreed to follow this Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In practice, they don't. The result is human misery across the entire globe, in terms of millions of people unjustly treated by the governments which are supposed to protect them. Go to www.youthforhumanrights.org. Find out all about it .Tell you kids .Tell you neighbors. Tell your schools. Tell everybody. If we all take responsibility for enforcing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we will have a happier and saner world. ]]>

<![CDATA[v]]>

<![CDATA[I'm proud of my son Barack Obama. ~jimmy carter]]>

<![CDATA[<img src="http://i965.photobucket.com/albums/ae140/sigcarlfred/nancysays.jpg">]]>

<![CDATA[Why are our elected officials focusing on a Health care bill when unemployment is 10% and social security is paying out more than it takes in? <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100315/ap_on_bi_ge/us_social_security_ious_8" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100315/ap_on_bi_ge/us_social_security_ious_8</a> (article on social security) I believe their priorities are screwed up! Call and voice your opposition to the debt increasing health care bill • Keep Trying to Call If It's Busy (That's the Point!): Dial: 877-762-8762 or 202-224-3121 HOW big is your jet's carbon footprint?]]>

<![CDATA[You're the one that constantly tries to call gay on everyone in here. Homophobic issues much? Who cares where people want to stick their members? A liberal homophobe, that's classic.]]>